Theology beacon dictionary of theology


For Further Reading: Chomsky



Download 6.66 Mb.
Page32/111
Date18.10.2016
Size6.66 Mb.
#2418
1   ...   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   ...   111

For Further Reading: Chomsky, Language and Mind,
enlarged ed.; Erikson, Childhood and Society; Joy, "Hu-
man Development and Christian Holiness,"
The Asbury
Seminarian,
Apr., 1976; Piaget, The Moral Judgment of the
Child.
Donald M. Joy

DEVIL. See satan.

DEVOTE, DEVOTION. Basic and central to Chris­tian holiness is devotedness and devotion. The heart of the matter is the matter of the heart. Ob­jectively, to "devote" is to give voluntarily to the Lord, no strings attached, as in Mic. 4:13, e.g., where the prophet calls for the "devoting" to God of the spoils of victory. Contrast this with Josh. 6:18 ff where Achan's tragedy was rooted in his unwillingness to recognize the curse hanging over the "things devoted to destruction." Com­pare also how the faithful ministers of God share in the blessings of true devotion (Ezek. 44:15-16, 29). The modern expression "devotedly giving of our means" indicates that the love of the heart discerns and gives the things that are the Lord's.

A "devout" person is a person devoted to God (Luke 2:25; Acts 22:12).

In the NT "devotion" is the undying love of the Christian for the Lord Jesus Christ (Eph. 5:24), absorbing every rightful lesser love. It is indi­cated in the giving over to Christ of all life and possessions in order to follow Him and share His life, whatever the consequence (Matt. 10:38; 16:23; cf. Ruth 3:10; Jer. 2:5).

The only real defense of the holy life against the evil cunning of the adversary is an ever deep­ening and intensifying devotion for Christ (2 Cor. 11:3). The citadel of the soul is strongly fortified only when devotion to Christ is complete. This was the citadel surrendered by our first parents. The apostle John capsulizes the principle in 1 John 3:19-20.

Devotion, however, requires "devotions." We must feed the fires of devotion, remembering that the "world" is anything, however seemingly "bad" or "good," that cools our devotion for Christ. Devotion may be cultivated and fed by listening to His Spirit as we read His Book; by holding conversations—not monologues—with Him in prayer; by doing what and as He says; by loving those whom He loves and those who love Him.

There are programs of "devotions," but de­votion is not a program; it is the core condition of the holy heart. Our prayer should always be:



More love to Thee, O Christ,

More love to Thee!

See PRAYER, CONSECRATION, HOLINESS.



For Further Reading: Christensen, The Inward Pil-
grimage;
Murray, With Christ in the School of Prayer;
Clark, A Testament of Devotion; Chambers, My Utmost
for His Highest.
T. CRICHTON MITCHELL

DIALECTIC. Originally "conversation," dialectic has had a variety of meanings throughout his­tory: art of discourse by question and answer (Socrates); pattern of logical reasoning (Aris­totle); pairing of contrasting opinions by author­ities, followed by a reconciling view (medieval theology); dynamic process of universal reality through thesis, antithesis, and synthesis, evident in history (Hegelian idealism, Marxian materi­alism).

Influenced by the Reformation and particu­larly Kierkegaard's revolt against idealism, neo-orthodox "dialectical theologians" (Barth, Brunner, Niebuhr, et al.) stressed the complex­ities and apparent opposites or paradoxes of hu­man existence under God. Finitude and infinity, time and eternity, culture and the kingdom of God, natural reason and divine revelation—such





162

DIASPORA—DISCERNMENT


discontinuities between humanity and God can­not be dissolved by rational coherence, but only held together in God-given faith. The radical tension between divine judgment on human sin­fulness and grace which alone can redeem is manifest to faith in the supreme paradox of the Incarnation-—"not a logical contradiction" but an event which "transcends all human expectations and possibilities" (Tillich, Systematic Theology, 1:57).

Theology that is dialectical is never final or fixed. It acknowledges human limits before the mystery of God and the ambiguities and polar­ities of life (2 Cor. 4:7-12; 6:3-10), yet calls for faithfulness to Christ that makes these tensions creative.

See neoorthodoxy, marxianism, philosophy, reason.

For Further Reading: Macquarrie, Principles of Chris­tian Theology, 2nd ed., 38, 147-48; Moltmann, The Church in the Power of the Spirit, 20-24,282-88; Niebuhr, The Nature and Destiny of Man, vol. 1 and 2:204.

Wilfred L. Winget

DIASPORA. See dispersion.

DICHOTOMY. This term is from the Greek di-chotomein, "to cut in half." In anthropology it is the doctrine that human nature is twofold in es­sence, spiritual and material, or soul/spirit and body. It thus differs from trichotomy, the view that spirit, soul, and body are three distinct con­stituent elements of human nature. Spirit and soul are seen as different aspects of man's imma­terial self, spirit being the Godward capacity or nature, while soul is the selfward and manward life. Dichotomists therefore grant a functional tri­chotomy even though insisting on an essential di­chotomy.

Of recent years there has been a tendency in some circles to minimize if not repudiate the im­plicit dualism in dichotomy, in favor of a holistic view of man. This emphasizes body-mind as a unity. While this may be a wholesome corrective to an extreme Platonism which postulates the body as evil, to be shed as soon as possible, and the spirit preexistent, entirely distinct, and inher­ently incompatible with the body, the reaction, if pushed to its own extreme, contains error as equally unbiblical. It implies natural mortality of the total person, with no form or degree of ex­tended survival after death excepting on the ba­sis of redemption in Christ.

See trichotomy, man, immortality conditional immortality, dualism, soul, soul sleep.

For Further Reading: Purkiser, Exploring Our Chris­tian Faith, 209-11; GMS, 262-63.

Richard S. Taylor

DICTATION THEORY. See inspiration of the bible.

DIDACHE. Didache is the process of teaching or instruction and also that which is taught (the doctrine). Both a body of knowledge and a way of life are to be interpreted, absorbed, and learned. Matters requiring knowledge, as cate­chism, are often described by katecheo. Discipline or training, relating to character and conduct, corresponds to paideia, from which pedagogy is derived. "Discipling" (from matheteud) empha­sizes making the learners to be like the teacher (Matt. 10:25). As kerygma is the specific procla­mation of God's saving purpose and acts, so di­dache is the broader teaching and doctrine.

When the expression "the teacher" (ho di-daskalos) is used without qualification, it refers to the one Teacher whose word is authoritative and complete, Jesus Christ. The didache, then, refers to His teaching. This body of knowledge and this way of life were handed down as a tradition (pa-radosis) by the oral teaching of the apostles and then in the Scriptures.



Didache is also the name of a document in sub-apostolic literature that purports to be a sum­mary of the teachings of Jesus through the apostles. It was not written by the apostles.

See doctrine, christian education.



For Further Reading: Ridderbos, The Authority of the
New Testament Scriptures,
72-80; Wegenast and Fiirst,
"Teach, Instruct, Tradition, Education, Discipline,"
NIDNTT, 3:759-81. WlLBER T. dayton

DISCERNMENT. This is the ability to distinguish reality from appearances and truth from false­hood. Such insight is needed in respect to persons, doctrines, impressions, and specific situ­ations.

Discernment is one of the special gifts of the Spirit (1 Cor. 12:10). The province of this gift is primarily that of discernings "of spirits." The "spirits" here may refer to different moods or at­mospheres, or to supernatural influences, per­haps both. Atmosphere or impression may come from evil spirits, even when persons involved may ascribe the various psychic or spiritual movements to the Holy Spirit. Or the human spirit may be the sole, or at least primary, agency. The gift of discernment enables its possessor to sense what the truth is behind the vocal claims and psychic phenomena.

The classic biblical example of this gift being demonstrated is Peter's perception of the ruse of



DISCIPLE—DISCIPLESHIP

163



Ananias and Sapphira (Acts 5:1-6). It is possible that Peter did not always have this dramatic power of "seeing through" people—which raises the question whether anyone can properly claim the gift as a permanent and infallible possession. To publicly claim such a gift advertises oneself as being privy to divine secrets and comes peril­ously close to setting oneself up as clairvoyant. The much-vaunted claims of so-called seers or psychics is at base a claim to a special power of discernment.

Especially to be suspect are persons who in the name of a "gift of discernment" presume to tell other people what they should do, such as whom they should marry, when they should move, what should be their vocation, and such matters.

It is more likely that the gift of discernment is given by the Spirit as needed, to the persons whom He has made responsible—as in the case of Peter.

Yet while false claims are to be avoided in re­spect to a "gift," the ability to discern, as a matter of good judgment and common sense, on the ba­sis of biblical principles and mature experience, is of inestimable value. Without it we will be gul­lible and forever taken in by charlatans or by Sa­tan posing as an "angel of light" (2 Cor. 11:14). John's admonition to "test the spirits to see whether they are from God" (1 John 4:1, niv) suggests not direct intuition or revelation but the intelligent application of definite criteria.

The prayerful exercise of common sense, through knowledge of the Bible, understanding of people, and sensitivity to the Holy Spirit are the components of that kind of discernment which every Christian should prayerfully strive to acquire.

But not only should "spirits" be discerned. "What is best" should also be discerned (Phil. 1:10, niv)—things that matter or that make a dif­ference. These are cultural and methodological matters. Those who cannot distinguish between what is important and what is not, what is essen­tial and what should belong to personal opinion, will tend to become preoccupied with minor matters and proliferate needless divisions among God's people.

See discrimination, culture, doctrine, guid­ance, gifts of the spirit.

For Further Reading: Knapp, Impressions.



Richard S. Taylor

DISCIPLE. The general meaning of the word in the Greek means "pupil" or "learner." A disciple is an understudy or apprentice to a teacher. Mo­ses had disciples (John 9:28) as well as John the

Baptist (Mark 2:18) and even the Pharisees (Matt. 22:16). A disciple is one who accepts the views of his teacher and is an adherent, both in belief and practice (7SBE, 2:851).

In the NT, the word "disciple" has both a spe­cial and general meaning. The special group of 12 apostles were called Christ's disciples (Matt. 10:1; 11:1). These were the ones closest to Him and were given a special mission (Acts 1:15-22).

However, the name "disciple" is most com­monly given to all Christ's followers. The term appears only in the Gospels and Acts and refers to those adhering to Christ's teachings. They were first called Christians at Antioch (Acts 11:26). Clearly they were the believers; they were learners in Christ's school (Matt. 11:28-30); they were to make disciples of others (Matt. 28:19); and their lives were to be sacrifices (Luke 14:26).

A disciple of Jesus is one who "believes His doctrines, rests upon His sacrifice, imbibes His spirit, and imitates His example" (ISBE, 2:851-52).

See discipleship, discipling, christian, cross-bearing.

For Further Reading: ZPBD, 217; Baker's DT, 166-67;
Unger's Bible Dictionary, 265. LEO G. COX

DISCIPLESHIP. The Christian concept of disci-pleship is distinctive, first of all, because of its personal emphasis. Who Jesus is and what He did overshadows what He taught. His entire teaching ministry led up to the question "Who do you say that I am?" (Mark 8:29, nasb). The au­thority of His teaching derived from the fact that He was Christ the Savior, the Son of God. If He had not risen from the dead, there would be no point in preserving His teaching. But as the living Lord He invites people to be His disciples (Matt. 11:28-30; Mark 1:17), and they must individually decide their commitment to Him (John 6:60-71). He communicates things to them as His friends (15:14-15) which the world cannot receive (14:15-24). This intimate relationship is reflected in the fact that Jesus calls His disciples His broth­ers and sisters (Matt. 12:49-50). Apart from this personal aspect Christianity would be another philosophic tradition like the ancient Greek schools or another legalistic religion like Rab­binic Judaism.

Second, because Jesus is Lord of God's king­dom which has come to men, He is to be obeyed absolutely. Loyalty to Him supersedes ties to self-interests (Luke 14:33), family (v. 26), social cus­tom (9:59-60), and worldly authorities (Acts 5:29). The disciple of Jesus is to obey all His com­





mandments (Matt. 28:20; John 8:31). One must take up his cross and follow Jesus in suffering (Matt. 10:38-39) and in serving (John 20:21). Re­alizing that the disciple is not above his Master (Matt. 10:24-25), he will follow His example in lowly service to his brethren (John 13) and in nonretaliatory love when wronged (Luke 6:27-30; 1 Pet. 2:21-23). Like his Master, the disciple seeks to be holy (1 Pet. 1:15-16) and perfect in love (Matt. 5:45).

Jesus summed up the essence of Christian dis-cipleship in Matt. 28:19-20. One first becomes a disciple (through a personal commitment to Jesus) and then is instructed to keep all Christ's commandments (absolute obedience). Both the sequence and the balance are essential if one would avoid legalism on the one hand or cheap grace on the other.

See conversion, obedience, cross-bearing, di­dache, discipling. pietism.

For Further Reading: Hershberger, T7ie Recovery of the Anabaptist Vision, 29-54; Bonhoeffer, The Cost of Disci-pleship; Kittel, 4:390-461. luke L. keefer, Jr.



DISCIPLINE. Discipline is the regulation of life by principle and rule. Regulation by rule is imposed discipline, while regulation by principle is self-discipline. Self-discipline may include rules too, but they will be self-imposed. Regulation by principle is the higher level (if the principles are Christian).

Some imagine that the acquisition of self-discipline should free one from any subordi­nation to rule. But that is impossible in any civilized society. Traffic rules, licensing laws, property restrictions, and hundreds of other laws which one takes for granted all constitute im­posed regulation. One's maturity is measured by one's capacity to live within this system cheer­fully and without losing a sense of essential free­dom.

The possession of a high level of self-discipline is not in itself an evidence of saving grace. The principles which govern one's life may be thor­oughly selfish and mercenary. An intense desire to gain a certain position may become the prin­ciple governing the whole of one's activities. Any dominating ideal, commitment, moral standard, or personal ambition may constitute a "principle" generating self-discipline. But clearly, principles may be low and unworthy as well as high and lofty. And even the more lofty principles may be forms of self-righteousness, commendable in themselves, perhaps, but not expressions of dis-cipleship.

But while discipline may not prove disci­pleship, discipleship demands discipline. With­out discipline discipleship dissolves. Discipleship increases rather than diminishes the imposed forms of discipline. For the supreme subordi­nation is to Christ: "Take my yoke upon you." The disciple says good-by to autonomy forever.

Subordination to Christ is proven by subordi­nation to the Church, His Body. Christ clearly in the NT, by personal word and by His Spirit, delegated authority to the Church to direct and restrict believers who expected to maintain fel­lowship in the Body.

The familiar Methodist Discipline exemplifies this principle. This represents the regulations un­der and within which Methodists govern them­selves. Corporately it is self-government. As it affects the individual, it is imposed government. Every branch of the Christian Church from the apostles until now has had some such disci­plinary structure, in some cases simple and in others elaborate, perhaps even oppressive. But the right of the Church to exercise discipline over its members is without question a biblical right. To profess subordination to Christ and practice insubordination to the Church is a form of self-delusion; for it is Christ through the Spirit who commands, "Obey them that have the rule over you" (Heb. 13:17; cf. Phil. 2:12; 2 Thess. 3:14). (The relationship of a believer to an apostate or heretical church is a totally different matter.)

The acceptance of the imposed disciplines, both of society and the Church, is a great aid in achieving self-discipline. Here too the true point of beginning for the Christian is to be found in the words of Jesus: "If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me" (Matt. 16:24). Christian self-discipline demands self-denial. This is first and foremost the denial of self's rule. There must be nothing less than the dethronement of self, then it can become self-denial as a pattern of life in the sense of self-control. This includes the con­trol of moods, affections, appetites, expenditures, time, tongue, not for the glory of self but the honor of Christ. At this level discipline is the governor which keeps the wheels of life from fly­ing apart. Whether it is the works of a watch or a human personality, balance and control will in­crease both durability and efficiency. And a self-controlled person is easier to live with and work with, for there is less friction, vibration, and noise.

See discipleship, discipling, obedience, grow (growth), spirituality, leisure.

For Further Reading: Gardner, Personal Religious Dis­ciplines; Cattell, The Spirit of Holiness; Shoemaker, Ex-
DISCIPLING

165



traordinary Living for Ordinary Men, 31-48; Taylor, The
Disciplined Life.
RICHARD S. TAYLOR

DISCIPLING. In its simplest definition, discipling is making disciples. However, the wording of the Great Commission seems to imply an extended obligation. For not only is the original imperative "make disciples" modified by "going" and "bap­tizing," but by "teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you" (Matt. 28:19-20). It would seem clear, therefore, that discipling includes more than making con­verts.

This understanding has been the springboard for a relatively new but burgeoning movement called "discipling." This has become the technical term for a special form of teaching activity within the local church. The "discipler," generally the pastor or other qualified person, gathers around him a group of "disciples" whom he instructs at a deeper level and a more rapid, concentrated pace than the regular ministries of the church provide.

Methods, and even philosophies, greatly vary. A typical program is the use of a syllabus by a small, committed group in two-hour sessions each week for a year. Elton Trueblood's Yoke­fellow program envisions a five-year reading course under competent guidance in Bible, theol­ogy, church history, and related areas. Simpler plans call for shorter periods; some plans are much less structured. Some pastors focus on one-to-one (or two or three) relationships.

With some disciplers the task is seen to be the reproduction of the leader, with the idea that these in turn reproduce themselves, in a geo­metric progression and expansion of disciples and disciplers, until virtually the entire church has been not only discipled but become a body of disciplers.

The discipling approach is seen by its advo­cates as the quickest and most effective way to develop an efficient, spiritually mature, and soul-winning church. Undoubtedly it has great poten­tial for the accomplishing of such a worthy objective. When properly managed, it has al­ready revitalized many churches and opened to many pastors an exciting and much-needed new form of ministry.

Observers of the movement see possible perils which could counteract effectiveness. One is the additional load placed on the already hard-pressed laymen, resulting in further frag­mentation of families, and further fatigue and frustration, which could prove counterproduc­tive, if not disastrous. Furthermore, a pouring of pastoral and lay time and energies into discipling could also weaken the structure of the church as a whole, since many of the most willing disciples are the very ones most needed to hold office in the church schools, on the board, and elsewhere. Some pastors believe that better nurturing can be achieved by strengthening the agencies already in place, primarily the pulpit ministry and Chris­tian education entities.

Perhaps also the supposed biblical base needs more careful examination. For one thing, it is un­realistic to try to pattern after the Jesus-Disciples model. No modern pastor has the authority or wisdom of Jesus; nor can he expect 12 or so peo­ple to leave their vocations, even their homes, to virtually live with him for three years. Even a very modest facsimile can result in damaging family disruption. This smacks more of some modern cults than of a soundly biblical church.

Lurking in the background, in some cases, is the disavowal of the distinction between clergy and laity, a disavowal widely popularized in re­cent times. Implicit is the understanding of Eph. 4:12 which interprets the ministries for which the saints are to be equipped to be those of the apostles, evangelists, prophets, and pastors and teachers (v. 11). This cannot possibly be the apos­tle's meaning. God has called these persons to these special vocations in the Church; they in turn are not authorized to "play God" and pre­sume to reproduce themselves. Rather the equip­ping of laymen is for the ministries which belong universally to the Christian life—prayer, wit­nessing, stewardship, churchmanship, holy liv­ing. The erasing of a distinction between clergy and laity cannot be soundly supported biblically.

What could safely be acknowledged as proper goals of a discipling program? Perhaps five can be listed. (1) The program should aim at achiev­ing a thorough grounding in Christian theology and biblical knowledge. This cognitive content should never be pushed into a corner by fellow­ship and inspiration, or an emphasis on personal support and affirmation. (2) There should be the aim of achieving Christian stability: commit­ment, devotional depth, and disciplined patterns of living. Knowledge must be supplied with self-control (2 Pet. 1:6). (3) Discipling provides a means of helping a Christian discover his "gifts" and to come to an understanding of God's will for him. (4) Discipling should result in a deeper, more all-absorbing concern for people—espe­cially the lost—and increased skill (a) in inter­personal relationships and (b) in influencing the unconverted Christward. (5) Discipling should lead to or build upon a crisis experience of entire



166

DISCRIMINATION—DISPENSATION OF THE SPIRIT


sanctification and should never be permitted to be a substitute.

See disciple, discipleship, discipline, koinonia,



church membership. grow (growth), pietism.

For Further Reading: Baker's Dictionary of Practical Theology, 414-42; Eims, The Lost Art of Disciple Making; Kuhn, The Dynamics of Disciple Building.



Richard S. Taylor

Directory: sites -> default -> files -> publications
publications -> Table of Content forward introduction
publications -> Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center for Wireless Technologies Georgia Institute of Technology
publications -> Housing Counseling Research in Chicago
publications -> Communicating with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Audiences
publications -> New Brunswick Info Sheet on First Nations Child Welfare
publications -> Paap’s Electronic Newsletter 14 November 2008 Volume 11 Number 22 towards ‘smart’ subsidies in agriculture: lessons from recent experience in malawi
publications -> Information support of pedagogical process for the children experiencing difficulties with acquisition of preschool educational programs
publications -> Asus’ ZenFone ar has Google’s augmentted and virtual reality baked in — but not combined
publications -> School Readiness and Early Grade Success Consultation Memo Atlanta, ga

Download 6.66 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   ...   111




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page