Zero Point Energy doc
Download 0.97 Mb. View original pdf
|
- Navigate this page:
- Ramifications of the Einstein Spatial Ether Sink Paradigm
| ZP OWER C ORPORATION PAGE OF 352 Z ERO P OINT E NERGY model with one eye on it possibly helping bridge the gap between gravity and electromagnetic phenomena. Massive bodies have been shown to serve as shields for each other from vacuum dynamics on their distal sides with the result that they are driven together. As they direct the flow of Einstein Spatial Ether towards themselves, massive bodies would project a zone of shieldingfrom dynamics on their distal sides, casting a shadow of calm - a zone of protection - on their proximal sides. The size and "strength" of the zone of protection would be dependent on the size of the respective masses and their separation. The tugging of ESE between two massive bodies could also dampen vacuum dynamics between them, providing another mechanism for the operation of the Casimir Effect. The fact is conventional gravity and the Casimir Effect do exist side by side and General Relativity has not dealt with this situation. I see similarities between this sink paradigm's and Beckmann's handling of electromagnetic inertia. I also see similarities between the behavior of the Casimir Effect, which conventional wisdom regards as an electromagnetic phenomenon, and that of certain ether theories based on gas law type mechanics. So my present openness regarding the Casimir Effect may not represent a weakness. Ramifications of the Einstein Spatial Ether Sink Paradigm This paradigm suggests three possible linkages with quantum dynamics. It shifts the focus from outside massive bodies to internal events, namely, the hunger for and internalization of Einstein Spatial Ether by mass, it points to the similar behavior of gravitational and electromagnetic inertia, and it is open to a possible role by the Casimir Effect. Although the sponge scenario could be regarded as an explanation of "how mass curves space" both it and the CE scenario really regard curved space as an artifact. Conditions are created for which Einstein's "dimpled space blanket" would bean analogy if it were not for the circular logic used in that analogy. But attention should be focused on the streaming process, not the resulting curvature. This paradigm differs from General Relatively in its treatment of black holes and what some call singularities. It seems tome that the curved space paradigm attempts to stuff matter and energy into black holes via an external process, namely the warping of "space. The paradigm which I propose is driven by processes internal to black holes, so called singularities, and Omega Entities with "space" being internalized instead of warped. Some of the phase changes associated with Omega Entity formation maybe the converse of those already postulated by BB and Inflationary models, but at least one more additional phase change obviously occurs, because something , the ultimate mass-energy complex , which this paradigm calls the |