TURNING POINTS
1-3 September 2016
BOOK OF PANELS AND ABSTRACTS
CONTENTS
OVERVIEW OF PANELS
|
3
|
STREAMS, PANELS AND ABSTRACTS
|
34
|
GENERAL STREAM
|
34
|
1. AFTER CHRISTIAN LAW? CONTESTING LAW'S CHRISTIANITY, CONTEMPLATING ALTERNATIVES
|
54
|
2. BIOPOLITICS AND DECONSTRUCTION
|
63
|
3. BLOCKCHAIN LAW
|
75
|
4. THE CRISIS OF DEMOCRACY IN AN ANTIPOLITICAL AGE
|
79
|
5. A CRISIS OF THE LIBERAL VISION OF THE RULE OF LAW AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS? TURNING POINTS IN THE EAST AND WEST
|
83
|
6. FROM CRISIS TO RESILIENCE: SPATIAL JUSTICE IN AN AGE OF AUSTERITY
|
96
|
7. CRITICAL LEGAL STUDIES AND POLITICAL ECONOMY STREAM
|
101
|
8. CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON CULTURE AND PRESERVATION - PRECARITY IN OUR PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE CULTURAL HERITAGES
|
109
|
9. CRITICAL PSYCHOLAWGY: DIALOGUE AT MODERN TIMES BETWEEN LEGAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCES
|
121
|
10. FEMINIST TURNING POINTS
|
133
|
11. OCCUPATION & THE DAY AFTER: PROTEST, PREFIGURATION, REPRESENTATION
|
141
|
12. ON THE LEGAL PRODUCTION OF THE (NEW) COMMONS: LAW AS A LIVING PRACTICE
|
147
|
13. PARRHÊSIA AND THE LAW
|
152
|
14. RESPONSES TO THE LOSS OF THE POLITICAL: INTELLECTUALS, HUMANITARIANS AND THE REVOLUTIONARIES
|
158
|
15. REVOLUTION, COUNTER-REVOLUTION AND THE LAW
|
163
|
16. THE TIME AND TEMPORALITY OF VULNERABILITY
|
170
|
CRITICAL LEGAL CONFERENCE 2016
Kent Law School
1st – 3rd September
TURNING POINTS
“…there are no witnesses to changes of epoch. The epochal turning is an imperceptible frontier, bound to no crucial date or event.”
The present is notoriously difficult to diagnose. Are we living at a decisive turning point for global and European history, politics and law? Are we witnesses to a new epoch? Or perhaps we just have a bad case of “presentism”? The Critical Legal Conference 2016 will open a forum for critical reflection on precarious political situations, particularly that of Europe in a global context - an apposite theme for a critical conference at the University of Kent, ‘the UK’s European University’ and a point of origin for the CLC.
Taking a global and historicised view of contemporary Europe and its intellectual and political traditions (as well as an interrogative stance on their centrality), we anticipate that this year’s CLC will enable a creative response to some of the many problems of our collective present. The difficulty in thinking the present lies partly in its immediacy, and partly in the way in which spaces for that thinking are themselves precarious, colonised, dis-placed, degraded, recast or simply made untenable. From individuals’ housing, employment and migration experiences to the broader question about the intensification or disintegration of the European political project, are life’s very objects and experiences now peculiarly shaped by precarity?
Law forms part of the architecture of precarity, shaping both its production and governance, whether through specific rules and regulations relating to welfare provision, housing law or the structuring and regulation of financial markets; or through changing images and enactments of justice, (fragmented) genealogies, and shifting understandings of modernity. One approach within the critical legal tradition has been to expose these architectures: to show how it produces inequity, to demonstrate its contingencies, to trace its genealogies, to question law’s production of a normative order of life. In this sense it might be said that the role of critique is to render law itself precarious. What is the contemporary nature, role and position of academic work generally, in relation to political life and cultural and intellectual history? Are we post-human? Post-Europe? Post-law? Post-critique? And what about the core critical legal concerns: law, justice and ethics?
GENERAL STREAM
PREVENT Roundtable Discussion: Critical legal scholarship in times of PREVENT? Activist explorations of the responsibility of the critic
-
Alexandra König, School of Law, Birkbeck
-
Ceylan Begüm Yildiz, School of Law, Birkbeck
-
Paddy McDaid, School of Law, Birkbeck
Documentary Panel: The Failure of Dublin Agreements and Schengen
Aisling O’Regan, Birkbeck
Panel 1: Critical Subjectivity
Chair: TBC
Law and the Pleasure of Text
Mark Antaki, Faculty of Law, McGill University - mark.antaki@mcgill.ca
Notes on the Black Notebooks: Thinking v Theory v Practice
Gilbert Leung, Independent Scholar – gillyleung@gmail.com
From Subject Crisis to Critical Subjectivity. A Theory of Discourse for The Man of the Crowd
Marco Castagna, Università di Napoli "Federico II" - marco.castagna@gmail.com
Genealogical Critique in Uncertain Times
Andreas Kotsakis, Oxford Brookes University - akotsakis@brookes.ac.uk
Panel 2: Alternative Critiques
Chair: TBC
The turning point potential of breaking dominant communication tools for the purpose of expressing critique towards the legal system
Natalie Ohanathe, UCL - natalya.oe@gmail.com
Formalism as Mishandling the Legal Map
Peter Brezina, University of Economics and Management in Prague - peter.brezina@vsem.cz
Sleep’s Legal Form; An Anthropological Reading On The Normative Significance Of Late Modern Sleep.
Ignacio Riquelme Espinosa, University of Bristol - i.riquelme@bristol.ac.uk
Humiliation’s jurisdiction – the animation of the legal world and the creation of political memory
Juliet Rogers, University of Melbourne/Griffith Law School, Queensland - juliet.rogers@unimelb.edu.au
Panel 3: Regulation and technology
Chair: TBC
Measuring the ‘lawfulness’ of legal technologies: from speedbumps to smart contracts
Jake Goldenfein, Swinburne Law School, Swinburne University of Technology - jgoldenfein@swin.edu.au
The Right to Internet Access, ICCPR, and China: Legal and Practical Insights on Chinese Internet Censorship
Artem Sergeev, University of Hong Kong - sergeev@connect.hku.hk
International Space Law and Legal Mechanism to protect Moon’s Environment
Amit Kumar Padhy, Hidayatullah National Law University, India -mitkumarpadhy24@gmail.com
Panel 4: Movement, Constraint and the Loss of ‘Home’
Chair: Suhraiya Jivraj
Repairing the Migrant ‘Crisis’: Counter-Solidarity and Friendship
Bal Sokhi-Bulley, University of Sussex - b.sokhibulley@qub.ac.uk
Nation, Home and the Body
Brigitte Nicole Grice, Independent Scholar - brigittenicolegrice@gmail.com
Mihaela Varzari, History and Philosophy of Art at the University of Kent - mihaela_varzari@yahoo.co.uk
Trafficking in Persons and the Rule of Law: Looking for a “Victim”
Anette Sikka, University of Illinois Springfield - Asikk2@uis.edu
Panel 5: Islamic Law: Contemporary Reconfigurations
Chair: TBC
The Colonial Crafting of Islamic Law: Anglo-Islamic Jurisprudence
John Strawson, University of East London, UK - J.Strawson@uel.ac.uk
Islamic Law and Gender Equality: A Critical Analysis
Qudsia Mirza, Birkbeck, University of London, UK - q.mirza@bbk.ac.uk
Against Public Policy: Dutch courts dealing with Islamic Family Law
Iris Sportel, Lichtenberg Kolleg, Georg-August University Göttingen, Germany - Iris.Sportel@zentr.uni-goettingen.de
The Position of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation on Abortion: Not Too Bad, Yet (Mystifyingly) Non-Existent
Ioana Cismas, University of Stirling, UK - Ioana.cismas@stir.ac.uk
Panel 6: Re-sistance, Re-expropriation and Re-enclosure
Chair: Olivia Barr
Space, abstraction and appropriation
Chris Butler, Lecturer in law, Griffith Law School - c.butler@griffith.edu.au
Contesting Commoditisation: Property, Certainty and Emissions Trading
Bonnie Holligan, Lecturer in Property Law, University of Sussex - B.Holligan@sussex.ac.uk
From Property to Territory – The Alchemy of State Formation
Henry Jones, Lecturer in Law, Durham Law School - h.r.g.jones@durham.ac.uk
Panel 7: Recasting Rights
Chair: TBC
A Right-Claim as a Political Challenge
Konstantine Eristavi, University of Edinburgh - s0962815@sms.ed.ac.uk
Self-Determination of Indigenous Peoples under the Socialist Perspective
Chris Chu Cheng Huang, Institute of Law for Science and Technology, National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan - itic.adhoc@gmail.com
Deconstructing the European Union’s present: a chronic solidarity disease, domopolitics and the migrant crisis
Rachael Dickson Hillyard School of Law, Queen’s University Belfast - rdickson07@qub.ac.uk
Panel 8: Security, Securitization and Criminalisation
Chair: TBC
Organized criminal answer to State governance in Latin America: gang resistance in motion
Vitor Stegemann-Dieter, University of Kent (UK) and Eötvös Loránd University (Hungary) - vs284@kent.ac.uk
Making a Case for Adopting a Human Rights Paradigm To Pandemic Preparation
Omowamiwa Kolawole, University of Cape Town(UCT), South Africa - ookolawole@gmail.com
Discretion, Framing, and the Single Legal Definition of Terrorism: One Size Fits All?
Alan Greene, Durham Law School - alan.greene@durham.ac.uk
Panel 9: Urbanity, Control and the Commons: Realising Possible Urban Futures
Chair: Harley Ronan
Walls of the city as palimpsests of the commons.
Francesco Salvini
Urban Protocols: An architectural commoning experimentation
Thanos Zartaloudis, Kent Law School, University of Kent
Control and Creativity
Nathan Moore, School of Law, Birkbeck College, London
Title TBC
Anne Bottomley
1. AFTER CHRISTIAN LAW? CONTESTING LAW'S CHRISTIANITY, CONTEMPLATING ALTERNATIVES
Panel 1
Chair: John Ackerman
“A major attack on Jewish freedoms…”:A Socio-Legal History of Anti-shechita Prosecutions in the English-speaking World, 1855-1913
David Fraser, Nottingham - david.fraser@nottingham.ac.uk
Stigma and the Political Theology of the Ban on Torture
Michelle Farrell, Liverpool - Michelle.Farrell@liverpool.ac.uk
Christian Israel
Didi Herman, Kent - D.Herman@kent.ac.uk
Panel 2
Chair: Didi Herman
Queering International Law: Sodom and ‘sodomy’ in a foundational moment
Nan Seuffert, University of Wollongong - nseuffer@uow.edu.au
The Colonial Encounter and The Construction of a Sacrificial International
Kojo Koram, Birkbeck - kojokoram20@gmail.com
Christian Identities of the Law: A Post-Colonial Perspective
Vishavjeet Chaudhary, Jindal Global University - vchaudhary@jgu.edu.in
Panel 3
Chair: John Ackerman
The vacillating ultimate name: glitches in disinstalling "Christianity"
Anton Schütz, Birkbeck - A.Schutz@bbk.ac.uk
The Political Economy of Messianism
Harvey Shoolman, London Metropolitan University - H.Shoolman@londonmet.ac.uk
When the Gods were born, what questions did they answer?
Thanos Zartaloudis, Kent - t.zartaloudis@gmail.com
Panel 4
Chair: Thanos Zartaloudis
Possibilities of law making in alternative metaphysics
Elena Paris, University of Bucharest - paris_elena@yahoo.com
Justice as Desire in Trans-Immanence
Jan Patrick Oppermann, Independent Scholar - jpoppermann9@googlemail.com
The God Beneath: Towards a Trinitarian Political Theology?
Paddy McDaid, Birkbeck - paddymcdaid@hotmail.com
2. BIOPOLITICS AND DECONSTRUCTION
Panel 1: Biopolitics, Deconstruction, Sovereignty
Chair: Chris Lloyd
Plasticity, Jurisdiction and the Interruption of Sovereignty
Daniel Matthews, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong - danmat@hku.hk
Sovereign Iconography
Stacy Douglas, Carleton University, Canada - StacyDouglas@cunet.carleton.ca
Archiving Bodies Through Forms of Life
Stewart Motha, Birkbeck College, University of London - s.motha@bbk.ac.uk
Panel 2: Biopolitics, War, Terror
Chair: Chris Lloyd
A Metaphysical Reading of the Biopolitical Subject
Teagan-Jane Westendorf, Monash University, Australia - twes4@student.monash.edu
The interplay of Rights, Bio-politics and Necro-politics in the Regulation of Speech
Jen Higgins, Birkbeck College, University of London - jhiggi06@mail.bbk.ac.uk
Can the subaltern speak international criminal law? Authority, jurisdiction, and the politics of international criminal justice
Roberto Yamato, Institute of Int. Relations, PUC-Rio, Brazil - roberto.v.yamato@gmail.com
Panel 3: Sex, Gender, Bio-Deconstruction
Chair: Stacy Douglas
Legitimizing Legal Sexual Policies: Normalization as Affective Regime
Barbara Kraml, University of Vienna, Austria - barbara.kraml@univie.ac.at
The Biopolitics and Body Protests of Extreme Hindu Nationalism
Oieshi Saha, West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences, India - oieshisaha09@nujs.edu
Queer Bioethics: What Is It, What Could It Be?
Tiia Sudenkaarne, University of Turku, Finland - tiijun@utu.fi
Panel 4: Biopolitics Otherwise
Chair: Daniel Matthews
Resisting the Present: Biopolitics in the Face of the Event
Thomas Clément Mercier, Kings College, London - thomas.mercier@kcl.ac.uk
Legitimacy and Life: humanity discourse and biopower in global law and policy
Ukri I Soirila, University of Helsinki, Finland - ukri.soirila@helsinki.fi
The empowerment of human being through a micro-physics of power: elements for an instrumentalization of human rights
Guadalupe Satiro, Independent Scholar - guadalupesatiro@gmail.com
Panel 5: Postcolonialism, Justice, Biopolitics
Chair: TBC
Has Transitional Justice Reached a Critical Juncture?
Catherine Turner, Durham University, England - catherine.turner@durham.ac.uk
Intervention and Dispossession: Biopolitics and Indigenous governance in (post)colonial Australia
Mark Harris, University of British Columbia, Canada - mark.harris@ubc.ca
“Three great men sit in a room, a king, a priest and a rich man with his gold…” Or How to
Answer a Riddle and use Biopolitics to deconstruct Private Law in the Post-colonial context
Giacomo Capuzzo, University of Perugia, Italy - jackcapuzzo@gmail.com
Panel 6. Bodies. Borders. Bio-Politics
Chair: Tiia Sudenkaarne
Women Instigating Conflict - Poetic Imperative versus Command Responsibility - Civilians or Combatants in an NIAC
Lucy Mathieson, Glasgow Caledonian University, Scotland - lucy.mathieson@gmail.com
Healing the North Korean Skin: Somatechnics of Sovereignty in South Korea
Hea Sue Kim, Goldsmiths, University of London, England - hkim048@gold.ac.uk
From Worker to Entrepreneur of Himself; The Transformative Power of the Homo Economicus and the Freedom of Movement
Dion Kramer, VU University Amsterdam - dion.kramer@vu.nl
3. BLOCKCHAIN LAW
Panel 1
Chair: Rob Herian
The Blockchain and Contract Law
Claire Sumner, The Open University - claire.sumner@open.ac.uk
The Blockchain and European Union Private International Law
Rhonson Salim, The Open University - rhonson.salim@open.ac.uk
Between Scylla and Charybdis: Lessons From A Comparative Analysis of the Regulation of Bitcoin in the United States and the United Kingdom
Immaculate Dadiso Motsi-Omoijiade, Warwick University - I.Motsi@warwick.ac.uk
Organic Digital Contracts – Organic Digital Things
Jannice Käll, Gothenburg University - jannice.kall@law.gu.se
Panel 2: Blockchain Roundtable
Chair: Rob Herian
Panelists:
-
Tatiana Cutts, Birmingham / LSE - t.cutts@bham.ac.uk
-
Primavera De Filippi, Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University - pdefilippi@gmail.com
-
Daniele D’Alvia, Birkbec, d.dalvia@bbk.ac.uk
-
Jake Goldenfein, Swinburne University of Technology - jgoldenfein@swin.edu.au
4. THE CRISIS OF DEMOCRACY IN AN ANTIPOLITICAL AGE
Panel 1
Chair: Louis Wolcher
The Fundamental Question
Louis E. Wolcher, University of Washington, Seattle USA - wolcher@uw.edu
Democracy in an inhospitable world: On Kant and the moral law
Anél Marais, Aberystwyth University, Wales - nab@aber.ac.uk
The Crisis of Democracy in an Antipolitical Age
Albena Azmanova, Brussels School of International Studies, University of Kent, Brussels - A.Azmanova@kent.ac.uk
Steven L. Winter, Wayne State University Law School, USA - swinter@wayne.edu
Panel 2
Chair: Steven Winter
The Problems and Perils of ‘Global Constitutionalism’
Tarik Kochi, Sussex Law School, University of Sussex - T.Kochi@sussex.ac.uk
Is the largest democracy of the world becoming the largest dictatorship? – India Position.
Parva Dubey, Hidayatullah National Law University, Raipur, Chhattisgarh India - parvadubey@gmail.com
Brazillian Judiciary in The Focus For Democratic Demands
Rafael da Silva Menezes, Federal University of Minas Gerais (Brazil) and Federal University of Amazonas (Brazil) - rafaelsmenezes@gmail.com
5. A CRISIS OF THE LIBERAL VISION OF THE RULE OF LAW AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS? TURNING POINTS IN THE EAST AND WEST
Panel 1
Chair: Rafał Mańko
Polish Constitutional Court and the Political: On the Consequences of the Fall of a Certain Myth
Adam Sulikowski, University of Wrocław - Adam.sulikowski@uwr.edu.pl
The Constitutional Tribunal in Poland – From the Greatest Judiciary Authority to the Guardian of Political Interests? (Polish Democracy at the Crossroads)
Grzegorz Pastuszko, University of Rzeszów - Grzegorz.pastuszko@op.pl
The Constitutionalisation of Austerity and the Economy of Sacrifice in the Colombian jurisprudence on Social and Economic Rights
Johanna del Pilar Cortes Nieto, University of Warwick - J.d-P.Cortes-Nieto@warwick.ac.uk
Panel 2
Chair: Konrad Kobyliński
Rule of Law or Rule of Lawyers? Critical Reflections Inspired by a Symptomatic Reading of Artur Kozak
Rafał Mańko, University of Amsterdam - r.t.mano@uva.nl
Discovering the role of performativity within the right making and right taking processes
Elif Ceylan, University of Exeter - Eco202@exeter.ac.uk
Poststructuralist Critique of the Liberal Concepts of Legal Interpretation. Between Interpretive Communities and the Political
Jakub Łakomy, University of Wrocław - jakub.lakomy@gmail.com
Panel 3
Chair: Adam Sulikowski
Nomos Basileus - “the Reign of Law” According to Giorgio Agamben. A Critique Commentary on Using the Ancients
Paulina Święcicka, Jagiellonian University, Kraków - Paulina.swiecicka@uj.edu.pl
Rule of law as a foundation of Polish constitutionalism and liberalism at the turn of 18th and 19th century
Michał Gałędek, University of Gdańsk
Rule of French Commercial Law in the Polish Territories
Anna Klimaszewska, University of Gdańsk - anna.klimaszewska@prawo.ug.edu.pl
Panel 4
Chair: Kimberley Brayson
Share with your friends: |