Chacko 11 – writer for USA Today (Sarah, “Road Fund Limits Loose” USA Today, Dec 11, 2011, http://www.usatoday.com/USCP/PNI/NEWS/2011-12-11-pni1211met-highwaysART0_ST_U.htm)//ctc
The federal government spends about $40billion a year on highway construction, yet for the vast majority of projects, it does not track how many are over budget, how much goes toward cost overruns or whether the record is getting better or worse. Arizona has avoided big construction-cost overruns. A4 The result is a patchwork pattern of planning lapses and design errors that push some projects into consuming more and more limited dollars, a Gannett investigation shows. The government stepped up scrutiny of "major projects," defined as greater than $500million, after Boston's disastrous Big Dig. That road and tunnel project, completed in 2007 after almost two decades, ran more than $12billion over budget. But most projects aren't subject to the tighter rules. In 2011, just 87 of 136,000 federal highway projects qualified as "major," according to the Federal Highway Administration. They accounted for $1.6billion in allocated funds, or less than 5 percent of all federal highway investment. Federal Highway Administrator Victor Mendez says his agency monitors highway programs through division offices in each state. But state departments of transportation are ultimately responsible for managing highway and interstate projects, most of which are at least 80 percent federally funded. "The buck stops with the state DOT," Mendez said in an interview. "That's the bottom line." Kenneth Mead, the U.S. Transportation Department's inspector general from 1997 to 2006, said it shouldn't be that way. An advocate for stronger oversight, he'd like the department to collect state-performance data and post it online. "Ultimately, if the feds are writing these checks, what comes with that is the responsibility to report on what use that money is being put to," Mead said in an interview. "Who are the stellar performers, and where are we having serious problems?" Gannettfiled Freedom of Information requests to get construction costs for 21 federally funded highway projects across the U.S. None was a major project. About half wrapped up within 5 percent of the original contract. Others had significant cost overruns, delays or both: Reconstruction of Interstate 287 in Westchester County, N.Y., is two years behind schedule and $78million, or 14.4 percent, over budget. Construction so far has cost taxpayers more than $72million per mile. In Louisiana, roughly eight miles of a 36-mile project to extend I-49 north from Shreveport have cost $96million, 9 percent over budget. Overruns include a $2.5million mistake calculating how much dirt would have to be removed. The highway abruptly ends at the Arkansas line with no connector until at least late 2014. Two projects, one ongoing, to rehabilitate 18 miles of I-295 in southern New Jersey are a combined $22million over budget, or about 15 percent. Project managers underestimated the asphalt and other materials needed and didn't factor in reconstructing a bridge deck. Work on 26 miles of U.S. 30 in central Ohio was completed in 2008, nearly a year late and $12.8million over budget, or about 13 percent. The day before groundbreaking, $700,000 was added because the cost of replacing any wetlands destroyed during construction wasn't included. Redesigning bridge piers added $595,000. A new freeway south of Reno, expected to be complete in June 2012, six months late, is $32million over budget, or 8 percent. More than half of the extra cost came after the contractor discovered that rock it had hoped to crush for road material was unsuitable. The Federal Highway Administration concluded that the state failed to adequately study the area's geology, but the federal agency still covered 90 percent of the added cost. Three phases of a project to widen 10 miles of I-10 in Tallahassee, Fla., came in a combined 9 percent over budget. Of the $14.1million in construction overruns, nearly $1million was because the amount of unsuitable soil that had to be removed turned out to be 26 times higher than initially thought. The state-centric approach to managing most federally funded highway projects could take on added significance as those federal dollars need to be stretched. The Highway Trust Fund's main source of revenue is the federal gas tax, which hasn't been raised from 18.4 cents per gallon since 1993. The fund cannot meet the growing demand, the Transportation Department's inspector general has said. An analysis done earlier this year for the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials found slightly more than half of state contracts ran over budget and 45 percent finished late. The study looked at contracts from 2001 to 2010 in 39 states that volunteered to participate. The worst-performing state, which was not identified, finished only 13 percent of its highway contracts on budget. Georgia, Texas and California completed as much as 85 percent of contracts at or below budget, according to the analysis. The report said high-performing states share common practices: They spend more time analyzing costs, identifying potential risks and tracking progress. The Federal Highway Administration encourages states to adopt such proven practices but does not require them to do so. "As long as state departments of transportation work within the law, FHWA does not have the authority to mandate that states adopt specific best practices," King Gee, associate administrator of the agency's Office of Infrastructure, said in a statement. "States manage these programs -- not the federal government." The Federal Highway Administration also can't withhold money from poor performers; federal highway funds are distributed to states based on a formula. Project overruns are paid out of that state's allocation. The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials shares best practices but argues each state has unique climate, terrain and laws. "None of us are afraid of measuring our performance," said association President Kirk Steudle, who is Michigan's transportation director. "We are concerned about a national one-size-fits-all measurement that doesn't fit all." In response to Boston's Big Dig, Congress required states to submit and annually update detailed project management and finance plans for "major projects," defined as more than $500million. Of 30 active major projects with cost and schedule updates, slightly more than half have had cost increases and two-thirds anticipate delays, a Gannett review of federal data found. But some projects that might qualify to be on the major-projects list are not. The Federal Highway Administration considers New York's 8.6-mile project on I-287, at $621million for construction and counting, "a collection of projects," so it doesn't rate the extra scrutiny. An investigation by the Journal News in White Plains, N.Y., revealed that I-287 work repeatedly went over budget and past deadline because of poor planning and lax oversight.The contract for one phase was changed more than 70 times. After an independent probe, Gov. Andrew Cuomo in November called for sweeping changes in the way the state designs, contracts and oversees New York's publicly funded construction. Also not on the Federal Highway Administration's major-projects list: a 36-mile extension of Interstate 49 in Louisiana, estimated at $622million. Federal officials say the I-49 work was divided into 11 separate segments, each costing under $100million.