Federal Communications Commission da 14-1722
Download 483.01 Kb.
|
- Navigate this page:
- 1.INTRODUCTION
- 3.BACKGROUND
- A.Commission Requirements for ETC Designation
Federal Communications Commission DA 14-1722 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554
ORDER Adopted: November 26, 2014 Released: November 26, 2014 By the Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau: 1.INTRODUCTION2.In this order, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) conditionally designates Buffalo-Lake Erie Wireless Systems Co., L.L.C. d/b/a Blue Wireless (Blue Wireless) as a limited eligible telecommunications carrier (ETC), eligible only to receive Lifeline support in its licensed service area in the state of New York, including the Tribal lands of the Allegany Indian Reservation and the Cattaraugus Indian Reservation (Tribal areas); and we conditionally designate SI Wireless, LLC (SI Wireless) as a limited ETC, eligible only to receive Lifeline support in its licensed service area in the state of Tennessee.1 3.BACKGROUNDA.The Act4.Section 254(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the Act), provides that “only an eligible telecommunications carrier designated under section 214(e) shall be eligible to receive specific federal universal service support.”2 Pursuant to section 214(e)(1)(A) and (B), a common carrier designated as an ETC must offer the services supported by the federal universal service support mechanisms either using its own facilities or a combination of its own facilities and resale of another carrier’s services throughout its designated service area and must advertise the availability and charges for those services.3 5.Section 214(e)(2) of the Act gives state commissions the primary responsibility for designating ETCs in their states.4 Section 214(e)(6) directs the Federal Communications Commission (Commission), upon request, to designate as an ETC “a common carrier providing telephone exchange service and exchange access that is not subject to the jurisdiction of a state commission.”5 The Commission has established a framework for determining whether a state commission or the Commission itself has jurisdiction to designate ETCs on Tribal lands.6 First, a carrier serving Tribal lands must petition the FCC for a determination on whether the state has jurisdiction over the carrier.7 The Commission then determines whether the carrier is subject to the jurisdiction of a state commission or whether it is subject to a Tribal authority given the Tribal interests involved. In the latter case, the Commission has jurisdiction to designate the carrier as an ETC8 and will proceed to consider the merits of the carrier’s petition for designation.9 6.Under section 214(e)(6), the Commission may, with respect to an area served by a rural telephone company, and shall, in all other cases, designate more than one common carrier as an ETC for a designated service area, consistent with the public interest, convenience, and necessity, so long as the requesting carrier meets the requirements of section 214(e)(1).10 Before designating an additional ETC for an area served by a rural telephone company, the Commission must determine that the designation is in the public interest.11 The Bureau has delegated authority to consider ETC designation requests.
8.In addition, the Commission’s rules require that in order to be designated as an ETC, an applicant must: (1) certify that it will comply with the service requirements applicable to the support that it receives; (2) demonstrate its ability to remain functional in emergency situations; (3) demonstrate that it will satisfy applicable consumer protection and service quality standards; (4) demonstrate that it is financially and technically capable of providing the Lifeline service; and (5) submit information describing the terms and conditions of any voice telephony plans offered to Lifeline subscribers, including details on the number of minutes provided as part of the plan, additional charges, if any, for toll calls, and rates for each such plan.13 9.Prior to designating an ETC pursuant to section 214(e)(6), the Commission must determine whether such designation is in the public interest.14 In determining the public interest, the Commission historically has considered the benefits of increased consumer choice and the unique advantages and disadvantages of the applicant’s service offering.15
Directory: edocs public -> attachmatch attachmatch -> Commissioner ajit pai attachmatch -> Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D attachmatch -> Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D attachmatch -> Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D attachmatch -> Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D attachmatch -> Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D attachmatch -> Federal Communications Commission fcc 15-77 Before the Federal Communications Commission attachmatch -> Statement of commissioner ajit pai Download 483.01 Kb. Share with your friends:
|