Final Report for Liverpool City Council
Download 1.57 Mb.
|
- Navigate this page:
- 2.6 Ethnicity
- 2.7 Disability and Access/Communication Barriers
|
The charts show quite a different picture for residents and visitors. Only 16% of residents were in the A/B group compared to 27% of visitors. 34% of residents were in the D/E group compared to just 18% of visitors. Altogether, 67% of visitors were in the A/BC1 groups compared to just 47% of residents. By comparison, in the Liverpool Destination Benchmarking Survey 2012, 61% of visitors were in the A/BC1 groups. 2.6 Ethnicity The majority of respondents described themselves as being “White British” – 99% of residents and 86% of visitors.
2.7 Disability and Access/Communication Barriers Respondents were asked if they considered themselves to be disabled. 7% of residents and 7% of visitors said that they were “a disabled or deaf person or living with a long-term illness”. These people were then asked if there were any access or communication barriers which prevented you from participating in the event. 13% of residents and 33% of visitors reported that they had encountered barriers.
Directory: 2013 2013 -> Annual InStructional unit plan 2013 -> The Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine 2013 -> #1 a lifesafer of virginia inc 2013 -> Name(s): your name here team or Group #(if applicable): Professor’s name 2013 -> Alcott Local School Council (lcs) Meeting Minutes 2013 -> Table Of Contents introduction 2 2013 -> Supplemental demographic information 2013 -> 【Education&Working Experience】 Download 1.57 Mb. Share with your friends:
|
