Justin Cherpin Professor Brown



Download 18.86 Kb.
Date11.08.2017
Size18.86 Kb.
#31333

Cherpin



Justin Cherpin

Professor Brown

English 101-26

10 March 2015

Response to “How I Learned to Love Football” and

“Move Over Boys, Make Room in the Crease”


Felisa Rogers and Sara Maratta created two articles that discuss their love for the game of sports. However, each essay is written in its unique style and has somewhat the same perspective, but differs in portraying their meaning of love. The essay “How I Learned to Love Football” by Felisa Rogers is much like a love story that is brought upon from football and her husband. In the essay “Move Over Boys, Make Room in the Crease” by Sara Maratta, the author has a love for hockey like no other, and, in addition, she develops an argument for women’s rights in sports. Although some may say that the two articles are identical because of love, I affirm that Felisa Rogers provides a contrast to Maratta’s discussion of her interest in hockey and their views of fandom along with the importance of sports contain differences.

In Rogers’ essay, she begins by talking about how Rich, now her husband, constantly talks of his love for the game of football. She then takes a turn to the flashback of her childhood. For the most part, she had an interest in poetry and presidential history. Felisa was brought up in an atmosphere that had no sports. While most Americans watch football every weekend, her mom and dad had other interests. She identifies within herself that possibly not being exposed to sports early on had a profound effect on her throughout schooling and life after. She attended a school in Mapelton, Oregon where sports acted like ambient air on her social status. Getting discouraged from constant talk of sports, she soon had hatred towards anything that encompassed sports. In her freshman year at high school, she played clarinet in a pep band. This provided minimal exposure to sports, and, although she noticed the intense game of football, she was still at a loss from what was exactly going on in the game. In the very next school year, she moved to South Eugene High School, and she found her place right at home. As Rogers explained, “there were hundreds of students who never seemed to know whether our team had won or lost” (531). This quote shows that she could, for once in her life, not have to fake an interest in sports. Going to this school concluded that she would dislike sports forever, or at least she thought so.

Even though she disliked sports, Felisa dated a man named Josh who was a huge Atlanta Falcons football fan. He educated her on the game, but her distain for football and sports came through like she was back in her childhood. She realized she did not need love for football just because she wanted to date a particular man. Then she married a hardcore Green Bay Packers football fan named Rich. She soon found out they had a lot in common like presidential history, vans, and music. However, she learned quickly that like Josh, he too had a love for football. It became a problem like it was with Josh, early school life, and her childhood. This among other things in their married life, began to cause stress. They had many setbacks, but she found one common lifeline for them was football. Rogers’s states, “… it was a lifeline between who he had become and who he used to be” (533). This quote demonstrates that she had to take the time to comprehend his football language. From here on, it had an impact on her interpretation of sports. She describes that football fandom is a lifeline in society. Felisa often found herself talking football, particularly Green Bay Packers football. She came to the conclusion that football is what drives Rich to be happy and actually turned out to be the good denominator in their relationship.

In Maratta’s essay, she begins by discussing from the age of fourteen the sport took over her life. The author flashes back to when she was younger wanting to watch television one night. She found her father surprisingly watching hockey. She was intrigued by all of the actions taking place on the ice, in addition to the broadcasters using the hockey language. Feeling an addiction like no other, she wanted to find out what exactly drives these hockey fans to love the game unconditionally. She was amazed that she had consumed tons of knowledge and love of hockey, even though she was female. Maratta makes a claim that she is not accepted as a real fan of hockey just because she is a woman. She explains that men still dominate the sports world and women are rather not looked upon as potential candidates for the game. Sara Maratta says, “the awareness that sports are not exclusively male-oriented; therefore, females can and should be involved and have the opportunity to provide insightful opinions about these pastimes” (539). This is important to include because this is where she takes her stand and expresses her belief on women with sports.



She continues to discuss how there are only a small amount of professional woman in sports, and they attract way less attention than that of men in sports. Then she claims that women are just as equal as men when it comes to aspects in sports, but no one gives them a chance. Maratta provides an example that in the game of tennis, it is all about the look rather the sport itself. There is stress on women to deal with their image while playing. Discussing another similar example, she describes how in the Women’s World Cup of Soccer, to be acknowledged, a woman has to perform like a man and keep in mind they are a girl playing the sport. She brings up a strong point that men do not have to prep their overall image before playing. In Maratta’s example of cheerleading the negativity continues. She says, “most individuals typecast cheerleaders as dumb blonde pompom-pushers, and attention hogs” (540). Further Maratta claims most cheerleaders are not “classified as true athletes” (540). These two quotes signify the stereotypical attitude most individuals feel towards cheerleading in general. She moves on to the issue of media covering women and that men continue to have a greater amount of television time than women. She identified that in the minimal coverage of women, it is mostly about how much a woman has come in the sport instead of the actions in the current game. Then she brings up that people have the stereotypical belief that women are not worthy of giving differences, comparisons, and opinions in women broadcasting. To this day, she says women are fighting for equal rights in sports to justify their position in the sports world. To conclude her essay, Sara Maratta explains that it is imperative for women to be vigorous in sports and that her love for the game of hockey is not going to diminish because a lack of acceptance for being female.

There are similarities and differences in both of the texts that display the meaning of each essay. A similar detail between the essays is love. Stated in Roger’s essay, “As an American football fan it’s my prerogative to believe in the worthiness of the Green Bay Packers and Packers fans everywhere. One in particular” (535). The quote is vital to consider because it shows how much Felisa came from when she was just a kid. This man changed her way of thinking and she took the time to read into what he was saying. Their relationship rose quickly because of the love they both developed for the game of football. Then stated in Maratta’s essay, “I go to hockey games because I love them, and I say that love is enough” (543). This describes just how much Sara loved the game of hockey. She explains that love is enough reason why she attends the action packed games. Both essays touch on love of sports in different ways. A difference that stands out is when the love occurred for each author. In the case of Felisa Rogers, she hated sports until after her twenties. She could not stand hearing any vocabulary associated with sports. Her parents in no way encouraged sports activities and they were not fans of any type of sports. In contrast, Sara Maratta loved sports from a young age. She engaged in the game because of all the actions and excitement she found within it. She found it a thrill to just be in the arena and being a fan of hockey. Her parents encouraged sports and supported her interest for football too. Talking fandom, in Roger’s essay she describes, “Football fandom is a source of comfort, common ground where one can meet with friends and rivals alike” (533). She is saying fandom is a place to have fun with family and comment on the game being played, where there is not a right or wrong answer. It is a ground to have jaw jacking conversations and engage in good times talking sports. In Maratta’s essay she states, “knowledgeable aficionada…devout fan who attends games with my family and friends, and stays up into early morning hours watching away games on TV. I don my Blue Jackets gear as proudly as a patriot would” (538). All of this is important to consider because it shows that Maratta views fandom as more than a common ground for sports fans. It is more for hardcore fans who brave any conditions and wear all their paraphernalia proud, while loving the game because they have true affection for what takes place on the rink, field, court, or track. As far as importance for sports, Felisa Rogers saw the importance of sports is vital because it can work as a common good in a relationship. It can help understand a person through their expressions toward actions of the game played. She saw it as an influence to change her view of sports and to seek opportunity to learn a new aspect of the genuine American. Sara Maratta saw sports as an important opportunity to improve women’s acceptance. She had great adoration for the game of hockey in particular, and noticed herself not being accepted. Furthermore, although she knows there will be a barrier between women and sports, she envisions woman to be active and just as competitive as a man without being judged.

I agree with the essay “How I Learned to Love Football” because many situations have happened much like the one in the case of Felisa. There are common meeting grounds like the bar, where men and women get together and express feelings other than sports. I agree that it does take years sometimes to love what was once always hated. Sometimes it requires an additional person to impact or influence the way one thinks on a particular topic. I can relate with Rogers that even though you may have problems with someone, there is always room for common ground. I find myself at times getting disheartened because of continuous general education classes I have to take before accomplishing my Fire Technology degree. However, when discussing anything that encompasses fire service, I can rant and just get intrigued in anything about it because I have a passion for it.

I agree with the essay “Move Over Boys, Make Room in the Crease” because there is a substantial amount of controversy a person hears about women not being accepted in sports. I agree with much of the information she has to say about the examples. I agree that women are not being accepted equally as men and it should not happen. There are numerous stereotypical people that say women cannot play sports or women do not have the same body as a man to perform at a high physical state. I agree that media has an effect on women in sports as well. The media constantly downplays the actions of women compared to men. When watching a sport in which a woman accomplishes a feat that a man does every day, the media tends to overstate their accomplishment as if it has never happened before. When something like this happens, there should be minimal talk because both sexes are equal. In addition, I agree that women are judged upon their appearance when competing. I envision both sides want to come out victorious. We are all human and should all be treated equally. Unlike Felisa, who was able to find the love for football through a mate, others may say no matter how much someone tries to explain all the objectives and tactics of the game, a person might still hold their objections. They might never be able to gain love for the thing they once hated. On the other hand, in the Maratta essay, many say that women do not have the same structure and strength as men do when competing in a sports environment. However, the concept of the game does not change regardless of what sex a player is. The same skill set is still needed for the ultimate goal to win. Women will create the same plays on the floor as men. They are in the WNBA because they have a talent and earned the position just as the men have in the NBA.

While both articles have the common thread of love, it is defined differently in each article. Whether a person has love for the game from a young age or the person learns to love the sport at a later age, the depth and complexity of one’s love for the game will depend on many factors. Both individual and social influences can control the love for the game. Being a woman should not alone automatically define her strength and skill in a sport. While men and women have similar body structure, their own individual skill set can stand out as to how they perform in a given sport.

Works Cited

Maratta, Sara. “Move Over Boys, Make Room in the Crease.” They Say, I Say: The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing with Readings. 2nd Edition. New York: Norton, 2012. 537-543. Print.



Rogers, Felisa. “How I Learned to Love Football.” They Say, I Say: The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing with Readings. 2nd Edition. New York: Norton, 2012. 529-535. Print.

Download 18.86 Kb.

Share with your friends:




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page