This manual outlines the research protocols for human subject research at American Public University System



Download 190.54 Kb.
Page1/6
Date28.01.2017
Size190.54 Kb.
#9484
  1   2   3   4   5   6


rectangle 36
This manual outlines the research protocols for human subject research at American Public University System.

APUS IRB

Institutional Review Handbook


rectangle 37

APUS IRB


Table of Contents


Table of Contents 2

INTRODUCTION 4

APUS POLICY ON RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS 5

Scope of Research Subject to IRB Approval 6

TRAINING: Collaborative IRB Training Initiative (CITI) Training 6

Research Involving APUS Staff, Students, and/or Faculty 6

Working With De-Identified Data Not Collected Through Interaction or Intervention 7

IRB Considerations for Class Activities 7

Student Research Requiring IRB Approval 7

Program Improvement, Assessment of Quality Improvement Studies 8

Research Exempt from IRB Review 8

Criteria for Approval of Research Not Exempt from Committee Review 9

IRB Decisions are Final and Binding 10

PREPARING AND SUBMITTING IRB PROPOSALS 10

INVESTIGATOR RESPONSIBILITIES 10

Study Changes 10

Adverse Events 11

What to Report 11

Annual Renewal 11

Addition or Deletion of PERSONNEL OR Investigators 12

IRB COMPOSITION, PROCEDURES AND RESPONSIBILITIES 12

Full Board 12

Expedited and Exempt Applications 12

Procedures for Review of Research 12

Committee Records 13

UNIVERSITY POLICY ON ETHICAL CONDUCT IN RESEARCH, SCHOLARSHIP AND EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES 13

Procedures 14

Appendix A: The IRB Checklist 16

Appendix B: IRB Applications 18

American Public University System Faculty/Staff IRB Application 18

Appendix C: Sample Consent Forms: 37

Appendix D: Data Usage, Storage, and Destruction Agreement 40

Appendix E: Protocol Amendment Form 41

Appendix F: Form for Reporting to the IRB Unanticipated Problems that May Involve Risks to Subjects or Others (UPIRTSO) 43

Appendix G: Extension Request for Approved Research 46




Table of Contents 2

INTRODUCTION 4

APUS POLICY ON RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS 5

Scope of Research Subject to IRB Approval 6

TRAINING: Collaborative IRB Training Initiative (CITI) Training 6

Research Involving APUS Staff, Students, and/or Faculty 6

Working With De-Identified Data Not Collected Through Interaction or Intervention 7

IRB Considerations for Class Activities 7

Student Research Requiring IRB Approval 7

Program Improvement, Assessment of Quality Improvement Studies 8

Research Exempt from IRB Review 8

Criteria for Approval of Research Not Exempt from Committee Review 9

IRB Decisions are Final and Binding 10

PREPARING AND SUBMITTING IRB PROPOSALS 10

INVESTIGATOR RESPONSIBILITIES 10

Study Changes 10

Adverse Events 11

What to Report 11

Annual Renewal 11

Addition or Deletion of PERSONNEL OR Investigators 12

IRB COMPOSITION, PROCEDURES AND RESPONSIBILITIES 12

Full Board 12

Expedited and Exempt Applications 12

Procedures for Review of Research 12

Committee Records 13

UNIVERSITY POLICY ON ETHICAL CONDUCT IN RESEARCH, SCHOLARSHIP AND EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES 13

Procedures 14

Appendix A: The IRB Checklist 16

Appendix B: IRB Applications 18

American Public University System Faculty/Staff IRB Application 18

Appendix C: Sample Consent Forms: 37

Appendix D: Data Usage, Storage, and Destruction Agreement 40

Appendix E: Protocol Amendment Form 41

Appendix F: Form for Reporting to the IRB Unanticipated Problems that May Involve Risks to Subjects or Others (UPIRTSO) 43

Appendix G: Extension Request for Approved Research 46

INTRODUCTION


American Public University System (APUS, this includes American Public University APU and American Military University AMU, hereafter referred to as APUS), like many other universities, maintains a research program that is in compliance with the U. S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office for Human Research Protection's (OHRP) Federalwide Assurance (FWA) guidelines. At APUS, all human subjects research is guided by ethical principles as described in the federal regulation, the Belmont Report, and “common rule” regulations 45CFR46. Compliance with these regulations is assured through approval and oversight of all institutionally affiliated research by APUS faculty, staff and student researchers.

The APUS Institutional Review Board (IRB) is the committee responsible for ensuring the protection of human subjects in research studies. Specifically, the committee:



  • Protects the rights and welfare of human subjects; and

  • Insures research is in compliance with all ethical, federal, and university regulations.

The purpose of this handbook is to explain the IRB, outline the process for completing an application, and explain the review and approval processes.

In this handbook, you will find:



  • Background materials on federal regulations

  • Guidelines for submitting your application;

  • Information to assist faculty and students in preparing for CITI training;

  • The latest versions of all research application forms; and

  • Informed consent templates.

APUS POLICY ON RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS


It is the policy of American Public University System (APUS) that all research involving human subjects and conducted under the aegis of APUS, must be conducted in accordance with accepted ethical and professional standards, and must be in compliance with federal regulations. All such research involving human subjects (unless it is specifically exempt from review as outlined within this handbook) must be reviewed and approved by the University's Institutional Review Board (IRB) before it is conducted. It is the policy of APUS that the IRB committee has the authority to approve, require modifications in, or disapprove any research conducted under aegis of APUS involving human subjects.

The term "research" refers to that which



  • Contributes to generalizable knowledge;

  • Is designed in advance;

  • Utilizes a systematic approach (45CFR46).

The term "human subject" is defined by Federal Regulations as “a living individual about whom an investigator conducting research obtains (1) data through intervention or interaction with the individual, or (2) identifiable private information” (45 CFR 46.102(f)).

  • Human participants include those who are actively involved in the research process (being interviewed, filling out surveys, etc.);

  • They also include those who provided medical samples, left records of their activities through applying for marriage licenses, etc.

The IRB reviews research that involves living individuals (1) about whom "an investigator conducting research obtains data through intervention or interaction with the individual" or (2) which contains "identifiable private information" (Title 45 CFR, Part 46.102.f). Secondary analysis of existing datasets where participants are individually identifiable should be reviewed by the IRB.


Download 190.54 Kb.

Share with your friends:
  1   2   3   4   5   6




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page