Exhibit R2. Road map of Virginia
Exhibit R3. PUBLIC ROAD LENGTH – 2001, MILES BY OWNERSHIP
Exhibit R4. PUBLIC ROAD LENGTH – 2001, MILES BY FUNCTIONAL SYSTEM
Exhibit R5. FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAY LENGTH – 2001, MILES BY OWNERSHIP
Exhibit R6. FEDERAL - AID HIGHWAY LENGTH – 2001, MILES BY SYSTEM
Exhibit R7. FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAY LENGTH – 2001, MILES BY TYPE OF SURFACE 1/
Exhibit R8. FEDERAL - AID HIGHWAY LENGTH – 2001, MILES BY LANE WIDTH 1/
Exhibit R9. FEDERAL - AID HIGHWAY LENGTH – 2001, MILES BY TRAFFIC LANES AND ACCESS CONTROL 1/
Exhibit R10. FEDERAL - AID HIGHWAY LENGTH – 2001, MILES BY AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUME
Exhibit R11. FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAY LANE - LENGTH – 2001, LANE - MILES BY SYSTEM 1/
Exhibit R12. NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM LENGTH – 2001, MILES OPEN AND NOT OPEN TO TRAFFIC
Exhibit R13. NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM ROAD LENGTH – 2001, MILES BY OWNERSHIP
Exhibit R14. NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM LENGTH – 2001, MILES BY FUNCTIONAL SYSTEM
Exhibit R15. NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM LENGTH - 2001, MILES BY VOLUME - SERVICE FLOW RATIO - RURAL 1/
Exhibit R16. NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM LANE-LENGTH - 2001 1/, LANE-MILES BY FUNCTIONAL SYSTEM
Exhibit R17. NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM TRAVEL - 2001 1/, ANNUAL VEHICLE - MILES BY FUNCTIONAL SYSTEM
Exhibit R18. NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM LENGTH - 2001, MILES BY MEASURED PAVEMENT ROUGHNESS - RURAL
Exhibit R19. STRATEGIC HIGHWAY CORRIDOR NETWORK (STRAHNET) LENGTH - 2001 1/, MILES BY INTERSTATE AND NON-INTERSTATE
Exhibit R20. FUNCTIONAL SYSTEM LENGTH - 2001, MILES BY OWNERSHIP - RURAL
Exhibit R21. FUNCTIONAL SYSTEM LENGTH - 2001 1/, MILES BY TYPE OF SURFACE - RURAL
Exhibit R22. FUNCTIONAL SYSTEM LENGTH – 2001, MILES BY LANE WIDTH - RURAL 1/
Exhibit R23. FUNCTIONAL SYSTEM LENGTH – 2001, MILES BY TRAFFIC LANES AND ACCESS CONTROL - RURAL 1/
Exhibit R24. FUNCTIONAL SYSTEM LENGTH – 2001, MILES BY AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUME - RURAL
Exhibit R25. FUNCTIONAL SYSTEM LANE-LENGTH - 2001, LANE-MILES 1/
Exhibit R26. FUNCTIONAL SYSTEM LENGTH - 2001 1/, MILES BY VOLUME - SERVICE FLOW RATIO - RURAL
Exhibit R27. AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC PER LANE – 2001, ON PRINCIPAL ARTERIALS
Exhibit R28. FUNCTIONAL SYSTEM LENGTH - 2001 1/, MILES BY MEASURED PAVEMENT ROUGHNESS / PRESENT SERVICEABILITY RATING
Exhibit R29. FUNCTIONAL SYSTEM LENGTH - 2001, MILES BY MEASURED PAVEMENT ROUGHNESS - RURAL
Exhibit R30. URBANIZED AREAS - 2001, MILES AND DAILY VEHICLE - MILES OF TRAVEL
Exhibit R31. URBANIZED AREAS - 2001, SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS
Exhibit R32. STATE HIGHWAY AGENCY-OWNED PUBLIC ROADS - 2001 1/, MILES BY FUNCTIONAL SYSTEM
Exhibit R33. STATE HIGHWAY AGENCY-OWNED PUBLIC ROADS - 2001 1/, RURAL AND URBAN MILES; ESTIMATED LANE-MILES AND DAILY TRAVEL
Exhibit R34. FUNCTIONAL SYSTEM TRAVEL - 2001 1/, ANNUAL VEHICLE – MILES (MILLIONS)
Exhibit R35. FEDERAL - AID HIGHWAY TRAVEL - 2001 1/, ANNUAL VEHICLE – MILES (MILLIONS)
Exhibit R36. PERSONS FATALLY INJURED IN MOTOR VEHICLE CRASHES - 2001 1/, FEDERAL - AID HIGHWAYS
Exhibit R37. PERSONS FATALLY INJURED IN MOTOR VEHICLE CRASHES - 2001 1/, FUNCTIONAL SYSTEM
Pavement Condition
Information on pavement conditions was obtained from State of the Pavement, 2002; Interstate and Primary Highways. Published by Central Office Pavement Management Staff, June 2002.
In the mid-1990s VDOT began to collect pavement distress data through the use of videotaped images. To make use of data collected from those tapes VDOT also made interim use of the pavement condition index (PCI) defined and used by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. After several trial years, the PCI was deemed too general for Virginia conditions so that a VDOT specific method, as described in detail in Appendix A, was considered necessary. Briefly, that system recognizes that pavement distresses
fall into two basic categories; they are either load related (caused by the application of vehicular loadings) or they are not load related (caused by the exposure of pavement elements to the environment). This realization gave rise to the development of two indices to describe pavement surface distresses. These are the load related distress rating (LDR) and the non-load related distress rating (NDR). These two indices, also, use 0 to 100 scales and are the basis for pavement surface condition evaluation in VDOT.
The advent of pavement data collection through contracted automated means led to a need for standardization of procedures for the purposes of consistency and as a contractual instrument for bidding purposes. The document providing this standardization, A Guide To Evaluating Pavement Distress Through The Use Of Video Images , was developed in the late 1990s and made available to vendors bidding on contract data collection.
To bring all pavement management elements into one computerized system, the Virginia Highway Pavement Management Application (HPMA) has been under development since the mid 1990s and now is well into implementation. The emphasis at this time is on final software testing, conversion of the data to the formats required by the new software, personnel hiring and training, development of standards and specifications, and the institution of quality assurance activities. However, the program already provides useful products. Pavement condition information is one such product. Dissemination of that product throughout the agency is a major reason a 1998 condition report and the present report were assembled. One of the uses of this information is to aid in the day-to-day maintenance activities of the agency. Another value of disseminating this information is to receive feedback from users on the PMP and its implementation. That feedback will be used to identify and address changes that may enhance the continued successful PMP implementation.
Exhibit R38 : Pavement Condition Definition
-
Index Scale
|
Pavement Condition
|
Likelihood of Corrective Action
|
90 and above
|
Excellent
|
Very Unlikely
|
70-89
|
Good
|
Unlikely
|
60-69
|
Fair
|
Possibly
|
50-59
|
Poor
|
Likely
|
49 and below
|
Very Poor
|
Very Likely
|
Share with your friends: |