1. 2Objectives: 3 3Courses 4 4Division of Lessons and their Timing



Download 0.71 Mb.
Page10/17
Date29.01.2017
Size0.71 Mb.
#12509
1   ...   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   ...   17

6.2IB Internal Assessment Rubric





6.3iGCSE Lab Write Up Assessment Rubric





6.4Presentation Rubric (Adapted from ToK) for both iGCSE and IB

6.4.1A Identification of knowledge issue


  • Did the presentation identify a relevant knowledge issue involved, implicit or embedded in a real-life situation?


Descriptor Achievement level



  • Level 1 was not achieved. 0

  • The presentation referred to a knowledge issue but it was irrelevant to the real-life situation

under consideration. 1–2

  • The presentation identified a knowledge issue that was in some ways relevant to the real-life situation

under consideration. 3–4

  • The presentation identified a knowledge issue that was clearly relevant to the real-life situation

under consideration. 5

6.4.2B Treatment of knowledge issues (ToK)


  • Did the presentation show a good understanding of knowledge issues, in the context of the real-life situation?



Descriptor Achievement level



  • Level 1 was not achieved. 0

  • The presentation showed some understanding of knowledge issues. 1–2

  • The presentation showed an adequate understanding of knowledge issues 3–4

  • The presentation showed a good understanding of knowledge issues. 5



6.4.2.1C Knower's perspective(ToK)


  • Did the presentation, particularly in the use of arguments and examples, show an individual approach and demonstrate the significance of the topic?



Descriptor Achievement level



involvement and did not demonstrate the significance of the topic. 1–2

  • The presentation, in its use of arguments and examples or otherwise, showed some personal

involvement and adequately demonstrated the significance of the topic. 3–4

  • The presentation, in its distinctively personal use of arguments and examples or otherwise, showed

clear personal involvement and fully demonstrated the significance of the topic. 5

6.4.3D Connections (ToK)


  • Did the presentation give a balanced account of how the topic could be approached from different perspectives?

  • Did the presentation show how the positions taken on the knowledge issues would have implications in related areas?

  • In awarding the higher achievement levels, the emphasis should be more on the quality of the consideration of connections than on the quantity of connections mentioned.



Descriptor Achievement level



  • Level 1 was not achieved. 0

  • The presentation explored at least two different perspectives to some extent. 1–2

  • The presentation gave a satisfactory account of how the question could be approached from different perspectives, and began to explore their similarities and differences. 3–4

  • The presentation gave a clear account of how the question could be approached from different

perspectives and considered their implications in related areas. 5


6.5IB chemistry essay (based on the IB Extended Essay Rubric)


Chose an article from a magazine like the New Scientist or the Scientific American and write a review of the main ideas presented there. You should include a copy of the article you have based your essay on. You should assume your audience understands chemistry to an iGCSE level. You will be given an opportunity to improve you essay after you have handed in your first draft. Your essay should be no more than 400 words and will be marked based on these criteria (which are taken from the Extended Essay mark scheme):
A. Research Question (2 marks)

  1. RQ is stated clearly in the introduction; RQ is sharply focused;

  2. RQ can be treated effectively in 400 words


B. Introduction (6 marks)

  1. Context of the RQ is clearly demonstrated;
    Significant of topic & why it is worthy of study is clearly explained.

  2. The link to Chemistry is clear


D. K/U of the topic studied (8 marks)

  1. Underlying principles have been correctly applied

  2. Theory behind techniques used is correctly applied

  3. Data has been manipulated appropriately

  4. Identified the appropriate scientific concepts in order to address the research question


E. Reasoned argument (6 marks)

  1. There is evidence of comparison and consideration of different approaches and methods.

  2. The argument develops logically

  3. Supportive arguments are based on data collected and address the research question


K. Holistic Judgment (8 marks)

  1. Intellectual initiative has been demonstrated in the research question chosen and/or the use of innovative approaches to the research question

  2. There is evidence of detailed research

  3. There is evidence of thorough reflection

  4. There is evidence of a well-informed and reasoned argument that consistently and effectively addresses the research question


30 marks total


Download 0.71 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   ...   17




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page