Accjc gone wild

June 2014 Sanctions – Inconsistent Results

Download 2.61 Mb. Page 74/121 Date 13.06.2017 Size 2.61 Mb. #20740

Navigate this page:

• June 2014 ACCJC Sanctions

June 2014 Sanctions – Inconsistent Results Inconsistent Application of Sanctions - June 2014 college Number of "Deficiencies" Cited Sanction Ohlone College 20 Reaffirm Accreditation Moreno Valley College 17 Reaffirm Accreditation Lassen Community College 7 Reaffirm Accreditation Norco College 16 Reaffirm Accreditation L.A. Mission College 14 Remove Warning and Reaffirm Accreditation Barstow College 0 Remove Warning and Reaffirm Accreditation Orange Coast College 3 Remove Warning and Reaffirm Accreditation Coastline College 3 Remove Warning and Reaffirm Accreditation L.A. Southwest College 0 Remove Warning and Reaffirm Accreditation Cerritos College 6 Warning West Valley College 15 Warning Golden West College 25 Continue on Warning L.A. Valley College 5 Continue Warning Hartnell College 34 Remove Probation, Issue Warning Evergreen Valley College 2 Probation San Jose City College 2 Probation Victor Valley College 7 Probation Palo Verde College 27 Probation June 2014 ACCJC Sanctions Back to the Same Old Belligerent Ways and Still Inconsistent Application A Picture of an Agency that is OUT OF CONTROL There are various conditions imposed on colleges with full accreditation as can be seen in a number of cases below. In some cases it appears to be better to receive a warning than to receive a full accreditation. It also seems clear that it is not a good idea to write up proposed improvements that a college hopes to make as the college may find itself under the gun to make such improvements. The most serious violations now appear to relate to SLOs and governing board operations – they seem to get the harshest sanctions. The Department of Education found the ACCJC lacking in a variety of areas including: must provide documentation to demonstrate that it has fully implemented its revised policies to demonstrate that the agency clearly delineates between areas of non-compliance and areas for improvement and the agency must provide documentation to demonstrate that it provides the institution with a detailed written report that clearly identifies any deficiencies in the institution's compliance with the agency's standards. [§602.18(e)]. The Commission continues to be unclear in its distinction between what change is required and what change is just a suggestion for improvement. It also continues to have a lack of a sufficient number of faculty members on Visiting Teams. The Commission continues to direct colleges to make improvements that bring them beyond the minimum of what standards require. Directory: uploads uploads -> 587 Return function, r i(X) r i(0) r i(1) r i(2) r i(3) 1 0 2 4 6 Thermal Station, I 2 0 1 5 6 3 0 3 5 6 10 uploads -> Department of science and humanities department of mathematics part-a questions and answers uploads -> The Case Against the nypd’s Quota-Driven ‘Broken Windows’ Policing What Is It? uploads -> For want of a nail uploads -> Ownership Models There are two different types of ownership models uploads -> Police Militarization uploads -> City of rising star regular meting thursday, july 14, 2016 uploads -> Township of winfield uploads -> Stop Militarizing Law Enforcement Act of 2014 uploads -> The Black Panther Party’s Ten-Point Program What We Want Now! Download 2.61 Mb. Share with your friends: