Alison sharrock

– (1991): “El realismo expresivo de Cynthia (Prop. II, 29, 31-38 y III, 6, 23-28)”, ExcPhil 1, 529-43.

– (1998): “Notas de mitología properciana (II 2, 9-10; 16, 53-54; 30, 1-6; 32, 35-36)”, CFC (L) 15 (= Hommaja al Profesor Marcelo Martínez), 185-93.

Muecke, Frances (1974): “Nobilis Historia? Incongruity in Propertius 4.7”, BICS 21, 124-32.

– (1978): “Propertius 4.7.26”, CQ 28, 242.

Müller, Carl Werner (1995): “Imaginationen des Todes in den Elegien des Tibull und Properz”, A&A 41, 132-47.

Müller, Richard (1952): Motivkatalog der römischen Elegie (Zürich).

Müller, Ulrich (1971): “Ovid ‘Amores’ – alba – tageliet. Typ und Gegentyp des ‘Tageliedes’ in der Liebesdichtung der Antike und des Mittelalters”, Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte 45, 451-80.

Munari, Franco (1948): “Sugli ‘Amores’ di Ovidio”, SIFC 23, 113-52.

– (1951): P. Ovidi Nasonis Amores. Testo, introduzione, traduzione e note. Biblioteca di studi superiori 11 ‘La nuova Italia editrice’ (Firenze; ⁵1970) [E. Fraenkel, Athenaeum 29, 1951, 343-52; W. Eisenhut, Gnomon 25, 1953, 445-56; La Penna 1952, 104-8].

– (1965): Il codice Hamilton 471 di Ovidio (Ars Amatoria, Remedia amoris, Amores); in appendice Pontanos’s marginalia in Berlin, Hamilton 471, by B. L. Ullman. Note e discussioni erudite 9 (Roma).

Muñoz Jiménez, María José (1994): “Los versos de Galo del papiro de Qasr Ibrîm y el carmen 242 de la Anthologia Latina”, in Actas del VIII congreso español de estudios clásicos (Madrid, 23-28 de septiembre de 1991) (Madrid), II, 783-90.

Munzi, Luigi (1996): “Da Properzio a Ovidio: un itinerario letterario nel pastiche di un anonimo pompeiano”, AION(filol) 18, 93-107.

Murgatroyd, Paul (1975): “Militia amoris and the Roman Elegists”, Latomus 34, 59-79.

– (1977): “Tibullus and the puer delicatus”, AClass 20, 105-19.

– (1980): Tibullus I: A Commentary on the First Book of the Elegies of Albius Tibullus (Pietermaritzburg) [H. Tränkle, MH 38, 1981, 184; R. Verdière, Latomus 41, 1981, 655; I. Du Quesnay, G&R 29, 1982, 91; G. Mader, AClass 24, 1981, 175-7 (response: P. Murgatroyd, AClass 25, 1982, 145-7); L. Duret, REL 61, 1983, 361].

– (1981): “Servitium amoris and the Roman Elegists”, Latomus 90, 589-606.

– (1982): “Elegiac Epanadiplosis”, CW 75, 246-8.

– (1984): “Genre and Themes in Ovid Amores 2.15”, EMC 28, 51-5.

– (1987): “Tibullus: A Review Article”, EMC 37, 69-92.

– (1989): “The Genre and Unity of Tibullus 2.6”, Phoenix 43, 134-42.

– (1992a): “Setting in Six Versions of the Hylas Myth”, in Deroux, Carl (ed.), Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History VI, Collection Latomus 277 (Bruxelles), 84-93.

– (1992b): “Tibulliana”, Latomus 57, 94-100.

– (1993): “Possible and Probable Etymologising in Tibullus II”, LCM 18, 121-2.

– (1994): Tibullus: Elegies II. Edited with Introduction and Commentary (Oxford) [D. F. Kennedy, G&R 42, 1995, 228-9; H. Tränkle, MH 52, 1995, 249; M. C. J. Putnam, NECN 23, 1995/6, 121-3; J. Filée, LEC 64, 1996, 195; J. H. Gaisser, BMCRev 7, 1996, 145-8; G. K. Galinsky, CB 72, 1996, 136; T. A. Suits, AJPh 117, 1996, 498-501; S. C. Smith, CJ 92, 1996/7, 193-5].

– (1999): “The Argumentation in Ovid, Amores 1.9”, Mnemosyne 52, 569-72.

Murgia, Charles E. (1986): “Influence of Ovid’s Remedia amoris on Ars amatoria 3 and Amores 3”, CPh 81, 203-20.

– (1989): “Propertius 4.1.87-88 and the Division of 4.1”, HSPh 92, 257-72.

– (2000): “The Division of Propertius 2”, MD 45, 147-242.

– (2002): “Critica varia”, in Miller, John F./Damon, Cynthia/Myers, K. Sara (edd.): Vertis in usum: Studies in Honor of Edward Courtney. Beiträge zur Altertumskunde 161 (München), 65-75.

Musso, Olimpio (1972): “Agricola deus (Tib. I, 1, 14)”, A&R 17, 21-4.

Musurillo, S. J., Herbert (1961): Symbol and Myth in Ancient Poetry (New York).

– (1967): “The Theme of Time as a Poetic Device in the Elegies of Tibullus”, TAPhA 98, 253-68.

– (1970): “Furtivus amor: The Structure of Tibullus 1, 5”, TAPhA 101, 387-99.

– (1975): “A Festival on Messalla’s Estate: Tibullus II, 1 Reconsidered”, in Classica et Iberica: a Festschrift in Honor of Joseph M.-F. Marique (Worcester, Mass)., 107-17.

Mutschler, Fritz-Heiner (1985a): “Ökonomie und Philosophie. Überlegungen zum 14. Gedicht der properzischen Monobiblos”, RhM 128, 161-80.

– (1985b): Die poetische Kunst Tibulls. Struktur und Bedeutung der Bücher 1 und 2 des Corpus Tibullianum. Studien zur klassischen Philologie 18 (Frankfurt a. M., etc.) [D. Fowler, G&R 33, 1986, 207; H. Tränkle, MH 44, 1987, 288-9; Grabensberger, GB 15, 1988, 273-5; W. Hofmann, DLZ 109, 1988, 27-30.

– (1996): “Hercules im Hain. Überlegungen zur Properzelegie 4,9”, in Faber, Richard/Seidensticker, Bernd (edd.): Worte, Bilder, Töne. Studien zur Antike und Antikerezeption. Bernhard Kytzler zu ehren (Würzburg), 115-28.

Myers, K. Sara (1990): “Ovid’s tecta ars: Amores 2.6, ‘Programmatics and the Parrot’”, EMC 34, 367-74.

– (1996): “The Poet and the Procuress: The Lena in Latin Love Elegy”, JRS 86, 1-21.

– (1999): “The Metamorphosis of a Poet: Recent Work on Ovid”, JRS 89, 190-204.

– (2002): “Psittacus redux”, in Miller, John F./Damon, Cynthia/Myers, K. Sara (edd.): Vertis in usum: Studies in Honor of Edward Courtney. Beiträge zur Altertumskunde 161 (München), 189-99.
Nachov, Isaias (1982): “De universalis siue indiuidualis rationis in Tibulli carminibus conexione (I, 3; 10; II, 3)”, in Dilke [et al.] 1982a, 21-8.

Nadeau, Yvan (1984): “Catullus’ Sparrow, Martial, Juvenal and Ovid”, Latomus 43, 861-8.

Nagle, Betty Rose (1987) : “Ovid, ‘Facile’ or ‘Formulaic’? A Metrical Mannerism and Its Implications”, QUCC 54 n. s. 25.1, 73-90.

Namia, Giacinto (1974): “In margine all’edizione tibulliana di Lenz e Galinsky (Leiden 1971)”, Vichiana 3, 146-63.

– (1975): “Appunti per una nuova lettura del Panegyricus Messallae”, Vichiana 4, 22-59.

– (1987): “Properzio III,10,1. Una iunctura oraziana e il rispetto della tradizione manoscritta”, Vichiana 16, 224-7.

Nardi, Enzo (1971): Procurato aborto nel mondo greco-romano (Milano).

Naughton, S. (1981): “On the Syntax of the Pseudo-Gallus”, in Giangrande, Giuseppe (ed.): Corolla Londiniensis (Amsterdam), 111-12.

Naumann, Heinrich (1968): “Ovid und die Rhetorik”, AU 11.4, 69-87.

Nauta, Ruurd R. (2002): “Lyrisch ik’ en persona in de bestudering van de Romeinse poësie”, Lampas 35, 2002, 363-86.

Navarro Antolín, Fernando (1991): “Amada codiciosa y Edad de Oro en los elegíacos latinos”, Habis 22, 207-21.

– (1994): “Iuraui stulte: Tib. III 19 (= IV 13)”, in Actas del VIII Congreso español de estudios clásicos (Madrid, 23-28 de septiembre de 1991) (Madrid), II, 799-804.

– (1996a): “Ingenium dominae lena mouebit anus. La auara puella en los Amores de Ovidio: Am. I.8, I.10, III.5, III.8”, in Arcaz Pozo/Laguna Mariscal/Ramírez de Verger 1996, 82-8.

– (1996b): Lygdamus: Corpus Tibullianum III.1-6. Lygdami elegiarum liber. Edition and Commentary. Translated by J. J. Zoltowski. Mnemosyne Supplementum 154 (Leiden/New York/Köln) [R. Herrera Montero, CFC(L) 13, 1997, 189-91; R. Piastri, BStudLat 29, 1999, 232-6].

– (1997): “El suicidio como motivo literario en los elegíacos latinos”, Emérita 65, 41-55.

– (1998): “Los taediae uitae o el suicidio elegiaco”, in Vidal, José Luis/Alvar Ezquerra, Antonio (edd.): IX congreso español de estudios clásicos: Madrid, 27 al 30 de septiembre de 1995. 5, Literatura latina (Madrid), 151-6.

Navarro López, Joaquín Luis (1996): “Una elegía a Cornelio Galo del napolitano Pomponio Gáurico”, ExcPhilol 6, 173-92.

– (1997/8): “Biografías renacentistas de Cornelio Galo. I, La Cornelii Galli Vita de Pietro Crinito”, ExcPhilol 7/8, 169-93.

– (1999): “Epigrama Occurris cum mane (ANTH. 915 Riese)”, ExcPhilol 9, 277-84.

Némethy, Geyza (1905): Albii Tibulli carmina. Accedunt Sulpiciae Elegidia. Edidit, adnotationibus exegeticis et criticis instruxit –. Editiones criticae scriptorum Graecorum et Romanorum a collegio philologico classico Academiae Litterarum Hungaricae publici iuris factae (Budapestii).

– (1906): Lygdami carmina. Accedit Panegyricus in Messallam. Edidit, adnotationibus exegeticis et criticis instruxit. Editiones criticae scriptorum Graecorum et Romanorum a collegio philologico classico Academiae Litterarum Hungaricae publici iuris factae (Budapestii).

– (1907): P. Ovidii Nasonis Amores. Editiones criticae scriptorum Graecorum et Romanorum a collegio philologico classico Academiae Litterarum Hungaricae publici iuris factae (Budapestii).

Nethercut, William R. (1963): Propertius and Augustus (diss., Columbia University, New York) [DA 24, 1964, 3]

– (1968a): “Elegiac Technique in Propertius 4.1.71-150”, WS 81, 92-7.

– (1968b): “Notes on the Structure of Propertius, Book IV”, AJPh 89, 449-64.

– (1970): “The Astrological Significance of Propertius 4.1.150: A Reexamination of sinistra”, WS 83, 110-17.

– (1975/6): “Twelve Years of Propertian Scholarship: 1960-1972”, CW 69, 1-33. 225-58. 289-309.

– (1976): “Propertius’ Fallax Opus (4.1.135)”, RhM 119, 30-8.

– (1983): “Recent Scholarship on Propertius”, ANRW II 30.3, 1813-57.

Neumann, Rudolf (1919): Qua ratione Ovidius in Amoribus scribendis Propertii elegiis usus sit (diss., Göttingen).

Neumeister, Christoff (1982): “Mimesis und imitatio in Ovids Elegie Am. 2, 18”, A&A 28, 94-102.

– (1986): Tibull. Einführung in sein Werk. Heidelberger Studienhefte zur Altertumswissenschaft (Heidelberg) [I. Opelt, Gymnasium 94, 1987, 560-1; P. Tordeur, AC 57, 1988, 389-90].

– (1987): “Tibull in der Reihe der vier Elegiker”, in Varwig, Freyr Roland (ed.): AÍnigma. Festschrift für Helmut Rahn. Bibliothek der klassischen Altertumswissenschaften. N. F. 2. Reihe, 78 (Heidelberg), 219-40.

– (1988): “Tibulls Rom-Elegie (II 5)”, in- Filologie e forme letterarie. Studi offerti a Francesco Della Corte (Urbino), III, 157-72.

– (1991): Das antike Rom. Ein literarischer Stadtführer (München; ³1997).

Neumeister, Karin (1983): Die Überwindung der elegischen Liebe bei Properz (Buch I-III) Studien zur klassischen Philologie 7 (Frankfurt a. M./Bern).

Newiger, Hans-Joachim (1964): “Zum Epigramm der Amores Ovids”, Hermes 92, 119-21.

Newman, John Kevin (1967a): Augustus and the New Poetry. Collection Latomus 88 (Bruxelles) [L. P. Wilkinson, Gnomon 41, 1969, 156-9; H. H. Janssen, Mnemosyne 24, 1971, 425-6].

– (1967b): The Concept of Vates in Augustan Poetry. Collection Latomus 89 (Bruxelles).

– (1980): “De novo Galli fragmento in Nubia reperto”, Latinitas 28, 83-94.

– (1984): “The New Gallus and the Origins of Latin Love Elegy”, ICS 9, 19-29.

– (1997): Augustan Propertius: The Recapitulation of a Genre. Spudasmata 63 (Hildesheim) [K. McCarthy, CR 49, 1999, 52-3; J.-Y. Maleuvre, LEC 67, 1999, 432-3; P. Tordeur, AC 68, 1999, 406; G. Liveley, JRS 91, 2001, 240-1].

– (1998): “Saturno rege: Themes of the Golden Age in Tibullus and Other Augustan Poets”, Radke, Anna Elissa (ed.): Candide Iudex. Beiträge zur augusteischen Dichtung. Festschrift für Walter Wimmel zum 75. Geburtstag (Stuttgart), 225-46.

Nicastri, Luciano (1984): Cornelio Gallo e l’elegia ellenistico-romana. Studio dei nuovi frammenti. Speculum Contributi di filologia classica (Napoli). [G. Senis, Maia 37, 1985, 295-6; F. Corsaro, Orpheus 7, 1986, 463-4; F. Graf, Gymnasium 94, 1987, 175-7].

– (1988): “Properzio coturnato. L’itinerario poetico di Pomponio Gaurico elegiaco [1481-1530 ca.]”, Vichiana 17, 191-260.

– (1995): “Dalla topica all’ermeneutica: una risposta a G. Giangrande sul ‘nuovo Gallo’”, GIF 47, 175-200.

Nicholson, Nigel (1998/9): “Bodies Without Names, Names Without Bodies: Propertius 1.21-22”, CJ 94, 143-61.

Nicolai, Walter (1973): “Phantasie und Wirklichkeit bei Ovid”, A&A 19, 107-16.

Nicolaïdis, Tasos (1994): Puella formosa: tò gunaikeîo kálloß stòn Kátoullo kaì toùß §Rwmaíouß ™legeiakoúß (Athina).

Nicoll, W. S. M. (1977): “Ovid, Amores I 5”, Mnemosyne 30, 40-8.

Nielsen, Alice Florence (1980): Criticism of Wealth in Tibullus, Propertius, and Ovid’s Amores (diss., Columbia University New York) [DA 43, 1982, 1533A].

Nitzsche, Jane Chance (1975): The Genius Figure in Antiquity and the Middle-Ages (New York).

Noonan, John Damian (1973): Some Aspects of Structure in the Elegies of Propertius (diss., Columbia University, New York) [DA 34, 1974, 5135A].

– (1990/1): “Propertius 1.3.3-4: Andromache Is Missing”, CJ 86, 330-6.

– (1991): “Re-Examining the Text and Meaning of the Gallus Fragment”, Latomus 50, 118-23.

Nosarti, Lorenzo (1987): “Coniectanea 1 (Properzio, Stazio, Corippo)”, MusPat 5, 135-50.

Novara, Antoinette (1989): “Un hymne tibullien au dieu Amour (à propos de Élég. II, 1, vv.67-90)”, VL 1989, 116, 2-10.

– (2000): “Magie, amour et humour chez Properce”, in Moreau, Alain/Turpin, Jean-Claude (edd.): La Magie. Actes du Colloque international de Montpellier, 25-27 mars 1999. Études rassemblées. Séminaire d’études des mentalités antiques. Publications de la recherche (Montpellier), III, 15-44.

Nowosad, Adam/Najock, Dietmar/Morgenroth, Hermann (2002): Concordantia in Corpus Tibullianum. Alpha–Omega, Reihe A. 160 (Hildesheim/New York).
Obermayer, Hans Peter (1998): Martial und der Diskurs über männliche ‘Homosexualität’ in der Literatur der frühen Kaiserzeit. Classica Monacensis 18 (Tübingen).

O’Brien, Eugene M. (1961): “The Mechanic and Spirit of Ovid’s Verse”, CB 38, 20-2

O’Hara, James J. (1989): “The New Gallus and the Alternae Voces of Propertius 1.10.10”, CQ 39, 561-2.

– (1995/6): “Vergil’s Best Reader? Ovidian Commentary on Vergilian Etymological Wordplay”, CJ 91, 255-76.

Oka, Michio (1988): “Nox mihi candida: Propert. 2, 15 and Catull. 68”, in Filologia e forme letterarie. Studi offerti a F. Della Corte (Urbino), III, 143-55.

Oliensis, Ellen (1997): “The Erotics of amicitia: Readings in Tibullus, Propertius, and Horace”, in Hallett/Skinner 1997, 151-71.

Oliva Neto, João Angelo (1989): “O mito de Enéias e a elegia de Propércio”, Classica (São Paulo) 2, 89-98.

Oliver, Revilo P. (1945): “The First Edition of the Amores”, TAPhA 76, 191-215.

– (1958): “Ovid in His Ring (Amores 2.15.9-26)”, CPh 53, 103-5.

– (1969): “The Text of Ovid’s Amores”, in Classical Studies Presented to Ben Edwin Perry. Illinois Studies in Language and Literature 58 (Urbana/Chicago/London), 138-64.

Olstein, Katherine (1973): A Motif Analysis of Ovid’s Amores (diss., Columbia University) [DA 35, 1975, 4469].

– (1975): “Amores 1.3 and Duplicity as a Way of Love”, TAPhA 105, 241-57.

– (1980): “Amores I.9 and the Structure of Book I”, in Deroux, Carl (ed.): Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History II. Collection Latomus 168 (Bruxelles), 286-300.

O’Neil, Edward N. (1963): A Critical Concordance of the Tibullan Corpus. American Philological Association Monographs 27 (Ithaca, NY).

– (1967): “Tibullus 2.6: A New Interpretation”, CPh 62, 163-7.

O’Neill, Kerill Neil (1995): Metaphor and Metamorphosis: Poet, Lover, and Narrator in Propertius 4 (diss., Cornell University).

– (1995b): “Propertius 4.4: Tarpeia and the Burden of Aetiology”, Hermathena 158, 53-60.

– (1998/9): “Symbolism and Sympathetic Magic in Propertius 4.5”, CJ 94, 49-80.

– (1999): “Ovid and Propertius: Reflexive Annotation in Amores 1.8”, Mnemosyne 52, 286-307.

– (2000): “Propertius 4.2: Slumming with Vertumnus?”, AJPh 121, 259-77.

Onetti Dambe, Sira (1986): “Il ‘servitium amoris’ in Properzio”, in Atti 1986, 77-80.

Opelt, Ilona (1960): “Das Grab des Riesen Goliath”, JbAC 3, 17-23.

Opsomer, Thomas (2003): “Referre aliter saepe solebat idem: the Relation Between Ovid’s Amores and Ars amatoria”, in Deroux, Carl (ed.): Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History XI. Collection Latomus 272 (Bruxelles), 313-50.

Orlandini, Anna (1999): “Structures syntactico-sémantiques des proverbs et des ‘sententiae’ en latin: leur insertion dans l’énoncé”, in Biville, Frédérique (ed.): Proverbes et sentences dans le monde romain: Actes de table ronde du novembre 1997. Collection du Centre d’études et de recherches sur l’Occident romain. Nouvelle série 19 (Paris), 75-90.

Orlebeke, Alison (1996): “Propertius 3.7.1-12”, CQ 46, 416-28.

– (1999): Aspects of Innovation in Propertius’ Third Book (diss., Princeton University, Princeton, NJ) [DAI-A 60, 1999/2000, 60].

Oroz Reta, Jose (1985): “Propercio y la elegía latina”, Helmantica 36, 345-67.

Ortega, A. (1983): “Tibulo y el problema de la paz”, Helmantica 34, 497-508.

– (1985): “Tibulo, primer testimonio de antibelicismo en Roma”, in Simposio Tibuliano 1985, 107-20.

Ortenzi, D. (1982): “Interno alla tecnica dell’aggettivazione in Tibullo”, AFLM 15, 645-59.

Osmun, George F. (1984): “Desistas lacrimas: Tears in Latin Elegy”, CB 60, 45-7.

Otis, Brooks (1938): “Ovid and the Augustans”, TAPhA 69, 188-229 [pp. 194-277 = “Ovids Liebesdichtungen und die Augusteische Zeit”, in Albrecht/ Zinn 1968, 233-54].

Otón Sobrino, Enrique (1971): “Deficiente manu”, CFC 2, 223-6.

– (1979/80): “Amor y culpa enTibulo”, CFC 16, 41-67.

– (1985): “La ironía en Tibulo”, in Simposio Tibuliano 1985, 167-94.

– (1992): “Nunc en Tibulo”, CFC(L) 2, 129-32.

– (1995): “La palabra en el umbral”, CFC(L) 8, 67-77.

– (1999): “Tibulo en Ovidio”, in Schubert 1999, 153-5.

Pabón, C. T. (1985): “Contradiciones y contrastos en Tibulo”, in Simposio Tibuliano 1985, 363-9.

Paci, Gianfranco (1986): “Gli Albii del Lazio e il nome di Tibullo”, in Atti 1986, 275-90.

Paduano, Guido (1968): “Le reminiscenze dell’Alcesti nell’Elegia IV 11 di Properzio”, Maia 20, 21-8.

Pallotto, M. (1982): “Costanti tematiche e variabili negli Amores di Ovidio. Appunti sulle elegie III 11 (10), 11b (11), 14”, AFLM 15, 661-76.

Palmer, Robert B. (1977): “Is there a Religion of Love in Tibullus?”, CJ 73, 1-10.

Papanghelis, Theodore D. (1987): Propertius: a Hellenistic Poet on Love and Death (Cambridge) [Gries, CW 82, 1988, 134; I. N. Kazazis, Hellenica 39, 1988, 443-52; D. E. Kennedy, LCM 14, 1989, 141-4; P. Murgatroyd, EMC 33, 1989, 66-9; P. Tordeur, AC 58, 1989, 315-6; M. Wyke, JRS 79, 1989, 172-3; J. H. Brouwers, Mnemosyne 45, 1992, 259-62].

– (1989)a: “About the Hour of Noon: Ovid, Amores 1, 5”, Mnemosyne 42, 54-61.

– (1989b): “Some Thoughts on Propertius 2.19.31”, Latomus 48, 601-3.

– (1991): §H qewría toû E. Auerbach già toû realismo stçn klasikç logotexnía kaì £ ™legeía 4.7 toû Séctou Propertíou“, EEThess(philol) 1, 99-119.

– (1994): “$Apò tçn §Ellhnikç stç §RwmaEEThess(philol 4, 137-72.

Papke, Roland (1986): “Panegyricus Messallae und Catalepton 9: Form und gegenseitiger Bezug”, in Krafft, Peter/ Tschiedel, Hans Jürgen (edd.), Concentus hexachordus. Beiträge zum 70. Symposion der bayerischen Hochschullehrer für Klassische Philologie in Eichstätt (24.-25. Februar 1984). Eichstätter Beiträge. Sprache und Literatur 13 (Regensburg), 123-68.

Papponetti, Giuseppe (ed.): Ovidio poeta della memoria. Atti del Convegno Internazionale di Studi. Sulmona, 19-21 ottobre 1989 (Sulmona) [I. Di Iovio, A&R 36, 1991, 220-2; E. Pianezzola, Aufidus 15, 1991, 117-24].

Paratore, Ettore (1958): Bibliografia ovidiana (Sulmona).

– (1959): “L’evoluzione della ‘Sphragis’ dalle prime alle ultime opere di Ovidio”, in Atti 1959, I, 173-203.

– (1960): “Ovidio e il giudizio ciceroniano su Lucrezio”, RCCM 2, 130-9.

– (1985): “I due Tibulli”, AFLNice 1985, 50, 349-57.

– (1986): “Gli atteggiamenti politici di Properzio”, in Bimillenario 1986, 75-94.

Parca, Maryline (1986): “The Position of Lygdamus in Augustan Poetry”, in Deroux, Carl (ed.): Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History IV. Collection Latomus 196 (Bruxelles), 461-74.

Parker, Douglas (1969): “The Ovidian Coda”, Arion 8, 80-97.

Parker, Holt N. (1991): “The Bones: Propertius 1.21.9-10”, CPh 86, 328-33.

– (1992a): “The Fertile Fields of Umbria: Prop. 1.22.10”, Mnemosyne 45, 88-92.

– (1992b): “In the Mood: Prop. 2.26.1-3”, Mnemosyne 45, 92-5.

– (1994): “Sulpicia, the Auctor de Sulpicia, and the Authorship of 3.9 and 3.11 of the Corpus Tibullianum”, Helios 21, 39-62.

Parsons, Peter J. (1987): “3723. Elegy”, in: Coles, R.A./Maehler, H./Parsons, P.J. (edd.): The Oxyrhynchus Papyri. Volume LIV. Edited with Translation and Notes (London), 58-64.

– (1988): “Eine neugefundene griechische Liebeselegie”, MH 45, 65-74.

Pascal, C. Bennett (1988): “Tibullus and the Ambarvalia”, AJPh 109, 523-36.

– (1994): “Rura cano”, in Deroux, Carl (ed.): Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History VII. Collection Latomus 227 (Bruxelles), 338-68.

Pasco-Pranger, Molly (1999/2000): “Vates operosus: Vatic Poetics and Antiquarianism in Ovid’s Fasti”, CW 93, 275-91.

Pascucci, Giovanni (1986): “Il callimachismo stilistico di Properzio”, in Bimillenario 1986, 199-222.

Pasoli, Elio (1957): In Properti Monobiblon Commentationes (Bologna).

– (1967a): “De Properti libro quarto”, Euphrosyne 1, 3-21.

– (1967b): Sesto Properzio, Il libro quarto delle Elegie. Saggio introduttivo, testo e traduzione (Bologna; ²1974).

– (1969): “Propertius IV 1, 17-20”, Euphrosyne 3, 47-57.

– (1970): “Alia de Prop. 4, 1, 17-20”, Latinitas 18, 18-26.

– (1971): “Bemerkungen zur Poesie des Properz”, Das Altertum 17, 80-92.

Pasquali, Silvio (1987; ed.): Properzio nella letteratura italiana. Atti del Convegno nazionale (Assisi, 15-17 novembre 1985), Roma.

Pasqualetti, Olyndus (1976): “Quid de Ovidii operibus, quae inscribuntur Amores, Ars amandi, Remedia amoris, Heroides, Medicamina faciei, quid denique de carminibus ab Ovidio exule conscriptos hisce ultimis XX annis in Italia scriptum iudicatumque sit”, in Acta 1976, 487-94.