When naming a complex simultaneous articulation, the primary articulation provides the main name of the sound and the secondary articulation usually acts as a pre-modifier of that name. As a consequence we have "labialised velar", "velarised alveolar", "nasalised labial", etc. Sometimes we split a secondary articulation into sub-categories and use those sub-category names as pre-modifiers, e.g. "rounded high-front vowel" instead of "labialised high-front vowel".
To add a further complication, when the primary articulator is the tongue then the name of the articulation is most often taken from the passive articulator that the tongue articulates with (e.g. alveolar, velar, etc.). Sometimes the name of the articulation is modified by the part of the tongue being used (e.g. "apico-dental" versus "lamino-dental"), but only when that extra information is necessary. This means that we could potentially talk about complex articulations with names like "pharyngealised apico-dental".
Types of Complex Articulation Labialisation Simultaneous Labialisation
Simultaneous labialisation is the protrusion or rounding of the lips at the same time as the primary articulation. This may be used phonemically when it contrasts with a neutral or spread lip posture which would be the normal or default posture for this type of primary sound. Simultaneous labialisation can be used contrastively or may be only contextual labialisation. For example, consonants adjacent to rounded vowels may be rounded through coarticulation with the lip posture of that sound. For example, in English [s] will most often be labialised [sʷ] when surrounded by rounded vowels (eg. [ʉː]) in sequences such as "two suits".
Transcription
Simultaneous labialisation is transcribed by placing a superscript "w" symbol ʷ to the right of the sound being labialised.
eg. [sʷ], [kʷ], [lʷ]
Some phoneticians have used a "w" placed under the symbol of the sound being labialised. This does not appear to be supported by the latest IPA standard and will not be used in this course.
Transitional Labialisation
In transitional labialisation the lip rounding or protrusion only becomes evident in the later part of the sound being labialised. This phenomenon most commonly occurs when a sound is followed by a lip rounded or protruded sound (such as [w] or [u]) and occurs because of coarticulation with that sound. Such examples are generally not phonemic, but rather are allophones of the normally unlabialised phoneme.
Transcription
Transitional labialisation is transcribed by placing a superscript "w" symbol ʷ to the right of the sound being labialised.
eg. [sʷ], [kʷ], [lʷ]
Palatalisation Simultaneous Palatalisation
In simultaneous palatalisation the front of the tongue is raised to approximate the tongue position for the vowel [i] below the hard palate. This is a secondary articulation for a sound which has a primary articulation anterior to the hard palate, such as alveolar, dental and labial articulations. Simultaneous palatalisation very often occurs as a result of co-articulation when a sound with an anterior primary articulation is uttered adjacent to palatal consonants such as [ j] or high front vowels such as [i]. For example, in English, the [p] in the words "peel" (/piːl/) and "pure" (/pjʊə/) can be pronounced with either simultaneous or transitional palatalisation. In English the consonant [l] is usually pronounced with palatalisation when it precedes a vowel at the beginning of a syllable (this is generally referred to as the "clear l").
Transcription
Clark and Yallop show simultaneous palatalisation as being transcribed with a subscript "j" following the symbol of the primary articulation, as in [lj]. This does not appear to be supported by the recent IPA standards and will not be used in this course. Instead, the IPA recommended superscript "j" will be used to indicate both simultaneous and transitional palatalisation, as follows:-
eg. [lʲ] [pʲ]
Pharyngealisation
Secondary pharyngealisation appears to be always simultaneous with lingual primary articulations and involves an adjustment of the tongue body. Only simultaneous secondary pharyngealisation appears to be used contrastively in human language. It may be possible, however, for co-articulatory forces to result in transitional pharyngealisation of a bilabial such as [b] when followed (probably across a word or syllable boundary) by the pharyngeal fricative [ʕ] in a language such as Arabic.
Transcription
The IPA standard recommends a superscript "ʕ" following the symbol of the sound being pharyngealised.
eg. [sˁ] [tˁ] [dˁ]
Examples
Arabic has a number of normal and pharyngealised ("emphatic") consonant pairs (n.b. for some Arabic dialects the secondary articulation is velar).
The consonant pairs are [s, sˁ], [z, zˁ], [t, tˁ], [d, dˁ].
Below are examples for [s, sˁ] only.
|
[sad]
|
"to prevail"
|
|
[sˁ]
|
name of the letter
|
|
Co-ordinate or double articulations occur when two simultaneous articulations of the same stricture occur simultaneously. Double articulations are most commonly double stops (both double oral stops and double nasal stops), typically involving a simultaneous lingual and a non-lingual stop articulation. There are also some (very rare) examples of double fricative articulations. One could also call the very common labial-velar approximant [w] a double articulation, in this case a double approximant, as the labial and the velar articulations both have the same stricture, approximant stricture.
Naming Double Articulations
Since double articulations consist of two primary articulations it is not appropriate to talk of "labialised velar stops" or "velarised labial stops" when talking of a double labial and velar stop. The normal name for such a double stop would be a "labial-velar stop". You will sometimes see a term like "labio-velar stop". Such a name appears to be too similar to names like "apico-dental" where the first part of the name refers to the active articulator and the second part of the name refers to the passive articulator of a single primary articulation. The term "labio-velar" might, therefore, be seen to imply an impossible combination of active and passive articulators. The published IPA standard refers to "labial-velar" approximants and fricatives and so it seems desirable to use a similar terminology with the double stop articulations.
nb. It is customary to place the name of the non-lingual articulation before the lingual articulation.
Share with your friends: |