Annual program performance report: South Asia 2008–09 September 2009
Objective 2: Respond, in line with Australia’s capacity, to humanitarian needs and issues of mutual concern to the governments of South Asia and Australia, as they emerge
Download 118.62 Kb.
|
- Navigate this page:
- Assessment of results and performance
- Estimated expenditure
- Quality reporting system ratings
- Achieving objectives
- Implementation progress
Objective 2: Respond, in line with Australia’s capacity, to humanitarian needs and issues of mutual concern to the governments of South Asia and Australia, as they emergeRating The objective is on track to be fully achieved within the timeframe.
Assessment of results and performanceAustralia responded quickly to the crisis in the north of Sri Lanka, where an estimated 280 000 people have recently been displaced as a result of the conflict. Australian support through the UN and the Red Cross provides shelter, evacuation, protection, medicines and medical assistance, nutrition, water and sanitation, and logistical support to help ensure effective delivery of these services. This substantial support has been rapidly delivered as a result of effective partnership arrangements with implementing agencies. Australia helped meet a range of humanitarian needs resulting from the civil conflict, with a focus on peace-building efforts to help create a more durable peace. Some key achievements are: support, through UN agencies and Australian NGOs, to help meet the basic humanitarian and resettlement needs of around 520 000 people displaced by violent civil conflict provision of access to safe water and sanitation services for 75 000 conflict-affected people and provision of permanent shelter to over 1000 affected families support for the health and education needs of children caught in the conflict strengthened engagement from the local business sector in promoting peace, through support to a national network of Chambers of Commerce, and by building private–public partnerships for peace (this year the Business for Peace Alliance expanded from 6 districts to all 25 districts of Sri Lanka) creation of sustainable public–private partnerships between business and government in 19 localities in Sri Lanka to identify, plan and implement policies and projects to strengthen governance and stimulate economic development establishment of 90 strong multi-ethnic community-based organisations focusing on issues like micro-enterprise development increased Sinhala, Tamil and Muslim participation in integrated social activities, including involvement of over 6000 youth in peace-building events. Australia responded to a range of other humanitarian crises in South Asia, including: $4 million to assist victims of Cyclone Sidr in Bangladesh $2 million to assist communities in India and Nepal affected by the Bihar/Koshi floods in September 2008: support channelled through UNICEF and WFP included medical supplies and nutritional supplementation for children $1 million to assist Bhutanese refugees in Nepal $0.7 million to assist Rohingya refugees from Myanmar living in camps in Bangladesh $0.5 million to help meet the nutritional and education needs of over 40 000 children from poor rural families in Bhutan.
What is the quality of our aid activities?
Quality reporting system ratingsQuality ratings for initiatives were provided after an intensive process of monitoring and reporting, dialogue with implementing partners and ratings moderation processes. Moderation processes involved Canberra-based staff visiting country offices and challenging the assumptions on which ratings were based. Table 2 (p. 21) provides a list of 'quality at implementation' ratings for each major South Asia Program initiative. Achieving objectivesSouth Asia Program objectives are generally clear, and components of initiatives are effectively targeted at the achievement of key objectives. Only one initiative was rated as (marginally) not sufficiently meeting objectives; this was related to limited monitoring and the consequent lack of evidence to demonstrate that objectives were being met. Implementation progressImplementation is tracking well: initiatives are meeting key milestones and operating within budget. Only one initiative was rated as (marginally) weak on implementation. This was a result of the time taken to begin project implementation. SustainabilityAll but two initiatives have been rated as satisfactory against sustainability criteria. This is an improvement from the previous year, when six initiatives were rated as unsatisfactory. This improvement is attributable to management actions taken to improve monitoring systems and to address identified problems. Nevertheless, further work is required to consolidate and extend improvements for sustainability. Sustainability has been sought by aligning Australian interventions more closely with partner government programs and priorities, including through support for sector-wide programs in Nepal and Bangladesh. Government ownership will help to ensure sustainability. Addressing some of the needs identified in the APPR last year has helped build sustainability. Concerns were raised last year about the real level of commitment of governments to the objectives of Australia’s regional HIV/AIDS initiative. More detailed monitoring revealed that partner governments were introducing new legislation and launching pilot schemes to facilitate the introduction of oral substitution therapy for injecting drug users. This high degree of partner government commitment increases the likelihood that initiative outcomes will be sustainable. Concerns were also raised last year over initiatives that were too reliant on ongoing donor funding. Assistance for the National Vitamin A Expansion Program in Nepal was consequently reoriented away from the previous implementing agency and towards UNICEF so that it could benefit from increased policy dialogue on integrating national nutrition priorities and strengthening government systems. In Bangladesh, Australia’s poverty approach was reoriented away from food aid towards targeting ultra-poor livelihoods, bringing a more dynamic, flexible and sustainable approach to development. It remains difficult to ascertain sustainability in some of the regional trust fund facilities. This is because each initiative supports a range of smaller innovative ad hoc activities that will have varying levels of development impact over the longer term. It may take some time for those development impacts to become apparent. Directory: about-us -> publications -> Documents Documents -> Table of Contents 1 Introduction and Background 7 Documents -> Annual Review for 2014 Summary Report Documents -> East Asia regional development cooperation report 2009 October 2010 Documents -> East Asia Regional Organisations and Programs Annual Program Performance Report 2011 Documents -> Development Cooperation Report 2010: Afghanistan May 2012 Documents -> Review of the dfat ending Violence Against Women (evaw) Program in Afghanistan Documents -> Independent progress report Documents -> Kuala Lumpur, 22 November 2015 Documents -> Aid Program Performance Report 2015-16 Download 118.62 Kb. Share with your friends:
|
