R.25.01 In an action commenced by statement of claim or notice of action, pleadings shall consist of the statement of claim, statement of defence, and/or reply, if any
Purposes (Farrow):
Every pleading shall contain a concise statement of the material facts on which the party relies ... but not the evidence by which those facts are to be proved.
Material facts* = facts that make out elements of claim
Difference between material facts, evidence, and particulars (Copland v. Commodore). Pursuant to 25.06(1), only need to know enough particular facts to make out legally cognizable cause of action; don’t put evidence in pleading
r.25.06(8) Court can give discretionary remedy of particulars under r.25.10 if minimum level of material fact disclosure has not been reached in pleadings (see below) (Copland v. Commodore
Level of specificity may depend on the type of relief sought – e.g. pleadings for punitive damages must be rigorous (Whiten v. Pilot Insurance).
(r. 25.06)(8)Where fraud, misrepresentation, breach of trust, malice or intent is alleged, the pleading shall contain full particulars”
Reliefanddamages(typeandlevel) must be specified (r.25.06(9))(Whiten v. Pilot Insurance).
Sets the stage for discovery – if something is not in there, you can’t get at it later on
Typically donotpleadlaw,but r.25.06(2) says conclusions of law may be pleaded only if the material facts supporting them are pleaded
Don’t plead assertions of causes of action/law, plead facts that make out those elements; however, in order to give your narrative flow, there may be pieces of information not strictly related to material facts (Copland v.Commodore)
Inconsistent allegations only permissible if clear they are being pleaded in the alternative – e.g. “if not contract then tort” (r.25.06(4))
Recall joinder of parties and claims as necessary (r.5)