Backlash Spending da biofuels 1NC


Uniqueness – On the Brink



Download 154.69 Kb.
Page2/8
Date26.11.2017
Size154.69 Kb.
#34722
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8

Uniqueness – On the Brink

The House will cut clean energy bills in order to research fossil fuels


Gallucci 6/16/12 (Maria Gallucci, clean economy reporter for InsideClimate, “In House Bill, Clean Energy on the GOP Chopping Block 13 Times” http://truth-out.org/news/item/9827-in-house-bill-clean-energy-on-the-gop-chopping-block-13-times)

Republicans in the House of Representatives quietly passed 13 provisions last week that would choke off Energy Department financing for existing clean energy and efficiency programs. The House adopted the amendments on June 6 as part of its 2013 Energy and Water Appropriations Bill. The proposed cuts reflect a broader trend. As the Tea Party reshapes the GOP, opposition to policies that reduce climate-changing gases and stoke the clean energy economy is soaring. More than half of the targeted DOE programs were started under Pres. George W. Bush, while some go back decades. They range from wind technology supports to mandates for zero-carbon buildings, LED light bulbs and electric golf carts (and, of course, the controversial program behind the Solyndra loan). Overall, the House energy bill would give $32.1 billion to energy and water programs, a cut of about $1 billion from Obama's budget request. It would also shift more dollars to fossil-fuel programs. Research and development of "clean" coal, oil and natural gas technologies, for instance, would get a 60 percent boost from last year's level to $554 million. The Democratic-led Senate hasn't passed its energy spending bill yet, but it's unlikely to include the same "ideological" amendments, said Jim DiPeso, policy director for ConservAmerica, a nonprofit formerly called Republicans for the Environment. "The House and Senate just don't see eye-to-eye on a lot of things.”


Continued funding for biofuel is on the brink


Weinstein 7/6/12 (Adam Weinstein, national security reporter, http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2012/07/navy-biofuel)

Congressional Republicans just got their battleship sunk. Even though House conservatives fought in May to prevent the Navy from spending any money on biofuel, the service last Friday launched its "Great Green Fleet"—the first-ever US flotilla to get underway with mostly nonconventional fuel. But election year jockeying may mean an epic battle over biofuel in Washington this fall. The fleet—technically, an aircraft carrier strike group—is cruising its way to a naval exercise on more than half biofuel, which derives its brew from sustainable biomasses. It's taking place against a major backdrop: The exercise, known as RIMPAC, is a biennial tradition for 22 nations with big-time seapower. It's like a global Boy Scout jamboree for sailors with nuke subs and cruise-missile-laden warships instead of merit badges and pocketknives. "The reason we're doing this is that we simply buy too many fossil fuels from either actually or potentially volatile places on earth," Navy Secretary Ray Mabus said last month. Mabus plans for the Navy to fulfill half of its energy needs using biofuel by 2020


Bipartisan support for biofuel but on the brink


Chu 6/19/12 (Keith Chu, Platts HRD, http://www.platts.com/RSSFeedDetailedNews/RSSFeed/ElectricPower/6397289)

Senators Mike Crapo, Republican-Idaho, and Mike Johanns, Republican-Nebraska, had offered an amendment that would have offered an explicit exemption for non-financial end users, including certain energy firms, from yet-to-be-finalized margin rules for swaps, which are required under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. The farm bill, officially the Agriculture Reform, Food and Jobs Act (S. 3240), sets US agriculture and food aid policy and includes mandatory funding for a host of farm programs. It also provides $800 million in mandatory funding for biofuels programs, including $216 million for companies that produce biofuels, and funding for farmers that grow energy crops. Although the bill attracted bipartisan support in the Senate Agriculture Committee, congressional observers have said election-year politics and general inertia may prevent the bill from moving forward this year. Meanwhile, in the US House of Representatives, Representative Marcy Kaptur, Democrat-Ohio, on Monday introduced the Rural Energy Investment Act, which mirrors the Senate farm bill's energy portion.


Biofuel is on the chopping block – but also key to the U.S. military


Lehner 7/3/12 (Peter Lehner, Executive Director of Natural Resources Defense Council, “Fourth of July Fireworks: Military Fights for Energy Independence, but Congress Might Stand in the Way” http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/plehner/fourth_of_july_fireworks_milit.html)

The military's goal, first and foremost, is to be an effective fighting force. For years, our armed forces have been at the forefront of technological innovation in a number of fields, developing battlefield technologies for improved communication, medical care, and transportation-- innovations like the Internet, GPS, and others that proved to be game-changers in the private sector as well. In the same fashion, the military has been leading the way on new energy resources, deploying alternatives to the fossil fuels that threaten our national security, hurt our economy and endanger our health. "We're doing this for one reason," said Navy Secretary Ray Mabus. "To be better war fighters." The U.S. Department of Defense is the single largest consumer of fuel in the whole world; its fuel purchases often support nations whose interests are hostile to ours. Our dependence on oil puts soldiers’ lives at risk. Yet the House of Representatives just voted to essentially ban the Department of Defense from purchasing biofuels until they get to the point where they’re cheaper than fossil fuels--even though DOD routinely invests in emerging technologies that it needs to hasten them toward commercial viability. That’s how we got the Internet. The Senate Armed Services Committee also has voted to obstruct DOD’s pursuit of advanced biofuels. After the full Senate returns from the Fourth of July recess, it will consider whether these harmful provisions will become law. The military's use of clean energy is cutting edge, helping power ships, planes and soldiers in the field, as well as fueling economic growth and job creation here at home. Navy and Air Force jets are already flying on a biofuel blend that comes from plants--a fuel that's made, from field to factory, in America. The Army is working with American entrepreneurs to develop powerful steam engines that run on biodiesel, and are strong enough to move tanks. The Marine Corps is looking at plant-based fuels to power personnel carriers and generators in remote locations. Military bases are looking to solar and wind power to meet their local energy needs, and to advanced vehicles that reduce oil demand. The military's interest in biofuels and other forms of renewable energy has nothing to do with politics or polar bears. "There is not a shred of political correctness" to it, Vice-Admiral Dennis McGinn told Scientific American. It's about saving lives, saving money, and protecting America's national security.




Download 154.69 Kb.

Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page