Call to missions


a.Confirmation of the Historical Text of the Bible



Download 2.95 Mb.
View original pdf
Page415/464
Date13.05.2022
Size2.95 Mb.
#58794
1   ...   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   ...   464
AllModules
a.
Confirmation of the Historical Text of the Bible

McDowell shows that the Bible meets the following three tests better than Page 2 of 24
APOLOGETICS - Comparative Religions
1/7/2012
http://test.missionstraining.org/Apologetics/ComparativeReligions.php

any other ancient historical document


Bibliographical test


number of manuscripts in existence (many manuscripts are better than a few manuscripts) time interval between the original and existing copies (a short time interval is better than along time interval) The Dead Sea Scrolls, dating to the first century BC, suggests that the Hebrew text (Massoretic text) used as a source for the Old Testament is faithful to the original Hebrew text. The Dead Sea Scrolls, which contain fragments of Old Testament Books, suggests that the Massoretic text was copied accurately over the thousand years following the time of the Dead Sea Scrolls. The minor differences between the Massoretic text and the Dead Sea Scrolls do not affect Christian doctrine.


Internal evidence test (Based on what it says, does the document appear to be reliable) Aristotle advocated giving the benefit of the doubt to a document unless there are contradictions or inaccuracies evident alack of understanding should not lead to the assumption that a document is erroneous. Primary Sources are considered more accurate than later sources. Biblical writers were eyewitnesses to Christ or they wrote from firsthand information (e.g. Luke 1:1-3)


External evidence test


Historical figures and documents confirm the Scriptures



Download 2.95 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   ...   464




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page