Steel Link
EPA 10
“Report of the Interagency Task Force on Carbon Capture and Storage,” http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/downloads/CCS-Task-Force-Report-2010.pdf
Modeling of the ACES Act of 2009 projects that by 2020 and 2030, approximately 180 and 480 million tonnes, respectively, would be captured, transported, and securely sequestered in deep geologic formations. These quantities of CO2 represent between 4 and 10 times the amount of CO2 transported in the United States in 2009, resulting in a need to construct new pipelines. Separate studies completed by the Interstate Natural Gas Association of America (INGAA) and the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) looked at the amount of infrastructure necessary to support future CCS deployment (Dooley et al., 2008; The INGAA Foundation, 2009). 46 The estimated length of pipelines needed for commercial deployment of CCS ranged from 5,000 to 13,000 miles in 2020 and from 22,000 to 36,000 miles through 2030. Between 1998 and 2007 the natural gas industry built 20,829 miles of pipelines in the United States (EIA, 2008). While expected construction rates seem reasonable, CO2 pipeline development will compete for resources, training needs, and additional draws on quantities of available commodities such as steel.
Link – Turns Case Trades off with steel – also takes out the case – makes widespread implementation less likely
Parfomak et al 9 – Specialist in Energy and Infrastructure @ CRS
Paul, “Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Pipelines for Carbon Sequestration: Emerging Policy Issues,” Scholar
If some form of CCS is effectively mandated in the future, a surge in demand for new CO2 pipe, in competition with demand for natural gas and oil pipelines, may exacerbate the trend of rising prices for pipeline materials, and could even lead to shortages of pipe steel from North American sources. As a consequence, the availability and cost of pipeline steel to build such a CO2 pipeline network for CCS may be a limiting factor for widespread CCS implementation.
Case Debate Econ Turns Case Economic decline turns the case – prevents broader investment in CCS
Handwerk 12 – National Geographic Analyst
Brian, “Amid Economic Concerns, Carbon Capture Faces a Hazy Future,” http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/energy/2012/05/120522-carbon-capture-and-storage-economic-hurdles/
For a world dependent on fossil fuels, carbon capture and storage (CCS) could be a key to controlling greenhouse gas emissions. But the technology meant to scrub carbon dioxide pollution from the air is experiencing stiff headwinds that have stalled many projects at the bottom line.t Many companies have determined that expensive CCS operations simply aren't worth the investment without government mandates or revenue from carbon prices set far higher than those currently found at the main operational market, the European Trading System, or other fledgling markets. According to a recent Worldwatch Institute report, only eight large-scale, fully integrated CCS projects are actually operational, and that number has not increased in three years. "In fact, from 2010 to 2011, the number of large-scale CCS plants operating, under construction, or being planned declined," said Matt Lucky, the report's author. Numerous projects in Europe and North America are being scrapped altogether, Lucky added. Last month, TransAlta, the Canadian electricity giant, abandoned plans for a CCS facility at an Alberta coal-burning plant because financial incentives were too weak to justify costly investment in CCS. "For a very small industry that's still in the developmental state, it's not a good sign when the number of planned projects is declining," Lucky said. "This is a period when it should be exploding, so this doesn't signal significant growth of the CCS industry in the near future." Low-Cost Carbon Killing Investment Carbon capture and storage could reduce greenhouse gas emissions by capturing CO2 where it's produced and storing it permanently in various types of underground geological reservoirs. The International Energy Agency (IEA) believes CCS technology can dramatically reduce greenhouse gas emissions when implemented at dirty fossil fuel power plants and other industrial facilities that enlarge the world's CO2 footprint. The IEA would like to see more than 3,000 CCS-equipped plants come online by mid-century to achieve 20 percent of planned reductions in CO2 emissions. But no large-scale projects currently operate at power plants, and Howard Herzog, a CCS expert at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), said efforts to scale up the industry are largely on hold. "I'd say the biggest problem we have right now is that there is not a market for CCS because there is no climate policy," Herzog said. "This technology can effectively help lower CO2 emissions in the atmosphere but that will always cost more than letting business as usual go on. So as long as there is no policy to stop business as usual, it will go on." The United States has failed to enact a climate policy. And other nations, in turn, have not reached a strong international agreement on mandatory carbon emissions reductions without the largest historic polluter at the negotiating table. As a result, the envisioned market-based solution, where companies could gain valuable "credits" for steps they would take to reduce emissions while others would face new costs for failure to act, has never gained traction. CCS is so costly that such an incentive system is necessary for its development. Herzog pointed to the American Electric Power Mountaineer coal power plant project in New Haven, West Virginia, where carbon produced at a coal plant was to be sequestered deep in Mount Simon sandstone. The U.S. Department of Energy was slated to fund half of the project's costs, up to $334 million, but after a successful pilot project, AEP canceled Phase 2 CCS at the site last summer. The decision was attributed to a weak economy and an uncertain U.S. policy on climate and carbon.
Share with your friends: |