2) Cuba’s ethanol industry is dying because of regulations put in place by Castro, but there are enough natural resources to quickly restart.
REUTERS, 12
[Brian Wilson, staff writer; “Insight: U.S. and Brazil - At last, friends on ethanol,” 9/12, http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/14/us-brazil-us-ethanol-idUSBRE88D19520120914]
Cuba's once-mighty sugar industry has deteriorated in recent decades under communist rule, but Rice University economist Ron Soligo has said the country has the potential to become the world's No. 3 ethanol producer behind the United States and Brazil. While Washington has had little diplomatic contact with Cuba in the past five decades, Brazil has a tradition of warm political and economic ties with the Caribbean nation. President Dilma Rousseff visited Havana in January and spoke of how Brazil can help Cuba develop its economy. Large-scale ethanol production has been largely taboo in Cuba, in part because former President Fidel Castro has denounced it as a "sinister" idea that drives up global food prices. Yet some Brazilian officials say that stance could change dramatically once the 86-year-old leader withdraws from politics. "Everybody knows that Cuba is an ethanol bonanza waiting to happen," said a Brazilian official who requested anonymity. "We'll be ready."
3) Most Cuban agricultural land is not being used, so growing sugarcane would not require destroying any habitats. It is comparatively safer than U.S. corn or Brazilian sugar.
SPECHT, 12
[Jonathan, Legal Advisor for Pearlmaker Holsteins, Inc. B; J.D., Washington University in St. Louis; “Raising Cane: Cuban Sugarcane Ethanol’s Economic and Environmental Effects on the United States,” 4/24, http://environs.law.ucdavis.edu/issues/36/2/specht.pdf]
Another reason Cuban sugarcane-based ethanol could be one of the most environmentally friendly fuels possible is that Cuba could produce a significant amount of ethanol without any negative impacts on native habitat. A striking amount of Cuban agricultural land — fifty five percent as of 2007 — is simply lying fallow and is not cultivated with anything. 125 Although its character may have changed due to years of neglect, this land is not virgin native habitat like the grasslands of North Dakota or the Cerrado of Brazil. Cuba therefore could greatly increase its production of sugarcane, and thus its production of sugarcane-based ethanol, without negative impacts on wildlife habitat. While it is not environmentally perfect — no form of energy is — Cuban sugarcane-based ethanol would raise fewer environmental concerns than the fuel sources it would displace: petroleum, domestic corn-based ethanol, and Brazilian sugarcane based ethanol. Therefore, from a purely environmental perspective, changing U.S. law and policy in order to promote the importation of Cuban sugarcane-based ethanol should be encouraged.
1AC: Cuban Ethanol Affirmative 122
4) The sugarcane ethanol industry can be rapidly rebooted with guidance from the U.S. and support for market access.
REUTERS, 12
[Brian Wilson, staff writer; “Insight: U.S. and Brazil - At last, friends on ethanol,” 9/12, http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/14/us-brazil-us-ethanol-idUSBRE88D19520120914]
Sugar cane, the main source of ethanol made in Brazil, already grows in many of the countries seen as potential producers of the biofuel. Cane produces more energy than it consumes during the ethanol-making process, unlike corn, the basis for U.S. ethanol. Homegrown ethanol holds obvious appeal for small, poor countries that import most of their energy at enormous costs. Honduras, for example, spent $2.1 billion - 12 percent of its gross domestic product - on fuel imports in 2011. However, producers and other investors generally refuse to build ethanol mills and other infrastructure unless they have a guaranteed domestic market. "And implementation of that framework gets to be very technical and difficult," Unica's Kutas said. One example: In the 1980s, Guatemala passed a law mandating a blend of ethanol in gasoline but has rarely enforced it because of bottlenecks that include a separate law capping the amount of the sugar cane crop that can be used for biofuels. To resolve such problems, the Brazilian and U.S. governments have helped finance and produce studies of the countries' ability to create and sustain ethanol production. Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador are where the most progress has been made, diplomats say.
2AC Extension Harms – Environment: A/t #1 “Species Are Resilient” 123
1) Grasslands are being plowed over for corn fields, which destroys unique ecosystems and keystone species. Every link in the food chain is critical and it is impossible to predict which death will trigger the domino toward total extinction, so you should err Affirmative on impact claims. Extend our DINER and SPECHT evidence.
2) Damage to the grasslands and wetlands from cornfields is impossible to reverse. Once the habitat is gone, the animals are not coming back.
SPECHT, 12
[Jonathan, Legal Advisor for Pearlmaker Holsteins, Inc. B; J.D., Washington University in St. Louis; “Raising Cane: Cuban Sugarcane Ethanol’s Economic and Environmental Effects on the United States,” 4/24, http://environs.law.ucdavis.edu/issues/36/2/specht.pdf]
If we proceed along the current trajectory without changing federal policies [including those promoting corn-based ethanol], the prairie pothole ecosystem may be further degraded and fragmented, and the many services it provides will be impossible to restore. The region will no longer be able to support the waterfowl cherished by hunters and wildlife enthusiasts across the country. Grassland bird populations, already declining, will be unable to rebound as nesting sites are turned into row crops. Water will become increasingly polluted and costly to clean as the grasslands and wetlands that once filtered contaminants disappear. 100
Share with your friends: |