GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies Volume 22(4), November 2022 http://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2022-2204-11 eISSN: 2550-2131
ISSN: 1675-8021 198 C. There was a violation of human rights by the preceding regime that leads us to get involved in external wars
بي
بم انلابلا ب ابي دددددددسنلاابقكقحلب هتناب نه
ةيجر خببو حب فباكخصلابىلاب ند بلو In the above fallacy, the illocutionary force of that
utterance is that of assertive, which implies the function of claims, as al-Maliki claims that the imbalance of distinction, extension, and exclusion on the home front lead the country to get involved in external wars. Nevertheless, to determine the illocutionary force at the textual level, the context of speech 3 needs to be assessed refer to appendix Bin which al-Maliki presented the preceding regime as a sectarian regime that violated the human rights of ethnicities and minorities through its policies. According to Parker and Salman (2013), al-Maliki joined the Islamic Da'wa Party (a party that adopted a Shi’a ideology) where he worked secretly against the Baathist leadership. In 1979, he carried a feeling of hatred against the preceding regime and kept accusing it of human rights violations. This can be inferred in the following unexpressed premise since the preceding
regime had expelled al-Maliki; therefore, the preceding regime had violated human rights. Thus, the words of that fallacy do not fit with their direction in the world. Therefore, the illocutionary
force is different as al-Maliki indirectly accuses the preceding regime of being a sectarian regime that violated the human rights of ethnicities and minorities and engaged in external wars. The illocutionary act of this fallacy can be seen in Table 8. TABLE 8. The illocutionary force of a faulty reasoning
Share with your friends: 
