Drones Case Neg



Download 157.71 Kb.
Page8/12
Date19.10.2016
Size157.71 Kb.
#4443
1   ...   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12

AT: Terror Adv. (1/2)


Drones are an essential tool in preventing terrorism

Bruno 10 [Greg Bruno, Staff Writer, CFR.org, Council on Foreign Relations, "Raising the Curtain on U.S. Drone Strikes",p. online]

Unmanned drone strikes are an essential tool for killing terrorists who provide guidance and operational support for international terrorism. The apparent killing of al-Yazid represents an important small victory, given his connections to terrorist plots abroad, and his declarations last summer that al-Qaeda would use nuclear weapons against the United States (RFE/RL). Such targeted killings, however, are only one element of national power that is part of the Obama administration's six-month-old Afghanistan and Pakistan Regional Stabilization Strategy.


Drones are an essential tool in defeating Al Qaeda

Lakhani, 9 [Kalsoom Lakhani, " Drone Attacks: Bombs in The Air Versus Boots on The Ground" July 20, 2009, Huffington Post, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kalsoom-lakhani/drone-attacks-bombs-in-th_b_241439.html]

U.S. intelligence officials have called the use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) or drones, "their most effective weapon against Al Qaeda." This belief seems to be manifested in the increased frequency of drone attacks in the border area between Pakistan and Afghanistan. Although the Bush administration authorized only a handful of such strikes in 2007, the Wall Street Journal reports there were more than 30 attacks in 2008. So far in 2009, attacks are up 30 percent from last year, with Newsblogging noting there have been 27 drone attacks, "of which only two occurred before Obama took office." Obama's administration officials have claimed that drone strikes in Pakistan have killed nine of the 20 top Al Qaeda officials. Peter Bergen and Katherine Tiedemann echoed in an article last month, "It is possible to say with some certainty that since the summer of 2008, U.S. drones have killed dozens of lower-ranking militants and at least ten mid-and upper-level leaders within Al Qaeda and the Taliban."
More evidence – key to high level target elimination

Halperin, 9 [Basil Halperin, " It's time for a political settlement in Afghanistan" Oct 6, 2009, WSPN, http://waylandstudentpress.com/2009/10/06/its-timefor-

a-political-settlement-in-afghanistan/]

Third, the use of Predator drone strikes must be maintained. These unmanned aircraft have been very successful at eliminating high value targets along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border, including members of the upper echelon of Al-Qaeda.
Essential element of the overall strategy

Zenko & Bruno, 10 [Micah Zenko, Fellow for Conflict Prevention, Council on Foreign Relations and Greg Bruno, Staff Writer, CFR.org, " Raising the Curtain on

U.S. Drone Strikes " June 2, 2010, CFR, http://www.cfr.org/publication/22290/raising_the_curtain_on_us_drone_strikes.html]



Predator drones have been credited with the removal of top al-Qaeda and Taliban figures from the tribal areas of Pakistan, the most recent example being the apparent killing of Mustafa Abu al-Yazid, al-Qaeda's No. 3. How critical are these unmanned strikes to the mission in the Afghan-Pakistan war zone? Unmanned drone strikes are an essential tool for killing terrorists who provide guidance and operational support for international terrorism. The apparent killing of al-Yazid represents an important small victory, given his connections to terrorist plots abroad, and his declarations last summer that al-Qaeda would use nuclear weapons against the United States (RFE/RL). Such targeted killings, however, are only one element of national power that is part of the Obama administration's six-month-old Afghanistan and Pakistan Regional Stabilization Strategy.

AT: Terror Adv. (2/2)


Drones keep terrorists on the run

Bergen, 9 [Peter Bergen, Katherine Tiedemann, New America Foundation "The Drone War" June 3, 2009, The New Republic, http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2009/drone_war_13672 ]

Officials in both the Bush and Obama administrations have been leery of discussing the highly classified drone program on the record, but a window into their thinking was provided by the remarks of then-CIA director Michael Hayden on November 13, 2008, as the drone program was in full swing. "By making a safe haven feel less safe, we keep Al Qaeda guessing.We make them doubt their allies; question their methods, their plans, even their priorities," he explained. Hayden went on to say that the key outcome of the drone attacks was that"we force them to spend more time and resources on self-preservation, and that distracts them, at least partially and at least for a time, from laying the groundwork for the next attack." This strategy seems to have worked, at least in terms of the ability of Al Qaeda and other FATA-based militant groups to plan or carry out attacks in the West. Since the summer of 2008, law-enforcement authorities have uncovered no serious plots against U.S. or European targets that have been traceable back to Pakistan's tribal regions.
More evidence –key to detecting roadside bombs and terrorist compounds

Drew, 9 [Christopher Drew, March 17, 2009 " Drones Are Weapons of Choice in Fighting Qaeda" March 17, 200, Common Dreams, http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2009/03/17-4]

Field commanders in Iraq and Afghanistan, where the Air Force is in charge of the Predators, say their ability to linger over an area for hours, streaming instant video warnings of insurgent activity, has been crucial to reducing threats from roadside bombs and identifying terrorist compounds. The C.I.A. is in charge of drone flights in Pakistan, where more than three dozen missiles strikes have been launched against Al Qaeda and Taliban leaders in recent months.



Download 157.71 Kb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page