Eine Bibliographie MÜnchen 2009

– (2001): Epode 14: Horace’s Carmen Inconditum?, in: Cavarzere/Aloni/Barchiesi 2001, 187-204.

– (2002): Horace and the Pirates, in: Powell, Anton/Welch, Kathryn (Hgg.): Sextus Pompeius, London, 213-228.

– (2003): A Commentary on Horace’s Epodes, Oxford [A. De Vivo, BStudLat 34, 2004, 675f.; D.E. Hill, G&R 51, 2004, 258; P. Hills, BMCRev 2004.09.31; H. Zehnacker, REL 82, 2004, 297-299; A. Cucchiarelli, Gnomon 77, 2005, 673-676; A. Barchiesi, CW 99, 2005/06, 455; W. Kißel, Gymnasium 113, 2006, 72-74; S. Lorenz, AAHG 60, 2007, 48-54].

– (2007): The Epodes: Horace’s Archilochus?, in: S.J. Harrison 2007a, 93-104.

Watt, Williams S. (1995): Horatiana, Latomus 54, 608-612.

Wehrli, Fritz (1944): Horaz und Kallimachos, MH 1, 69-76 = ders.: Theorie und Humanitas, Zürich 1972, 270-278.

Weinreich, Otto (1942): Religionswissenschaftliche und literaturgeschichtliche Beiträge zu Horaz, Zeitschrift für Kirchengeschichte 51, 33-74 = ders.: Ausgewählte Schriften III. 1937-1970, Amsterdam 1979, 149-188.

– (1962; Hg.): Römische Satiren. Ennius. Lucilius. Varro. Horaz. Persius. Juvenal. Seneca. Petronius. Übersetzt von O.W., Chr.M. Wieland, H. Blümner, A. Maisack. Mit einem Essay ‚Zum Verständnis der Werke’, Reinbek (Rowohlts Klassiker der Literatur und der Wissenschaft 114-116 = Lateinische Literaturv 4).

Welch, Tara Silvestri (2001): Est locus uni cuique suus: City and Status in Horace’s Satires 1.8 and 1.9, ClAnt 20, 165-192.

Welwei, Karl-Wilhelm/Maier, Mischa (1997): Der Topos des ruhmvollen Todes in der zweiten Römerode des Horaz, Klio 79, 107-116.

Werner, Shirley (1998): Reading through Distance: Horace, Ode 3.2 and the Rhetoric Imposed by the Reader, CML 18, 271-292.

Wesselschmidt, Q.F. (1979): Stoicism in the Odes of Horace, Diss. University of Iowa, Iowa City [DA 40, 1979, 2649A].

West, David Alexander (1967): Reading Horace, Edinburgh [O. Dreyer, Gymnasium 75, 1968, 492-494; R.G.M. Nisbet, CR 19, 1969, 56f.; F.A. Sullivan, CPh 64, 1969, 57f.].

– (1973): Horace’s Poetic Technique in the Odes, in: Costa 1973, 29-58.

– (1974): Of Mice and Men: Horace, Satires 2.6.77-117, in: Woodman, Tony/West, David (Hgg.): Quality and Pleasure in Latin Poetry, Cambridge, 67-80.

– (1991): Cur me querelis (Horace, Odes 2.17), AJPh 112, 45-52.

– (1995a): Horace Odes I. Carpe Diem. Text, Translation and Commentary, Oxford [A.D. Nuttall, CA News Dec. 1995, 14f.; R.M. Gentilcore, NECN 23, 1995/96, 159-161; W.S. Anderson, BMCRev 7, 1996, 358-363; D. Feeney, TLS 4847, 1996, 9; M. Lowrie, Vergilius 42, 1996, 148-151; M. Tennick, JACT Review 19, 1996, 28f.; M. Lowrie, CPh 92, 1996/97, 295-301; M. Aschei, Athenaeum 85, 1997, 662-664; J. Filée, LEC 65, 1997, 370; F. Jones, CR 47, 1997, 204f.; N.C. Coppelino, CW 91, 1997/98, 305; H. Müller, WS 111, 1998, 288f.; H.P. Syndikus, Gnomon 70, 1998, 455f.].

– (1995b): The Presidential Address, Proceedings of the Classical Association 92, 12-23.

– (1995c): Reading the Metre in Horace, Odes 3.9, in: S.J. Harrison 1995a, 100-107.

– (1998): Horace Odes II: Vatis Amici, Oxford [R. Ancona, Vergilius 45, 1999, 138-143; M. Gale, G&R 46, 1999, 238; J.N. O’Neill, BMCRev 99.10.12; H. Dettmer, CW 93, 1999/2000, 635f.; J.N. O’Neill, CO 78, 2000/01, 138f.].

– (2000): Speculative Historicism, Histos 4.

– (2002): Horace Odes III: Dulce Periculum, Oxford [F. Cupaiuolo, BStudLat 33, 2003, 211; D. E. Hill, G&R 50, 2003, 248; J.T. Quinn, BMCRev 2003.09.17; A. Barchiesi, CW 97, 2003/04, 467; D.N. Erickson, CO 81, 2003/4, 90; J.S.C. Eidinow, JRS 94, 2004, 243f.; E.W. Leach, Gnomon 76, 2004, 309-314; J.-Y. Maleuvre, LEC 72, 2004, 147f.; J.H.D. Scourfield, CR 55, 2005, 122-125].

West, Stephanie (1990): Horace, Epistles 1.2.42-3, CQ 40, 280.

Whitaker, Richard (1984): Gallus and ‘Classical’ Augustans (Vergil and Horace), PLLS 4, 55-60.

White, Heather (2005): Textual Problems in Horace, Orpheus 26, 163-184.

White, Peter (1977): Horace A.P. 128-30: The Intent of the Wording, CQ 27, 191-201.

– (1987): Horace, Epistles 2.1.50-54, TAPhA 117, 227-234.

– (1995): Postumus, Curtius Postumus, and Rabirius, CPh 90, 151-161.

– (2007): Friendship, Patronage and Horatian Socio-poetics, in: S.J. Harrison 2007a, 195-206.

Wickert, Lothar (1947): Horaz und Augustus, WJA 2, 158-172 = Binder, Gerhard (Hg.), Saeculum Augustum, Bd. 2: Religion und Literatur, Darmstadt 1988 (Wege der Forschung 512), 288-313 (mit einem Nachtrag von 1980).

Wiegand, Dietmar (1960): Die Natur bei Vergil und Horaz. Bibliographie für die Jahre 1920-1959, Gymnasium 67, 1960, 344-358.

Wieland, Hans (1950): Ut currat sententia. Beobachtungen zur Bewegungsführung in den Satiren und Episteln des Horaz, Diss. Freiburg i.Br. (ms.).

Wiesen, D.S. (1981): Two Problems in Horace’s Satires, Mnemosyne 34, 87-95.

Wigodsky, M. (1980): Horace's Miser (s. 1 1 108) and Aristotelian Self-Love, SO 55, 33-58.

Wijeyamohan, T. (2000): Horace and His Epicurean Beliefs, Classicum 26,2, 25-28.

Wilamowitz-Moellendorf, Ulrich von (1913): Sappho und Simonides. Untersuchungen über griechische Lyriker, Berlin (305-323: „Horaz und die griechischen Lyriker“).

Wili, Walter (1947): “Die literarischen Beziehungen des Properz zu Horaz,” in Festschrift für Edouard Tièche zum 70. Geburtstag am 21. März 1947. Schriften der Literarischen Gesellschaft Bern 6 (Bern), 179-190 = Eisenhut 1975, 202-213.

– (1948): Horaz und die augusteische Kultur, Basel (Nachdr. 1966) [K. Jax, AAHG 1, 1948, 114f.; M. Puelma Piwonka, DLZ 70, 1949, 439-446; R.T. Bruère, CPh 46, 1951, 188-190; F.O. Copley, AJPh 72, 1951, 86-90; R.G.M. Nisbet, CR 18, 1968, 55-57].

Wilkinson, Lancelot Patrick (1945): Horace and His Lyric Poetry, Cambridge (²1951; Nachdrucke 1968 und London 1994) [F.O. Copley, AJPh 67, 1946, 280-283; E. Fraenkel, JRS 36, 1946, 185-189; R.M. Henry, CR 60, 1946, 74f.].

Will, Elizabeth Lyding (1982): Ambiguity in Horace Odes I,4, CPh 77, 240-245.

– (2001): Defining the regina vini of the Sestii, in: Goldman, Cleo Rickman (Hg.): New Light from Ancient Cosa: Classical Mediterranean Studies in Honor of Cleo Rickman Fitch, Frankfurt a.M. u.a. (Hermeneutics of Art 10), 35-47.

Wille, Günther (1961): Singen und Sagen in der Dichtung des Horaz, in: Eranion. Festschrift für Hildebrecht Hommel, Tübingen, 169-184.

– (1967): Musica Romana. Die Bedeutung der Musik im Leben der Römer, Amsterdam.

– (1972): Horaz als politischer Lyriker, in: Τιμητικόν αφιέρωμα Κωνσταντίνω Ι. Μερεντίτη επι της τεσσερακονταετηρίδι της εκπαιδευτικής αυτού δράσεως. Festschrift für Konstantinos J. Merentitis, Athina, 439-481.

– (1977): Einführung in das römische Musikleben, Darmstadt 122-147.

Willett, Steven J. (1996): Reticent About the Feeling, Precise About the Thing: Horace’s Ironic Elegy, Diotima www.stoa.org/diotima/essays/links.shtml.

Williams, Gordon (1962): Poetry in the Moral Climate of Augustan Rome, JRS 52, 28-46.

– (1968): Tradition and Originality in Roman Poetry, Oxford.

– (1969): The Third Book of Horace’s Odes Edited with Translation and Running Commentary, Oxford.

– (1972): Horace, Oxford (Greece & Rome. New Surveys in the Classics 6).

– (1980): Figures of Thought in Roman Poetry, New Haven/London.

– (1993/94): Public Policies, Private Affairs, and Strategies of Address in the Poetry of Horace, CW 87, 395-408.

– (1995): Libertino Patre Natus: True or False?, in: S.J. Harrison 1995a, 296-313.

Willige, Wilhelm (1957): Horaz und Tibull, Gymnasium 64, 98-101.

Wilson, Penelope (1980): Pindar and His Reputation in Antiquity, PCPhS 206, 97-174.

Wimmel, Walter (1953): Über das Verhältnis der 4. Ecloge zur 16. Epode, Hermes 81, 317-344.

– (1954): Eine Besonderheit der Reihung in Augusteischen Gedichten, Hermes 82, 199-230.

– (1960): Kallimachos in Rom. Die Nachfolge seines apologetischen Dichtens in der Augusteerzeit, Wiesbaden (Hermes Einzelschriften 16).

– (1961): Vergils Eclogen und die Vorbilder der 16. Epode des Horaz, Hermes 89, 208-226.

– (1962a): Doppelsinnige Formulierung bei Horaz, Glotta 40, 119-143.

– (1962b): Zur Form der horazischen Diatribensatire, Frankfurt a.M. 1962 [U. Knoche, Gnomon 35, 1963, 470-475; C.O. Brink, CR 14, 1964, 161-163].

– (1965): Recusatio-Form und Pindarode, Philologus 109, 83-103.

– (1987): Zum Problem doppelsinniger Formulierung beim späten Horaz, Glotta 65, 241-250.

– (1993): Die Bacchus-Ode C. 3,25 des Horaz, Stuttgart (AbhMainz 1993,11) [I. Borzsák, Gymnasium 101, 1994, 462f.; H. Zehnacker, REL 72, 1994, 297f.; E. Dönt, WS 109, 1996, 301f.].

– (1994): Sprachliche Ambiguität bei Horaz, München (Abhandlungen der Marburger Gelehrten-Gesellschaft Nr. 24) [E. Doblhofer, AAHG 48, 1995, 8-10; H. Zehnacker, REL 73, 1995, 292; I. Borzsák, Gymnasium 103, 1996, 80f.; V. Cristóbal, Emérita 65, 1997, 378].

– (1996/97): Gallus und Thrakien bei Vergil und Horaz (zu Horaz c. 3,25), WJA 21, 229-237.

Wirth, Gerhard (1963; Hg): Horaz: Episteln. Lateinisch und Deutsch. Übersetzt und erläutert von C.M. Wieland, Reinbek bei Hamburg (rowohlts klassiker 144-146).

Wiseman, T.P. (1988): Satyrs in Rome? The Background to Horace’s Ars poetica, JRS 78, 1-13.

Wistrand, Erik (1958): Horace’s Ninth Epode and Its Historical Background, Göteborg (Studia Graeca & Latina Gothoburgensia 8) = ders.: Opera selecta, Stockholm 1972, 289-350 [S. Borzsák, DLZ 80, 1959, 627-629; Gerlo, AC 28, 1959, 421f.; Lamacchia, A&R 4, 1959, 161-165; A.G. Lee, Gnomon 31, 1959, 740f.; Paladini, Latomus 18, 1959, 662-668; Perret, REL 37, 1959, 299f.; Rostagni, RFIC 37, 1959, 329f.; Bruère, CPh 55, 1960, 141-143; M.L. Clarke, CR 10, 1960, 136f.; P. Grimal, REA 62, 1960, 187f.; Hajdová, SPFB 9,E 5, 1960, 144f.; Herrmann, RBPh 38, 1960, 586; A.D. Leeman, Mnemosyne 13, 1960, 273-275; Mariños, Emérita 28, 1960, 362f.; Pepe, GIF 13, 1960, 273-275; André, RPh 35, 1961, 173f.; Boillat, MH 18, 1961, 46f.].

– (1963): Archilochus and Horace, in: Archiloque. Sept exposés et discussions, Vandœuvres-Genève (Entretiens sur l’antiquité classique 10), 255-287 = ders.: Opera selecta, Stockholm 1972, 397-419.

– (1977): Poetic Patriotism Under Augustus. Prop. 3,4 and Hor. Carm. 3,14, in: ders.: Miscellanea Propertiana, Göteborg 1977 (Studia Graeca & Latina Gothoburgensia 38), 8-30.

Witke, Charles (1983): Horace’s Roman Odes: A Critical Examination, Leiden (Mnemosyne Supplementum 77; 2-5. 19-27 = Anderson 1999b, 169-179) [Robertson, G&R 31, 1984, 211; Defossé, LEC 53, 1985, 486; Williams, EMC 39, 1985, 492-494; Nadeau, Latomus 46, 1987, 226-228; A.J. Woodman, CR 37, 1987, 17f.].

– (1989): Recent Structural Studies on Horace, AugAge 9, 49-58.

Wittchow, Frank (2005): Der Dichter auf der Suche nach seiner Rolle: Zur persona in den Jamben des Horaz, A&A 51, 69-82.

Wlosok, Antonie (2000): Freiheit und Gebundenheit der augusteischen Dichter, RhM 143, 75-88.

Wójcik, Andrzej (1975): De nominum, quae ad geographiam et historiam spectant in ‘Epodis’ Horatianis adhibitorum munere litterario, SPhP 1, 97-113.

– (1983): Duie Horacjańskie epody aktyjskie (Hor. Epod. 1:9) [De duobus Horatianis epodis Actiacis (Hor. Epod. 1 et 9)], SPhP 6, 133-153.

– (1995): Fikcja i rzeczywistość wliście Horacego do Mecenas [Fiktion und Wirklichkeit in Horazens Brief an Maecenas] (Hor. Epist. I 7), in: Lewandowski, Igacy/Wójcik, Andrzej (Hgg.): Vetustatis amore et studio: księga pamiątkowa ofiarowana Proseworowi Kazimierzowi Limanowi, Poznan, 85-92.

Wood, Allen G. (1985): Literary Satire and Theory: A Study of Horace, Boileau, and Pope, New York.

Woodman, A.J. [= Tony] (1970): Horace, Odes, II,3, AJPh 91, 165-180 = Anderson 1999b, 117-129.

– (1972): Horace’s Ode Diffugere nives and Solvitur acris hiems, Latomus 31, 752-778.

– (1974): Exegi monumentum: Horace, Odes 3.30, in: ders./West, David (Hgg.): Quality and Pleasure in Latin Poetry, Cambridge, 115-128 = Anderson 1999b, 205-222.

– (1980): The Craft of Horace in Odes I.14, CPh 75, 60-67.

– (1984): Horace’s First Roman Ode, in: Poetry and Politics in the Age of Augustus, Cambridge, 83-94.

– (2002): Biformis vates: the Odes, Catullus and Greek Lyric, in: Woodman/Feeney 2002, 53-64.

– (2003): Poems to Historians: Catullus 1 and Horace, Odes 2.1, in: Braund, David/Gill, Christopher (Hgg.): Myth, History and Culture in Republican Rome. Studies in Honour of T.P. Wiseman, Exeter, Devon,191-216.

– /Feeney, D.C. (2002; Hgg.): Traditions and Contexts in the Poetry of Horace, Cambridge [L. Deschamps, REA 105, 2003, 308-310; S.N. Byrne, CB 80, 2004, 87-94; A. Cucchiarelli, JRS 94, 2004, 244-246; L.T. Pearcy, Vergilius 50, 2004, 199-205; C. Witke, ElectronAnt 8, 2004; B.K. Gold, CR 55, 2005, 125-127; B. Stenuit, Latomus 64, 2005, 512].

Wülfing, Peter (2000): Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori: la storia di una interpretazione da Bertolt Brecht fino ai giorni nostri, QS 26(52), 215-225 = Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori: Zur Geschichte einer Interpretation von Bertolt Brecht bis heute, StudClas 34-36, 1998-2000, 59-67 = ders.: Vorträge und Schriften aus der Altertumswissenschaft und ihrer Didaktik, Trier 2001 (Bochumer Altertumswissenschaftliches Colloquium 49), 383-393.

– (2002): Rectius vives, Licini ... Ein Einstieg in die Lektüre poetischer Texte mit Horaz c. II 10, AU 45,2, 21-26.

Wulfram, Hartmut (2008): Das römische Versepistelbuch. Eine Gattungsanalyse, Berlin [N. Holzberg, Latomus 69, 2010, 1115-1117].

Wurzel, F. (1938): Der Ausgang der Schlacht von Aktium und die 9. Epode des Horaz, Hermes 73, 367-379.

Wyke, Maria (1992): Augustan Cleopatras: Female Power and Poetic Authority, in: Powell, Anton (Hg.): Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustus, London, 98-140 = dies.: The Roman Mistress: Ancient and Modern Representations, Oxford, 195-243.

Yanagisawa, K. (2000): The ‘Parentage’ Topos: Horace, Odes 2.13.1-12 and Ovid, Amores 1.12, MH 57, 270-274.

Yardley, J.C. (1976): Lovers’ Quarrels: Horace Odes 1, 13, 11 and Propertius 4, 5, 40, Hermes 104, 124-128.

– (1979): Horace and the Wolf, Mnemosyne 32, 333-337.

Young, David C. (1987): Pindar and Horace Against the Telchines (Ol. 7.53 & Carm. 4.4.33), AJPh 108, 152-157.

Zaffagno, Elena (1993): Memorie letterarie e sperimentazione: alcuni casi di personificazione in Orazio, in: Feraboli, Simonetta (Hg.): Mosaico. Studi in onore di Umberto Albini dedicati dal D.Ar.Fi.Cl.eT. ‘F. Della Corte’, Genova, 217-229.

– (2003): Sospiri d’amore e memorie letterarie in un giorno di festa, in: dies.: (Hg.): FuturAntico, Genova, 355-362.

Zarzycka-Stanczak, Krystyna (1996): ‘Dis amicum ... Carmen’: Pieśn wiekowa Horacego i jej kontext historyszno-literacki [Das Carmen saeculare und sein literarhistorischer Kontext], RoczHum 44, 103-115.

Zehnacker, Hubert (1995): Horaz, Carmen III 27, RhM 138, 68-82.

– (1999): Les amis de nos amis (À propos d’Horace, Epîtres, I,9), Helmantica 151-153, 781-791.

Zellner, Josef (2002): Glück mit Bewusstsein (Horaz, Ode II 3), AU 45,2, 43-46.

Zetzel, James E.G. (1980): Horace’s Liber Sermonum: The Structure of Ambiguity, Arethusa 13, 59-77.

– (1982): The Poetics of Patronage in the Late First Century B.C., Barbara K. Gold (Hg.): Literary and Artistic Patronage in Ancient Rome, Austin, TX, 87-102.

– (2002): Dreaming About Quirinus: Horace’s Satires and the Development of Augustan Poetry, in: Woodman/Feeney 2002, 38-52.

Zgoll, Christian (2004): Phänomenologie der Metamorphose. Verwandlungen und Verwandtes in der augusteischen Dichtung, Tübingen (Classica Monacensia 28).

Zielinski, E. (1986): Ein ‘aristotelisches’ Horazgedicht. Exemplarische Textarbeit an der Horazode 2,10, AU 29,6, 25-52.

Zimmermann, Sylvia (2001): Geschichte und Politik – Mythos und Mythisierung: Kleopatra im Bild der Augusteischen Dichter, in De Martino, Francesco/Morenilla, Carmen (Hgg.): El fil d’Ariadna: Universidad de Valéncia 3-5 de maig 2000. Studi sul teatro classico (Bari), 405-422.

Zinn, Ernst (1940): Der Wortakzent in den lyrischen Versen des Horaz, München; Nachdruck mit einem Nachwort von Wilfried Stroh, Hildesheim 1997 (Spudasmata 65).

– (1960): Elemente des Humors in augusteischer Dichtung, Gymnasium 67, 41-56.

– (1961): ΑΠΟΡΟΣ ΣΩΤΗΡΙΑ. Horaz im Rettungsboot (carm. III 29,62), in: Eranion. Festschrift für Hildebrecht Hommel, Tübingen, 185-212 = Offermann 1972, 225-257.

– (1972): Erlebnis und Dichtung bei Horaz, in: Offermann 1972, 369-388.

Zintzen, Clemens (1985/86): Horaz’ Einladung an einen Kaufmann (c. IV 12), GB 12/13, 131-145.

Ziolkowski, Jan M. (2004): Between Text and Music: The Reception of Virgilian Speeches in Early Medieval Manuscripts, MD 52, 107-126.

Ziolkowski, Theodore (2005): Uses and Abuses of Horace: His Reception since 1935 in Germany and Anglo-America, IJCT 12, 183-215.

Zoccali, F. (1979): Parodia e moralismo nella satira II,5 di Orazio, AAPel 55, 303-321.

Zumwalt, Nancy K. (1974): Horace, C. 1.34: Poetic Change and Political Equivocation, TAPhA 104, 435-467.

– (1975): Horace, C. 1.22: Poetic and Political Integrity, TAPhA 105, 417-431.

– (1977/78): Horace’s Navis of Love Poetry (C. 1.14), CW 71, 249-254.

Zusi, L. (1979): Considerazioni sulle Odi di Orazio. Temi gnomici e simposiaci, Roma.

9. Erotische Elegie (Gallus, Properz, Tibull und Ovid, Amores)

Abel, Walther (1930): Die Anredeformen bei den römischen Elegikern. Untersuchungen zur elegischen Form (diss., Berlin).

Acta 1976 = Acta Conventus omnium gentium Ovidianis studiis fovendis Tomis a die XXV ad diem XXXI mensis Augusti MCMLXXII habiti, Nicolao Barbu, Eugenio Dobroiu, Michaele Nasta curantibus. Ovidianum, Societas Ovidianis studiis inter omnes gentes fovendis. Universitas Bucurestensis, Cathedra philologiae classicae (Bucurestiis). [F. Bömer, Gymnasium 83, 1976, 557-9].

Adams, J. N. (1982): The Latin Sexual Vocabulary (London; ³1990).

Ahern, Charles Frederic, jr. (1983): Ovidius ludens: Poetry, Love and the Opposition of Nature and Culture in the Amatory Poems (diss., Yale University, New Haven, Conn).

– (1987): “Ovid, Amores 2.7.27 f.”, CJ 82, 208-9.

Albert, Rainer (1981): Das Bild des Augustus auf den frühen Reichsprägungen (Speyer).

Albert, Winfried (1988): Das mimetische Gedicht in der Antike: Geschichte und Typologie von den Anfängen bis in die augusteische Zeit. Athenäum Monographien: Altertumswissenschaft = Beiträge zur klassischen Philologie 190 (Frankfurt a. M.) [B. Feichtinger, GB 16, 1989, 302-9; D. M. Schenkeveld, Mnemosyne 43, 1990, 460-2; A. Barchiesi, RIFC 118, 1990, 327-30; P. Frassinetti, Athenaeum 68, 1990, 587-8; M. Heath, CR 40, 1990, 166; M. Lausberg, Gnomon 66, 1994, 176-9].

Albrecht, Michael von (1972-3): “Der Forschungsbericht. Ovid II. Bericht, 1. Teil”, AAHG 25, 55-76; 2. Teil, ibid. 267-90; 3. Teil, AAHG 26, 129-50.

– (1976): “Qua arte narrandi Ovidius in Amoribus usus sit”, in Acta 1976, 57-63.

(1977): Römische Poesie. Texte und Interpretationen (Heidelberg; Tübingen ²1995 = UTB 1845).

– (1982): “Properz als augusteischer Dichter”, WS 16, 220-36 = Binder, Gerhard (Hg.): Saeculum Augustum. Religion und Literatur, Darmstadt 1988 (WdF 512), 360-377 = “Properzio poeta augusteo”, in Colloquium 1983, 59-73.

– (1983): “Ovide imitateur de Tibulle”, LEC 51, 117-24 = “De Ovidio Tibulli imitatore”, in De Tibullo eiusque aetate. Acadademia Latinitati fovendae Comm. VI (Roma), 37-45.

– (1997): Ovid: Amores. Liebesgedichte. Lateinisch/Deutsch. Übersetzt und herausgegeben. Universal-Bibliothek 1361 (Stuttgart) [F. Pizzimenti, Maia 55, 2003, 675-7].

– (1998): “Umgangssprachliche Elemente in Ovids Amores”, in Baumbach, Manuel/Köhler, Helga/Ritter, Adolf Martin (edd.): Mousopolos Stephanos: Festschrift für Herwig Görgemanns. Bibliothek der klassischen Altertumswissenschaften N. F. 2. Reihe, 102 (Heidelberg), 20-42.

– (2000a): Das Buch der Verwandlungen. Ovid-Interpretationen (Düsseldorf/Zürich).

– (2000b): “Ovids Amores und sein Gesamtwerk”, WS 113, 167-80 = “Los Amores de Ovidio y el conjunto de su obra”, Myrtia 16, 2001, 173-85.

– (2003): Ovid. Eine Einführung, Stuttgart (Universal-Bibliothek 17641).

– (2005): „Properzio e Tibullo: due carriere letterarie parallele e complementari,” in Santini/Santucci 2005, 249-287.

– /Zinn, Ernst (1968): Ovid. Wege der Forschung 92 (Darmstadt).

Alessi, Paul T. (1985): “Propertius 2.28: Unity Without Illness”, CJ 81, 39-48.

– (1989): “Propertius: furor, ingenium and Callimachus”, in Deroux, Carl (ed.): Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History V. Collection Latomus 206 (Bruxelles), 216-32.

Alfonsi, Luigi (1941): Appunti sulla „fortuna“ di Properzio, Aevum 15, 236-240.

– (1943): “L’elegia di Gallo”, RFIC 20, 46-56.

– (1945a): “L’amore – amicizia negli elegiaci latini”, Aevum 19, 372-8.

– (1945b): L’elegia di Properzio. Pubblicazioni dell’ Università Cattolica del S. Cuore, n. s. 7 (Milano; reprint New York/London, 1979).

– (1945c): Note properziane, Aevum 19, 357-371.

– (1946): Albio Tibullo e gli autori del ‘Corpus Tibullianum’ Pubblicazioni dell’Università Cattolica del S. Cuore, n. s. 13 (Milano).

– (1952): “Nota properziana”, Hermes 80, 115-117.

– (1955a): “La donna dell’elegia latina”, in Jonge, P. de [et al.] (edd.): Ut pictura poesis. Studia Latina Petro Ioanni Enk septuagenario oblata (Leiden), 35-44.

– (1955b): “Note properziane”, Hermes 83, 379-384.

– (1959): “Amores II, 16, 11-12”, Latomus 18, 800-2.

– (1962): “Properzio IV, 7, 89”, Latomus 21, 168-9.

– (1963): “Properzio IV, 7, 2”, Aevum 37, 337.

– (1965): “Menandro e Tibullo, uno spunto”, Aegyptus 45, 16-19.

– (1967a): “‘Ali dell’anima’ e fuoco d’amore”, RhM 110, 175-7.

– (1967b): “Una praetexta ‘Veii’?”, RFIC 95, 165-8.

– (1968a): “A proposito della digressione tibulliana su Osiride”, Aevum 42, 475-6.

– (1968b): “Dal teatro greco alla poesia romana”, Dioniso 42, 5-15.

– (1971): “Sul mito di Ercole e Caco in Properzio”, in Fons Perennis: Saggi critici di filologia classica raccolti in onore di V. D’Agostino (Torino), 1-6.

– (1976): “L’humanitas di Ovidio negli Amores”, in Acta 1976, 71-8.

– (1981): “Dall’ideale dell’‘otium’ all’ideale della Roma augustea”, in Colloquium 1981, 81-100.

– (1986): “La divinità nel I libro delle elegie di Properzio”, in Altheim-Stiehl, Ruth/Rosenbach, Manfred (edd.): Beiträge zur altitalischen Geistesgeschichte. Festschrift Gerhard Radke zum 18. Februar 1984 (München), 5-14.

– (1988): “Il canone elegiaco latino”, in Filologia e forme letterarie. Studi offerti a Francesco Della Corte (Urbino), III, 125-30.

– /Schmid, Wolfgang (1959): “Elegie”, RAC 4, 1026-61.

Alfonso, Stefania (1990a): “Cinzia, gli occhi, la cattura del poeta. Properzio 1, 1 e la svolta d’amore”, Aufidus 10, 19-51.

– (1990b): “Rapito in estasi”, in Alfonso/Cipriani [et al.] 1990, 1-37.

– /Cipriani, Giovanni/Fedeli, Paolo/Mazzini, Innocenzo/Tedeschi, Antonella (1990): Il poeta elegiaco e il viaggio d’amore. Dall’innamorato alla crisi. Scrinia 3 (Bari) [L. Deschamps, REA 93, 1991, 166-8; G. Garbarino, CCC 12, 1991, 109; V. Viparelli, BStudLat 21, 1991, 338-42; P.-J. Dehon, AC 61, 1992, 376-7; G. Eichberg, GIF 44, 1992, 140-1; J. Fabre-Serris, REL 70, 1992, 309; D. Gagliardi, Orpheus 13, 1992, 410-13; H. Bardon, Latomus 52, 1993, 167-8; G. Laguna Mariscal, Emérita 61, 1993, 390-2; F.-H. Mutschler, Gnomon 67, 1995, 262-4].

Allen, Archibald (1975): “Unus Ahoy”, Glotta 53, 123-4.

– (1985a): “On Coan Silks and Cognisance (Prop. 2.1.5)”, Hermes 113, 381-2.

– (1985b): “Propertius, ‘Founts Divine’”, Phoenix 39, 271-2.

– (1989a): “Epistolary Woes in Propertius”, Hermes 117, 479-84.

– (1989b): “Propertius’ ‘Paternal Ashes’”, CQ 39, 264-5.

– (1992a): “Armed Camps in Propertius”, RhM 135, 95-6.

– (1992b): “Propertius, I 16, 37-38”, Emérita 60, 151-2.

– (1992c): “Propertius 2.7 on Love and Marriage”, AJPh 113, 69-70.

– (1995): “Propertius inter libellos … (3, 9, 43f.)”, Hermes 123, 377-9.

– (1996): “Propertius and ‘Coan Philitas’”, CQ 46, 308-9.

Allen, Archibald W. (1950a): “Elegy and the Classical Attitude Toward Love: Propertius 1, 1”, YCS 11, 255-77.

– (1950b): “‘Sincerity’ and the Roman Elegists”, CPh 45, 145-60.

– (1962): “Sunt qui Propertium malint”, in Sullivan, John Patrick (ed.): Critical Essays on Roman Literature: Elegy and Lyric (London), 107-48.

Allen, Peter L. (1984): Love Oft Expressed: Conventions and Irony in Ovid’s Amores, Aucassin and Nicolette, and Chaucer’s Legend of Good Women (diss., The University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill.) [DA 45, 1985, 2516A-2517A].

Allison, June W. (1980a): “Propertius 4.7.94”, AJPh 101, 170-3.

– (1980b): “Virgilian Themes in Propertius 4.7 and 8”, CPh 75, 332-8.

– (1984): “The Cast of Characters in Propertius 4.7”, CW 77, 355-58.

Almirall Sardà, Jaume (1995): “Amor i navegació. Transsumptes de la poesía en els Amores d’Ovidi”, Faventia 17, 39-48.

Álvarez Hernández, Arturo (1992): “Los Amores de Galo en la Arcadia de Virgilio”, AFC 12, 5-22.

– (1995): “Horacio, la elegía, los elegíacos”, Euphrosyne 23, 43-62.

– (1997): La poética de Propercio. Autobiografía artística del ‘Calimaco romano‘. Accademia properziana del Subasio (Assisi) [F. Cairns, RPL 20, 1997, 233-4.; R. Dimundo, Aufidus 32, 1997, 160-2; C. Novielli, BStudLat 29, 1999, 237-43; S. Raimondi, Faventia 21, 1999, 164-7; D. Ottria, Maia 52, 2000, 203-6; E. Zaina, CR 50, 2000, 296-7; J. Gómez Pallarès, Faventia 23, 2001, 161-2; G. Laguna, Emérita 69, 2001, 176-8].

– (2000): “La tecnica compositiva di Properzio,” in Catanzaro/Santucci 2000, 109-131.

– (1998): “Properzio e Quevedo,” in Catanzaro/Santucci 1998, 79-104.

– (2005): “Properzio e gli archetipi ellenistici del genere elegiaco,” in Santini/Santucci 2005, 3-59.

Amande, Carlotta (1989): “Prop. IV, 3, 47-52: gioco verbale e imitatio alessandrina”, in Mantero, Teresa (ed.): Analysis, II: Varia poetica. Pubbl. del D. AR. FL. CL. ET. NS. 129 (Genova), 139-48.

Amato, Sebastiano (1987): “Cesare o Ottaviano nel nuevo Gallo di Qasr Ibrîm?”, Orpheus 8, 322-36.

Amoruso, Vito (1998): “Pound e Properzio: il passato come ‘maschera’ del presente,” in Catanzaro/Santucci 1998, 39-49.

Ancona, Ronnie/Greene, Ellen: Gendered Dynamics in Latin Love Poetry, Baltimore 2005 [R. Gibson, BMCR 2007.12.40].

Anderson, R. D./Parsons, P. J./Nisbet, R. G. M. (1979): “Elegiacs by Gallus from Qasr Ibrîm”, JRS 69, 125-55.

Anderson, William S. (1964): “Hercules exclusus: Propertius, IV, 9”, AJPh 85, 1-12.

– (1992): “The Limits of Genre: Response to Francis Cairns”, in Galinsky, Karl (ed.): The Interpretation of Roman Poetry: Empiricism or Hermeneutics? Studien zur klassischen Philologie 67 (Frankfurt a. M.), 96-103.

André, Jean-Marie (1965): Albius Tibullus, Elegiarum Liber Primus – Tibulle, Élégies, Livre Premier, éd., introd. et comm. Érasme. Coll. de textes lat. comm. 13 (Paris).

– (1966): L’otium dans la vie morale et intellectuelle romaine des origines à l’époque augustéenne. Publications de la Faculté des Lettres et Sciences Humaines de Paris. Série ‘Recherches’ 30 (Paris).

– (1980): “Les élégiaques romaines et le statut de la femme”, in L’élégie romaine 1980, 51-61.

– (2002): “Politique, dirigisme augustéen et esthétisme chez Properce”, in Defosse, Pol (ed.): Hommages à Carl Deroux. Collection Latomus 266. 267 (Bruxelles), I, 13-28.

Andreini, Carol Jean (1979): The Poetic Personality of Tibullus (diss., University of Minnesota) [DA 90, 1980, 5848A].

Angrisani, Maria Luisa (1974): Properzio tra politica e mitologia. Quaderni della Rivista di Cultura Classica e Medioevale 15 (Roma).

– (1978): “Properzio 4, 9, 70-4 e i miti di Hercules e Semo Sancus”, AMArc 7, 129-60.

Angrisani Sanfilippo, Maria Luisa (1984): “Note di contributo al tema della ‘recusatio’ properziana”, BStudLat 14, 80-2.

Antony, Heinz (1976): Humor in der augusteischen Dichtung: Lachen und Lächeln bei Horaz, Properz, Tibull und Vergil (Hildesheim).

Arcaz Pozo, Juan Luis (1992): Las obras amatorias de Ovidio en los manuscritos de España. Col. Tesis doctorales 38/92 (Madrid).

– (1993a): “La expresión de lo erótico en Tibulo: un comentario a 1.1.44 y 1.9.21-22”, CFC(L) 5, 65-71.

– (1993b): “Los tituli de las elegías de los Amores de Ovidio en el ms. Escorialensis g. III.26”, Habis 24, 125-32.

– (1994): “Hurtado de Mendoza, traductor de Ovidio: Amores I 5 y 8”, in Actas del VIII congreso español de estudios clásicos (Madrid, 23-28 de septiembre de 1991) (Madrid), III, 349-56.

– (1995): “Passer mortuus est! Catulo (carm. 3), Ovidio (am. 3.7) y Maximiano (el. 5.87-104)”, CFC(L) 8, 79-88.

– /Laguna Mariscal, Gabriel/Ramírez de Verger, Antonio (1996; edd.): La obra amatoria di Ovidio: aspectos textuales, interpretación literaria y pervivencia (Madrid) [P. Esposito, BStudLat 27, 1997, 650-3; A. Patacas, Helmantica 48, 147, 1997, 467-8; S. Viarre, Latomus 57, 1998, 727; B. Zimmermann, MH 55, 1998, 232; A. Sharrock, CR 49, 1999, 60-2.

Arcos Pereira, Trinidad/Cuyás de Torres, María Elisa (1994): “El Scorialensis g-III-12 de Propercio”, in Actas del VIII congreso español de estudios clásicos (Madrid, 23-28 de septiembre de 1991) (Madrid), II, 561-7.

Arena, Antonella (2002): “Per una interpretazione della Nemesi tibulliana”, in Defosse, Pol (ed.): Hommages à Carl Deroux. Collection Latomus 266. 267 (Bruxelles), I, 29-35.

Argetsinger, Kathryn (1992): “Birthday Rituals: Friends and Patrons in Roman Poetry and Cult”, CA 11, 175-93.

Arias Abellán, C. (1985): “El sistema sémico adjetival. Su reflejo en la obra de Tibulo”, in Simposio Tibuliano 1985, 195-204.

Arkins, Brian (1989): “Language in Propertius 4.6”, Philologus 133, 246-51.

– (1990): “The Anxiety of Influence: Ovid’s Amores as kénwsiß”, Latomus 49, 826-32.

– (1994): “Greek Myth in Latin Poetry”, SyllClass 5, 17-28.

Armstrong, Rebecca (2005): Ovid and His Love Poetry, London [N. Holzberg, CR 57, 2007, 99-110].

Arnold, P. J. (1997): “A Note on Propertius 1.10.3: iucunda voluptas”, CQ 47, 597-8.

Assis de Rojo, M. Estela (1998): “La matrona romana: su significación en el programa cultural de Augusto a través de la Elegía IV.11 de Propercio”, Argos 22, 11-25.

Assisi 1986 = Assisi per il bimillenario della morte di Propertio. Atti della Accademia Properziana del Subasio VI^a, 12 (Assisi).

Athanassaki, Lucia (1992): “The Triumph of Love and Elegy in Ovid’s Amores 1, 2”, MD 28, 125-41.

Atti 1959 = Atti del Convegno Internazionale Ovidiano. Sulmona maggio 1958. 2 Bde. (Roma).

Atti 1986 = Atti del Convegno Internazionale di Studi su Albio Tibullo (Roma-Palaestrina, 10-13 maggio 1984) (Roma) [H. F. Bauzà, Emérita 57, 1989, 195-6; P. Hamblenne, LEC 57, 1989, 181-2; P. Pinotti, RFIC 117, 1989, 210-15; P. Tordeur, AC 58, 1989, 323-4; R. Perrelli, Orpheus 12, 1991, 286-8].

Augello, Giuseppe (1973): “La condizione poetica di Tibullo”, BStudLat 3, 316-35.

Auhagen, Ulrike (1999): Der Monolog bei Ovid. ScriptOralia 119. Reihe A: Altertumswissenschaftliche Reihe. 30 (Tübingen) [S. M. Wheeler, CR 50, 2000, 442-3; M. Janka, GFA 4, 2001, 1125-37; B. W. Boyd, JRS 92, 2002, 243-4; J. Wildberger, Gnomon 74, 2002, 179-80].

Avery, William T. (1960a): “The Vita of Tibullus: Authorship and an Emendation”, CPh 55, 24-7.

– (1960b): “The Year of Tibullus’ Death”, CJ 55, 205-9.

– (1961): “Tibullus’ Death Again”, CJ 56, 229-33.

Axelson, Bertil (1960a): “Das Geburtsjahr des Lygdamus. Ein Rätsel der römischen Elegiendichtung”, Eranos 58, 281-97.

– (1960b): “Lygdamus und Ovid. Zur Methodik der literarischen Prioritätsbestimmung”, Eranos 58, 92-111.

Baca, Albert Roy (1965): Delia and Nemesis in the Corpus Tibullianum (diss., University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA) [DA 26, 1965, 3312].

– (1968): “The Role of Delia and Nemesis in the Corpus Tibullianum”, Emérita 36, 49-56.

Badian, E. (1985): “A Phantom Marriage Law”, Philologus 129, 82-98.

– (1988/97): “Which Metellus? A Footnote to Professor Barchiesi's Article”, AJAH (?)106-10.

Baeza, E./J.A. Estévez/A. Ramírez de Verger (2005): “The Amores of Ovid in the Fragmentum Trevirense,” Exemplaria Classica 9 75-84.

Baeza Angulo, Eulogio F. (1989): “Ovidio, Amores III, 7”, Faventia 11, 25-58.

Baker, Robert J. (1968): “Miles annosus: The Military Motif in Propertius”, Latomus 27, 322-49.

– (1970): “Laus in amore mori: Love and Death in Propertius”, Latomus 29, 670-98.

– (1973a): “Duplices tabellae: Propertius 3.23 and Ovid Amores 1.12”, CPh 68, 109-13.

– (1973b): “A Literary Burnt Offering (Propertius 4, 7, 77-78)”, CPh 68, 286-9.

– (1983): “Caesaris in nomen (Propertius IV, vi)”, RhM 126, 153-74.

– (1990): Propertius I: Translated with Introduction, Literary Commentary and Latin Text. University of New England. Teaching Monograph Series 8 (Armindale, Australia; reprint Warminster 2000) [B. Heiden, CW 85, 1991/2, 260-1; G. Lieberg, Gnomon 64, 1992, 673-6; B. Gold, CO 70, 1992/3, 75-6; D. F. Kennedy, CR 44, 1994, 208; J. H. Brouwers, Mnemosyne 48, 1995, 251-4].

Bàligan, Giuseppe (1967): “Il natalis di Ligdamo”, Vichiana 9, 84-6.

Baldo, Gianluigi (2005): “Pathos ed elegia nelle Metamorfosi di Ovidio,” in Santini/Santucci 2005, 325-358.

Ball, Robert Jerome (1971): The Structure of Tibullus’s Elegies (diss., Columbia University, New York) [DA 32, 1971, 1490A]

– (1975a): “Recent Work on Tibullus (1970-1974)”, Eranos 73, 62-8.

– (1975b): “The Structure of Tibullus 1.7”, Latomus 34, 729-44.

– (1975c): “Tibullus 2.5 and Vergil’s Aeneid”, Vergilius 21, 33-50.

– (1976): “Dramatic Unity in Tibullus: A Tribute to Propertius”, Emérita 44, 189-95.

– (1977/8): “Tibullus’s Structural Strategy: The Internal Design”, Maia 29/30, 113-17.

– (1979): “Tibullus’ Structural Strategy: The External Ordering”, Prudentia 11, 1-6.

– (1981): “The Politics of Tibullus: Augustus, Messalla, and Macer”, GB 10, 135-42.

– (1983): Tibullus the Elegist: A Critical Survey. Hypomnemata 77. (Göttingen) [J. Filée, LEC 52, 1984, 373; P. Murgatroyd, EMC 29, 1985, 490-1; P. Tordeur, AC 54, 1985, 382-3; L. Duret, REL 64, 1986, 279-82; F. Cairns, CR 37, 1987, 180-2; A. Thill, Latomus 46, 1987, 900-1; D. P. Harmon, CJ 83, 1988, 337-8].

– (1989): “Recent Structural Studies on Tibullus”, AugAge 9, 1-15.

– (1993/4): “Albi, ne doleas: Horace and Tibullus”, CW 87, 409-14.

– (2002): “Legitur Tibullus et placet”, in Defosse, Pol (ed.): Hommages à Carl Deroux. Collection Latomus 266. 267 (Bruxelles), I, 48-53.

Ballaira, Guglielmo (1987): “Per l’autenticità del papiro di C. Cornelio Gallo di Qasr Ibrîm”, Paideia 42, 47-54.

Ballester, Xaverio (1989): “Galo: los inicios literarios”, CFC 23, 117-24.

Barbaud, Thierry (2001): “La figure appelée prosopopée chez les élégiaques latins: de la poétique à la poésie”, REL 79, 126-39.

– (2002): “La sententia amoureuse chez les Élégiaques romains et notamment chez Properce”, BAGB, 94-118.

Barber, E. A. (1953; ed.): Sexti Properti Carmina. Scriptorum Classicorum Bibliotheca Oxoniensis (Oxford; ²1960).

Barbieri, Aroldo (1979): “Tibullo I, 10, 11-13”, in Studi di poesia latina in onore di Antonio Traglia. Storia e letteratura. Raccolta di studi e testi 146 & 147 (Roma), 593-600.

Barchiesi, Alessandro (1981): “Notizie sul ‘nuovo Gallo’”, A&R n. s. 26, 153-66.

– (1988 [1997]): “Ovid the Censor”, AJAH 13, 96-105 [101-3: “Appendix: On the ‘Two Editions of Ovid’s Amores and the Implications of the Introductory Epigram”] = id. (2001): Speaking Volumes: Narrative and Intertext in Ovid and Other Latin Poets. Edited and Translated by Matt Fox and Simone Marchesi (London), 155-162.

– (1989): “Voci e istanze narrative nelle Metamorfosi di Ovidio”, MD 23, 55-97 = “Voices and Narrative ‘Instances’ in Ovid’s Metamorphoses”, in id. (2001): Speaking Volumes: Narrative and Intertext in Ovid and Other Latin Poets. Edited and Translated by Matt Fox and Simone Marchesi (London), 49-78 = Knox, Peter E.: Oxford Readings in Ovid (Oxford, 2006), 274-319.

Bardon, Henri (1956): La litterature latine inconnue, II, Paris [19-22: Valgius Rufus]

Barrett, Ralph Conrad (1974): Tibullus I: Theme and Technique: di tibi divitias dederunt (diss., University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA) [DA 34, 1979, 6611A].

Barsby, John A. (1973): Ovid’s Amores, Book One (Oxford; reprint Bristol, 1979).

– (1974): The Composition and Publication of the First Three Books of Propertius, G&R 21, 128-37.

– (1975a): “Desultor amoris in Amores 1.3”, CPh 70, 44-5.

– (1975b): “Propertius III 20”, Mnemosyne 28, 30-9.

– (1978): Ovid. Greece & Rome: New Surveys in the Classics 12 (Oxford).

– (1996): “Ovid’s Amores and Roman Comedy”, PLLS 9, 135-57.

Bassi, Karen (1994): “Amor and mors in Tibullus 1.1”, SyllClass 5, 53-61.

Batstone, William W. (1992): “Amor improbus, felix qui, and tardus Apollo: the Monobiblos and the Georgics”, CPh 87, 287-302.

– (2000): “Sulpicia and the Speech of Men” (Vortrag www.wbatstone.com/sulpicia.htm)

Bausenhart, Matthias (1989): “‘ ... castas odisse puellas’: Bemerkungen zu Properz I 1”, in Schola Anatolica. Freundesgabe für Hermann Steinthal, herausgegeben von Kollegium und Verein der Freunde des Uhland-Gymnasiums Tübingen (Tübingen), 373-89.

Bauzá del Conicet, Hugo Francisco (1986a): “Caracteristicas de la elegía latina”, AFC 11, 5-23.

– (1986b): “Properzio y la Arcadia”, in Bimillenario 1986, 319-23.

Beaujeu, Jean (1969): “Étude d’un texte latin: Properce IV, 4,” IL 21, 180-6.

– (1974) : “Le frère de Quirinus (à propos de Virgile, Enéide 1, 292 et de Properce 4, 1, 9)”, in Mélanges de philosophie, de littérature et d’histoire ancienne offerts à Pierre Boyance (Roma), 57-72.

Beck, Markus (2000): “Properzens Elegie 2, 7 und die augusteische Gesetzgebung”, Philologus 144, 303-24.

Becker, Carl (1966): “Horos redselig? (Zu Properz IV 1)”, WS 79, 442-51.

– (1971): “Die späten Elegien des Properz”, Hermes 99, 449-80.

Bejarano, Virgilio (1990): “Propercio en Carisio”, AFB 13, 25-32.

Belfiore, Maria T. (1960): “Propertiana”, Emérita 28, 309-15.

– (1963): “El texto del Propercio y los manuscritos Salmantinos”, Emérita 31, 1-10.

Bellido, José A. (198/9): “El motivo litterario de la militia amoris en Plauto y su influencia en Ovidio”, EClás 37, 27-32.

Beltrami, Lucia (1989): “Properzio 4, 4: la colpa della Vestale”, in Catanzaro/Santucci 1989, 267-72.

Beltrán, M. T./Sánchez-Lafuente, A. (1985): “Sobre conjeturas al texto de Tibulo”, in Simposio Tibuliano 1985, 205-16.

Benediktson, D. Thomas (1985a): “Pictorial Art and Ovid’s Amores”, QUCC 49 n. s. 20.2, 111-20.

– (1985b): “Propertius’ ‘Elegiacization’ of Homer”, Maia 37, 17-26.

– (1989): Propertius: Modernist Poet of Antiquity (Carbondale/Edwardsville) [J. Butrica, CR 40, 1990, 266-8; W. Nethercut, CW 84, 1990/1, 240-1; F.-H. Mutschler, Gnomon 63, 1991, 461-3; J. Warden, Phoenix 45, 1991, 269-73; O. Devillers, LEC 61, 1993, 172-3].

Bénéjam, M. J. (1980): “L’âge d’or de Tibulle”, in L’élégie romaine 1980, 91-103.

Bennett, Alva Walter (1965): Form in Propertius (diss., University of California, Berkeley, CA) [DA 26, 1966, 3932f.].

– (1967): Sententia and Catalogue in Propertius (3,9,1-20), Hermes 95, 222-243.

– (1968): The Patron and Poetical Inspiration: Propertius 3, 9, Hermes 96, 318-340.

Benzer, G. (1976): Einige Ansätze strukturalistischen Interpretierens in der klassischen Philologie. Mit Beiträgen zu Vergil, ecl. VII; Horaz, iamb. II und c. I, 9; Tibull I, 6 (diss., Innsbruck).

Berman, Kathleen E. (1969): Propertian Imitations in Ovid’s Amores (diss., Yale University, New Haven, Conn.) [als Buch: K. Morgan 1977].

– (1972): “Some Propertian Imitations in Ovid’s Amores”, CPh 67, 170-7.

– (1975): “Ovid, Propertius and the Elegiac Genre: Some Imitations”, RSC 23, 14-22.

Bermejo Jiménez, C. (1985): “El silencio en Tibulo”, in Simposio Tibuliano 1985, 217-25.

Bernays, Ludwig (1998): “Ein Textproblem in Ovids Elegie Am. 2, 18”, Mnemosyne 51, 590-4 = [erweitert] “Textprobleme in Ovids Elegie am. 2.18”, in Bernays 2000a, 173-80.

– (2000a): Ars poetica. Studien zu formalen Aspekten der antiken Dichtung. Prismata. Beiträge zur Altertumswissenschaft 9 (Bern, etc.).

– (2000b): “Ein Textproblem in Ovids Elegie Am. 1.15”, Mnemosyne 53, 713-18.

– (2000c): “Ein umstrittener Vers bei Properz”, in Bernays 2000a, 165-72.

– (2000d): “Strukturen des Hemiepes in Ovids Elegien”, in Bernays 2000a, 181-92.

– (2000e): “Strukturtypen des Pentameters bei Properz”, in Bernays 2000a, 147-57.

– (2000f): “Zur Gliederung der Elegie 1.3 des Properz”, in Bernays 2000a, 159-64.

– (2002a): “Bemerkungen zur Elegie 4.6 des Properz”, Mnemosyne 55, 593-8.

– (2002b): “Bemerkungen zu Tib. 1.4.43f.”, Mnemosyne 55, 345.

– (2002c): “Textprobleme in Ovids Elegie Am. 1.13”, Mnemosyne 55, 97-104.

– (2004): “Zur Elegie Tib. 3.9 und zur Problematik der Sulpicia-Gedichte”, Mnemosyne 57, 209-14.

Bernsdorff, Hans (2000): Kunstwerke und Verwandlungen. Vier Studien zu ihrer Darstellung im Werk Ovids. Studien zur klassischen Philologie 117 (Frankfurt a. M., etc.) [N. Holzberg, CR 51, 2001, 402].

Berthet, Jean-François (s. d., aber nach 1985): “La femme dans l’élégie latine”, in La femme dans l’antiquité: Actes du Colloque de la M. A. F. P. E. N., 12 et 13 mars 1985. Publ. de la M. A. F. P. E. N. et de l’Université de Dijon (Dijon), 57-65.

– (1987): “Encore Properce et Homere”, BFLM 75, 55-62.

– (1991): “L’Etrusca disciplina dans les élégies de Properce, Tibulle et Lygdamus”, in Guittard, Charles/Briquel, Dominique (edd.): Les écrivains du siècle d’Auguste et l’Etrusca disciplina. Caesarodunum Suppl. 61; La divination dans le monde étrusco-italique 4 (Tours), 89-99.

Bertini, Ferruccio (1976): “La Ringkomposition negli Amores ovidiani e l’autenticità dell’ elegia III 5”, RCCM 18, 151-60.

– (1984): “Ovidio, o dell’ambiguità”, Vichiana 73, 3-4.

– (1995a): “Gli Amores di Ovidio tra filologia e letteratura”, Aevum(ant) 8, 199-216.

– (1995b): “Amores III 5 e l’elegia pseudo-ovidiana De sompnio”, in Gallo, Italo/Nicastri, Luciano (edd.): Aetates Ovidianae. Lettori di Ovidio dall’antichità al rinascimento (Napoli), 223-37.

Bertman, Steven (1978): “Duality in Ovid, Amores 1.5”, LCM 3, 227-9.

– (2005): Erotic Love Poems of Greece & Rome, New York 2005 [R. Rees, BMCR 2005.06.14].

Bertoli, Enea (1972/3): “Mistica e soteriologia in Tibullo”, AAPat n. s. 85, 323-62 = [revidiert] id.: La civiltà impossibile. Due studi di letteratura latina Sic vos non vobis. Collana di Studi Greci et Latini 3 (Bologna, 1977), 13-80.

– (1991): L’elegia 1.3 di Tibullo (Padova).

Bettenworth, Anja (2002): “Ross oder Reiter? Zu Prop. 4, 10, 19”, Hermes 130, 122-6.

Bianchi, Rossella (1986): “Tibullo. Manoscritti e libri a stampa (Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, maggio-ottobre 1984). Catalogo della mostra”, in Atti 1986, 381-415.

Bickel, Ernst (1960): “Die Lygdamuselegien. ‘Lygdamus’ appellativisch ‘servus amoris’. Messalla Messalinus als Verfasser der Elegien”, RhM 103, 97-109.

Bilinski, Bronislaw (1986): “Riflessi dell’antropologia culturale nelle poesie di Tibullo”, in Atti 1986, 167-95.

Bimillenario 1986 = Bimillenario della morte di Properzio. Atti del Convegno Internazionale di studi properziani, Roma-Assisi, 27-26 maggio 1985 (Assisi) [M. Bettini, MD 18, 1987, 149-63; F. Corsaro, Orpheus 10, 1989, 484-9].

Binaghi, Jorce (1996): “El ‘nuevo’ Cornelio Galo: Alejandrinismo y ‘originalidad romana’ en la elegía latina”, AFC 14, 52-7.

Binder, Gerhard (1967): “Compitalia und Parilia: Properz 4, 1, 17-20”, MH 24, 104-15.

– (1995): “Herrschaftskritik bei römischen Autoren. Beispiele eines seltenen Phänomens”, in id./Effe, Bernd (edd.): Affirmation und Kritik. Zur politischen Funktion von Kunst und Literatur im Altertum. BAC Bochumer Altertumswissenschaftliches Colloquium 20 (Trier), 125-64.

– /Hamm, Ulrich (1998): “Die ‘Locke der Berenike’ und der Ursprung der römischen Liebeselegie”, in Radke, Anna Elissa (ed.): Candide Iudex. Beiträge zur augusteischen Dichtung. Festschrift für Walter Wimmel zum 75. Geburtstag (Stuttgart), 15-34.

Bing, Peter/Cohen, Rip (1991; edd.): Games of Venus: an Anthology of Greek and Roman Erotic Verse from Sappho to Ovid. Introduced, Translated and Annotated (London/New York) [J. Clauss, BMCRev 03.02.05, 1992].

Birt, Theodor (1922): Die Cynthia des Properz (Leipzig); S. 101-104 = Eisenhut 1975, 41-53.

Blänsdorf, Jürgen (1987): “Der Gallus-Papyrus – eine Fälschung?”, ZPE 67, 43-50.

Bobrowski, Antoni (1991): “The Propemptikon in the Augustan Poetry (Hor. Od. III 27; Prop. I 8; Ovid. Am. II 11): a Comparative Study”, Eos 79, 203-15.

– (1993): “Mythology and Composition in Tibullus 2, 3 and Propertius 2, 8”, ClassWrat 17, 119-24.

– (1994): “Propertius 2.8 and 2.9 as Counterparts”, SO 69, 108-20.

Boeft, Jan den (1980): “Vota cadunt (Tibullus II 2, 17)”, Mnemosyne 33, 329-34.

– (1985): “Tenerorum lusor amorum”, Lampas 18, 229-51.

Bömer, Franz (1965): “Der Geburtsort des C. Cornelius Gallus“, Gymnasium 72, 8f.

– (1974): “Der Kampf der Stiere. Interpretationen zu einem poetischen Gleichnis bei Ovid (am. II 12, 25f, met. IX 46ff.) und zur Frage der ‘Erlebnisdichtung’ der augusteischen Zeit”, Gymnasium 87, 503-13.

Boldrer, Francesca (1998): “Un problema in Prop. 4, 2, 19: noces o vaces?”, in Quaderni 1998, Università degli Studi di Torino. Pubblicazioni del Dipartimento di filologia, linguistica et tradizione classica 11 (Bologna), 131-6.

– (1999): L’elegia di Vertumno (Properzio 4.2). Introduzione, testo critico, traduzione e commentario. Supplementi di Lexis 4 (Amsterdam) [F. Cupaiuolo, 29, 1999, 648-50; E. Delbey, REL 77, 1999, 344-5; C. Walde, MH 57, 2000, 292; W. Lapini, Prometheus 27, 2001, 284-7; C. Mastoiacovo, GIF 53, 2001, 335-8; A. M. Morelli, Eikasmos 12, 2001, 471-7; F. Muecke, CR 53, 363-4].

– (2001): “Il mito di Vertumno tra Properzio e Ovidio”, ARF 3, 2001, 87-111.

– (2003): “Il callimachismo di Properzio nelle elegie romane: analisi di 4, 1” in Belloni, Luigi/De Finis, Lia/Moretti, Gabriella (edd.): L’officina ellenistica. Poesia dotta e popolare in Grecia e a Roma. Labirinti 69 (Trento), 399-423.

Bollo Testa, Cristina (1981): “Funzione e significato del mito in Properzio. Interpretazione di dati statistici”, QUCC 37, n. s. 8, 135-54.

Bollók, János (1998): “Wann wurde Troja neugegründet? Die Bedeutung der astrologischen Formelsprache des Properz IV 1”, AAntHung 38, 11-25.

Bonanno, Maria Grazia (1990): L’allusione necessaria. Ricerche intertestuali sulla poesia greca e latina. Filologia e critica 63 (Roma).

Bonjour, Madeleine (1975): Terre natale: Études sur une composante affective du patriotisme romain. Collection d’Études Anciennes (Paris).

Bonvicini, Mariella (1995): “Il faselo catulliano da Properzio a Marziale”, BStudLat 25, 16-21.

Booth, Joan (1981): “Aspects of Ovid’s Language”, ANRW II 31.4, 2686-700.

– (1982): “Two Notes on the Text of Ovid’s Amores”, CQ 32, 156-8.

– (1983): “Double-Entendres in Ovid, Amores 2.2”, LCM 8, 101-2.

– (1991): Ovid: The Second Book of Amores. Edited with Translation and Commentary (Warminster; ²2000) [D. Fowler, G&R 39, 1992, 231-2; J. Fabre-Serris, REL 71, 1993, 275; A. M. Keith, BMCRev 4, 1993, 238-42; A. Sharrock, CR 43, 1993, 50-1 ; P. Pinotti, RFIC 121, 1993, 89-91; S. Viarre, AC 62, 1993, 323; A. Barchiesi, Gnomon 66, 1994, 588-92; J. Yardley, EMC 38, 1994, 91-3].

– (1992): “Ovid Amores 2.13.17-18: quae Oedipum requirant interpretem”, CPh 87, 241-6.

– (1995): Latin Love Elegy: a Companion to Translations of G. Lee. With Introduction and Commentary (London; ²1999: revised edition unter dem Titel Catullus to Ovid: Reading Latin Love Elegy: A Literary Commentary with Latin Text) [M. Johnson, Classicum 21, 1995, 38-40; J. Barsby, Prudentia 28, 1996, 48-50; R. Maltby, CR 48, 1998, 493-4; B. W. Boyd, Mouseion 46, n. s. 2, 2002, 388-92].

– (1996): “Tibullus 1.8 and 9: a Tale in Two Poems?”, MH 53, 232-47.

– (2001a): “Moonshine: Intertextual Illumination in Propertius 1.3.31-3 and Philodemus, Anth. Pal. 5.123”, CQ 51, 537-44.

– (2001b): “Nostra Venus, vacuus amor and the Ending of Propertius 1.1: Double Trouble?”, Mnemosyne 54, 339-45.

– (2001c): “Problems and Programmatics in Propertius 1.1”, Hermes 129, 63-74.

– (2006): “Naming Names – or not: Some Significant Choices and Suppressions in Latin Poetry,” in id./Robert Maltby (edd.): What’s in a Name? The Significance of Proper Names in Classical Latin Literature, Swansea, 49-64.

– /Verity, A. C. F. (1978): “Critical Appreciations, IV: Ovid Amores 2.10”, G&R 25, 125-40.

Booth, N. B. (1987): “Propertius 4.1.8”, CQ 37, 528-9.

Bortone Poli, Adriana (1981): Tibulliana (Lecce) [G. Martorana, Orpheus 3, 1982, 418-9; G. Senis, Maia 34, 1982, 198-9].

Boucher, Jean-Paul (1964): “Properce et Callimaque”, REL 42, 273-6.

– (1965): Études sur Properce: Problèmes d’inspiration et d’art. Bibliotheque des Écoles françaises d’Athenes et de Rome 204 (Paris; ²1980) [G. B. Townend, CR 16, 1966, 327-9; D. Henry, CPh 63, 1968, 77-82].

– (1966): Caius Cornélius Gallus (Paris).

– (1974): “Place et rôle de la religion dans les Élégies de Properce”, in Mélanges de philosophie, de litterature et d’histoire ancienne offerts à Pierre Boyance (Rome), 79-102.

– (1976): “À propos de Cérinthus et de quelques autres pseudonymes dans la poésie augustéenne”, Latomus 35, 504-19.

– (1985): “L’Orient vu à travers un élégiaque latin. Le témoignage de Properce”, in Huot, J. L./You, M./Calvet, Y. (edd.), De L’Indus aux Balkans. Recueil à la mémoire de Jean Deshayes (Paris) 79-85.

– (1987): “L’élégie III, 19 de Properce et la Ciris”, BFLM 15, 71-7.

Bouquet, Jean (1996): “La nuit, le sommeil et le songe chez les élégiaques latins”, REL 74, 182-211 [L. Marchal, LEC 70, 2002, 414-15].

Bowditch, Lowell (2003): “Propertius 2.10 and the Eros of Empire”, in Thibodeau, Philip/Haskell, Harry (edd.): Being There Together: Essays in Honor of Michael C. J. Putnam on the Occasion of His Seventieth Birthday (Minnesota), 163-80.

Bowie, Ewen L. (1985): “Theocritus’ Seventh Idyll, Philetas and Longus”, CQ 35, 67-91.

– (1986): “Early Greek Elegy, Symposium and Public Festival”, Journal of Hellenic Studies 106 (1986), 13-35.

– /Friedrich Spoth (1997): „Elegie“, in: Der Neue Pauly 3, 969-976.

Boyd, Barbara Weiden (1984a): “Cydonea mala”, HSPh 87, 169-74.

– (1984b): “Parva seges satis est: The Landscape of Tibullan Elegy in 1.1 and 1.10”, TAPhA 114, 273-80.

– (1984c): “Tarpeia’s Tomb: A Note on Propertius 4.4”, AJPh 105, 85-6.

– (1987a): “The Death of Corinna’s Parrot Reconsidered: Poetry and Ovid’s Amores”, CJ 82, 199-207 = Knox, Peter E.: Oxford Readings in Ovid (Oxford, 2006), 205-216.

– (1987b): “Propertius on the Banks of the Eurotas (a Note on 3.14.17-20)”, CQ 37, 527-8.

– (1997): Ovid’s Literary Loves: Influence and Innovation in the Amores (Ann Arbor) [P. Murgatroyd, Phoenix 51, 1997, 413-14; S. L. James, BMCRev 98.5.9 ; A. M. Keith, Vergilius 44, 1998, 140-51; M. Gale, G&R 49, 1999, 86; B. R. Nagle, AJPh 120, 1999, 468-71; N. Holzberg, CR 49, 1999, 59-60].

– (2002a): “The Amores: the Invention of Ovid”, in Boyd 2002b, 91-116.

– (2002b; ed.): Brill’s Companion to Ovid (Leiden/Boston/Köln) [M. S. Cummings, Mouseion 47, n. s. 3, 2003, 57-73; S. Green, CR 53, 2003, 365-7; N. Holzberg, JRS 93, 2003, 374-6; S. H. Lindheim, Vergilius 49, 2003, 135-51].

Boyle, A. J. (2003): Ovid and the Monuments: a Poet’s Rome. Ramus Monographs 4 (Victoria).

Braccesi, Lorenzo (1978): “Critica letteraria ed epigrafica latina”, Paideia 33, 3-6.

Bradley, James R. (1995): “Auxilia magistris: The Elegies of Sulpicia: An Introduction and Commentary”, New England Classical Newsletter Journal 22, 159-64. .

Bramble, John C. (1973): “Critical Appreciation I: Propertius iii. 10”, G&R 20, 155-61.

– (1974): “Cui non dictus Hylas puer? Propertius 1.20”, in Woodman, Tony/West, David (edd.), Quality and Pleasure in Latin Poetry (Cambridge), 81-93.

Brandt, Paul (1911): P. Ovidi Nasonis Amorum libri tres (Leipzig; reprint Hildesheim, 1991).

Braun, Richard Emil (1969): Docta puella fuit: Resentment and Reprisal in Propertius (diss., University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX).

Braund, Susanna Morton/Roland Mayer (1999; Hgg.): Amor: Roma. Love and Latin Literature, Cambridge [P. Murgatroyd, BMCRev 1999.08.12].

Brazouski, Antoinette (1979): The Augustan Attitudes of the Poetic persona of Tibullus (diss., Loyola University, Chicaco, Ill.) [DA 40, 1979, 2044A].

– (1985): “Tibullus 2.3 and the Homeric Concept of Nemesis”, CB 61, 52-4.

– (1987): “Some Observations on Tibullus 1.10.33-38”, CB 63, 37-9.

– (1990): “Lovers in Elysium”, CB 66, 35-6.

– (1998): “Indicium in the Works of Ovid”, SyllClass 9, 86-94.

Breed, Brian W. (2003/4): “Portrait of a Lady: Propertius 1.3 and Ecphrasis”, CJ 99, 35-56.

Breen, Carolyn Clark (1998): Tibullus Illustrated: Lares, Genius and Sacred Landscapes (diss., Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD) [DA 59, 1998/9, 158A].

Bréguet, Esther (1946): Le roman de Sulpicia. Élégies IV, 2-12 du ‘Corpus Tibullianum’, (Genève; reprint Roma 1972).

– (1948): “Les Élégies de Gallus d’après la X^e Bucolique de Virgile”, REL 26, 204-14.

– (1960): “In una parce duobus: thèmes et clichès”, in Hommages à Léon Herrmann, Collection Latomus 44 (Bruxelles), 202-14.

– (1962): “Le thème ‘alius … ego’ chez les poètes latins”, REL 40, 128-36.

– (1980): “L’élégie 1, 4 de Tibulle”, in L’élégie romaine 1980, 65-71.

Bremmer, Jan N. (1993): “Tibullus’ Colonus and His ‘Ambarvalia’”, In Sancisi-Weerdenburg, Heleen [et al.] (edd.): De Agricultura. In Memoriam Pieter Willem de Neeve (Amsterdam), 177-81.

Brenk, Frederick E. (1979): “Tarpeia Among the Celts: Watery Romance, from Simylos to Propertius”, in Deroux, Carl (ed.), Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History I Collection Latomus 164 (Bruxelles), 166-74.

Bretzigheimer, Gerlinde (2001a): “Die Geliebte in Ovids Amores”, in Neukam, Peter (ed.): Tradition und Zukunft. Dialog Schule – Wissenschaft. Klassische Sprachen und Literaturen 35, 44-66.

– (2001b): Ovids Amores. Poetik in der Erotik. Classica Monacensia 22 (Tübingen) [E. J. Kenney, BMCRev 2001.10.39; S. Wheeler, JRS 92, 2002, 244-5; M. Janka, Gymnasium 110, 2003, 591-4].

Bright, David F. (1971): “A Tibullan Odyssey”, Arethusa 4, 197-214.

– (1975): “The Art and Structure of Tibullus I.7”, GB 3, 31-46.

– (1978): Haec mihi fingebam: Tibullus in His World. Cincinnati Classical Studies n. s. 3 (Leiden) [T. Woodman, G&R 26, 1979, 200; R. J. Ball, Gnomon 52, 1980, 324-30; R. O. A. M. Lyne, CR 30, 1980, 20-2; N. Rudd, JRS 70, 1980, 243-4; G. K. Galinsky, CPh 70, 1981, 72-4; J. H. Brouwers, Mnemosyne 35, 1982, 408-10; Di Mattia, Orpheus 3, 1982, 416-18].

– (1984): “The Role of Odysseus in the Panegyricus Messallae”, QUCC 46 n. s. 17.2, 143-54.

Brisson, Jean-Paul (1992): Rome et l’âge d’or de Catulle à Ovide: vie et mort d’un mythe. Coll. Textes à l’appui (Paris).

– (1994): “Tibulle et l’âge d’or: un contrepoint à trois voix”, in Thomas, Joël (ed.): L’imaginaire religieux gréco-romain. Coll. Études Perpignan (Perpignan), 139-50.

Brodersen, Kai (ed.): Liebesleiden in der Antike : Die „Erotika Pathemata“ des Parthenios [J.L. Lightfoot, BMCRev 01.05.13]

Brouwers, Johannes Hubertus (1967): Horatius en Propertius over epiek en lyriek (diss., Universiteit Nijmegen) [H. Juhnke, Gnomon 41, 1969, 662-666].

– (1978): “Ferreus ille fuit. Sens et structure de Tibulle 1, 2, 67-80, Mnemosyne 31, 389-406.

– (1985): “Propertius, El. 3, 4: triomflied en recusatio-gedicht”, Lampas 18, 203-13.

– (1995): “Propertius’ Elegie 3.3 als excusatio-gedicht”, Lampas 28, 159-75.

Brozek, Mieczyslaw (1982-84 [1987]): “De Ovidi Amoribus retractatis”, AAntHung 30, 303-8.

Brugnoli, Giorgio (1969): “Persio e Properzio”, RCCM 11, 190-202.

– (1983): “Corneli Galli Fragm.”, MCr 18, 233-6.

– (1986): “Ceraunia saxa, in Bimillenario 1986, 339-47.

– (1988): “Verg. Aen. 6, 871”, GIF 40, 229-30.

– (1994): “Tibullus nitidus agricola”, RCCM 36, 353-7.

Brunhölzl, Franz (1984): “Der sogenannte Galluspapyrus von Kasr Ibrim”, Codices manuscripti 10, 33-7.

Buchan, Mark (1995): “Ovidius Imperamator: Beginnings and Endings of Love Poems and Empire in the Amores”, Arethusa 28, 53-85.

Buchheit, Vinzenz (1965): “Tibull II 5 und die Aeneis”, Philologus 109, 104-20.

– (1986): “Ovid und seine Muse im Myrtenkranz”, Gymnasium 93, 257-72.

Büchner, Karl (1965): “Die Elegien des Lygdamus”, Hermes 93, 65-112. 503-508 = id.: Werkanalysen. Studien zur römischen Literatur. VIII (Wiesbaden, 1970), 116-77.

– (1967): “Ovids Amores”, in Radke, Gerhard (ed.): Gedenkschrift für Georg Rohde. Aparchai 4 (Tübingen), 57-81 = id.: Werkanalysen. Studien zur römischen Literatur VIII, (Wiesbaden, 1970), 178-99.

– (1976): Die römische Lyrik. Texte, Übersetzungen, Interpretationen, Geschichte (Stuttgart).

Bürger, R. (1905): „Studien zu Lygdamus und den Supiciagedichten,“ Hermes 40, 321-35.

Bulloch, A. W. (1973): “Tibullus and the Alexandrians”, PCPhS 19, 71-89.

Buonocore, Marco (1994): Aetas Ovidiana. La fortuna di Ovidio nei codici della Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana (Sulmona) [P. Parboni, RFIC 123, 1995, 210].

– (1995a): “I codici di Ovidio presso la Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana”, RCCM 37, 1995, 7-55.

– (1995b): “Excerpta di Properzio alla Biblioteca Vaticana”, BStudLat 25, 59-65.

– (1995c): Properzio nei codici della Biblioteca apostolica Vaticana. Premessa di Paolo Fedeli (Assisi) [G. B. Conte, S&C 20, 1996, 413-16; F.-L. Schiavetto, Sandalion 19, 1996, 177-8].

Burck, Erich (1932): “Das Paraklausithyron. Die Entwicklungsgeschichte eines Motivs der antiken Liebesdichtung“, Humanistisches Gymnasium 43, 186-200 = Burck 1966a, 244-56.

– (1952): “Römische Wesenszüge der augusteischen Liebeselegie”, Hermes 80, 163-200 = Burck 1966a,, 192-221.

– (1959): “Abschied von der Liebesdichtung (Properz 3, 24 und 25)”, Hermes 87, 191-211 = Burck 1966a, 257-74.

– (1961): Römische Liebesdichtung. Veröffentlichungen der Schleswig-Holsteinischen Universitätsgesellschaft N. F. 29 (Kiel) = Burck 1966a, 222-37.

– (1966a): Vom Menschenbild in der römischen Literatur (Heidelberg, 1966).

– (1966b): “Zur Komposition des vierten Buches des Properz”, WS 79, 405-27 = Burck 1981, 389-406.

– (1970): “Sextus Propertius: Elegie II 5. Interpretation”, in Eisenhut, Werner (ed.): Antike Lyrik. Ars interpretandi 2 (Darmstadt), 432-50 = Burck 1981, 373-88.

– (1975): “Die Rolle des Dichters und der Gesellschaft in der augusteischen Dichtung”, A&A 21, 12-35 = Burck 1981, 307-34.

– (1977): “Ovid, Amores 1, 3 im Rahmen der römischen Liebesdichtung”, AU 20.4, 63-81 = Burck 1981, 407-28.

– (1981): Vom Menschenbild in der römischen Literatur II (Heidelberg, 1981),

– (1983): “Liebesbindung und Liebesbefreiung: Die Lebenswahl des Properz in den Elegien 1,6 und 3,21”, in ‘Αρετής μνήμη’. Αφιέρωμα ‘εις μνήμην’ του Κωνσταντίνου Ι. Βουρβέρη. Ελληνική Ανθρωπιστική Εταιρεία. Μέλετες και Έρευνες (Athina), 191-211 = Burck 1981, 349-72.

– (1986): “Mythologisches bei Properz (2,14)”, in Böhr, Elke/Martini, Wolfram (edd.), Studien zur Mythologie und Vasenmalerei. Konrad Schauenburg zum 65. Geburtstag am 16. April 1986 (Mainz), 213-21.

– (1988): “Mutat via longa puellas: Properz 1,8A und 1, 11”, Gymnasium 95, 193-206.

Burrows, Thomas Wilson (1985): Poetic Ambiguity in the Delia Elegies of Albius Tibullus (diss., Northwestern University, Evanston, Ill.) [DA 46, 1985, 970A].

Burzacchini, Gabriele (1992): “Corinna in Roma (Prop. II 3, 21; Stat. Silv. V 3, 158)”, Eikasmos 3, 47-65.

Butler, H. E./Barber, E. A. (1933; edd.): The Elegies of Propertius. Edited with Introduction and Commentary (Oxford; reprint Hildesheim 1964).

Butrica, James L. (1980): “Pontanus, Pocchus, Petreius, and Propertius”, RPL 3, 5-9.

– (1983): “Propertius 3.6”, EMC 27, 17-37.

– (1984): The Manuscript Tradition of Propertius. Phoenix Suppl. 17 (Toronto, Buffalo, London) [Schierling, Manuscripta 28, 1984, 181-2; S. J. Heyworth, CR 36, 1986, 45-8; G. P. Goold, Phoenix 42, 1988, 87-9; J. den Boeft, Mnemosyne 42, 1989, 558-62; P. Fedeli, JRS 79, 1989, 208-9; A. La Penna, Gnomon 61, 1989, 118-26].

– (1993a): “Lygdamus, Nephew of Messalla?”, LCM 78, 51-3.

– (1993b): “Propertius’ Horoscope and a Birthdate Rejected”, CPh 88, 330-1.

– (1993c): “Propertius 3.11.33-38 and the Death of Pompey”, CQ 43, 342-6.

– (1994): “Myth and Meaning in Propertius 3.15”, Phoenix 48, 135-51.

– (1996a) : “The Amores of Propertius: Unity and Structure in Books 2-4”, ICS 21, 87-158.

– (1996b): “Hellenistic Erotic Elegy: The Evidence of the Papyri”, PLLS 9, 297-322.

– (1996c): “Two Two-Part Poems in Propertius Book 1 (1.8; 1.11 and 12)”, PLLS 9, 83-91.

– (1997): “Editing Propertius”, CQ 4, 176-208.

– (1999a): “The Life and Career of Propertius in the Scholarship of the Early Renaissance”, GIF 51, 179-212.

– (1999b): “The Text of the New Vatican Excerpta of Propertius”, BStudLat 29, 63-7.

– (2000a): Propertius and the Myth of theItali,” in Catanzaro/Santucci 2000, 349-388.

– (2000b): “Propertius on the Parilia (4.4.73-8)”, CQ 50, 472-8.

Cahoon, Leslie Gillespie Muller (1981): Ovid and His praecepta amoris (diss., University of California, Berkeley, CA) [DA 42, 1982, 3145A].

– (1983): “Juno’s Chaste Festival and Ovid’s Wanton Loves: Amores 3.13”, CA 2, 1-8.

– (1984): “The Parrot and the Poet: the Function of Ovid’s Funeral Elegies”, CJ 80, 27-35.

– (1985): “A Program for Betrayal: Ovidian nequitia in Amores 1.1, 2.1, and 3.1”, Helios 12, 29-39.

– (1988): “The Bed as Battlefield: Erotic Conquest and Military Metaphor in Ovid’s Amores”, TAPhA 118, 293-307.

– (1990/1): “Psittacus redux: Boyd’s Bird and Mine (or, Some Thoughts on Aims and Methods in Literary Studies)”, CJ 86, 368-76.

Cairns, Francis (1969): “Propertius i.18 and Callimachus, Acontius and Cydippe,” CR 20, 131-4 = Cairns 2007, 137-40.

– (1971a): “Propertius 2.29A,” CQ 21, 455-60 = Cairns 2007, 179-185.

– (1971b): “Propertius 2.30 A and B”, CQ 21, 204-13 = Cairns 2007, 186-96.

– (1971c): “Propertius 3,10 and Roman Birthdays”, Hermes 99, 149-55.

– (1972): Generic Composition in Greek and Roman Poetry (Edinburgh).

– (1973): “Notes on Propertius 1.8,” SO 49, 97-104 = Cairns 2007, 113-119.

– (1974a): “Propertius 2.19.32,” in Watson A. (ed.): Daube Noster: Essays in Legal History of David Daube (Edinburgh), 49-51.

– (1974b): Some Observations on Propertius 1.1, CQ 24, 94-110 = Cairns 2007, 1-20.

– (1974c): “Some Problems in Propertius 1.6,” AJPh 95, 150-63 = Cairns 2007, 94-103.

– (1975): “Horace, Epode 2, Tibullus I, 1 and Rhetorical Praise of the Countryside”, MPhL 1, 79-91.

– (1975): “Further Adventures of a Locked-out Lover: Propertius 2.17,” University of Liverpool Inaugural Lectures Series (Liverpool) = Cairns 2007, 156-169.

– (1977): Two Unidentified Komoi of Propertius. I 3 and II 29, Emérita 45, 325-53 = Cairns 2007, 35-58.

– (1979a): “Propertius on Augustus’ Marriage Law (II 7), GB 8, 185-204 = Cairns 2007, 141-55.

– (1979b): “Self-Imitation Within a Generic Framework: Ovid, Amores 2.9 and 3.11 and the renuntiatio amoris”, in West, David/Woodman, Tony (edd.): Creative Imitation and Latin Literature (Cambridge, etc.), 121-41 = Cairns 2007, 423-442.

– (1979c): Tibullus: A Hellenistic Poet at Rome (Cambridge) [R. Maltby, CR 31, 1981, 37-9; H. Guite, Phoenix 36, 1982, 378-80; J. K. Newman, CPh 77, 1982, 374-7; W. Wimmel, Gnomon 54, 1982, 118-23; R. J. Ball, CJ 78, 1983, 362-3; J. H. Brouwers, Mnemosyne 37, 1984, 214-6; W. Wimmel, AAHG 37, 1984, 22-4].

– (1981): “Lesbia Mentoreo (Propertius 1,14,2),” PLLS 3, 419-22 = Cairns 2007, 134-6.

– (1983a): “L’elegia IV, 6 di Properzio: manierismo ellenistico e classicismo augusteo”, in Colloquium 1983, 97-115 = “Propertius and the Battle of Actium (4.6)”, in Woodman, Tony/West, David (edd.), Poetry and Politics in the Age of Augustus, (Cambridge, 1984), 129-68.

– (1983b): “Tibullus 1, 8, 35f. and a Conventional Ancient Gesture”, Vichiana 12 (=Miscellanea di studi in memoria di Francesco Arnaldi), 75-7 = Cairns 2007, 350-53.

– (1984a): “The Etymology of militia in Roman Elegy”, EClás 26 (88), 211-22 = Cairns 2007, 298-307.

– (1984b): “Propertius and the Battle of Actium (4.6), in Woodman and West, 129-68 = Cairns 2007, 220-61.

– (1984c): “Propertius 1.4 and 1.5 and the ‘Gallus’ of the Monobiblos”, PLLS 4, 61-103 = Cairns 2007, 59-93.

– (1984d): “Religione e nationalismo nell’epigramma ellenistico e nell’elegia romana”, in Flores 1984, 59-80.

– (1986a): “The Milanion/Atalanta exemplum in Propertius, 1, 1: uidere feras (12) and Greek Models”, in Decreus, Freddy/Deroux, Carl (edd.): Homages à Jozef Veremans. Collection Latomus 193 (Bruxelles), 29-38 = Cairns 2007, 27-34.

– (1986b): “Stile e contenuti di Tibullo e di Properzio”, in Atti 1986, 47-59.

– (1988): “AP 9, 588 (Alcaeus of Messene) and nam modo in Propertius 1, 1, 11”, in Filologia e forme letterarie. Studi offerti a Francesco Della Corte (Urbino), I, 377-84 = Cairns 2007, 21-26.

– (1989/90): “Love at the Seaside: Propertius (1, 11), Cynthia, and Baiae”, The University of Leeds Review 32 (1989/90) 1-16 = Cairns 2007, 120-33.

– (1991): “Ovidio, Amores 1.3: Dipendenza letteraria vs indipendenza intellettuale” in Gallo/Nicastri 1991, 27-40 = “Imitation and Originality in Ovid Amores 1.3”, PLLS 7, 1993, 101-22 = Cairns 2007, 396-413.

– (1992a): “Propertius 4.9: ‘Hercules Exclusus’ and the Dimensions of Genre”, in Galinsky, Karl (ed.): The Interpretation of Roman Poetry: Empiricism or Hermeneutics? Studien zur klassischen Philologie 67 (Frankfurt a. M.), 65-95 = Cairns 2007, 262-85.

– (1992b): “Rhetoric and Genre: Propertius 1.6.31-6, Menander Rhetor 398.29-32-399.1, and a Topos of the Propemptikon”, SIFC 85, 980-90 = Cairns 2007, 104-12.

– (1993): “Imitation and Originality in Ovid Amores 1.3”, PLLS 7th Vol., 101-22 = Cairns 2007, 396-413.

– (1996): “Ancient ‘Etymology’ and Tibullus: On the Classification of ‘Etymologies’ and on ‘Etymological Markers’”, PCPhS 42, 24-59 = Cairns 2007, 308-40.

– (1998a): “Tibullus 2.1.57-8: Problems of Text and Interpretation”, in Radke, Anna Elissa (ed.): Candide Iudex. Beiträge zur augusteischen Dichtung. Festschrift für Walter Wimmel zum 75. Geburtstag (Stuttgart), 47-54 = Cairns 2007, 354-60.

– (1998b): “Tibullus 2.2: Genres, Augural Content, Literary Context, Text and Interpretation”, PLLS 10, 203-34 = Cairns 2007, 361-86.

– (1999a): “Ovid Amores 1.15 and the Problematic fruges of Line 25”, in Schubert 1999, I, 99-109 = Cairns 2007, 414-422.

– (1999b): “Propertius 2.23 and Its Final Couplet (23-24)”, CPh 94, 454-9 = Cairns 2007, 173-78.

– (1999c): “Tibullus, Messalla, and the spica: I 1.16; I 5.28; I 10.22, 67; II 1.4; II 5.84”, Emérita 67, 219-30 = Cairns 2007, 341-49.

– (2000a): “Allusions to hunc ... meum esse aio in Propertius? (I 6 9, 8 25-26, 8 42-44, 9 26, 19 1, 21 9-10; II 8 6, 9 45-46, 22 40, 24 35-36; IV 3 1-2, 6 39-40)”, RPL 3, 168-81 = Cairns 2007, 286-97.

– (2000b): “Tibullus 2.6.27-40: Nemesis’ Dead Sister”, Eranos 98, 65-74 = Cairns 2007, 387-95.

– (2002): “Propertius the Historian (3.3.1-12)”, in Levene, D. S./Nelis, D. P. (edd.): Clio and the Poets: Augustan Poetry and the Traditions of Ancient Historiography. Mnemosyne Supplementum 224 (Leiden, etc.), 25-44 = Cairns 2007, 197-211.

– (2003): “Propertius 3.4 and the Aeneid Incipit”, CQ 53, 309-11 = Cairns 2007, 212-13.

– (2004a): “Varius and Vergil: Two Pupils of Philodemus in Propertius 2.34?”, in Armstrong, David/Fish, Jeffrey/Johnston, Patricia A./Skinner, Marilyn (edd.): Philodemus, Vergil and the Augustans (Austin, TX), 299-342.

– (2004b): “Variazioni su Ila in Properzio 1.20” in Santini/Santucci, 75-98.

– (2006): Sextus Propertius: The Augustan Elegist (Cambridge) [N. Holzberg, CR 57, 2007, 398-400

– (2007): Papers on Roman Elegy 1969-2003. Eikasmos 16 (Bologna).

– (2010): The Mistress’s Midnight Summons: Propertius 3.16, Hermes 138, 70-91.

Califf, D. J. (1997): “Amores 2.1.7-8: a Programmatic Allusion by Anagram”, CQ 47, 604-5.

Callebat, Louis (1966): “Tradition et innovation dans la poésie de Commodius”, Pallas 13, 85-94.

Calleja, J. P. (1998): “La representación del amor en el ciclo de Delia”, Auster 3, 57-73.

Cambier, Guy (1972): “Tibulle, II, 5, 47”, Latomus 37, 507-11.

– (1977): “Quelques remarques sur la variante rutilis dans Tibulle, II,5,47”, [Resümee in] RBPh 55, 1275-6.

– (1981): “Tibulle, II, 5, 47 Rutilis déformation graphique de Rutulis”, AC 50, 121-4.

Cameron, Alan (1968): “The First Edition of Ovid’s Amores”, CQ 18, 320-33.

– (1995): Callimachus and His Critics (Princeton).

Camilloni, Maria Teresa (1985): “Considerazioni in margine a Properzio 2,34,83-84”, in D’Anna, Giovanni (ed.), Su le vestigia degli antichi padri (Ancona), 143-50.

Campbell, C. (1973): “Tibullus: Elegy I.3”, YCS 23, 147-57.

Camps, W. A. (1954): “Critical Notes on Some Passages in Ovid”, CR 4, 203-7.

– (1961a): “Propertiana”, CR 11, 104-6.

– (1961b): Propertius: Elegies Book I (Cambridge).

– (1965): Propertius: Elegies Book IV (Cambridge).

– (1966): Propertius: Elegies Book III (Cambridge).

– (1967): Propertius, Elegies Book II (Cambridge).

– (1989): “The Structure of Propertius 2.6”. Phoenix 43, 359-64.

– (1991): “A Note on the Structure of the Pieces Numbered 1-25 in Propertius Book 2”, PCPhS 37, 22-9.

Cancelli, Filippo (1986): “Spunti ideologici-politici in Tibullo”, in Atti 1986, 233-50.

Cano Alonso, Pedro Luis (1990/1): “A pereat!: Propercio airado”, Faventia 12/13, 13-23.

– (1993): “Rescoldo de unos celos: el recuerdo en el libro cuarto de Propercio”, CFC(L) 4, 73-81.

– (1998): “Sobre los personajes de Propercio”, Faventia 20, 101-8.

Cantarella, Eva (1996): Passato prossimo. Donne romane da Tacita a Sulpicia (Milano).

Capponi, Filippo (1988): Ovidius cynegeticus. Pubbl. del D. AR. FI. CL. ET. 722 (Genova).

Caputo, Rino (1998): “Petrarca e Properzio che d’amor cantaro fervidamente,” in Catanzaro/Santucci 1998, 113-123.

Carbonero, Oreste (1989): “La figura di Elena di Troia nei poeti latini da Lucrezio a Ovidio”, Orpheus 70, 378-91.

– (1992): “De iusta bellandi causa apud Euripidem, Propertium et Lucanum”, Latinitas 40, 115-19.

– (1991): “De Propertiana C. Marii existimatione”, VoxLat 27, 104, 219-21.

Cardauns, Burkhart (1961): “Zu den Sibyllen bei Tibull 2, 5”, Hermes 89, 357-66.

Cardoso, Zélia de Almeida