Eine Bibliographie MÜnchen 2009

– (1968): “Osservazioni sullo stile di Properzio”, in Omaggio a Eduard Fraenkel per i suoi ottant’anni (Roma), 88-106 = SIFC 41, 1969, 81-94.

– (1980): Propertius. Il primo libro delle Elegie. Introduzione, testo critico e commento. Accademia Toscana di Scienze e Lettere ‘La Colombaria’. Studi 53 (Firenze) [J. den Boeft, Mnemosyne 37, 1984, 212-14; K.-W. Weeber, AAHG 37, 1984, 27-8].

– (1981): “Elegy and Literary Polemic in Propertius’ Monobiblos”, PLLS 3, 227-42.

– (1982): “Properzio 3, 20. Un carme unitario”, Vichiana 77, 100-8.

– (1983a): “Interpretazioni properziane (libro III)”, CL 3, 43-56.

– (1983b): “‘Propertii Monobiblos’: struttura e motivi”, ANRW II 30.3, 1858-922.

– (1984a): Properti elegiarum libri I-IV. Bibliotheca scriptorum Graecorum et Romanorum Teubneriana (Stuttgart) [F. Della Corte, Maia 36, 1984, 295-301; A. Wankenne, LEC 52, 1984, 275; S. Heyworth, CR 35, 1985, 281-284; H. Tränkle, MH 42, 1985, 361; C. Formicola, Vichiana 15, 1986, 322-7; J. Soubiran, RPh 60, 1986, 139-41; P. Tordeur, Latomus 46, 1987, 858-9; A. La Penna, Gnomon 60, 1988, 25-32; J. den Boeft, Mnemosyne 42, 1989, 558-62].

– (1984b): “Simbolo, metafora, ambiguità. Properzio 3, 3 e le smanie epiche del poeta elegiaco”, GB 11, 141-63.

– (1985a): Il libro terzo delle elegie. Introduzione, testo e commento. Studi e commenti 3 (Bari) [Barroso de Albuquerque, Euphrosyne 15, 1987, 446-7; J. Butrica, EMC 31, 1987, 125-8; M. Hubbard, JRS 77, 1987, 251-2; M. Citroni, Gnomon 60, 1988, 318-23; P. Tordeur, Latomus 47, 1988, 465; J. den Boeft, Mnemosyne 42, 1989, 558-62; A. Ramírez de Verger, AJPh 110, 1989, 180-3].

– (1985b): Propertius, Codex Guelferbytanus Gudianus 224 olim Neapolitanus. Prefazione di – (Assisi) [S. J. Heyworth, CR 36, 1986, 48-50; G. Polara, Orpheus 7, 1986, 224; G. Colonna, Paideia 42, 1987, 132-3; P. Tordeur, AC 56, 1987, 367].

– (1986a): “Allusive Technique in Roman Poetry”, MPhL 7, 17-30.

– (1986b): “Le elegie a Marato o dell’accumulazione dei topoi”, in Atti 1986, 331-44.

– (1986c): “Properzio e l’amore elegiaco”, in Bimillenario 1986, 277-301.

– (1986d): “Properzio e la sua poesia”, in Assisi 1986, 125-41.

– (1986e): “Sul modo di costituire il testo di Properzio”, RFIC 114, 238-50.

– (1987a): “Acanthis e la sete dei morti (Prop. 4, 5)”, in Raffaelli, Renato (ed.): Rappresentazioni della morte. Letteratura e antropologia 1 (Urbino), 91-129.

– (1987b): “Properzie, fra culto del testo tradito e caccia alla corruttela”, BFLM 15, 107-12.

– (1988a): “L’età augustea nel giudizio di Properzio”, in Benedini, Eros (ed.), L’età augustea vista dai contemporanei e nel giudizio dei posteri. Atti de1 Convegno (Mantova Palazzo Ducale, 27-22-23 maggio 1987) (Mantova), 87-105.

– (1988b): “La traduzione-pastiche. Il Properzio di Ezra Pound”, Lexis 6, 225-33.

– (1989): “La poesia d’amore”, in Da Cavallo, Guglielmo/Fedeli, Paolo/Giardina, Andrea (edd.): Lo spazio letterario di Roma (Roma), I, 143-76.

– (1990a): “Tradurre poesia, tradurre Properzio”, Aufidus 10, 93-130 = Nicosia, Salvatore (ed.): La traduzione dei testi classici: teoria, prassi, storia. Atti del Convegno di Palermo, 6-9 aprile 1988 (Napoli), 245-73.

– (1990b): “L’odiosamato”, in Alfonso/Cipriani [et al.] 1990, 121-55.

– (1994): “Ideologia augustea e poesia: il mito di Ercole e Caco in Properzio”, in Rosen, Klaus (ed.): Macht und Kultur im Rom der Kaiserzeit (Bonn), 109-19.

– (1996): “Il Properzio del Lachmann, in Commentatori e traduttori di Properzio dall’Umanesimo ad Lachmann. Atti del Convegno Internazionale. Assisi, 28-30 ottobre 1994 (Assisi), 355-78.

– (1998a): “Julien Benda a colloquio con Properzio”, in Catancaro/Santucci 1998, 19-38.

– (1998b; ed.): Poesia d’amore latina. Biblioteca della Pléiade 29 (Torino) [F. Cupaiolo, BStudLat 29, 1999, 207-8].

– (1998): Properzio, in: Enciclopedia Oraziana III, 57-59.

– (1999): “Elegia e commedia: inamorato, meretrice e ruffiana”, in Raffaelli, Renato/Tontini, Alba (edd.): Asinaria (Sarsina, 12 settembre 1999). Ludus philologiae. Lecturae Plautinae Sarsinates 2 (Urbino), 25-48.

– (2000): “Le fonti,” in Catanzaro/Santucci 2000, 251-272.

– (2002a): “Properzio 2.2: un interpretazione”, Lexis 20, 95-106.

– (2005a): “Properzio e la poesia greca prealessandrina,” in Santini/Santucci 2005, 3-32,

– (2005b): Properzio. Elegie, Libro II. Introduzione, testo e commento. Cambridge [J.L.Butrica, BMCRev 2006.03.25].

– /Dimundo, Rosalba (1994): Properzio, Il libro di Cinzia. Introduzione, testo latino, traduzione (a cura di Angelo Tonelli) e commento puntuale del I libro delle Elegie. Il convivio. Collana di classici greci e latini (Venezia) [A. Touwaide, Scriptorium 49, 1995, 197].

– /Pinotti, Paola (1985): Bibliografia properziana (1946-1983). Atti Accademia properziana del Subasio, serie VI 9 (Assisi) [V. Viparelli Santangelo 15, 1985, 139; G. Colonna, Paideia 42, 1987, 131-2; P. Tordeur, AC 56, 1987, 366-7; A. Ramírez de Verger/A. Pérez Vega, Emérita 57, 1989, 194-5; P. Galand, Latomus 48, 1989, 256].

Feger, Robert/Wilhelm Willige (1954): Albius Tibullus: Cerinthus und Sulpicia, Gymnasium 61, 338-45.

Feichtinger, Barbara (1989): “Poetische Fiktion bei Properz”, GB 76, 143-82.

– (1991): “Properz, Vates oder Haruspex? Zu seinem politischen und poetischen Selbstverständnis”, C&M 42, 187-212.

– (1993): “Casta matrona – puella fallax. Zum literarischen Frauenbild der römischen Elegie”, SO 68, 40-68.

Ferguson, John (1960): “Catullus and Ovid”, AJPh 87, 337-57.

– (1978): “Notes on Some Uses of Ambiguity and Similar Effects in Ovid’s Amores, Book 1”, LCM 3, 121-32.

Fernández Palacios, Fernando (1996): “La religión en Tibullo”, Polis 8, 23-49.

Fineberg, Brenda Haack (1997): Configurations of Desire in the Elegies of Tibullus (diss., University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill.) [DA 52, 1991/2, 1315A-1316A].

– (1993): “The Dark Ladies of Tibullan Elegy”, in DeForest, Mary (ed.), Woman's Power, Man’s Game: Essays on Classical Antiquity in Honor of Joy K. King (Wauconda), 249-56.

– (1999): “Repetition and the Poetics of Desire in Tibullus 1.4”, in Miller (1999b), 419-28.

Finkenauer, Achim (2001): “Properz 4, 11, 39/40. Perseus von Makedonien und Cornelias Verteidigung vor dem Totengericht”, RhM 144, 146-59.

Fiore, Tommaso (1987): “La poesia di Ovidio”, in. id.: Dal Virgilio minore alla poesia d’Ovidio. Biblioteca di studi moderni 30 (Manduria, etc.), 71-142.

Fischer, Edith (1973): Amor und Eros: Eine Untersuchung des Wortfeldes "Liebe" im Lateinischen und Griechischen (Hildesheim).

Fischer, Rudolf (1968): Das außeritalische geographische Bild in Vergils Georgica, in den Oden des Horaz und in den Elegien des Properz (diss., Zürich).

Fisher, John M. (1969): “Three Notes on Tibullus I, 1, 9-10; 33-36; 47-48”, Hermes 97, 378-80.

– (1970): “The Structure of Tibullus’ First Elegy”, Latomus 29, 765-73.

– (1983): “The Life and Work of Tibullus”, ANRW II 30.3, 1924-61.

Flach, Dieter (1967): Das literarische Verhältnis von Horaz und Properz (Gießen) [H. Juhnke, Gnomon 41, 1969, 662-666].

– (1998): “Properz als Dichter des Maecenaskreises”, in Radke, Anna Elissa (ed.): Candide Iudex. Beiträge zur augusteischen Dichtung. Festschrift für Walter Wimmel zum 75. Geburtstag (Stuttgart), 67-79.

– (2011a): Sextus Propertius: Elegien. Lateinisch und deutsch. Hrsg., eingeleitet und übersetzt von H.F., Darmstadt (Texte zur Forschung 99).

– (2011b): Sextus Propertius: Elegien. Kommentar von D.F., Darmstadt.

Flaschenriem, Barbara Lynn (1992): Seeing Double: Amatory Rhetoric and Gender in Sappho, the Anacreontea and Propertius (diss., University of California at Berkeley).

– (1997): “Loss, Desire, and Writing in Propertius 1.19 and 2.15”, ClAnt 16, 259-77.

– (1998): “Speaking of Women: ‘Female Voice’ in Propertius”, Helios 25, 49-64.

– (1999): “Sulpicia and the Rhetoric of Disclosure”, CPh 94, 36-54.

Fletcher, G.B.A. (1961): “Propertiana”, Latomus 20, 85-92.

– (1965): “Tibullus and Other Poets of the Corpus Tibullianum”, Latomus 24, 45-52.

– (1989): “Further Propertiana”, Latomus 48, 354-9.

Fliedner, Heinrich (1974): Amor und Cupido. Untersuchungen über den römischen Liebesgott. Beiträge zur klassischen Philologie 53 (Meisenheim am Glan).

– (1975): “Ohne Liebe ein Gott. Überlegungen zu Ovid am. 2, 9, 25f.”, in Monumentum Chiloniense. Studien zur augusteischen Zeit. Kieler Festschrift für Erich Burck zum 70. Geburtstag (Amsterdam), 432-5.

Flores, Enrico (1984; ed.): Dall’epigramma ellenistico all’elegia romana. Atti del Convegno della S. I. S. A. C. (Napoli 27 novembre 1981) (Napoli) [Alexander, CL 3, 1983, 134-5; J. Fabre, REL 63, 1985, 322; E. Klecker, WS 20, 1986, 293; M. Dubuisson, AC 56, 1987, 358-9; P. Galand, Latomus 47, 1988, 705-6; G. Lieberg, AAHG 41, 1988, 5-6; .

Flores, María Esperanza (1998): “La intercesura en Propercio”, in: Gil, Luis/Martínez Pastor, Marcelo/Aguilar, Rosa María (edd.): Corolla Complutensis: in memoriam Josephi S. Lasso de la Vega = Homenaje al professor José S. Lasso de la Vega (Madrid), 397-402.

Fögen, Thorsten (2006): “Tränen in der ömischen Liebeselegie,” Zeitschrift für Semiotik 28, 239-69.

Foley, Stephen (2003): “Unhinging Tibullus: a Note on Entering ‘Elegy’ 1”, in Thibodeau, Philip/Haskell, Harry (edd.): Being There Together: Essays in Honor of Michael C. J. Putnam on the Occasion of His Seventieth Birthday (Minnesota), 198-203.

Fontana, Monica (1998): “Il topos letterario della scorza incisa”, Patavium 12, 27-47.

Foulon, A. (1999): L’expression du sentiment de l’amour dans les Amores, VL 154, 13-22.

Ford, Gordon B., jr. (1966): “An Analysis of Amores I 4”, Helikon 6, 645-52.

Formicola, Crescenzo (1981): “Due note properziane. IV 8, 39 e IV 11, 53”, Vichiana 10, 174-81.

– (1985): “Properzio e Melibeo. Arte allusiva e interpretazione letteraria”, Vichiana 14, 241-57.

– (1991): “Le sorti dell’eros femminile sulle rive dell’Acheronte (Prop. IV 7, 55 sq.)”, Vichiana 3a ser. 2, 240-2.

– (1998): “Anfibiologia ed imitatio in Tib. I 1, 48”, BStudLat 28, 45-56.

– (1999a): “L’accampamento di Cupido (Ov. Am. I 9): riforma del génoß e ideologia della contestazione (discussione di una variante)”, Vichiana 4a ser. 1, 57-73.

– (1999b): “Tibulliana e pseudo-tibulliana I”, Vichiana 4a ser. 1, 116-27.

– (2003): “Il poema della concordia (Catull. 65, Callimaco e l’elegia latina)”, Vichiana 4a ser. 5, 183-205.

Forni, Giovanni (1986): “Properzio nel mondo romano. Indagine prosopografica”, in Bimillenario 1986, 175-97.

Fortuny Previ, F. (1985): “Presencia de la magia en Tibulo”, in Simposio Tibuliano 1985, 243-53.

Foulon, Albert (1977): “Une ‘source’ peu connue de Tibulle dans le Corpus Tibullianum: Théognis”, Latomus 36, 132-43.

– (1980a): “Tibulle II, 3 et l’alexandrinisme”, REL 58, 252-73.

– (1980b): “Tibulle I, 7 et Callimaque”, in L’elegie romaine 1980, 79-89.

– (1983): “Tibulle, II, 5: hellénisme et romanité”, REL 61, 173-88.

– (1986a): “Variations sur l’arc-en-ciel (Tibulle I, 4, 43-44)”, Kentron 2, 48-51.

– (1986b): “Réflexions sur l’imitation. Le cheval vieilli chez Ennius, Tibulle, Ovide”, Kentron 2, 114-17.

– (1987): “Les laudes ruris de Tibulle II, 1, 37-80. Une influence possible de Lucrèce sur Tibulle”, REL 65, 115-31.

– (1990a): “L’art poétique de Tibulle”, REL 68, 66-79.

– (1990b): “Introduction à l’élégie latin”, Kentron 6, 89-100. 123-35.

– (1992a): “Du noveau sur la datation du Panégyrique de Messalla?: Panégyrique de Messalla 151-174 et Georgiques I, 237-256”, Kentron 8, 17-24.

– (1992b): “Réflexions sur la composition des livres I et II du Corpus Tibullianum”, Orphea voce 4, 25-35.

– (1992c): “Sur l’interpretation d’un distique controversé de Properce: Élégies IV, 11, 101-102”, in Au miroir de la culture antique: Mélanges offerts au Président René Marache (Rennes), 223-30.

– (1996): “La mort et l’au-delà chez Properce”, in REL 47, 155-67.

– (1999): “L’expression du sentiment de l’amour dans les Amores”, VL 154, 12-22.

– (2000): “L’expression du sentiment de l’amour dans le Corpus Tibullianum”, REL 78, 93-117.

Fowler, Don P. (2000): “Catullus 68 and Propertius I, 10: a Note”, in: Bécares, Vicente [et al.] (edd.): Intertextualidad en las literaturas griega y latina. Classica Salmaticensia 2 (Madrid), 233-40.

Fox, Matthew (1996): Roman Historical Myths (Oxford).

– (1999): “Propertius 4.9 and the Toils of Historicism”, MD 43, 157-76.

Fränkel, Hermann (1945): Ovid: A Poet Between Two Worlds. Sather Classical Lectures 18 (Berkeley/Los Angeles) = Ovid – ein Dichter zwischen zwei Welten (Darmstadt, 1972).

Francese, Christopher Anson (1993): Parthenius of Nicaea and Roman Love Stories (diss., University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX) [DA 54, 1993, 1347A].

Frank, R. I. (1982): “Augustan Elegy and Catonism”, ANRW II 30.1, 559-79.

Franzoi, Alessandro (1991): “Properzio: note di lettura al I e al IV libro delle Elegie”, Sileno 17, 149-61.

– (1993) “‘Amores’ 3, 11: due questioni ovidiane”, CCC 14, 31-40.

– (1998): “Lettura di Ovidio, Amores 1, 15”, in Cresci Marrone, Giovanella (ed.): Temi augustei. Atti dell’incontro di studio Venezia, 5 giugno 1996 (Amsterdam), 61-72.

Frécaut, Jean-Marc (1968): “Vérité et fiction dans deux poemes des Amours d’Ovide I, 5 et III, 5”, Latomus 27, 350-61.

– (1969): “Une figure de style chère à Ovide: le zeugma ou attelage”, Latomus 28, 28-41.

– (1972): L’esprit et l’humour chez Ovide (Grenoble).

Fredericks, S. C. (1976): “A Poetic Experiment in the Garland of Sulpicia (Corpus Tibullianum, 3, 10)”, Latomus 35, 761-82.

Fredrick, David Charles (1992): She’s Nothing: Gender and Representation in Catullus and Elegy (diss., University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA) [DA 53, 1993, 3199A-3200 A].

– (1997): “Reading Broken Skin: Violence in Roman Elegy”, in Hallett/Skinner 1997, 172-93 = P. A. Miller 2002, 457-79.

Freimann, Hans (1968): Imitationsspektrum zum ersten Buche der Amores des Ovid (diss., Freiburg).

Freis, Richard (1993): “Exiguos elegos: Are Ars Poetica 75-78 Critical of Love Elegy?”, Latomus 52, 364-71.

Frijs-Jensen, Karsten (1985): “Propertius 1, 8, 19: a Conjecture”, C&M 36, 173-5.

Frings, Irene (2005): Das Spiel mit eigenen Texten. Wiederholung und Selbstzitat bei Ovid, München (Zetemata 124).

Frost, Christopher Powell (1991): “Propertius 3.3.45-46: Don’t Go Near the Water”, AJPh 112, 251-9.

Frost, Rebecca Lynn (1998): The Rhetoric of Authority in the Propertian Monobiblos (diss., University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA) [DA 59, 1998/99, 2483A].

Fruhstorfer, Martin (1986): “Fores perfringere – eine Metapher in der erotischen Dichtung?”, RhM 129, 54-6.

Fuchs, Harald (1972): “Kleinigkeiten”, MH 29, 217-8.

Führer, Rudolf (1988): Zu P.Oxy. 3723 (Hellenistische Liebeselegie?), ZPE 74, 22

Funaioli, H. (1905): Grammaticorum Romanorum Fragmenta, Leipzig (BT) [482-486: C. Valgius Rufus].

Funke, Hermann (1988): “Urit me Glycearae nitor …: Literarische Schönheitsbeschreibungen in der Antike”, in Stemmler, Theo (ed.): Schöne Männer – schöne Frauen. Literarische Schönheitsbeschreibungen. 2. Kolloquium der Forschungsstelle für europäische Literatur des Mittelalters (Tübingen), 47-67.

– (1990): “Liebe als Krankheit in der griechischen und römischen Antike”, in Liebe als Krankheit. 3. Kolloquium der Forschungsstelle für europäische Literatur des Mittelalters (Tübingen), 11-30.

Fusillo, Massimo (2002): “Su Properzio nella cultura moderna”, in Catanzaro/Santucci 2000, 335-48.

Fyler, John M. (1970/1): “Omnia vincit Amor: Incongruity and the Limitations of Structure in Ovid’s Elegiac Poetry”, CJ 66, 196-203.

Gaertner, Jan Felix (1999): “The Literary Background of an Amateurish Poetess: on [Tib.] 3, 13”, PP 54.306, 198-200.

– (2000a): “Zu den Vorlagen von [Tib.] III, 10”, Latomus 59, 2000, 672-3.

– (2000b): “[Tib.] III 8 und Ovids Fasti”, Mnemosyne 53, 88-9.

– (2002): “Zur Deutung von [Tib.] 3, 19”, Mnemosyne 55, 346-9.

Gärtner, Thomas (2003): “Die Destruktion des elegischen Wertgefüges: Zu den beiden Elegienbüchern des Albius Tibullus”, Eos 90, 215-45.

Gagliardi, Donato (1984): “Una iunctura ovidiana: desultor amoris (Am. I 3, 15)”, SIFC 3a ser., 2, 243-5.

– (1992): “Orazio e Tibullo (per la ricostruzione di un rapporto ‘trasversale’)”, A&R n. s. 37, 75-87.

– (1994): “Tibullo e l’epigramma ellenistico”, in Storia poesia e pensiero nel mondo antico. Studi in onore di Marcello Gigante (Napoli), 217-27.

Gaisser, Julia Haig (1971a): “Structure and Tone in Tibullus, 1, 6”, AJPh 92, 202-16.

– (1971b): “Tibullus 1.7: A Tribute to Messalla”, CPh 66, 221-9.

– (1977): “Tibullus 2.3 and Vergil’s Tenth Eclogue”; TAPhA 107, 131-46.

– (1983): “Amor, rura and militia in Three Elegies of Tibullus: 1.1, 1.5 and 1.10”, Latomus 42, 58-72.

Galán, Lia Margarita (1996): “Gimnasia en Propercio (Elegia 3,14)”, Auster 1, 33-44.

– (1998): La Romana. Presencia de la mujer en las Elegías del Corpus Tibullianum. Estudios/Investigaciones 35 (Buenos Aires).

Galand-Hallyn, Perrine (1991): “Corinne et Sappho (elocutio et inventio dans les Amours et les Héroides d’Ovide”, BAGB, 336-58.

Gale, Monica R. (1997): “Propertius 2.7: Militia amoris and the Ironies of Elegy”, JRS 87, 77-91.

Galinsky, Gotthard Karl (1969): “The Triumph Theme in the Augustan Elegy”, WS 3, 75-107.

– (1972): The Herakles Theme: The Adaptations of the Hero in Literature from Homer to the Twentieth Century (Oxford).

– (1973): “Some Emendations and Non-Emendations in the Third Edition of Corpus Tibullianum”, Mnemosyne 26, 160-9.

– (1996): Augustan Culture: An Interpretive Introduction (Princeton, NJ) [T. R. Stevenson, Prudentia 28, 1996, 52-7; J. A. Crook, JRS 87, 1997, 287-8; E. Fantham, EMC 16, 1997, 515-20; T. Habinek, Vergilius 43, 1997, 156-60; M. Jager, NECN 24, 1997, 115-7; A. P. Keaveney, G&R 44, 1997, 97-8; A. Smith, BMCRev 97.2.24; J.-M. André, Latomus 57, 1998, 930-2; J. Booth, CR 48, 1998, 396-8; J. Henderson, Hermathena 164, 1998, 101-16; F. Hinard, REG 111, 1998, 354; L. A. Hughes, CO 75, 1998, 119-21; E. A. Schmidt, MH 55, 1998, 247; J. B. Solodow, BMCRev 98.1.2; K. Wacker, Gymnasium 105, 1998, 79-81; R. J. Evans, Mnemosyne 52, 1999, 628-34; J. Filée, LEC 67, 1999, 119-20; A. La Penna, Athenaeum 87, 1999, 330-40; P. Walcot, G&R 46, 1999, 117; P. Hardie, Gnomon 72, 2000, 49-53].

Gall, Dorothea (1999): Zur Technik von Anspielung und Zitat in der römischen Dichtung: Vergil, Gallus und die Ciris. Zetemata 100 (München) [H.-J. Tschiedel, AAHG 55, 2002, 177-80].

Gallo, Italo/Nicastri, Luciano (1991; edd.): Cultura poesia ideologia nell’opera di Ovidio Pubblicazioni dell’Università degli Studi di Salerno, sezione atti, convegni, miscellanee 33 (Napoli) [P. Militerni Della Morte, BStudLat 22, 1992, 70-3; E. M. Ariemma, Vichiana 4, 1993, 131-9; F. Corsaro, Orpheus 14, 1993, 191-4; M. Guglielmo, CCC 14, 1993, 229-33; H. Bardon, Latomus 53, 1994, 871-3; P. Pinotti, RFIC 123, 1995, 216-18; N. Scivoletto, GIF 47, 1995, 299-313; M. Guglielmo, Prometheus 22, 1996, 285-88].

Gamel, Mary-Kay (1983): “You Can Always Count on a Murderer for a Fancy Prose Style or The Net and the Pin”, Pacific Coast Philology 78, 100-7.

– (1989): “Non sine caede: Abortion Politics and Poetics in Ovid’s Amores”, Helios 16, 183-206.

– (1998): “Reading as a Man: Performance and Gender in Roman Elegy”, Helios 25, 79-95.

Garbarino, Giovanna (1983): “Epiloghi properziani: le elegie di chiusura dei primi tre libri”, in Colloquium 1983, 117-48.

– (1987): “Properzio e la ‘domina’: l’amore come dipendenza”, in Renato Uglione (ed.), Atti del Convegno Nazionale di Studi su La Donna nel Mondo Antico, Torino 27-23 aprile 1986 (Torino), 169-93.

García Jurado, Francisca (2001): “El vestido femenino como motivo elegiaco en Propercio y el Corpus Tibullianum”, CFC(L) 20, 83-98.

García Leal, A. (1985): “Juventud y vejez en Tibulo”, in Simposio Tibuliano 1985, 255-62.

García López, J. (1985): “Ritus patrius y ritus Graecus en Tibulo II, 1”, in Simposio Tibuliano 1985, 263-73.

García Rubio, S. (1985): “Tibulo-Ronsard. Dos modos de expresión”, in Simposio Tibuliano 1985, 275-9.

Gasperini, Lidio (1986): “Mondo rustico e religiosità popolare nel corpus Tibullianum”, in Atti 1986, 215-32.

Gasser, Franziska (1999): Germana Patria: Die Geburtsheimat in den Werken römischer Autoren der späten Republik und der frühen Kaiserzeit. Beiträge zur Altertumskunde 118 (Stuttgart/Leipzig).

Gatz, Bodo (1967): Weltalter, goldene Zeit und sinnverwandte Vorstellungen. Spudasmata 16 (Hildesheim).

Gauly, Bardo Maria (1990): Liebeserfahrungen. Zur Rolle des elegischen Ich in Ovids Amores. Studien zur klassischen Philologie 48 (Frankfurt a. M., etc.) [B. Feichtinger, GB 19, 1993, 268-70; N. Holzberg, GGA 245, 1993, 39-48; M. A. Rodríguez Madrigal/A. Ramírez de Verger, Gnomon 67, 1995, 64-5].

– (1995): “Lentus amor: Zu einer Metapher bei Tibull und Horaz und zum elegischen Pseudonym Marathus”, Hermes 123, 91-105.

Gazich, Roberto (1995): ‘Exemplum’ ed esemplarità in Properzio Pubblicazioni dell’Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore; Scienze filologiche e storia, Brescia 6 (Milano) [J.-Y. Maleuvre, LEC 64, 1996, 304-5; V. Viparelli , BStudLat 26, 1996, 296-8; R. Strocchio, Orpheus 18, 1997, 243-5; J. Booth, CR 48, 1998, 309-11; B. Feichtinger, Gnomon 70, 1998, 555-7; G. Mader, Latomus 58, 1999, 194-6; S. Raimondi, Faventia 22, 2000, 153-5].

– (1997): “Moenia disponere: Properzio, Callimaco e la città augustea”, Aevum(ant) 10, 289-336.

Geiger, Hanspeter (1978): Interpretationen zur Gestalt Amors bei Tibull (diss., Zürich) [R. Valenti Pagnini, BStudLat 9, 1979, 136-7; J.-P. Borle, MH 37, 1980, 257; R. O. A. M. Lyne, CR 30, 1980, 20-2; K. Vretska, AAHG 33, 1980, 107; D. Wachsmuth, Gymnasium 87, 1980, 109 ].

Gendre Loutsch, Marianne/Jacobi, Catherine (1997): “Quelques aspects du sommeil et des songes chez Tibulle, les auteurs du ‘Corpus Tibullianum’ et Properce”, in Knoepfler, Denis (ed.): Nomen Latinum: Mélanges de langue, de littérature et de civilisation latines offerts au professeur André Schneider à l’occasion de son départ à la retraite (Neuchâtel), 83-96.

Georg, Bernhard (2001): Exegetische und schmückende Eindichtungen im ersten Properzbuch. Studien zur Geschichte und Kultur des Altertums, 1. Reihe, Bd. 17 (Paderborn) [C. Rambaux, REL 79, 2001, 302-3; H. P. Stahl, BMCRev 2002.08.34; G. Luck, Gnomon 76, 2004, 269-71].

Gerber, Douglas (ed., tr.)(1999): Greek Elegiac Poetry, Cambridge [E. Katz Anhalt, BMCR 00.03.24]

Gerressen, Wilfried (1970): Tibulls Elegie 2, 5 und Vergils Aeneis (diss., Köln).

Geymonat, Mario (1974): Una prefazione in senari al trattato di Valgio Rufo sulle erbe?, PP 29, 256-261.

Ghiselli, Giovanni (2005): “Alcuni stili dell’apparire di donne e di uomini nella letteratura antica: cultus, rusticitas, e sui neglegentia,” in Santini/Santucci 2005, 395-436.

Giangrande, Giuseppe (1974): “Los tópicos helenisticos en la elegía latina”, Emérita 41, 1-36 = id.: Scripta minora Alexandrina. Classical and Byzantine Monographs (Amsterdam, 1981), II, 463-98.

– (1980): “An Alleged Fragment of Gallus”, QUCC 34 n. s. 5, 141-53.

– (1981a): “Hellenistic Topoi in Ovid’s Amores”, MPhL 4, 25-51 = id.: Scripta minora Alexandrina (Amsterdam, 1985), IV, 515-41.

– (1981b): “On the Alleged Fragment of Gallus”, in id. (ed.): Corolla Londiniensis. London Studies in Classical Philology 8 (Amsterdam), 41-4.

– (1981c): “Propertius, Callimachus Romanus?”, in Colloquium 1981, 147-67.

– (1982a): “Hellenistic Features in the Pseudo-Gallus”, in id. (ed.): Corolla Londiniensis (Amsterdam), II, 99-108.

– (1982b): “On the Pseudo-Gallus”, in id. (ed.): Corolla Londiniensis (Amsterdam), II, 83-93.

– (1984): “Motivi epigrammatici ellenistici nell’elegia romana”, in Flores 1984, 29-58.

– (1986): “La componente epigrammatatica nella struttura delle elegie di Properzio”, in Bimillenario 1986, 223-64.

Giannarelli, Elena (1983): “L’immagine della neve al sole dalla poesia classica al Petrarca: contributo per la storia di un ‘topos’, Quaderni Petrarcheschi 1, 91-129.

Giardina, Giancarlo (1964): “Lettura di un’elegia ovidiana (Amores I 15)”, Vichiana 1, 42-57.

– (1975-7): “Note a Properzio”, MCr 10-12, 227-31.

– (1977): Sex. Properti Elegiarum Liber II, ed., brevi commentario instruxit. Corpus Scriptorum Latinorum Paravianum (Torino).

– (1982): “In margine a Ovidio, Amores 1, 5”, Vichiana 14, 150-4.

– (1983): “Echi tardo-antichi e medievali di Properzio,”, MCr 18, 241.

– (1984/5): “Prop. III 5, 3ss.”, MCr 19/20, 203-4.

– (1986/7): “Appunti su Prop. I 3”, MCr 21/22, 353-8.

– (1988/9): “Note a Properzio”, MCr 23/24, 311-16.

– (1997-2000): “Prop. I 16, 17-36”, MCr 32-35, 151-2.

– (2002a): “Properzio 3,9,8” Philologus 146, 371.

– (2002b): “Sul testo di Properzio 3,5,40”, RFIC 130, 191-3.

– (2003a): “Properzio 2, 3, 22”, QUCC 104 n. s. 75.3, 147-50.

– (2003b): “Ancora Prop. 2, 3, 22: una nuova proposta”, GIF 55, 93-7.

– (2004a): “Due note properziane (1, 8a, 13-16; 2, 18c, 35-36)”, BStudLat 34, 35-7.

– (2004b): “Osservazioni critico-testuali a due elegie di Properzio (1, 16; 4, 3)”, QUCC 105 n. s. 76.1, 139-42.

– (2004c): “Prop. 1, 16, 23-24”, Aufidus 16.49, 15-19.

– (2004d): “Properzio 2.1.5: una crux non ancora sanata”, Prometheus 30, 253-60.

– (2005): Properzio. Elegie. Edizione critica e traduzione, Edizioni dell’Ateneo [F. Nau, BMCRev 2006.03.20].

Gibson, Roy K. (1995): “How to Win Girlfriends and Influence Them: Amicitia in Roman Love Elegy”, PCPhS 41, 62-77.

– (2007): Excess and Restraint: Propertius, Horace, & Ovid’s Ars amatoria BICS Supplement 89 (London).

Giebel, Marion (1991): Ovid. Mit Selbstzeugnissen und Bilddokumenten. Rowohlts Monographien 460 (Reinbek bei Hamburg).

Gigante Lanzara, Valeria (1990): “Virgilio e Properzio”, in Gigante, Marcello (ed.), Virgilio e gli Augustei (Napoli), 111-16.

Gildenhard, Ingo/Zissos, Andrew: (2000): Inspirational Fictions: Autobiography and Generic Reflexivity in Ovid’s Poems, G&R 47, 67-79.

Ginsberg, Warren (1983): The Cast of Characters: the Representation of Personality in Ancient and Medieval Literature (Toronto).

Giomini, Remo (1959): “Ricerche sulle due edizioni degli ‘Amores’”, in Atti 1959, I, 125-42.

– (1965): “Sul distico introduttivo di Ovidio, Her. XI”, StudUrb 39, 89-103.

Giordano, F. (1969/70): “In margine a Tibullo 1, 10, 11”, AFLN 72, 39-48.

– (1971/2): “Ricerche sulle assonanze e rime finali di parola in Tibullo”, AFLN 14, 19-41.

Giuliodori, Giovanna (2001): “La 3a elegia della Monobiblos di Properzio: note di lettura”, AFLM 34, 195-218.

Glass, B. P. (1970): Index Tibullianus (Hildesheim).

Glatt, Martin (1991): Die ‘andere Welt’ der römischen Elegiker. Das Persönliche in der Liebesdichtung. Studien zur klassischen Philologie 54 (Frankfurt a. M., etc.) [S. Viarre, AC 62, 1993, 307-8; R. Salinas, Helmantica 47, 1996, 142-3].

Glock, Anne (1999): “Funktionen von Aitiologie: Properz 4, 2”, in Batsch, Christoph/ Egelhaaf-Gaiser, Ulrike/Stepper, Ruth (edd.): Zwischen Krise und Alltag. Antike Religionen im Mittelmeerraum. Potsdamer Altertumswissenschaftliche Beiträge (PawB) 1 (Stuttgart), 197-219.

Glover, Christopher L. (1999): The Trials of Speech: Problematic Communication in Ovid (diss., Yale University, New Haven, Conn.) [DAI-A 60, 1999/2000, 4413].

Glücklich, Hans-Joachim (1977): Zeitkritik bei Properz, AU 20, 4 , 45-62.

Görler, Woldemar (1965): “Ovids Propemptikon (Amores 2, 11)”, Hermes 93, 338-47.

– (1988): “Laudabunt alii ...: Zur Funktion einer wenig beachteteten Redefigur”, in Filologia e forme letterarie. Studi offerti a F. Della Corte, (Urbino), III, 25-46.

Gößl, Sibylle (1981): “Ovid, Amores I 7”, GB 10, 165-80.

Gold, Barbara Kirk (1982): “Propertius 3.9: Maecenas as eques, dux, fautor”, in id. (ed.), Literary and Artistic Patronage in Ancient Rome (Austin), 103-17.

– (1984): “Propertius 3,8: a Self-conscious Narration”, QUCC 46 n. s. 17.2, 155-64.

– (1985/6): “Time, Poetry, and Immortality in Propertius (Propertius 1.8)”, CJ 81, 148-57.

– (1987): Literary Patronage in Greece and Rome (Chapel Hill/ London).

– (1993a): “‘But Ariadne Was Never There in the First Place’: Finding the Female in Roman Poetry”, in Rabinowitz, Nancy Sorkin/Richlin, Amy (edd.), Feminist Theory and the Classics (New York), 75-101 = P. A. Miller 2002, 430-56.

– (1993b): “The ‘Master Mistress’ of My Passion: the Lady as Patron in Ancient and Renaissance Literature, in DeForest, Mary (ed.), Woman's Power, Man’s Game: Essays on Classical Antiquity in Honor of Joy K. King (Wauconda), 279-304.

Gómez Pallarès, Joan (1995): “El papiro de Cornelio Galo, frgm. 2 de Courtney 1993, vv. 4-5, templa … legam, y la ‘lectura’ de monumentos en el siglo 1 a. C.”, AFB 18, 6, 169-74.

González Vega, F. (2003): “Alusión prospectiva y apropriación (inter)textual. La futura clasicidad de Virgilio vaticinada por Propercio”, in Nieto Ibáñez, Jesús-M^a (ed.): Lógos hellenikós. Homenaje al Profesor Gaspar Morocho Gayo. 2 Bde. (León), 285-97.

Goold, George Patrick (1965): “Amatoria critica”, HSPh 69, 1-107.

– (1966): “Noctes Propertianae”, HSPh 71, 59-106.

– (1977): Ovid I: Heroides and Amores. With an English Translation by Grant Showerman. Second Edition Revised by –. Loeb Classical Library (Cambridge, Mass./London).

– (1988) : “On Editing Propertius”, in Horsfall, Nicholas (ed.): Vir bonus discendi peritus: Studies in Celebration of Otto Skutsch’s Eightieth Birthday. Institute of Classical Studies. Bulletin Supplement 51 (London), 27-38.

– (1989): “Problems in Editing Propertius”, in Grant, John (ed.), Editing Greek and Latin Texts. Papers Given at the Twenty-Third Annual Conference on Editorial Problems, University of Toronto, 6-7 november 1987 (New York), 97-119.

– (1990): Propertius, Elegies. Edited and Translated. Loeb Classical Library 18 (Cambridge, Mass./London) [A. Ramírez de Verger, Habis 22, 1991, 450-3; Gries, CW 85, 1991/2, 267; T. Suits, NECN 19, 1991/2, 43-4; J. P. Sullivan, CO 69, 1991/2, 113; J. Butrica, Phoenix 46, 1992, 273-6; J. Delz, MH 49, 1992, 263; D.R. Shackleton Bailey, Gnomon 65, 1993, 454].

– (1992): “Paralipomena Propertiana”, HSPh 94, 287-320.

– (1998): “A Paraclausithyron from Pompeii”, in Knox, Peter/Foss, Clive (edd.): Style and Tradition. Studies in Honor of Wendell Clausen. Beiträge zur Altertumswissenschaft 92 (Stuttgart/Leipzig), 16-29.

Gosling, Anne (1987): “Tibullus 2,5 and Augustan Propaganda”, EMC 31, 333-9.

– (1992): “Political Apollo: from Callimachus to the Augustans”, Mnemosyne 45, 501-12.

Gotoff, Harold C. (1974): “Tibullus: Nunc levis est tractanda Venus”, HSPh 78, 231-51.

Govaerts, S. (1966): Le Corpus Tibullianum: Index verborum et relevés statistiques. Essai de méthodologie statistique (La Haye).

– (1973): “Quelques observations à propos de la courbe cumulative de la distribuition du vocabulaire chez un poète latin”, RELO 1973, 4, 19-27.

Grabensberger, P. (1979): Stilformen bei Tibull. Eine Untersuchung der Gestaltungsprinzipien in ausgewählten Elegien des 1. und 2. Buches (diss., Graz).

Graf, Fritz (1982): “Die Gallus-Verse von Qasr Ibrîm”, Gymnasium 89, 21-36.

Graffigna, Paola (1989): “L’andamento ripetitivo delle strutture ‘superliminali’ in Tib. I 2”, in Mantero, Teresa (ed.), Analysis. II: Varia poetica. Pubbl. del D. AR. Fl. CL. ET. n. s. 129 (Genova), 127-37.

Gransden, K. W. (1979): “Lente currite, noctis equi: Chaucer, Troilus and Criseyde 3.1422-70, Donne, The Sun Rising and Ovid, Amores 1.13”, in West, David/Woodman, Tony (edd.): Creative Imitation and Latin Literature (Cambridge), 157-71.

Green, Peter (1981): “Wit, Sex and Topicality: the Problems Confronting a Translator of Ovid’s Love Poetry”, EMC 25, 79-96.

– (1982): Ovid: The Erotic Poems: The Amores, The Art of Love, Cures for Love, On Facial Treatment for Ladies. Translated with an Introduction. Penguin Classics (Harmondsworth).

Green, S. (2004): “Contextualization and Textual Criticism: Making Sense of Character in Propertius 4.4 and Ovid, Heroides 1”, CW 97, 363-72.

Greenberg, Nathan A. (1987): “Metrics of the Elegiac Couplet”, CW 80, 233-41.

Greene, Ellen Schifferman (1992) : Discourses of Desire: Modes of Self-Presentation in Greek and Roman Latin Love Poetry (diss., University of California at Berkeley) [DA 53, 1992/3, 3517A-3518A].

– (1994): “Sexual Politics in Ovid’s Amores: 3.4, 3.8, and 3.12”, CPh 89, 344-50.

– (1995) : “Elegiac Woman: Fantasy, materia and Male Desire in Propertius 1.3 and 1.11”, AJPh 116, 303-18.

– (1998): The Erotics of Domination: Male Desire and the Mistress in Latin Poetry (Baltimore/London) [C. Brunelle, BMCRev 99.10.19; P.-J. Dehon, LEC 68, 2000, 393-4; B. C. Verstraete, Phoenix 54, 2000, 177-9; C. Santini, IJCT 7, 2000/1, 608-9; A. R. Sharrock, JRS 91, 2001, 219; J. K. Newman, Latomus 61, 2002, 459-60].

– (1998/9): “Travesties of Love: Violence and Voyeurism in Ovid, Amores 1.7”, in Miller (1999b), 409-18.

– (2000): “Gender Identity and the Elegiac Hero in Propertius 2.1”, in Fear (2000c), Arethusa 33, 241-61.

Griffin, Jasper (1977): “Propertius and Antony”, JRS 67, 17-26.

– (1984): “Augustus and the Poets: ‘Caesar qui cogere posset’”, in Millar, Fergus/Segal, Erich (edd.): Caesar Augustus: Seven Aspects (Oxford), 189-218.

– (1985): Latin Poets and Roman Life (London; ²1994) [R. G. M. Nisbet, JRS 77, 1987, 184-90; M. C. J. Putnam, CW 80, 1987, 458-9; D. West, CR 37, 1987, 50-2; R. Thomas, CPh 83, 1988, 54-69; J. C. Yardley, EMC 32, 1988, 74-8; A. Moreau, Annales (ESC) 43, 1988, 918-20].

Griffith, John G. (1988): “Gallus Resartus (Restoration of Latin Papyrus from Qasr Ibrîm)”, in id.: Festinat Senex or An Old Man in a Hurry, Being an Assortment of Unpublished Essays on Problems in Greek and Latin Literature and Archaeology, Together with Reprints of Three Articles (Oxford), 64-9.

Grilli, Alberto (1991): “L’uso della storia letteraria nelle elegie d’Ovidio”, in Papponetti 1991, 61-74.

Grimal, Pierre (1952): “Les intentions de Properce et la composition du livre IV des ‘Élégies’”, Latomus 11, 183-97. 315-26 = Collection Latomus 12 (Bruxelles, 1953).

– (1960): “Tibulle et Hésiode”, in Hésiode. Entretiens sur l’antiquité classique 7. (Vandœuvres/Geneve), 271-301.

– (1961): “Les amours du poète. Properce et Cynthie”, in Civilisation romaine. La Table Ronde n^o 157 (Paris), 34-49.

– (1966): “Les conséquences d’un ‘cursus’: Tibulle, Properce et Messalla, in Mélanges d'archéologie, d’épigraphie et d’histoire, offerts à Jerôme Carcopino (Paris), 433-44.

– (1982): “Delia meretrix an uxor?”, in Dilke [et al.] 1982a, 15-20 = VL 1983, 90, 3-7.

– (1983): “Properce et l’au-delà”, in Zehnacker, Hubert/Hentz, Gustave (ed.), Hommages à Robert Schilling. Collection d’Études Latines. Série scientifique 37 (Paris), 127-35.

Grondona, Marco (1971): “Struttura e stile dell’Elegia II 1 di Tibullo”, Maia 23, 236-44.

– (1975): “L’elegia I, 10 di Tibullo nelle sue corrispondenze strutturali con I, 1, 3 e 7”, A&R 20, 15-33.

– (1977): “Gli epigrammi di Tibullo e il congedo delle elegie (su Properzio e Virgilio)”, Latomus 36, 3-29.

Gross, Nicolas P. (1976): “Ovid, Amores 3.11 A and B: a Literary Mélange”, CJ 71, 152-60.

– (1979): “Rhetorical Wit and Amatory Persuasion in Ovid”, CJ 74, 305-318.

– (1985): Amatory Persuasion in Antiquity: Studies in Theory and Practice (Newark).

– (1995/6): “Ovid, Amores 1.8: Whose Amatory Rhetoric?”, CW 89, 197-206.

Gruber, John Charles (1987): The Relationship of Love and Death: Metaphor as a Unifying Device in the Elegies of Propertius (diss., The Ohio State University, Columbus) [DA 48, 1988, 2329A].

Grüner, Andreas (1993): “Zur Topographie des Esquilin in der frühen Kaiserzeit. Das Haus des Properz: Versuch einer Lokalisierung”, Boreas 16, 39-55.

Grumach, Ernst (1949): Tibull, Properz, in Goethe und die Antike. Eine Sammlung I, Potsdam.

Gruppe, Otto F. (1838): Die römische Elegie. Kritische Untersuchungen mit eingeflochtenen Übersetzungen. 2 Bde. (Leipzig).

Guarducci, Margherita (1977): “Epigrammi greci in una casa romana di Assisi”, in Colloquium Propertianum, Assisi, 26-28 marzo 1976. Atti, Assisi, 124-9.

– (1985): “La casa di Properzio: nuove riflessioni sulla Domus Musae di Assisi e sulle sue epigrafi”, RAL 40, 163-82.

– (1986): “La casa di Properzio a Assisi”, in Assisi 1986, 137-41.

Günther, Hans-Christian (1994): “Tibullus ludens”, Eikasmos 5, 251-69.

– (1997a): Properz und das Selbstzitat in der augusteischen Dichtung. Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Sitzungsberichte. 1997, 2 (München).

– (1997b): Quaestiones Propertianae. Mnemosyne Supplementum 169 (Leiden, etc.) [J. Radicke, GGA 251, 1999, 168-80; S. Raimondi, Faventia 21, 1999, 169-71; G. Liveley, JRS 91, 2001, 240-1].

– (1997c): “Verse Transpositions in Tibullus”, CQ 47, 501-9.

– (1998a): “Römische Liebeselegie und hellenistische Dichtung”, Hellenica 48, 7-27.

– (1998b): “Word Play in Propertius”, Eikasmos 9, 243-57.

– (2002): Albius Tibullus: Elegien. Mit einer Einleitung zur römischen Liebeselegie und erklärenden Anmerkungen zum Text übersetzt (Würzburg) [L. Spahlinger, Gymnasium 111, 2004, 290-1].

Gundel, H./R. Hanslik (1955): C. Valgius Rufus, RE VIII A 1, 272-276.

Gurval, Robert Alan (1995): Actium and Augustus: the Politics and Emotions of Civil War (Ann Arbor) [P. White, Phoenix 51, 1997, 410-12; E. Dench, CR 48, 1998, 398-9].

Gutzwiller, Kathryn J. (1985): “The Lover and the Lena: Propertius 4.5”, Ramus 14, 105-15.

Guzmán Arias/Blaya Andreu, R. (1985): “Notas de bibliografía. Clasificación temática”, in Simposio Tibuliano 1985, 281-85.

Habinek, Thomas (2002): “Ovid and Empire”, in Hardie 2002a, 46-61.

Hälikkä, Riikka (2001): “Sparsis comis, solutis capillis: Loose Hair in Ovid’s Elegiac Poetry”, Arctos 35, 23-34.

Haffter, Heinz (1970): “Das Gedichtbuch als dichterische Aussage – Überlegungen zu den Elegien des Properz”, in Ableitinger, Doris/Gugel, Helmut (ed.), Festschrift Karl Vretska zum 70. Geburtstag am 18. Oktober, überreicht von seinen Freunden und Schülern (Heidelberg), 53-67 = Eisenhut 1975, 160-73.

Hagen, Bolko (1954): Stil und Abfassungszeit der Lygdamusgedichte (Ps.-Tibull III 1-6) (diss., Hamburg; dactyl.).

Hall, John Barrie (1978): “Ovid, Amores 3,7(6), 55”, PACA 14, 7.

– (1982): “A Note on Ovid, Amores 1.13.79f.”, LCM 7, 92.

– (1983): “Ovid Amores II.IX 23-24”, PACA 17, 63.

– (1994): “Problemi sul testo degli Amores di Ovidio”, Acme 49, 25-34.

– (1999): “Critical Observations on the Text of Ovid’s Amatory Works”, in Morton Braund, Susanna/Mayer, Roland (1999; edd.): Amor: Roma. Love & Latin Literature. Eleven Essays (and One Poem) by Former Research Students Presented to E. J. Kenney on His Seventy-Fifth Birthday. Cambridge Philological Society. Supplementary Volume 22 (Cambridge), 94-103.

Hallett, Judith P.: (1971): Book IV: Propertius’ ‘recusatio’ to Augustus and Augustan Ideals, (diss., Harvard University).

– (1973): “The Role of Women in Roman Elegy: Counter Cultural Feminism”, Arethusa 6, 103-24 = Sullivan, John Patrick (ed.): Women in the Ancient World. The Arethusa Papers (Albany, 1984), 247-62 = P. A. Miller 2002, 329-47.

– (1985): “Queens, Princeps and Women of the Augustan Elite: Propertius’ Cornelia-Elegy and the Res Gestae Diui Augusti”, in Winkes, Rolf (ed.), The Age of Augustus. Interdisciplinary Conference Held at Brown University. April 30-May 2, 1982, (Providence/Louvain), 73-88.

– (1989): “Women as Same and Other in Classical Roman Elite”, Helios 16, 59-78.

– (1992): “Heeding Our Native Informants: The Uses of Latin Literary Texts in Recovering Elite Roman Attitudes Toward Age Gender and Social Status”, EMC 36, 333-55.

– (1993a): “Feminist Theory, Historical Periods, Literary Canons, and the Study of Greco-Roman Antiquity”, in Rabinowitz, Nancy Sorkin/Richlin, Amy (edd.), Feminist Theory and the Classics (New York/London), 45-72.

– (1993b): “Martial’s Sulpicia and Propertius’ Cynthia”, in DeForest, Mary (ed.), Woman's Power, Man’s Game: Essays on Classical Antiquity in Honor of Joy K. King (Wauconda), Wauconda, 322-53 = CW 86, 1992/3, 99-123.

– :“Sulpicia and the Marriage Racket” (Vortragsmanuskript)

– /Skinner, Marilyn (1997): Roman Sexualities (Princeton, NJ) [B. C. Verstraete, Phoenix 52, 1998, 151-3; C. A. Williams, BMCRev 98.10.16].

Hannoosh, Michele (1989): “The Reflexive Function of Parody”, CompLit 41, 113-27.

Hansen, Gustaf Charles (1993): A Stylistic Analysis of Ovid’s Elegiac Poetry with a View Towards Determining the Authorship of Heroides 16-21 (diss., University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.) [DA 56, 1995/6, 2666A].

Hanslik, Rudolf (1952): “Der Dichterkreis des Messalla”, AAWW 89.2, 22-38.

– (1955): “M. Valerius Messalla Corvinus (nr. 261)”, RE VIII A 1, 131-57.

– (1956): “Tibull I, 1”, WS 69, 297-303.

– (1962): “Textkritisches in Properz Buch IV: IV 4”, RhM 105, 236-52.

– (1963): “Textkritik in Properz Buch IV: IV 1”, Hermes 91, 178-90.

– (1970): Tibulls Elegie I 3, in Wimmel, Walter (ed.): Forschungen zur römischen Literatur. Festschrift zum 60. Geburtstag von Karl Büchner (Wiesbaden), 138-45.

– (1976): “Zum ersten Gedicht der Monobiblos des Properz”, WSt N.F. 10, 186-198.

– (1979): Sex. Propertii Elegiarum Libri IV. Bibliotheca scriptorum Graecorum et Romanorum Teubneriana (Leipzig).

Harder, Richard/Walter Marg (1956): P. Ovidius Naso, Liebesgedichte. Amores. Lateinisch und deutsch (München; ⁷1992); S. 160-174 auch in: Albrecht/Zinn 1968, 295-312.

Hardie, Philip (1992): “Augustan Poets and the Mutability of Rome”, in Powell, Anton (ed.), Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustus (London), 59-82.

– (2002a; ed.): The Cambridge Companion to Ovid (Cambridge) [B. Rochette, LEC 70, 2002, 418-19; P. J. Davis, AJPh 124, 2003, 485-9; N. Holzberg, JRS 93, 2003, 374-6; S. H. Lindheim, Vergilius 49, 2003, 135-51].

– (2002b): Ovid’s Poetics of Illusion (Cambridge) [J.-Y. Maleuvre, LEC 70, 2002, 419; C. Walde, MH 59, 2002, 261; P. J. Davis, AJPh 124, 2003, 485-9; A. Feldherr, JRS 93, 2003, 373-4; R. T. Ganiban, NECJ 30, 2003, 173-5; C. A. Perkins, CB 79, 2003, 152-6; M. Janan, CW 97, 2003/4, 216-17; J. Wildberger, Gnomon 76, 2004, 453-4].

– (2004): “Approximative Similes in Ovid: Incest and Doubling”, Dictynna 1, 83-112 [http://www.univ-lille3.fr./portail/documents/dictynna/fabre-serris.pdf].

Hardy, W. G. (1923): “On Ovid Am. ii.19 and iii.4”, CPh 18, 263-4.

Harmon, Daniel P. (1980): The Poet’s Initiation and the Sacerdotal Imagery of Propertius 3.1-5, in: Carl Deroux (Hg.): Studies in Latin Literature an Roman History II, Bruxelles (Coll. Latomus 168), 317-334.

– (1986): “Tibullus and the Rural Festival”, ANRW II 16.3, 1943-55.

Harrauer, Hermann (1969): Die Komposition der Elegien des 1. Tibullbuches (diss., Wien, 1. Teil; dactyl.), 1-251; Untersuchung der bei Tibull seltenen Wörter im Hinblick auf ihren Sprachwert (diss., Wien, 2. Teil; dactyl.), 252-654.

– (1973): A Bibliography to Propertius. Bibliography to the Augustan Poetry 2 (Hildesheim).

– (1977): A Bibliography to the Corpus Tibullianum. Bibliography to the Augustan Poetry 1 (Hildesheim) [G. K. Galinsky, ACR 2, 1972, 254-5; E. Kutáková, LF 95, 1972, 127; R. J. Littlewood, Phoenix 26, 1972, 205-6; E. N. O’Neil, CPh 68, 1973, 313-14; B. Riposati, C&S 45/6, 1973, 133-7; G. E. Thüry, AAHG 26, 1973, 112-13; S. Viarre, AC 42, 1973, 278; E. J. Kenney, CR 24, 1974, 138; C.J. Classen, Gymnasium 83, 1976, 146-7].

Harris, Michael Peter (1971): Propertius’ Book IV: The Interplay of Public and Private Themes (diss., Cornell University, Ithaca, NY) [DA 32, 1972, 5209A].

Harrison, Stephen J. (1989): “Augustus, the Poets, and the spolia opima”, CQ 39, 408-14.

– (1994): “Drink, Suspicion and Comedy in Propertins 1.3”, PCPhS 40, 18-26.

– (2002): “Ovid and Genre: Evolution of an Elegist”, in Hardie 2002a, 79-94.

Harrison, S. J. (2005): Hercules and Augustus in Propertius 4.9, PLL 12, 117-131.

Hartmann, Elmar (1965): “Die Gallus-Inschrift auf dem Vatikanischen Obelisken”, Gymnasium 72, 1-8.

Harvey, F. D. (1983): “Cognati Caesaris: Ovid Amores 1, 2, 51/52”, WS N. F. 17, 89-90.

Harzer, Friedmann (2002): Ovid. Sammlung Metzler 328 (Stuttgart/Weimar).

Haß, Petra (1998): Der locus amoenus in der antiken Literatur: Zur Theorie und Geschichte eines literarischen Motivs (Bamberg) [M. Lobe, DASIU 46, 1999, 33-4; A. Kledt, GFA 3, 2000; J. F. Miller, CR 50, 2000, 312-13].

Hauben, Hans (1984): “Gallus apostata. Encore le P. Oxy 2820”, in Atti del XVII Congresso internazionale di papirologia (Napoli, 19-26 maggio 1983) (Napoli), 1085-97.

Heiden, B.A. (1982): Book-division within Propertius Book II," QUCC NS 11, 151-69.

– (1988): “Learned Allusions and Political Expression in Propertius 2.1.51-70”, Latomus 47, 358-64.

– (1995): “Sic te servato: an Interpretation of Propertius 1.21”, CPh 90, 161-7.

Heil, Andreas (2011): „Princeps und poeta auf dem Palatin. Eine intermediale Analyse von Properz 2,31, in: Haltenhoff, Andreas/Andreas Heil/Fritz-Heiner Mutschler (2011; Hgg.): Römische Werte und römische Literatur im frühen Prinzipat, Berlin/New York (Beiträge zur Altertumskunde 275), 53-80.

Heilmann, Willibald (1959): Die Bedeutung der Venus bei Tibull unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Horaz und Properz (diss., Frankfurt a. M).

Heinemann, Maximilian (1910): Epistulae amatoriae quomodo cohaereant cum elegiis Alexandrinis (diss., Straßburg).

Heldmann, Konrad (1987): “Schönheitspflege und Charakterstärke in Ovids Liebeslehre. Zum Proömium der ‘Medicamina faciei’”, WJA 7, 153-76.

– (1994): “Ovids Sabinus-Gedicht (Am. 2,18) und die ‘Epistulae Heroidum’”, Hermes 122, 188-219.

– (2003): “Argumentationskunst und tätige Liebe in Ovids Gedicht am. 1, 9”, Hermes 131, 46-66.

Hellegouarc’h, Joseph (1989a): “Parce, precor … ou Tibulle et la prière. Étude stilistique”, ICS 74, 49-68.

– (1989b): “Style et métrique dans Tibulle I-II”, VL 1989, 115, 10-21.

Helm, Rudolf (1957): “Sextus Propertius” (2), RE 23.1, 758-96.

– (1958): Tibull, Gedichte. Lateinisch und deutsch. Schriften und Quellen der Alten Welt 2 (Berlin; ⁴1979).

– (1965): Properz, Gedichte. Lateinisch und Deutsch. Schriften und Quellen der Alten Welt 18 (Berlin; ⁴1986)

Helmbold, Wilhelm C. (1949): “Propertius IV.7, Prolegomena to an Interpretation”, University of California Publications in Classical Philolology 13.9, 333-44.

Hemelrijk, Emily Ann (1999): Matrona docta: Educated Women in the Roman Élite from Cornelia to Julia Domna (London) [H. N. Parker, BMCRev 2002.07.32; G. Vidén, Gnomon 74, 2002, 240-3].

– (2000): “Roem, roddel en reputatie: de Romeinse dichterin Sulpicia”, Hermeneus 72, 76-9.

Henderson, Alistair A. R. (1969): “Tibullus, Elysium and Tartarus”, Latomus 28, 649-53.

– (1978): “Ovidius numerans”, LCM 3, 185-7.

– (1987): “Tibullus 1.2.1”, LCM 12, 21.

Henderson, John (1991/2): “Wrapping up the Case: Reading Ovid, Amores, 2,7 (+ 8)”, MD 27, 37-88; 28, 27-83.

– (2002): “A Doo-Dah-Doo-Dah-Dey at the Races: Ovid Amores 3.2 and the Personal Politics of the Circus Maximus”, ClAnt 21, 41-65.

Hendry, Michael Edward (1990): Problems of Unity and Design in Propertius II. (diss., University of Virginia, Charlottesville) [DA 57, 1990/1, 3731A].

– (1995): “Lachmann’s Hypothesis. www.curculio.org.lachmann.html

– (1995/6): “Propert. I 13, 29-32”, MCr 30/1, 239-45.

– (1996a): “Guzzling Poison and Draining the Sea: a Conjecture on Propertius 2.24b.27”, Phoenix 50, 67-9.

– (1996b): “‘Nevermore’: a Conjecture on Propertius 2, 23, 24”, Mnemosyne 49, 440-3.

– (1997a): “Three Propertian Puns”, CQ n.s 47, 599-603.

– (1997b): “Inadvisable Mutilations: The Unity of Propertius 2.22”, CQ n.s. 47, 599-603.

Hengst, D. den (1988): “Ovidius ludens. De geestigheid van Ovidius”, Lampas 27, 346-60.

Hennemann, Klaus (1971): Tibulls religiöse Dichtkunst (diss., Freiburg i. Br).

Henniges, Martin (1979): Utopie und Gesellschaftskritik bei Tibull (Corpus Tibullianum Buch I und II) (Frankfurt a. M) [H. Harrauer, WS 18, 1984, 238; A. Thill, REL 59, 1981, 385; F.-H. Mutschler, AAHG 39, 1986, 46-8].

Herescu, Nicolas Ian (1958; ed.): Ovidiana. Recherches sur Ovide, publiées à l'occasion du bimillénaire de la naissance du poète (Paris).

Hering, Wolfgang (1973): “Die Monobiblos als Gedichtbuch”, Acta Class. Univ Scient. Debrecen 9, 69-75.

– (1982): “Form und Inhalt in der frühaugusteischen Poesie”, ANRW II 30.1, 181-253.

Herrlinger, Gerhard (1930): Totenklage um Tiere in der antiken Dichtung. Mit einem Anhang byzantinischer, mittellateinischer und neuhochdeutscher Tierepikedien. Tübinger Beiträge zur Altertumswissenschaft 8 (Stuttgart).

Herrmann, Katharina (2001): “Wenn selbst die Musen nicht weiterhelfen ... Zu Tibull II 4”, Hermes 129, 505-13.

Herrmann, Léon (1961): “Tarpeius”, Latomus 20, 530-4.

– (1964a): “Un nouveau fragment de Sulpicia?”, Latomus 23, 322-3

– (1964b): “Le Pseudo-Lygdamus”, Latomus 23, 726-49.

– (1968a): “(Pseudo) Properce, IV, 3, 1”, Latomus 27, 650.

– (1968b): “Sex superant versus. (Pseudo) Properce, Élégies, IV, 2, 57-58”, Latomus 27, 617-21.

– (1975): “Ovide, la Bona Dea et Livia”, AC 44, 126-40.

– (1978): “Confirmation de la règle des 18 vers par les deux livres authentiques de Tibulle”, Latomus 37, 387-94.

Herter, Hans (1976): Die durstigen Tauben, GB 5, 123-42.

Heubner, Heinz (1961): Propertiana, Hermes 89, 382-384.

Hexter, Ralph (2002): “Ovid in the Middle Ages: Exile, Mythographer, and Lover”, in Boyd 2002b, 413-42.

Heyne, Christian Gottlob (1817): Albii Tibulli carmina, libri tres cum libro quarto Sulpiciae et aliorum, Ch. G. Heynii ed. quarta nunc aucta notis et observationibus E. C. F. Wunderlichii (Leipzig).

Heyworth, Stephen J. (1984a): “A Note on the Gallus Fragment”, LCM 9, 63-4.

– (1984b): “Notes on Propertius Books I and II”, CQ 34, 394-405.

– (1986): “Notes on Propertius, Books III and IV”, CQ 36, 199-211.

– (1992): “Propertius 2.13”, Mnemosyne 45, 45-59.

– (1994): “Some Allusions to Callimachus in Latin Poetry”, MD 33, 51-79. .

– (1995a): “Dividing Poems”, in Pecere, Oronzo/Reeve, Michael D. (edd.), Formative Stages of Classical Traditions: Latin Texts from Antiquity to the Renaissance. Proceedings of a Conference Held at Erice, 16-22 October 1993, as the 6th Course of International School for the Study of Written Records. Biblioteca del ‘Centro per il collegamento degli studi medievali e umanistici in Umbria’ 15 (Spoleto), 117-48.

– (1995b): “Propertius: Division, Transmission, and the Editor’s Task”, PLLS 8, 165-85.

– (1999): “Textual Notes on Propertius 4.3, 4.4, 4.5”, in Morton Braund, Susanna/Mayer, Roland (1999; edd.): Amor: Roma. Love & Latin Literature. Eleven Essays (and One Poem) by Former Research Students Presented to E. J. Kenney on His Seventy-Fifth Birthday. Cambridge Philological Society. Supplementary Volume 22 (Cambridge), 71-93.

– (2007a): Cynthia: A Companion to the Text of Propertius (Oxford) [N. Holzberg, CW 102, 2009, 505f.].

– (2007b): Propertius, Patronage and Politics, BICS 50, 93-128.

–/J.H.W. Morwood (2011): A Commentary on Propertius, Book 3, Oxford.

Highet, Gilbert (1949): The Classical Tradition, Oxford.

– (1998) “Tibullus the Rebel” in Ball, Robert (ed.): The Unpublished Lectures of Gilbert Highet. Hawaii Classical Studies 2 (Bern, etc.), 105-18.

Hiltbrunner, Otto (1970): “Ovids Gedicht vom Siegelring und ein anonymes Epigramm aus Pompei”, Gymnasium 77, 283-99.

Hinds, Stephen (1984): “Carmina digna: Gallus P. Qasr Ibrîm 6-7 Metamorphosed”, PLLS 4, 43-54.

– (1987a): “Generalising about Ovid”, Ramus 16, 4-31.

– (1987b): “The Poetess and the Reader: Further Steps Towards Sulpicia”, Hermathena 143, 29-46.

– (1995): “Reflexive Annotation in Poetic Allusion”, Hermathena 158, 41-51.

– (1998): Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Roman Literature and Its Contexts (Cambridge) [M. Gale, G&R 46, 1998, 239-40; C. Nappa, BMCRev 98.9.8; M. Lowrie, CW 92, 1998/9, 384-5; G. Conte, JRS 89, 1999, 217-20; J. F. Miller, CPh 94, 1999, 351-5; P. A. Miller, CPh 94, 1999, 351-5; J. J. O’Hara, CR 49, 1999, 97-8; P. Tordeur, AC 68, 1999, 395; G. Tronchet, REA 101, 1999, 226-8; J. Zetzel, Phoenix 53, 1999, 171-2; S. Raimondi, Faventia 22, 2000, 165-7; A. Deremetz, Latomus 60, 2001, 783-4].

Hodge, R. I. V./Buttimore, R.A. (1977): The ‘Monobiblos’ of Propertius: an Account of the First Book of Propertius Consisting of a Text, Translation and Critical Essay of Each Poem (Cambridge/Ipswich).

Hofmann, Heinz (1988): “Ovidius elegiacus et epicus. Over enkele hoofdlijnen van het moderne Ovidiusonderzoek”, Lampas 21, 320-32.

Hoffmann, Jürgen (1976): Poeta und Puella. Zur Grundkonstellation der römischen Liebeselegie (diss., Erlangen).

Hoffmann, Roland (1997): Lateinische Verbalperiphrasen vom Typ amans sum und amatus fui: Valenz und Grammatikalisierung (Primäres Textkorpus: Ovid). Europäische Hochschulschriften. Reihe XXI: Linguistik, 175 (Frankfurt a. M., etc.).

Hofstaedter, James Raymond (1972): The Structure of Ovid's Amores, Book I (diss., Ohio State University) [DA 33, 1973. 6333A].

Hohenwallner, Ingrid (2001): Venit odoratos elegia nexa capillos. Haar und Frisur in der römischen Liebeselegie. Mit einem Prolog von Gerhard Petersmann und einem Epilog herausgegeben von Siegrid Düll. Arianna 2 (Möhnesee) [D. Richter, Thetis 8, 2001, 351-2].

Holleman, A. W. J.