286
WORLD WAR I AND ITS AFTERMATH
Britain. I have a copy of his April (1917) Theses, from Glasgow, published by the Socialist Labor Press. Another pamphlet I received from a friend there was The Proletarian Revolution by V. I. Ulianov (Lenin), published by the British Socialist Party. In the early twenties Lenin’s pamphlets began to appear here. I recall Robert Minor, with his pockets full of copies of The State and Revolution, passing them out enthusiastically to all of us. It was written in August and September 1917. Another that had a great effect on those of us who were called “syndicalists” was “Left-Wing” Communism—an Infantile Disorder, particularly the chapters “Should Revolutionaries Work in Reactionary Trade Unions?” and “Shall We Participate in Bourgeois Parliaments?” The answer Lenin gave to both questions was “Yes,” which caused much debate here, especially in the IWW and left-wing Socialist circles, and led many to join the Communist Party.
A little later, an earlier pamphlet written in 1916, called Imperialism—the Highest Stage of Capitalism, was translated into English. It is here, in his introduction to the first Russian edition, that Lenin referred to the necessity of formulating his few observations on Russian politics “with extreme caution, by hints, in that Aesopian language— in that cursed Aesopian language—to which tsarism compelled all revolutionaries to have recourse.” I gave no special thought to this at the time. I knew how Irish songs like “Dark Rosaleen” and “Kathleen-ni- Houlihan” referred to Ireland and “Spanish ale will give you hope!” meant help was coming to the revolutionaries from Spain. In all oppressed countries such figure of speech were necessary. Little did I think that this phrase, “Aesopian language,” would be twisted and perverted 30 odd years later in a Federal Court in Foley Square in New York City by a renegade stool pigeon, Louis Budenz, to convict Communists, myself included, accused under the thought-control Smith Act.
Foster—Leader of Labor
In recalling the onslaught of the Palmer Raids, the deportation drives and state syndicalist prosecutions after World War I, it would be a serious mistake not to see the other side of the picture—the magnificent fight-back spirit of the American workers at that time. In addition to the above repressive government efforts, there was a vicious drive against the trade unions by Big Business all over the country in a cam
FOSTER—LEADER OF LABOR
287
paign to install the “open shop” and company unions. The employers resented the wartime gains of labor and were determined to destroy them. The cost of living was extremely high during and after the war, and the workers’ grievances were aggravated. The years of 1919 and the early 20s saw American workers engaged in heroic struggles on a gigantic scale. There emerged in these epic battles a new leader of labor—a great organizer and strategist, William Z. Foster. He had advocated, as a delegate to the Chicago Federation of Labor, the utilization of the war period to bring the unorganized millions of basic industry into the American Federation of Labor, but the AFL leaders rejected his plans.
Aided by a few coworkers, among them Jack Johnstone, and supported by John R. Fitzpatrick, president of the Chicago Federation, Foster demonstrated in a most dramatic manner that it could be done. He had worked long hours in the car bams of Swift and Company, yet he could not afford an overcoat in 1915. He knew the lot of the stockyard workers. A vice-president of Armour’s had recently insulted a workers’ committee when they came to complain of low wages, long hours, dangerous and unsanitary working conditions in the slave pens Of the yards. “Tell your union friends,” he said, “that organized labor will never get anything from this company that it hasn’t the power to take.” Bill Foster, exploited worker from the stockyards turned labor organizer, never forgot those cynical words. He packed a deadly wallop for the Big Five—Armour, Swift, Morris, Cudahy and Wilson— who made 40 million dollars in 1917. He organized their plants.
Many of the workers were immigrants, many Negroes. For the first time 20,000 Negro workers were organized side by side with their white brothers. This was a unique historical accomplishment. The IWW had had no great success in organizing Negro workers, although they had organized some in the lumber camps of Louisiana and on the waterfront of Philadelphia. But in textiles and lumber in the North and mining in the West, where the IWW was strong, there were as yet few Negro workers. This therefore was the real beginning of organizing Negro and white workers together in basic industry. When workers were fired for joining the union, a national strike vote was carried 100 per cent. The workers were ready and willing to quit. With the huge wartime demand for foodstuffs, the packers could not stand a strike.
The Federal Mediation Commission stepped in and offered arbitration. For three weeks the unions exposed the conditions in that terrible
288
WORLD WAR I AND ITS AFTERMATH
industry. There had been no great changes in conditions from the days The Jungle was written by Upton Sinclair a decade before. The hearings were, as Foster described them, “a long recital of starvation, exhausting labor, sickness, mutilation, ignorarice, drunkenness, insanity, despair and death.” One woman worker testified that she had had a hat when she came from Poland, but it got worn out and she could never afford another. In December 1917 came the first victory. The Commission agreed to the right to organize, a 10 per cent wage increase, seniority, no discrimination. They also agreed to abolish arbitrary discharges and to establish sanitary lunchrooms, dressing rooms and washrooms.
This was followed in March 1918 by Judge Altschuler, wartime administrator of the packing industry, granting 85 per cent of their additional demands, which included 10 per cent to 25 per cent wage increases, an eight-hour day with ten hours’ pay, extra pay for overtime, equal pay for men and women, a guarantee of five days’ work a week, and lunch periods with pay. Even today, these would be substantial gains. To top it off, the awards were retroactive; 125,000 Chicago workers received six million dollars in back pay—and a few overcoats and hats were then possible for the packinghouse workers. This victory thrilled and encouraged the members of the entire labor movement. It prepared them for the postwar struggles, the greatest of which was led by Foster in 1919-20.
While Bill Foster was listening to the arbitration hearings on packing he had a plan in his pocket for organizing steel, citadel of the open shop. Representatives of 15 international unions were called together by the Chicago Federation of Labor. Samuel Gompers, president of the AFL said skeptically, “Well, Brother Foster, what do you propose?” The 15 unions grudgingly agreed to a federated campaign and pledged the ridiculous sum of $100 each. Foster was made the unpaid secretary of the National Committee for Organizing Iron and Steel Workers. Fortunately, his own union, the Railway Carmen, paid his salary as an organizer. He remarked with justifiable bitterness, “You would think we were setting out to organize a bunch of peanut stands instead of a half a million workers.” Gompers never spoke at a steel workers’ meeting. Finally, he resigned as chairman of the committee and appointed John Fitzpatrick in his place.
However, Foster was not easily discouraged. He had faith in the
THE GREAT STEEL STRIKE, 1919
289
workers. He said many years later in his pamphlet on Unionizing Steel, written to help the CIO in this field: “I was never one of those who considered the organizing of workers such a huge task. The problem in any case is merely to develop the proper organization crews and systems, and the freedom-hungry workers, skilled or unskilled, men or women, black or white, will react almost as naturally and inevitably as water runs down a hill.” He demonstrated the truth of his words in the greatest single key industry in the country, steel. The New Republic called it a “miracle of organization.” The Journal of Political Economy commended “his remarkable ability.”
The Great Steel Strike, 1919
Judge Gary, arrogant president of the U.S. Steel Corporation, tried to head off the organization drive among steel workers. He ordered a basic national eight-hour day, which he referred to contemptuously as, “Give them an extra cup of rice!” On October 1, 1918, Foster and his corps of organizers moved into the heart of steel—Pittsburgh, “The Iron City”—which is surrounded by a ring of what were then company towns, Aliquippa, Ambridge, Duquesne, McKeesport, Clairton, Homestead, Donora, Johnstown and others. The going was rough. In the course of the drive, 30,000 workers were fired. The KKK appeared and the spy system spread. Speech and assemblage were suppressed and the workers were held in a state of industrial peonage. Organizers were jailed and beaten up. Foster, Mother Jones and others were arrested and driven out of town. Mayor Crawford of Duquesne, called “The Toad” by the workers, remarked when he heard that Rabbi Stephen Wise of New York was to speak at a free speech protest meeting: “Jesus Christ himself could not speak here for the A. F. of L.!”
There were 33 nationality groups involved in the drive, many foreign-born, brought directly from Ellis Island to these industrial prisons. As in our IWW textile strikes a few years earlier, language was a tremendous problem for the organizers at meetings and in literature. Foster, like Haywood, trained the organizers to use simple nontechnical speech, and to speak slowly, and distinctly, repeating the main ideas. Many foreign-speaking workers began to learn English at these meetings, an “Americanization” by-product of the strike.
290
WORLD WAR I AND ITS AFTERMATH
A barrage of redbaiting was let loose on Foster. A Senate Investigation Committee did not concern itself with the many just grievances and indescribably bad working and living conditions of the workers, some of whom were huddled in barracks. Nor did they concern themselves with the brutality of the Coal and Iron Constabulary (later abolished by Governor Pinchot), nor with the violations of all constitutional rights. No, their main concern was to picture Foster as the chief Red in America, who was using the strike to start a revolution. His previous activities as an IWW and a syndicalist and all his writings were featured in newspaper scareheads. He was charged with being a “Bolshevik”—then the last word in redbaiting.
But Foster proceeded on his determined path, in his characteristically quiet and systematic manner. By June 1919, over 100,000 workers were in the union, which made a demand on Judge Gary for collective bargaining. He ignored the letter. A strike vote registered 98 per cent in favor. On September 22, 1919, approximately 304,000 workers quit the steel mills. By September 30, there were 367,000 out on strike in 50 cities in ten states. The giant industry stopped; the fires went out, blast furnaces ceased to roar, the red glow that filled the skies for miles, faded; smoke and gas no longer polluted the atmosphere. The great life-giving force, the workers, had gone out of the vast plants.
A reign of terror was then let loose on the strikers. The steel areas were overrun by police, deputy sheriffs, state troopers and strike breakers who were brought in under their protection. Picketing was forbidden and strikers who attempted to picket were arrested and beaten. Twenty-two workers laid down their lives in this great struggle. No mass meetings or union meetings were permitted during the four months of the strike. The workers maintained a magnificent unity as long as humanly possible, and were supported in a spirit of solidarity by other workers all over the country. Outstanding were the contributions of the needle-trades workers of New York City, who sent their brothers in steel $180,000.
But terror and hunger, and the indifference, even sabotage, of the official Gompers machine of the AFL finally crushed the heroic effort. However, as often happens in what are called “lost strikes,” it had cost the employers dearly and they were forced to abolish the 12- hour day and seven-day week and to make many changes in wages and working conditions, which the workers credited to their own bat-
THE GREAT STEEL STRIKE, 1919
291
ties. The great moral victory was in the proof that the octopus steel could be successfully organized. Fifteen years later the CIO finished the job that Bill Foster so courageously tackled back in 1919. Phillip Murray said when he was president of United Steel Workers, CIO, “There’s one Communist my door is always open to—Bill Foster, for what he did for the steel workers!”
At the same time that the great steel strike was going on, in the year 1919, more than four million American workers were involved in other strike struggles. There was a general strike in Seattle and one in Winnipeg, Canada. There was what was called the “outlaw strike” of
-
railroad shopmen, unsanctioned by their officials. Despite a temporary injunction, over a million coal min ers were on strike at the same time as the steel workers. The textile workers of Lawrence were out again, under the banner of the Amalgamated Textile Workers and won the 48-hour week. Clothing workers and maritime workers, were on the march in 1919. Labor was aggressive, stubborn and persistent in defense of its rights after World War I. Blood was shed in these great struggles. Heroic men and women died for the working class.
Such a one—a woman who gave her life—was Mrs. Fannie Sellins. Her maiden name was Mooney. She was a widow with four children when she began her labor organizing work for the garment workers of the AFL in St. Louis. She was very successful and was loaned to the United Mine Workers of America to go into the coal towns and work quietly in the homes, especially in places where men organizers had been beaten up and deported. On August 22, 1919, she was brutally murdered in Natrona, near Breckenridge, Pennsylvania, in Allegheny County. A strike of miners at the Allegheny Steel Company’s mine was taking place there. A dozen armed men, called “deputies” but actually paid by the mining company, were stationed at that place. They tried to break up the picket lines of the miners by threats and brutality. Their hatred of Mrs. Sellins was fanned further by the fact that she was loaned by the miners to help organize the steel workers.
Foster referred to her as “one of the finest labor organizers I ever met.” He said:
Fannie Sellins had a special distinction as an organizer during the great 1919 Steel Strike. She was one of the best of our whole corps of organizers. In New Kensington [Pennsylvania] she lined up 15,000 to 20,000 steel workers. Of the whole 80 centers, this was the only one which spontaneously organized itself. Fannie Sellins had an exceptional belief in the
292
WORLD WAR I AND ITS AFTERMATH
workers and she went out and organized them. She was killed because she organized these thousands of steel workers. She took the initiative and in the midst of terror went out to her work.”
On a hot afternoon in August Mrs. Sellins received a call to come to Natrona. A striker, a young veteran, had been arrested. She found deputies flourishing guns at an excited group of men, women and children. She felt trouble brewing and tried to get the children away, into nearby yards behind a fence. The deputies opened fire and killed an unarmed striker, 60-year-old Joseph Starzeleski, and shot Mrs. Sellins in the back. After she fell, they pumped more bullets into her body. One deputy put her hat on his head and swaggered around shouting, “I am Fanny Sellins now!” The two victims are buried in a common grave under a beautiful monument erected by the union, with an inscription, “Faithful ever to the cause of Labor.” It was dedicated by Phillip Murray and organizers of the United Mine Workers of America. Every year the workers of the area commemorate the death of Fannie Sellins, one of the many martyrs who died for labor.
The Children’s Crusade
The dramatic climax of the movement for amnesty came unexpectedly out of small groups of friendless and poverty-stricken families in Oklahoma and Arkansas. They became the center of a Children’s Crusade to the nation’s capital, a long trek for backwoods folks who had never been but a few miles from their little farms. The idea of a living petition, one that could not be pigeonholed or thrown in a wastepaper basket, originated with resourceful and determined Kate Richards O’Hare. She had just finished serving two years in the Jefferson City, Missouri, prison for an anti-war speech.
A Women’s Committee to Free Kate O’Hare had been set up in the Rand School building in New York City. A talented and eloquent young Negro woman Socialist, Helen Holman, was its secretary. Thanks to the tireless efforts of the Socialist women, the sentence had been cut from five to two years.
As a Socialist agitator, working out of St. Louis, Mrs. O’Hare had made many speaking trips into the Southwest and knew the barren, hard lives of the tenant farmers and their wives and children. Now a group of the leaders of these people were in Leavenworth prison for opposing the war and resisting the draft. Some were Socialists, all were
THE CHILDREN’S CRUSADE
293
members of an organization called The Working Class Unions, and their anti-war movement became known as The Green Com Rebellion. With their shotguns in hand, they went up into the hills to barricade themselves against being drafted.
The families left behind by these political prisoners were in dire poverty, unable to visit their men in prison for lack of funds. Kate was aroused to great indignation by the story of the wife of Stanley Clark, a Socialist lawyer, whose only “crime” was that he had collected funds to help the families of the Bisbee miners who had been deported into the desert in 1917 during a strike. Mrs. Clark had gathered affidavits to prove that her husband was actually pro-war and had sent all the material to Washington but heard nothing of it. Kate decided to gather up all the families in that part of the country to make a tour on the way to Washington, and to tell their stories in every city. Several IWW families joined en route and there were 33 in the party when they reached New York City. They had visited Cincinnati and Detroit and had stopped off at Terre Haute, Indiana, to see Debs who was quite ill at that time. Their meetings collected over $4,000 for their expenses on the Crusade, a large sum in those days.
Everywhere, the Crusade was greeted with deep emotion and enthusiasm. Over three years had passed since the armistice and there had been great disappointment at Christmas, 1921. President Harding had pardoned only a few of the political prisoners and had then refused to see delegations to discuss the matter further. The families had expected a general amnesty. The vociferous opposition of the American Legion slowed the President down after he released Debs.
The Crusade left St. Louis on April 16, 1922, and arrived in Washington on April 29. They remained until after July 19. When they arrived in New York City from Buffalo on an early morning train, they were a forlorn yet valiant little band of eager, wide-eyed youngsters, sleepy babies and anxious, tired mothers. As they came off the train, they efficiently unfurled their signs and marched proudly through Grand Central Station. This extraordinary “Army with Banners” created an immediate sensation among all spectators. “A Little Child Shall Lead Them,” was out in front. Then came “A Hundred and Thirteen Men Jailed for Their Opinions,” and “My Daddy Didn’t Want to Kill”; another said, “Is the Constitution Dead?” and another, “Eugene Debs Is Free—Why Not my Daddy?” A young girl, Irene Danley, carried a sign that read: “My Mother Died of Grief.” A young mother walked with a three-year-old child carrying a banner:
294
WORLD WAR I AND ITS AFTERMATH
“I Never Saw My Daddy.” An elderly woman, Mrs. Hough, mother of an imprisoned IWW youth marched proudly along. Our first destination was the nearby headquarters of the Amalgamated Food Workers. The police asked me if I had a permit for a parade. I said, “No, it’s not a parade. We intend to take these women and children to a place where they can eat and rest.” They looked at them and gruffly acceded to our plan and we were soon there.
Here, at last, at the food workers’ union, were not strange people, staring at them and their banners. Here were comrades and friends such as they had found in other cities. Few local people dared to speak to them or come near them at home. But now their circle of friends grew even stronger and wider. They were not alone on a bleak farm on a lonely hillside. Big handsome bearded French and Italian chefs from the most exclusive hotels and restaurants in New York were there, wearing their white cooks’ hats a foot high. The most skilled waiters in the world, with tears in their eyes, tenderly served these hungry children. The tables were decked with flowers. Each child was given a souvenir, a small replica of the Statue of Liberty. The children sang “My Country, ’Tis of Thee,” for their hosts. It was heart-rending to hear their childish voices sing of “Sweet land of liberty!” under the circumstances.
That afternoon the older children went to the circus at Madison Square Garden as the guests of Mrs. J. Sargent Cram, a granddaughter of Peter Cooper. It was a great event, as most of them had never seen a circus, certainly nothing comparable with the Garden’s three-ringed wonders. The mothers and babies were taken for rest and tea to the Fifth Avenue mansion of Mrs. Willard Straight. Sympathetic friends came in to meet them. They sat erect in Mrs. Straight’s beautiful drawing room, telling their stories. I recall a thin, stem-faced little woman, Mrs. Hicks, who had four children under seven. The baby, a beautiful child named Helen Keller, was bom after her father was put in jail. Her husband was a preacher, William Madison Hicks, a descendant of Elias Hicks who founded the Quaker sect known as the “Hick- sites.” They were pacifists by religious conviction and politically were Socialists. He had been threatened with lynching before his arrest. We heard that day tales of heart-breaking poverty and labor, chopping cotton, of cruel discrimination by neighbors and townsfolk inflamed by war hysteria and of how these women became tired of petitions to Washington to which there were no answers. Then their “Kate” called them to go with her “to see the President.”
Share with your friends: |