Environmental Assessment Report


Agriculture Intensification



Download 1.03 Mb.
Page5/26
Date05.08.2017
Size1.03 Mb.
#26894
TypeReport
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   26

5.4.2 Agriculture Intensification
The principal environmental risks associated with intensification of agriculture concern the safe handling and application of pesticides and the appropriate application of fertilizers to avoid excessive runoff and contamination of soils and of surface and ground waters. The Plant Protection Service (MAWPI) guidelines should be followed regarding the selection, use, storage and application of pesticides. Appropriate training of agricultural workers and monitoring of pesticide residues and runoff should be incorporated in sub-project design and independently monitored during project implementation. With sub-projects involving fertilizer or pesticide applications, monitoring of groundwater and downstream water quality (as appropriate) should be included in project implementation.
5.4.3 Mining and Energy
Small scale mining of coal, sand and gravel, gemstones and clay for pottery and brick-making should include appropriate safeguards to avoid increasing soil erosion and contamination of water supplies. A monitoring plan should be included in project design and provisions for appropriate mitigation and rehabilitation of mine sites and storage areas should be incorporated into sub-project financed activities. Financing of facilities for biogas production should include provisions for appropriate storage of manure and crop wastes and disposal of residues to prevent contamination of water bodies and soils. An appropriate monitoring regime should be included in project design.
For all three of the above sub-project types financing of individual projects is expected to be modest and the cost of mitigation to overcome negative impacts will represent low additional costs that would be incorporated into the sub-project.
In Table 2 the types and potential significance of impacts of the fourteen sub-project groups are summarized. In Table 3 the types of environmental impacts and recommended mitigation measures for a range of potential sub-projects are identified.
Table 2. Types of sub-projects and potential major environmental impacts.


Sub-project Group

Types of Potential Major Impacts

Level of Significance

Agricultural Diversification or High Value Specialization (e.g. flower, fruit, seed, fish, livestock production)

Biological diversity loss, chemical pollution of soil and water, erosion and land degradation (from overgrazing), waste accumulation

Moderate to high

Agro-processing ( e.g. dairy, poultry, wool, mushrooms, honey, juice, vegetable and fruit canning )

Waste accumulation, water pollution, noise and health

Moderate

Handicrafts (e.g. felt, carving, weaving)

None

Negligible

Tradesman Workshops (e.g. blacksmith, carpentry, plumbing and electrical)

Waste accumulation

Low

Forestry (woodlots)

None

Negligible

Mining and Energy (artisanal coal and gemstone mining, clay for brick making, sand and gravel, microhydro and biogas)

Waste accumulation, soil and water pollution, erosion, land degradation, dust and human health

Moderate to High

Renovation of public buildings, rural roads and market infrastructure

Social disruption, noise and nuisance

Low

Small-scale irrigation and rural water supply

Soil erosion, water pollution from runoff

Low to Moderate

Support services (e.g. veterinary, medical, dental, crop protection)

Pesticide or chemical contamination, waste accumulation

Low

Transport and communications

Site disruption

Low to moderate

RetAiyl and wholesale trade and storage facilities

Site and social disruption

Low to moderate

Recreation and tourism (e.g. accommodations, trekking, food services)

Site and social disruption, biodiversity loss, waste accumulation

Low to Moderate

Education, public health and social services (clinics, training centers)

None

Negligible

Financial, legal and other services (e.g. microcredit, equipment leasing, accounting, business planning)

None (equipment leasing and microcredit applications would be evaluated as sub-projects in categories listed above)

Negligible

Table 3. Types of impacts and mitigation measures for potential sub-projects


3.1 Agricultural Diversification: Seed, Cutting and Orchard Stock

Overall Potential Impact: Moderate




Potential Direct Impacts

Potential Indirect Impacts

Consequences

Mitigation Required

Remarks

Positive impact: increased yields, improved food security and economic well-being for small farmers













Loss of biodiversity due to land clearing




Decreased biodiversity

Restrict or prohibit clearing in critical natural habitats

Consult with national authorities responsible for biodiversity protection




Increased use of pesticides and chemical fertilizers

Possible contamination of soils and water supplies and impact on human health

Selection of approved chemicals, proper storage and handling, application of optimum quantities and frequency, adoption of integrated pest management approach

Coordination with extension services of MAWPI is needed to ensure training and dissemination of good practice information


Residual Impact Assuming Full Mitigation: LOW - MODERATE

Potential for adverse environmental impact: MODERATE


3.2 Agricultural Diversification: Fertilizer and Pesticide Application

Overall Potential Impact: Moderate to High




Potential Direct Impacts

Potential Indirect Impacts

Consequences

Mitigation Required

Remarks

Positive impact: increased yields, improved food security and economic well-being for small farmers













Reduction in soil organic content

Modified soil structure and reduction in moisture retention capacity

Reduced long term productivity







Nutrient enrichment of water bodies
Soil and water contamination



Eutrophication of water bodies
Damage to terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems

Possible contamination of soils and water supplies, biodiversity loss

Selection of approved chemicals, proper storage and handling, application of optimum quantities and frequency, adoption of integrated pest management approach

Coordination with extension services of MAWPI is needed to ensure training and dissemination of good practice information. Public education is important and could be done through government agencies or NGOs. Extension services should work with farmers to develop land and crop management plans.

Health impacts on workers and consumers

health impacts on downstream water consumers

Increased health care costs and reduced worker productivity

Training in handling and storage methods, use of proper equipment, selection of approved chemicals, monitoring of frequency and quantity of applications

Independent monitoring of application quantities, residues in crops and soil and water contamination is required


Residual Impact Assuming Full Mitigation: MODERATE

Potential for adverse environmental impact: MODERATE



3.3 Agricultural Diversification: Livestock Production

Overall Potential Impact: MODERATE to HIGH




Potential Direct Impacts

Potential Indirect Impacts

Consequences

Mitigation Required

Remarks

pasture degradation and erosion due to overstocking

Loss of ground cover, soil erosion, changes in plant community

reduced productivity, soil erosion, sedimentation

Control stocking rates to ensure that carrying capacity is not exceeded

Work closely with extension services to develop pasture management plans and monitor impacts

physical damage to fragile lands




Increased runoff causing flooding and landslides

Control grazing to avoid protected areas and fragile landscapes


Identify and enforce limits and restrictions on areas where grazing is permitted




Biodiversity loss

Simplified natural communities and reduced resilience

Implement pasture improvement methods based on native species




concentration of manure




High nutrient loading in runoff water, reduced water quality

Management of animal wastes

Waste management plan should be incorporated in project design


Residual Impact Assuming Full Mitigation: NONE

Potential for adverse environmental impact: MODERATE


3. 4 Agro-processing

Overall Potential Impact: MODERATE




Potential Direct Impacts

Potential Indirect Impacts

Consequences

Mitigation Required

Remarks

Waste accumulation, runoff, water pollution




Human health risk from waste accumulation, contamination of water supplies

Use appropriate methods for storage of raw materials, products, wastes and approved waste treatment or disposal methods. Waste discharge to remain within permitted limits.

Processing operations must conform to regulations and guidelines of the Ministry of Health, MAWPI and SAEPF, all of which are responsible for regular inspection and monitoring




Noise, dust, nuisance

Social disruption

Conformance with existing codes

Monitoring done by local authorities


Residual Impact Assuming Full Mitigation: LOW

Potential for adverse environmental impact: MODERATE


3. 5 Handicrafts

Overall Potential Impact: NONE




Potential Direct Impacts

Potential Indirect Impacts

Consequences

Mitigation Required

Remarks


NOT APPLICABLE


Residual Impact Assuming Full Mitigation: NONE

Potential for adverse environmental impact: NONE



3. 6 Tradesman Workshops (electrical, carpentry, blacksmith, plumbing)

Overall Potential Impact: LOW




Potential Direct Impacts

Potential Indirect Impacts

Consequences

Mitigation Required

Remarks

Waste accumulation and discharge into soil or water bodies







Compliance with existing codes for construction, business operations, waste discharge and disposal

Local civil authorities are responsible for monitoring compliance

Impact on human health of inappropriate handling of toxic materials, fuels and lubricants




Increased health care costs and lowered productivity

Appropriate training and licensing of tradesmen and periodic inspection/certification of facilities





Residual Impact Assuming Full Mitigation: NONE

Potential for adverse environmental impact: LOW


3. 7 Forestry (woodlots)

Overall Potential Impact: LOW




Potential Direct Impacts

Potential Indirect Impacts

Consequences

Mitigation Required

Remarks

biodiversity loss




Replacement of natural vegetation or native trees may result in habitat loss for native species and simplification of the natural community

Use native species when possible. Use mixed species. Stagger planting to avoid even aged stands.

The Forestry Department and agricultural extensions services should provide advice on species selection, planting and harvesting cycles.

Soil erosion and stream sedimentation




Loss of soil fertility and degradation of water quality

Adopt rotational harvest cycle to avoid clearcutting. Adopt low impact logging techniques





Residual Impact Assuming Full Mitigation: NONE

Potential for adverse environmental impact: LOW


3. 8 Mining and Energy (small scale coal, clay, sand and gravel extraction, gemstones: micro-hydro and biogas)

Overall Potential Impact: MODERATE TO HIGH




Potential Direct Impacts

Potential Indirect Impacts

Consequences

Mitigation Required

Remarks

Erosion and land degradation




Landslides, stream degradation

Careful site selection away from erodable stream banks and other unstable formations.

Short term impacts may effect local hydrological regimes. Impacts can be minimized by choosing sites with stable characteristics.

Sedimentation of water bodies

Changes to hydrology and degradation of aquatic ecosystems

Decline in water quality and productivity of aquatic systems

Containment of wastes and tAiylings. Restoration included in project costs.

Where effective containment is problematic or exceedingly costly, projects should be rejected for financing.

Decreased water quality due to waste discharge and presence of persistent toxic elements

Impacts on human health

Increased morbidity and health care costs

Precise limits on discharge from processing and ongoing independent monitoring of discharge and of ground and surface water quality

Waste management plans should be part of project design. Waste removal and storage and discharge levels should be independently monitored for ( at least) the life of the project.


Residual Impact Assuming Full Mitigation: MODERATE

Potential for adverse environmental impact: MODERATE to HIGH


3. 9 Renovation of existing infrastructure (buildings, roads)

Overall Potential Impact: LOW




Potential Direct Impacts

Potential Indirect Impacts

Consequences

Mitigation Required

Remarks

Site disruption (temporary)




Increased erosion, runoff and sedimentation of water bodies

Adopt effective containment practices.

Although "temporary" effects of site disruption can have long lasting effects.




Exposure of workers to toxic materials during renovation

Increased health care costs and lost productivity

Survey for presence of hazardous materials (e.g. lead, asbestos) and require workers to use appropriate protective technologies, equipment and clothing.

Good practices for occupational health and safety that are in compliance with existing regulations and standards should be followed. Independent monitoring or inspection by MoH should be done.



Download 1.03 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   26




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page