Florida commission on hurricane loss projection methodology



Download 1.99 Mb.
Page17/29
Date18.10.2016
Size1.99 Mb.
#1208
1   ...   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   ...   29

Audit
1. Demonstrate how the claim practices of insurance companies are accounted for when claims data for those insurance companies are used to develop or to verify model calculations. For example, the level of damage the insurer considers a loss to be a total loss, claim practices of insurers with respect to concurrent causation, or the impact of public adjusting.
2. Provide the percentage of loss at or above which the model assumes a total loss.

A-3 Modeled Loss Cost Projections and Probable Maximum Loss Levels*Considerations

(*Significant Revision)



  1. Loss cost projections and probable maximum loss levels shall not include expenses, risk load, investment income, premium reserves, taxes, assessments, or profit margin.




  1. Loss cost projections and probable maximum loss levels shall not make a prospective provision for economic inflation.




  1. Loss cost projections and probable maximum loss levels shall not include any provision for direct hurricane storm surge losses.




  1. Loss cost projections and probable maximum loss levels shall be capable of being calculated from exposures at a geocode (latitude-longitude) level of resolution.




  1. Demand surge shall be included in the model’s calculation of loss costs and probable maximum loss levels using relevant data.




  1. The methods, data, and assumptions used in the estimation of demand surge shall be actuarially sound.

Purpose: The loss costs and probable maximum loss levels from the model should reflect losses paid by the insurance company as insurance claims resulting from wind damage from an event as defined in Standard A-2.


Loss costs represent the expected annual loss per $1,000 exposure. Other “expense and profit loads” such as those listed in the standard are included in rate filings and are calculated outside the scope of the Commission.
Loss severity is influenced by general economic inflation applicable to material and labor. Other “expense and profit loads” such as those listed in the standard are included in rate filings and are calculated outside the scope of the Commission.
Loss severity is influenced by general economic inflation applicable to material and labor. Amounts of insurance may also be influenced (although perhaps differently) by economic inflation. Economic inflation is an element of past insurance experience that has been used to construct and validate hurricane loss projection models.
Hurricane storm surge is covered by the National Flood Insurance Program or in some cases by other policies, but normally not covered by private insurance market personal residential property policies that cover the wind peril.
Demand surge is recognized as an important element for modeling.
Relevant Form: G-4, Actuarial Standards Expert Certification
Economic inflation is an element of past insurance experience that has been used to construct and validate hurricane loss projection models.
Hurricane storm surge is covered by the National Flood Insurance Program or in some cases by other policies, but normally not covered by private insurance market personal residential property policies that cover the wind peril.

Relevant Form: G-4, Actuarial Standards Expert Certification




Disclosures


  1. Describe the method or methods used to estimate annual loss costs and probable maximum loss levels needed for ratemaking. . Identify any source documents used and research performed.



  1. Identify the highest level of resolution for which loss costs and probable maximum loss levels can be provided. Identify the highest level of resolution for which loss costs and probable maximum loss levels can be provided. Identify all possible resolutions available for the reported output ranges.




  1. Describe how the model incorporates demand surge in the calculation of loss costs and probable maximum loss levels.




  1. Provide citations to published papers, if any, that were used to develop how the model estimates demand surge.


Audit


    1. Describe how the model handles expenses, risk load, investment income, premium reserves, taxes, assessments, profit margin, economic inflation, and any criteria other than direct property insurance claim payments.




    1. The method of inclusion of secondary uncertainty in the probable maximum loss levels will be examined.

3. Provide the data and methods used to incorporate individual aspects of demand surge on personal and commercial residential coverages, inclusive of the effects from building material costs, labor costs, contents costs, repair time, etc.


4. All referenced literature will be reviewed to determine applicability.

A-4 Policy Conditions



  1. The methods used in the development of mathematical distributions to reflect the effects of deductibles and policy limits shall be actuarially sound.




  1. The relationship among the modeled deductible loss costs shall be reasonable.




  1. Deductible loss costs shall be calculated in accordance with s. 627.701(5)(a), F.S.

Purpose: For a given windspeed and structure type, there is a range of possible results. Some losses may fall completely below the deductible. The distribution of losses is therefore important to the determination of the effects of deductibles and policy limits.


Relevant Form: G-4, Actuarial Standards Expert Certification
Disclosures


  1. Describe the methods used in the model to treat deductibles (both flat and percentage), policy limits, replacement costs, and insurance-to-value when projecting loss costs.




  1. Provide an example of how insurer loss (loss net of deductibles) is calculated. Discuss data or documentation used to confirm or validate the method used by the model.

Example:

(A)



(B)

(C)

(D)=(A)*(C)


(E)=(D)-(B)


Structure

Value

Policy


Limit

Deductible


Damage


Ratio

Zero Deductible

Loss

Loss Net of

Deductible

100,000

90,000

500

2%

2,000

1,500

3. Describe how the model calculates annual deductibles.



Audit
1. Describe the process used to determine the accuracy of the insurance-to-value criteria in data used to develop or validate the model results.
2. To the extent that historical data are used to develop mathematical depictions of deductibles and policy limits, demonstrate the goodness-of-fit of the data to fitted models.


  1. To the extent that historical data are used to validate the model results, the treatment of the effects of deductibles, policy limits, and coinsurance in the data will be reviewed.




  1. Justify changes from the previously accepted submission in the relativities among corresponding deductible amounts for the same coverage.



A-5 Coverages



  1. The methods used in the development of contents loss costs shall be actuarially sound.




  1. The methods used in the development of time element coverage loss costs shall be actuarially sound.

Purpose: A reasonable representation of contents losses is necessary in order to address policies that principally cover contents, such as tenants and condo unit owners policies.


Policies can provide varying types of time element coverage and insurance policies may pay for time element claims irrespective of damage to the insured property.

Relevant Form: G-4, Actuarial Standards Expert Certification


Disclosure
1. Describe the methods used in the model to calculate loss costs for contents coverage associated with personal and commercial residential structures.
2. Describe the methods used in the model to calculate loss costs for time element coverage associated with personal and commercial residential structures. State whether the model considers both direct and indirect loss to the insured property. For example, direct loss could be for expenses paid to house policyholders in an apartment while their home is being repaired. Indirect loss could be for expenses incurred for loss of power (e.g., food spoilage).
Audit


    1. The methods used to produce contents and time element loss costs will be reviewed.


A-6 Loss Output*

(*Significant Revision)


  1. The methods, data, and assumptions used in the estimation of probable maximum loss levels shall be actuarially sound.




  1. Loss costs shall not exhibit an illogical relation to risk, nor shall loss costs exhibit a significant change when the underlying risk does not change significantly.




  1. Loss costs produced by the model shall be positive and non-zero for all valid Florida ZIP Codes.




  1. Loss costs cannot increase as the quality of construction type, materials and workmanship increases, all other factors held constant.




  1. Loss costs cannot increase as the presence of fixtures or construction techniques designed for hazard mitigation increases, all other factors held constant.




  1. Loss costs cannot increase as the quality of building codes and enforcement increases, all other factors held constant.




  1. Loss costs shall decrease as deductibles increase, all other factors held constant.




  1. The relationship of loss costs for individual coverages, (e.g., structures and appurtenant structures, contents, and time element) shall be consistent with the coverages provided.




  1. Output ranges shall be logical for the type of risk being modeled and deviations supported.




  1. All other factors held constant, output ranges produced by the model shall in general reflect lower loss costs for:




    1. masonry construction versus frame construction,




    1. personal residential risk exposure versus mobile home risk exposure,




    1. inland counties versus coastal counties, and




    1. northern counties versus southern counties.



A-6 Loss Output (Continued)

  1. For loss cost and probable maximum loss level estimates derived from or validated with historical insured hurricane losses, the assumptions in the derivations concerning (1) construction characteristics, (2) policy provisions, (3) coinsurance, (4) contractual provisions, and (5) relevant underwriting practices underlying those losses, as well as any actuarial modifications, shall be appropriate based on the type of risk being modeled.

Purpose: Reinsurance and other capital market products pricing, retention levels and limits for catastrophe reinsurance treaties, and rating agency capital adequacy determinations are frequently based upon probable maximum loss levels. This standard is to ensure that probable maximum loss levels are based on an actuarially sound methodology.


Modeled loss costs shall vary according to risk. If the risk of loss due to hurricanes is higher for one area or structure type, then the loss costs shall also be higher. Likewise, if there is no difference in risk there shall be no difference in loss costs. Loss costs not having these properties have an illogical relation to risk.
Updates or revisions to the model lead to changes in the output ranges which shall be reasonable. This standard requires that the impacts on the loss costs are actually attributable to the updates or revisions.

Relevant Forms: G-4, Actuarial Standards Expert Certification

A-1, Zero Deductible Personal Residential Loss Costs by ZIP Code

A-2, Base Hurricane Storm Set Statewide Loss Costs

A-3, Cumulative Losses from the 2004 Hurricane Season

A-4, Output Ranges

A-5, Percentage Change in Output Ranges

A-6, Logical Relationship to Risk (Trade Secret item)

A-7, Percentage Change in Logical Relationship to Risk

A-8, Probable Maximum Loss for Florida

S-2, Examples of Loss Exceedance Estimates

S-5, Average Annual Zero Deductible Statewide Loss Costs –

Historical versus Modeled
Disclosures


  1. Provide a completed Form A-1, Zero Deductible Personal Residential Loss Costs by ZIP Code. Provide a link to the location of the form here.




  1. Provide a completed Form A-2, Base Hurricane Storm Set Statewide Loss Costs. Provide a link to the location of the form here.

  2. Provide a completed Form A-3, Cumulative Losses from the 2004 Hurricane Season. Provide a link to the location of the form here.

4. Provide a completed Form A-4, Output Ranges. Provide a link to the location of the form here.


5. Provide a completed Form A-5, Percentage Change in Output Ranges. Provide a link to the location of the form here.
6. A completed Form A-6, Logical Relationship to Risk (Trade Secret item) shall be provided during the closed meeting portion of the Commission meeting to review the model for acceptability.
7. Provide a completed Form A-7, Percentage Change in Logical Relationship to Risk. Provide a link to the location of the form here.
8. Provide a completed Form A-8, Probable Maximum Loss for Florida. Provide a link to the location of the form here.
9. Describe how the model produces probable maximum loss levels.
10. Provide citations to published papers, if any, that were used to estimate probable maximum loss levels.
11. Describe how the probable maximum loss levels produced by the model include the effects of personal and commercial residential insurance coverage.
12. Explain any difference between the values provided on Form A-8 and those provided on Form S-2.
13. Demonstrate that loss cost relationships among coverages, territories, and regions are consistent and reasonable.
14. Provide an explanation for all anomalies in the loss costs that are not consistent with the requirements of this standard.
15. Provide an explanation of the differences in output ranges between the previously accepted submission and the current submission.
16. Identify the assumptions used to account for the effects of coinsurance on commercial residential loss costs.
17. Describe how loss adjustment expenses are considered within the loss cost and probable maximum loss level estimates.
Audit
1. Describe how the model handles expenses, risk load, investment income, premium reserves, taxes, assessments, profit margin, and economic inflation.
A-4 Demand Surge*

(*Significant Revision)



      1. A. Demand surge shall be included in the model’s calculation of loss costs and probable maximum loss levels using relevant data.

B. The methods, data, and assumptions used in the estimation of demand surge shall be actuarially sound.


Purpose: Demand surge is recognized as an important element for modeling and due to recent hurricanes there are sufficient data for this standard to be met.
Relevant Form: G-4, Actuarial Standards Expert Certification
Disclosures


    1. Describe how the model incorporates demand surge in the calculation of loss costs and probable maximum loss levels.Provide citations to published papers, if any, that were used to develop how the model estimates demand surge.


Audit
1. Provide the data and methods used to incorporate individual aspects of demand surge on personal and commercial residential coverages, inclusive of the effects from building material costs, labor costs, contents costs, repair time, etc.


  1. 2. Provide the data and methods used for probable maximum loss levels for Form A-8.




  1. All referenced literature will be reviewed to determine applicability.



  1. A-5 User Inputs


All modifications, adjustments, assumptions, inputs and/or input file identification, and defaults necessary to use the model shall be actuarially sound and shall be included with the model output report. Treatment of missing values for user inputs required to run the model shall be actuarially sound and described with the model output report.

Purpose: Hurricane loss projection models may rely on certain insurer assumptions. Implicit assumptions may or may not be appropriate for use by a given insurer, depending on the circumstances.

Relevant Form: G-4, Actuarial Standards Expert Certification
Disclosures


  1. Describe the methods used to distinguish among policy form types (e.g., homeowners, dwelling property, mobile home, tenants, condo unit owners).

Disclose, in a model output report, the specific type of input that is required to use the model or model output in a residential property insurance rate filing. Such input includes, but is not limited to, optional features of the model, type of data to be supplied by the model user and needed to derive loss projections from the model, and any variables that a model user is authorized to set in using the model. Include the model name and version number on the model output report. All items included in the output form submitted to the Commission shall be clearly labeled and defined.

Provide a copy of the input form used by a model user to provide input criteria to be used in the model. Describe the process followed by the user to generate the model output produced from the input form. Include the model name and version number on the input form. All items included in the input form submitted to the Commission shall be clearly labeled and defined.Describe actions performed to ensure the validity of insurer data used for model inputs or validation/verification.

Audit


  1. Quality assurance procedures shall include methods to assure accuracy of insurance data. Compliance with this standard will be readily demonstrated through documented rules and procedures.All model inputs and assumptions will be reviewed to determine that the model output report appropriately discloses all modifications, adjustments, assumptions, and defaults used to produce the loss costs.



A-6 Logical Relationship to Risk*

(*Significant Revision)
Loss costs shall not exhibit an illogical relation to risk, nor shall loss costs exhibit a significant change when the underlying risk does not change significantly.

Loss costs produced by the model shall be positive and non-zero for all valid Florida ZIP Codes.Loss costs cannot increase as the quality of construction type, materials and workmanship increases, all other factors held constant.Loss costs cannot increase as the presence of fixtures or construction techniques designed for hazard mitigation increases, all other factors held constant.Loss costs cannot increase as the quality of building codes and enforcement increases, all other factors held constant.

Loss costs shall decrease as deductibles increase, all other factors held constant.

  1. The relationship of loss costs for individual coverages, (e.g., structures and appurtenant structures, contents, and time element) shall be consistent with the coverages provided.

Purpose: Modeled loss costs shall vary according to risk. If the risk of loss due to hurricanes is higher for one area or structure type, then the loss costs shall also be higher. Likewise, if there is no difference in risk there shall be no difference in loss costs. Loss costs not having these properties have an illogical relation to risk.
Relevant Forms: G-4, Actuarial Standards Expert Certification

A-1, Personal Residential Loss Costs

A-2, Zero Deductible Personal Residential Loss Costs by ZIP Code

A-3, Base Hurricane Storm Set Statewide Loss Costs

A-4, Hurricane Andrew (1992) Percent of Losses

A-5, Cumulative Losses from the 2004 Hurricane Season

S-5, Average Annual Zero Deductible Statewide Loss Costs –

Historical versus Modeled


Disclosures


  1. Demonstrate that loss cost relationships by type of coverage (structures, appurtenant structures, contents, time element) are consistent with actual insurance data.




  1. Demonstrate that loss cost relationships by construction type are consistent with actual insurance data.




  1. Demonstrate that loss cost relationships among coverages, territories, and regions are consistent and reasonable.




  1. Explain any anomalies or special circumstances that might preclude any of the above conditions from occurring.




  1. Provide a completed Form A-1, Personal Residential Loss Costs.




  1. Provide a completed Form A-2, Zero Deductible Personal Residential Loss Costs by ZIP Code.




  1. Provide a completed Form A-3, Base Hurricane Storm Set Statewide Loss Costs.




  1. Provide a completed Form A-4, Hurricane Andrew (1992) Percent of Losses.




  1. Provide a completed Form A-5, Cumulative Losses from the 2004 Hurricane Season.



Download 1.99 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   ...   29




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page