Brain Circulation Good – Economy
Brain circulation increases world income and global welfare.
Solimano, United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, Regional Advisor ‘08
(Andrés, February 14 2008, “The International Mobility of Talent: Types, Causes and Development Impact” p. 1-2 BLG)
The topics of brain drain and brain circulation—more colloquial names for the international mobility of talent—is now reviving after being largely dormant for a few decades. In the 1960s and 1970s there were interesting polemics among economists between the ‘nationalists’ (represented by Don Patinkin) and the ‘internationalists’ (represented by Harry Johnson) that also affected the views of policymakers at the time. The internationalist view stressed that the mobility of talent was the result of better economic and professional opportunities found abroad than in the home country and that this mobility leads to clear gains for those who move and also for the world economy as resources moved from places with lower productivity to places with higher productivity, thereby raising world income and global welfare. The nationalist school, in turn, questioned the practical meaning of the concept of ̈world welfare ̈ and pointed out the asymmetric distribution of gains from mobility between receiving and sending countries associated with the mobility of qualified human resources. At that time the topic was strongly influenced by the notion of ‘brain drain’, say a one-way flow of qualified human resources from poor to rich countries (or from the periphery to the core nations in the world economy) that entailed a net permanent loss for the source country. These flows were often viewed as having a negative effect on source countries that made an educational investment in qualified human resources that ultimately left their home nations.
Brain drain is key to creating a bridge between two nation’s markets—benefiting both nations
Solimano, PhD in Economics MIT, 8 (Andres, Cambridge University Press, February, “The International Mobility of Talent: Types, Causes and Development Impact”, p1:4-5) date accessed 7/8/11 PG
The story now is of a world in which Indian and Chinese nationals that after graduating in the US became successful entrepreneurs (e.g. in Silicon Valley) and who are uniquely positioned to serve as bridges between Asian and American markets given their contacts, access to technology and capital in both markets and societies. In the 1990s and early 2000s these people started new productive ventures in their home countries transferring technology and market knowledge. In the Latin American context, Chilean, Mexican, and Bolivian entrepreneurs are making successful inroads in biotechnology and cellular phone companies in North America. Some of those investments also have created new links and encouraged new investments in their home countries. The international mobility of talent is not only restricted to the business sector but it is also present in the cultural sector: international celebrities in the world of literature and painting such as Isabel Allende, Mario Vargas Llosa, Fernando Botero, and others are succeeding in Europe, likewise famous soccer players from Africa who succeed in rich countries. However, not all talent mobility is as glamorous as these examples could suggest. A particularly dramatic case is the massive and persistent emigration of medical doctors, nurses and other workers in the health sector coming from poor nations in sub-Saharan African, from the Philippines and other developing countries who go to work to the UK, US, Canada, Australia and other developed countries. The negative side effect of this mobility of health professionals is the weakening of the health sector in the source countries. This is particularly serious in the case of Africa suffering from AIDS epidemics, malaria, and other diseases that impair the countries’ development potential and causes loss of human lives. This poses conflicts between the private interests of health professionals and the social needs of the health sector in the home countries.
Impact Turn - Economy
Plan increases US aerospace industry - The aerospace industry contributes 15% of our GDP and over 15 million American jobs.
President’s High Growth Job Training Initiative in the Aerospace Industry ‘05
(May 2005, America’s Aerospace Industry: Identifying and Addressing Workforce Challenges “Report of Findings and Recommendations For The President’s High Growth Job Training Initiative in the Aerospace Industry” http://www.doleta.gov/brg/indprof/aerospace_report.pdf 7/6/11 BLG)
The aerospace industry was selected for the President’s High Growth Job Training Initiative in large part because of its significant impact on the economy overall, as well as its impact on the growth of other industries. The President established a Commission on the Future of the United States Aerospace Industry to call attention to how the “critical underpinnings of this nation’s aerospace industry are showing signs of faltering—and to raise the alarm.” The aerospace industry is a powerful force within the U.S. economy and one of the nation’s most competitive industries in the global marketplace. It contributes over 15 percent to our Gross Domestic Product and supports over 15 million high-quality American jobs. Aerospace products provide the largest trade surplus of any manufacturing sector. Last year, more than 600 million passengers relied on U.S. commercial air transportation and over 150 million people were transported on general aviation aircraft. Over 40 percent of the value of U.S. freight is transported by air. Aerospace capabilities have enabled e-commerce to flourish with overnight mail and parcel delivery, and just-in-time manufacturing. “The industry is confronted with a graying workforce in science, engineering and manufacturing, with an estimated 26 percent of industry employees available for retirement within the next five years. New entrants to the industry have dropped precipitously to historical lows as the major manufacturing companies continue to consolidate. Compounding the workforce crisis is the failure of the U.S. K-12 1 education system to properly equip U.S. students with the math, science, and technological skills needed to advance the U.S. aerospace industry.” 1
Economic downturn causes extinction
Bearden. Director, Association of Distinguished American Scientists, 2000
(T.E., “The Unnecessary Energy Crisis: How to Solve It Quickly”, June 12 www.cheniere.org/techpapers/Unnecessary%20Energy%20Crisis.doc)
Bluntly, we foresee these factors - and others { } not covered - converging to a catastrophic collapse of the world economy in about eight years. As the collapse of the Western economies nears, one may expect catastrophic stress on the 160 developing nations as the developed nations are forced to dramatically curtail orders. International Strategic Threat Aspects History bears out that desperate nations take desperate actions. Prior to the final economic collapse, the stress on nations will have increased the intensity and number of their conflicts, to the point where the arsenals of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) now possessed by some 25 nations, are almost certain to be released. As an example, suppose a starving North Korea launches nuclear weapons upon Japan and South Korea, including U.S. forces there, in a spasmodic suicidal response. Or suppose a desperate China - whose long range nuclear missiles can reach the United States - attacks Taiwan. In addition to immediate responses, the mutual treaties involved in such scenarios will quickly draw other nations into the conflict, escalating it significantly. Strategic nuclear studies have shown for decades that, under such extreme stress conditions, once a few nukes are launched, adversaries and potential adversaries are then compelled to launch on perception of preparations by one's adversary. The real legacy of the MAD concept is his side of the MAD coin that is almost never discussed. Without effective defense, the only chance a nation has to survive at all, is to launch immediate full-bore pre-emptive strikes and try to take out its perceived foes as rapidly and massively as possible. As the studies showed, rapid escalation to full WMD exchange occurs, with a great percent of the WMD arsenals being unleashed . The resulting great Armageddon will destroy civilization as we know it, and perhaps most of the biosphere, at least for many decades.
Share with your friends: |