Human Geography – The Globalisation of Economic Activity Uneven Development in the Global Economy



Download 251.58 Kb.
Page4/6
Date29.07.2017
Size251.58 Kb.
#24712
1   2   3   4   5   6

Ford

Global Structure


  • American TNC

  • World’s 3rd largest automaker

  • Operates in over 200 countries

  • Headquarters in Michigan, USA

  • Research takes place in more industrialized nations eg. USA, Japan, UK

  • Car assembly in Germany, Spain, UK, Belgium, Brazil, China

    • China: reap gains from market with increasingly affluent middle class

  • Component manufacture in Malaysia and the Philippines: cheaper labour and land cost

  • Diversify locations to reduce risk of strikes to operations

  • Corporate growth accentuated by increasing global connectedness through acquisitions, mergers and alliances

    • Eg. early 1990s, Ford acquired the British firm Jaguar

    • Eg. joined with previous rivals – Chrysler and General Motors – to produce a car that will use less energy, cause less pollution and challenge the dominance of Japanese and Korean manufacturers


Impacts


  • Economic

    • Spain’s economic modernization: offered opportunities for participating in a rapidly expanding domestic market and served as a base for further export and trade with EU countries

    • Bought parts from India, fuelling growth of Indian’s automobile industry

    • Local labour along the maquiladora in 1980s

    • Automobiles more affordable

    • Poorly paid labour force eg. workers in Mexico in 1983 paid <$3/h compared to US workers who are paid $23/h

    • Repatriation of profits

    • Footloose nature: can suddenly pull out and cause widespread retrenchment

  • Social and environmental

    • Improvement in technical skills of locals

    • Improve transport system and lives of people

      • Launched a road safety fund in the Philippines, which supports the Responsibility in Driver Education Program, hoping to reduce traffic fatalities there

    • Ameliorate problem of pollution

Mitsubishi Motors Corporation

Global Structure


  • Japan’s 5th largest automobile producer

  • 3 head offices in Japan, North America and Australia

  • Research and development, product testing in Japan, North America and Germany

  • Manufacturing in the Netherlands, Japan, North America, Thailand, the Philippines and Australia


Impacts


  • Economic

    • Direct job creation

      • Eg. expansion of Mitsubishi Motors plant in Illinois, USA in 2003 provided 300 new jobs in the manufacturing sector

    • Tax revenue which can be channeled into public projects like education and healthcare to aid national development

    • Transfer of technological skills and nurturing of local talent in the automobile industry through joint ventures

      • Eg. 22-year long partnership with Proton of Malaysia from 1983-2005 to develop Proton’s first product, the Proton Saga

    • Consumers have greater variety of products to choose from

    • Footloose nature: at risk of losing jobs

      • Mitsubishi Motors decided to close down its Lonsdale plant in Adelaide, Australia in 2004 due to global debts, causing 650 workers to lose their jobs

    • Profit repatriation, so host countries only receive a small percentage of profits earned

    • Competition to local firms

  • Environment

    • May have outsourced to LDCs to evade strict environmental regulations to save production costs – may cause environmental damage

    • But Mitsubishi Motors has set behavioural standards to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases and maximize efficient use of natural resources

Nokia

Global Structure


  • World’s largest mobile telephone manufacturer

  • Headquarters in Finland

  • Customization and logistics centre in US

  • Research and development in Finland, Japan, China, USA, Germany, Hungary

  • Production units in Brazil, China, Finland, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, India, Mexico, South Korea

  • Against outsourcing production stream so that they can control the quality of its products


Impacts


  • Economic

    • Teams up with local small-medium enterprises in host countries to help develop local SMEs and help Nokia understand how to better market their products to penetrate into the market

    • Job opportunities

      • Eg. established 5 research institutions and 4 production bases

    • Transfer of technology

  • Social

    • Provide solutions for the locals

  • Environmental

    • Nokia ranked as the top mobile and PCs producing company by Greenpeace International based on their practices to eliminate harmful chemicals and on taking responsibility for their products once they are discarded by consumers

Walmart

Global Structure


  • World’s largest retailer

  • Headquarters in Arkansas, USA

  • Regional outlets in Central America (Guatemala, Honduras), Europe (UK), Canada, Asia (Japan, China)

  • Manufacturing plants in Jordan


Impacts


  • Economic

    • Provides jobs and reduces poverty

      • Walmart is the largest private employer in the US and Mexico

    • Provides goods at lowest prices possible

      • Eg. Global Insight recently released a study which found that Walmart saved each American household on average $2329 in 2004

    • Poor working conditions and standards: lowly paid yet subjected to long working hours of up to 20h a day, lack of workers’ welfare as they will be severely punished for any minor mistakes made

  • Political

    • Policies against labour unions: risk that the welfare of workers would not be protected due to disallowance to unionize

  • Environmental

    • Stockpiling tons of lawn and garden products on pallets outdoors results in chemicals washing into storm drains when it rains, affecting drinking water

      • Eg. fined $1m in civil penalties for violating Clean Water Act

Kraft


Download 251.58 Kb.

Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4   5   6




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page