International baccalaureate organization



Download 7.79 Mb.
Page11/61
Date17.11.2017
Size7.79 Mb.
#34108
1   ...   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   ...   61

Section C: curriculum




Standard C1


A comprehensive, coherent, written curriculum, based on the requirements of the programme and developed by the school, is available to all sections of the school community.



Standard C2

The school has implemented a system through which all teachers plan and reflect in collaborative teams.




Standard C3


Teaching and learning at the school empowers and encourages students to become lifelong learners, to be responsible towards themselves, their learning, other people and the environment, and to take appropriate action.



Standard C4

There is an agreed approach to assessment, and to the recording and reporting of assessment data, which reflects the practices and requirements of the programme.





Brief outline: C1 – Both schools follow the prescribed Georgia Performance Standards. As each grade level/discipline meets for planning, they use these performance standards as their starting point for creating their units of instruction. The teams then add the Guiding Question, Areas of Interaction and Assessment Criteria to create MYP units. Each discipline participates in curriculum mapping activities to assure that the MYP and State curriculums are aligned. The results of both these efforts are then collected and placed in a shared folder on the school’s network so all teachers at both schools may access the information.

C2 – Middle school teachers have common planning time by grade level. Starting in the 2005-6 school year, schedules were created to allow middle school teachers to meet in vertical discipline teams multiple times each year. In the 2006 – 7 school year the planning process was further formalized by the addition of Professional Learning Communities and coaching activities. In addition, the vertical teaming was extended to include all five grade levels at least once per year. Paid summer planning time was also begun in the summer of 2007. Through common planning time each grade level collaborates across all subjects. Subject areas have several meetings each year in which they can collaborate and share ideas. Grade level meetings are held each week. Mathematics and Language A teachers meet weekly by grade to collaborate and assure that all are using similar plans which include all elements of the MYP curriculum.

C3 – In order to support the MYP, both schools have provided professional development to assist teachers in using methodologies that support the programme. Specifically, training has been provided in Professional Learning Communities (PLC) and Standards Based Classroom (SBC) techniques which stress the same traits that are found in the learner profile. Teachers now emphasize critical thinking and problem solving skills. Also, more opportunities have been created for students to collaborate and practice group learning activities. In addition, the posting and discussion of the Guiding Question and Area of Interaction has been added to the PLC standards. At the middle school, each teacher/administrator observes other teachers a minimum of four times during the year and provides feedback. Part of this process is to note the posting and discussion of of the Guiding Question and Area of Interaction . Finally, we have instituted a mandatory service element in our implementation of the MYP. This has resulted in our students taking a more active role in community events.

C4 – MYP assessment criteria is used by all teachers in both schools. At this point we are using the criteria to provide a single grade for the students’ work. To do this we take the appropriate assessment criteria for the work and modify it so the criteria are in a more understandable and quantitative form. We will evaluate this approach over the summer of 2008 and make a decision about how to go forward. For simplicity we like this approach where students receive one grade instead of two.






Section D: the student




Standard D1

Students learn to choose to act, and to reflect on their actions, so that they contribute to their own well-being and that of the community and the environment.




Standard D2


(if applicable)

In the final year of the programme, all students complete a programme-specific project [the MYP personal project] that allows them to demonstrate a consolidation of their learning.





Brief outline:D1 – We implemented a mentoring program at the middle school level to help students establish and monitor goals, both academic and personal. The middle school is working to develop a school wide discipline policy to provide maximum consistency. Several students will assist in the development process. The middle school created a recycling program in which the students collect plastic drink containers at the end of lunch time. These containers are placed in bags and then parents periodically transport them to our local recycling plant. Every student in the building has participated in this effort.
D2 – A plan is in place to support the personal project in the fifth year of the program. Documents that are being used for this effort are included later in this document. To support this effort the middle school will create a yet unnamed smaller version of the personal project for all 8th grade students to complete. This project will consist of the student reflecting on and reporting about their contribution to the community and school. This will probably be included as an activity that is completed during our middle school mentoring effort.


9g

Describe how teaching and learning at the school support students in developing the attributes listed in the IB learner profile booklet?




Brief description:

Our schools recognized a need to add additional rigor to our academic programs. In particular we wanted to offer a program that offered this rigor for all levels of students. What we found in the Middle Years Programme was the framework that would provide this rigor. Through professional development at both schools, teachers have received training that supports the MYP. As a result of implementing the Middle Years Programme and these professional development opportunities, teachers of all students are using methodologies that support the attributes of the IB Learner Profile. In every classroom (Special Education, ESOL, Heritage Language, regular education, Talented and Gifted) students are challenged to solve problems and think critically. They are routinely asked to use their creativity and curiosity to go beyond the routine answer and explore the topic being discussed at a deeper level. They are also asked to demonstrate their mastery and understanding in a number of ways through varied assessment vehicles. The diversity of our student populations gives our schools the unique ability to appreciate and celebrate the many contributions that the varied cultures have made in our community and nation. Through our community service efforts, the students gain opportunities to contribute to their neighborhoods and the community has the opportunity to see the students demonstrate their concern and caring for their community. Both schools have made conscious efforts to encourage the students to reflect on their learning. This reflection may be in the form of a journal entry, a Writing Across the Curriculum assignment, a formal paper assignment or a class discussion. The Middle Years Programme has been the catalyst that has propelled our schools to ask more of our students and become the school the community desired.



The success of the programme is already being seen in the number of students that are transferring from private schools to our public middle and high school. In addition, approximately one hundred students who live outside our county are paying tuition to be able to attend Riverwood High School. Ridgeview Charter Middle School is beginning an expansion/renovation that will increase its capacity to a level which may allow it to also accept tuition paying students.


The person(s) who completed this application form should sign below.

Name:




Title:




Signature:




Date:





The completed application form, application fee and supporting documentation should be sent to the regional director responsible for your area.

Note: The MYP application forms and appendices should be completed electronically and returned to the appropriate regional office. In consultation with the regional office, any supporting documentation should be sent on CD-Rom(s) wherever possible. Where this is not possible, hard copies of the documents should be provided. Please ensure that the school is clearly identified in all correspondence.

Appendix 1 Proposed MYP implementation budget




Candidate

Candidate

Participation year 1

Participation year 2

Participation year 3

ACADEMIC YEAR

2006-7

2007-8

2008-9

2009-10

2010-11














Application fee

8.800

1,000







Annual fee





5400

500


5400

500


5400

500


Resources











Curriculum




























































Professional development











IBO Training

40,000

20,000

20,000

10,000

10,000

Local Training

5,000

5,000

15,000

5,000

5,000



































































Other



































TOTAL

53,800

26,000

40,900

20,900

20,900


Appendix 2 MYP teaching staff

Name

Subject(s)

Qualifications

Level taught

Teaching experience(number of years)

Full-time/part-time

Allen, Lindsay

Math

BS, MS

4-5

4

FT

Anderson, Gaye

Technology

BS

4-5

7

FT

Balachandran, Rama

Science

M. Ed.

4-5

16

FT

Balkcom, Gayle

Science

MS

4-5

26

FT

Banner, Diane

Humanities

MA

4-5

11

FT

Battersby, Brooke

Visual Arts

BA

4-5

3

FT

Bembury, Timothy

Technology

BA

4-5

8

FT

Bentkowski, Sharon

Math

BS, MS

4-5

17

FT

Bounds, Jordan

Language A

M. Ed.

4-5

30

FT

Bradley, Sandra

Math

BS

4-5

8

FT

Cook, Courtney

Language A

BS

4-5

1

FT

Dalton, Marcia

Spec Ed

M. Ed.

4-5

30

FT

Davis, Mary

Math

BA

4-5

12

FT

DeLany, Cassie

Math

BA

4-5

10

FT

Dondero, Jill

Humanities

MA

4-5

5

FT

Elliott, Kirk

Science

BS

4-5

35

FT

Few, Charles

Spec Ed

MA

4-5

4

FT

Floyd, Jeanetta

Science

PhD

4-5

1

FT

Fowler, Stephanie

Spec Ed

PhD

4-5

9

FT

Gilley, Felicia

Spec Ed

MA

4-5

7

FT

Gribble, Daniel

Humanities

BA

4-5

7

FT

Griffith, Jon

Technology

BS

4-5

29

FT

Gunter, Doryiane

Technology

M. Ed.

4-5

11

FT

Hale, Kris

Humanities

MA

4-5

14

FT

Herbert, Brandi

Language A

BA

4-5

5

FT

Holloway, Jeffrey

Spec Ed

MA

4-5

11

FT

Hudson, Leigh

Physical Ed

BS

4-5

29

FT

Hughley, Amy

Performing Arts

MA

4-5

9

FT

Jackson, Regina

Spec Ed

MA

4-5

6

FT

Jennings, Lauren

Science

BS

4-5

1

FT

Katz, Shana

Technology

M. Ed.

4-5

7

FT

Kopkas, Diane

Language A

M. Ed.

4-5

9

FT

Kopkas, Jeremy

Humanities

M. Ed.

4-5

9

FT

Leech, Lori

Science

BS

4-5

3

FT

Litchfield, Cynthia

Spec Ed

BS

4-5

2

FT

Little, Andrea

Math

M. Ed.

4-5

9

FT

MacDonald, John

Humanities

Ph.D.

4-5

15

FT

Macoy, Donald

Physical Ed

MA

4-5

11

FT

Manning, Ebony

Spec Ed

BA

4-5

2

FT

Marstall, Ron

Visual Arts

MS

4-5

25

FT

McKeone, Rick

Physical Ed/Math

MA

4-5

33

FT

Mezzio, Mike

Humanities

MA

4-5

15

FT

Moorman, Nicholas

Language B (Japanese)

MA

4-5

18

FT

Morris, Carrie

Language A

M. Ed.

4-5

8

FT

Moseley, Mary

Language A

MA

4-5

7

FT

Mussman, Amanda

Humanities

MA

4-5

2

FT

Nadeau, Melissa

Spec Ed

M. Ed.

4-5

7

FT

Nissen, Phillip

Math

Ph. D.

4-5

20

FT

Oliney, Gregory

Language B (Spanish)

BA

4-5

1

FT

Paige, Bruno

Performing Arts

BA, MA

4-5

25

FT

Pearch, David

Physical Ed

BS, M. Ed.

4-5

8

FT

Plait, Lindsey

Language A

BS

4-5

2

FT

Ravisangar, Niroshini

Math

BS

4-5

5

FT

Santoro, Mike

Humanities

BA

4-5

11

FT

Schmidt, Mary

ESOL

BA

4-5

25

FT

Sealy, Andre

Science

BS

4-5

10

FT

Smith, Sheri

Technology

BA

4-5

9

FT

Sprayberry, Allison

Language B (Spanish)

MA

4-5

7

FT

Squaire, Cristal

Language B (Spanish)

BA

4-5

15

FT

Stevens, Emelda

Technology

BA

4-5

29

FT

Swafford, Anna

Language A

BS, TAG cert.

4-5

10

FT

van der Hoek, Mary

Performing Arts

MFA

4-5

7

FT

Whitworth, Allise

Visual Arts

MA

4-5

5

FT

Willeford, Ann

Language B (French)

Ph. D.

4-5

25

FT

Robertson, Janet

Language A

M.Ed., TAG cert.

4-5

25

FT

Pece, Kate

Language A

MA, ESOL cert.

4-5

9

FT


Appendix 3 MYP teacher training

Please indicate when your teachers, in every one of the eight subject groups, have received training. For partnerships*, at least one teacher from every site must be trained at an IBO-approved workshop in each subject group. We are also interested in which teachers, if any, have visited IB World Schools authorized to offer the MYP. Please indicate this on the chart.



Subject groups

Name of teacher

MYP course and grade levels

Training at IBO-approved workshops: place and date

School visits: place and date

Language A
















Margaret De Roo

Language A, Level 4

Niagara Falls, March 2006




Language B


























(add rows as necessary)

Humanities


























(add rows as necessary)




Jill Dondero

Humanities, Levels 4-5

Niagara Falls, March 2006




Sciences


























(add rows as necessary)

Mathematics


























(add rows as necessary)


Download 7.79 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   ...   61




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page