| Standard C1 |
A comprehensive, coherent, written curriculum, based on the requirements of the programme and developed by the school, is available to all sections of the school community.
|
| Standard C2 | The school has implemented a system through which all teachers plan and reflect in collaborative teams. |
| Standard C3 |
Teaching and learning at the school empowers and encourages students to become lifelong learners, to be responsible towards themselves, their learning, other people and the environment, and to take appropriate action.
|
| Standard C4 | There is an agreed approach to assessment, and to the recording and reporting of assessment data, which reflects the practices and requirements of the programme. |
|
Brief outline: C1 – Both schools follow the prescribed Georgia Performance Standards. As each grade level/discipline meets for planning, they use these performance standards as their starting point for creating their units of instruction. The teams then add the Guiding Question, Areas of Interaction and Assessment Criteria to create MYP units. Each discipline participates in curriculum mapping activities to assure that the MYP and State curriculums are aligned. The results of both these efforts are then collected and placed in a shared folder on the school’s network so all teachers at both schools may access the information.
C2 – Middle school teachers have common planning time by grade level. Starting in the 2005-6 school year, schedules were created to allow middle school teachers to meet in vertical discipline teams multiple times each year. In the 2006 – 7 school year the planning process was further formalized by the addition of Professional Learning Communities and coaching activities. In addition, the vertical teaming was extended to include all five grade levels at least once per year. Paid summer planning time was also begun in the summer of 2007. Through common planning time each grade level collaborates across all subjects. Subject areas have several meetings each year in which they can collaborate and share ideas. Grade level meetings are held each week. Mathematics and Language A teachers meet weekly by grade to collaborate and assure that all are using similar plans which include all elements of the MYP curriculum.
C3 – In order to support the MYP, both schools have provided professional development to assist teachers in using methodologies that support the programme. Specifically, training has been provided in Professional Learning Communities (PLC) and Standards Based Classroom (SBC) techniques which stress the same traits that are found in the learner profile. Teachers now emphasize critical thinking and problem solving skills. Also, more opportunities have been created for students to collaborate and practice group learning activities. In addition, the posting and discussion of the Guiding Question and Area of Interaction has been added to the PLC standards. At the middle school, each teacher/administrator observes other teachers a minimum of four times during the year and provides feedback. Part of this process is to note the posting and discussion of of the Guiding Question and Area of Interaction . Finally, we have instituted a mandatory service element in our implementation of the MYP. This has resulted in our students taking a more active role in community events.
C4 – MYP assessment criteria is used by all teachers in both schools. At this point we are using the criteria to provide a single grade for the students’ work. To do this we take the appropriate assessment criteria for the work and modify it so the criteria are in a more understandable and quantitative form. We will evaluate this approach over the summer of 2008 and make a decision about how to go forward. For simplicity we like this approach where students receive one grade instead of two.
|
| Section D: the student |
| Standard D1 | Students learn to choose to act, and to reflect on their actions, so that they contribute to their own well-being and that of the community and the environment. |
| Standard D2
(if applicable)
| In the final year of the programme, all students complete a programme-specific project [the MYP personal project] that allows them to demonstrate a consolidation of their learning. |
|
Brief outline:D1 – We implemented a mentoring program at the middle school level to help students establish and monitor goals, both academic and personal. The middle school is working to develop a school wide discipline policy to provide maximum consistency. Several students will assist in the development process. The middle school created a recycling program in which the students collect plastic drink containers at the end of lunch time. These containers are placed in bags and then parents periodically transport them to our local recycling plant. Every student in the building has participated in this effort.
D2 – A plan is in place to support the personal project in the fifth year of the program. Documents that are being used for this effort are included later in this document. To support this effort the middle school will create a yet unnamed smaller version of the personal project for all 8th grade students to complete. This project will consist of the student reflecting on and reporting about their contribution to the community and school. This will probably be included as an activity that is completed during our middle school mentoring effort.
|
9g
|
Describe how teaching and learning at the school support students in developing the attributes listed in the IB learner profile booklet?
|
|
Brief description:
Our schools recognized a need to add additional rigor to our academic programs. In particular we wanted to offer a program that offered this rigor for all levels of students. What we found in the Middle Years Programme was the framework that would provide this rigor. Through professional development at both schools, teachers have received training that supports the MYP. As a result of implementing the Middle Years Programme and these professional development opportunities, teachers of all students are using methodologies that support the attributes of the IB Learner Profile. In every classroom (Special Education, ESOL, Heritage Language, regular education, Talented and Gifted) students are challenged to solve problems and think critically. They are routinely asked to use their creativity and curiosity to go beyond the routine answer and explore the topic being discussed at a deeper level. They are also asked to demonstrate their mastery and understanding in a number of ways through varied assessment vehicles. The diversity of our student populations gives our schools the unique ability to appreciate and celebrate the many contributions that the varied cultures have made in our community and nation. Through our community service efforts, the students gain opportunities to contribute to their neighborhoods and the community has the opportunity to see the students demonstrate their concern and caring for their community. Both schools have made conscious efforts to encourage the students to reflect on their learning. This reflection may be in the form of a journal entry, a Writing Across the Curriculum assignment, a formal paper assignment or a class discussion. The Middle Years Programme has been the catalyst that has propelled our schools to ask more of our students and become the school the community desired.
The success of the programme is already being seen in the number of students that are transferring from private schools to our public middle and high school. In addition, approximately one hundred students who live outside our county are paying tuition to be able to attend Riverwood High School. Ridgeview Charter Middle School is beginning an expansion/renovation that will increase its capacity to a level which may allow it to also accept tuition paying students.
|
The person(s) who completed this application form should sign below.
Name:
|
|
Title:
|
|
Signature:
|
|
Date:
|
|
The completed application form, application fee and supporting documentation should be sent to the regional director responsible for your area.
Note: The MYP application forms and appendices should be completed electronically and returned to the appropriate regional office. In consultation with the regional office, any supporting documentation should be sent on CD-Rom(s) wherever possible. Where this is not possible, hard copies of the documents should be provided. Please ensure that the school is clearly identified in all correspondence.
|
Appendix 1 Proposed MYP implementation budget
|
Candidate
|
Candidate
|
Participation year 1
|
Participation year 2
|
Participation year 3
|
ACADEMIC YEAR
|
2006-7
|
2007-8
|
2008-9
|
2009-10
|
2010-11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application fee
|
8.800
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
Annual fee
|
|
|
5400
500
|
5400
500
|
5400
500
|
Resources
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curriculum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional development
|
|
|
|
|
|
IBO Training
|
40,000
|
20,000
|
20,000
|
10,000
|
10,000
|
Local Training
|
5,000
|
5,000
|
15,000
|
5,000
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
53,800
|
26,000
|
40,900
|
20,900
|
20,900
|
Appendix 2 MYP teaching staff
Name
|
Subject(s)
|
Qualifications
|
Level taught
|
Teaching experience(number of years)
|
Full-time/part-time
|
Allen, Lindsay
|
Math
|
BS, MS
|
4-5
|
4
|
FT
|
Anderson, Gaye
|
Technology
|
BS
|
4-5
|
7
|
FT
|
Balachandran, Rama
|
Science
|
M. Ed.
|
4-5
|
16
|
FT
|
Balkcom, Gayle
|
Science
|
MS
|
4-5
|
26
|
FT
|
Banner, Diane
|
Humanities
|
MA
|
4-5
|
11
|
FT
|
Battersby, Brooke
|
Visual Arts
|
BA
|
4-5
|
3
|
FT
|
Bembury, Timothy
|
Technology
|
BA
|
4-5
|
8
|
FT
|
Bentkowski, Sharon
|
Math
|
BS, MS
|
4-5
|
17
|
FT
|
Bounds, Jordan
|
Language A
|
M. Ed.
|
4-5
|
30
|
FT
|
Bradley, Sandra
|
Math
|
BS
|
4-5
|
8
|
FT
|
Cook, Courtney
|
Language A
|
BS
|
4-5
|
1
|
FT
|
Dalton, Marcia
|
Spec Ed
|
M. Ed.
|
4-5
|
30
|
FT
|
Davis, Mary
|
Math
|
BA
|
4-5
|
12
|
FT
|
DeLany, Cassie
|
Math
|
BA
|
4-5
|
10
|
FT
|
Dondero, Jill
|
Humanities
|
MA
|
4-5
|
5
|
FT
|
Elliott, Kirk
|
Science
|
BS
|
4-5
|
35
|
FT
|
Few, Charles
|
Spec Ed
|
MA
|
4-5
|
4
|
FT
|
Floyd, Jeanetta
|
Science
|
PhD
|
4-5
|
1
|
FT
|
Fowler, Stephanie
|
Spec Ed
|
PhD
|
4-5
|
9
|
FT
|
Gilley, Felicia
|
Spec Ed
|
MA
|
4-5
|
7
|
FT
|
Gribble, Daniel
|
Humanities
|
BA
|
4-5
|
7
|
FT
|
Griffith, Jon
|
Technology
|
BS
|
4-5
|
29
|
FT
|
Gunter, Doryiane
|
Technology
|
M. Ed.
|
4-5
|
11
|
FT
|
Hale, Kris
|
Humanities
|
MA
|
4-5
|
14
|
FT
|
Herbert, Brandi
|
Language A
|
BA
|
4-5
|
5
|
FT
|
Holloway, Jeffrey
|
Spec Ed
|
MA
|
4-5
|
11
|
FT
|
Hudson, Leigh
|
Physical Ed
|
BS
|
4-5
|
29
|
FT
|
Hughley, Amy
|
Performing Arts
|
MA
|
4-5
|
9
|
FT
|
Jackson, Regina
|
Spec Ed
|
MA
|
4-5
|
6
|
FT
|
Jennings, Lauren
|
Science
|
BS
|
4-5
|
1
|
FT
|
Katz, Shana
|
Technology
|
M. Ed.
|
4-5
|
7
|
FT
|
Kopkas, Diane
|
Language A
|
M. Ed.
|
4-5
|
9
|
FT
|
Kopkas, Jeremy
|
Humanities
|
M. Ed.
|
4-5
|
9
|
FT
|
Leech, Lori
|
Science
|
BS
|
4-5
|
3
|
FT
|
Litchfield, Cynthia
|
Spec Ed
|
BS
|
4-5
|
2
|
FT
|
Little, Andrea
|
Math
|
M. Ed.
|
4-5
|
9
|
FT
|
MacDonald, John
|
Humanities
|
Ph.D.
|
4-5
|
15
|
FT
|
Macoy, Donald
|
Physical Ed
|
MA
|
4-5
|
11
|
FT
|
Manning, Ebony
|
Spec Ed
|
BA
|
4-5
|
2
|
FT
|
Marstall, Ron
|
Visual Arts
|
MS
|
4-5
|
25
|
FT
|
McKeone, Rick
|
Physical Ed/Math
|
MA
|
4-5
|
33
|
FT
|
Mezzio, Mike
|
Humanities
|
MA
|
4-5
|
15
|
FT
|
Moorman, Nicholas
|
Language B (Japanese)
|
MA
|
4-5
|
18
|
FT
|
Morris, Carrie
|
Language A
|
M. Ed.
|
4-5
|
8
|
FT
|
Moseley, Mary
|
Language A
|
MA
|
4-5
|
7
|
FT
|
Mussman, Amanda
|
Humanities
|
MA
|
4-5
|
2
|
FT
|
Nadeau, Melissa
|
Spec Ed
|
M. Ed.
|
4-5
|
7
|
FT
|
Nissen, Phillip
|
Math
|
Ph. D.
|
4-5
|
20
|
FT
|
Oliney, Gregory
|
Language B (Spanish)
|
BA
|
4-5
|
1
|
FT
|
Paige, Bruno
|
Performing Arts
|
BA, MA
|
4-5
|
25
|
FT
|
Pearch, David
|
Physical Ed
|
BS, M. Ed.
|
4-5
|
8
|
FT
|
Plait, Lindsey
|
Language A
|
BS
|
4-5
|
2
|
FT
|
Ravisangar, Niroshini
|
Math
|
BS
|
4-5
|
5
|
FT
|
Santoro, Mike
|
Humanities
|
BA
|
4-5
|
11
|
FT
|
Schmidt, Mary
|
ESOL
|
BA
|
4-5
|
25
|
FT
|
Sealy, Andre
|
Science
|
BS
|
4-5
|
10
|
FT
|
Smith, Sheri
|
Technology
|
BA
|
4-5
|
9
|
FT
|
Sprayberry, Allison
|
Language B (Spanish)
|
MA
|
4-5
|
7
|
FT
|
Squaire, Cristal
|
Language B (Spanish)
|
BA
|
4-5
|
15
|
FT
|
Stevens, Emelda
|
Technology
|
BA
|
4-5
|
29
|
FT
|
Swafford, Anna
|
Language A
|
BS, TAG cert.
|
4-5
|
10
|
FT
|
van der Hoek, Mary
|
Performing Arts
|
MFA
|
4-5
|
7
|
FT
|
Whitworth, Allise
|
Visual Arts
|
MA
|
4-5
|
5
|
FT
|
Willeford, Ann
|
Language B (French)
|
Ph. D.
|
4-5
|
25
|
FT
|
Robertson, Janet
|
Language A
|
M.Ed., TAG cert.
|
4-5
|
25
|
FT
|
Pece, Kate
|
Language A
|
MA, ESOL cert.
|
4-5
|
9
|
FT
|
Appendix 3 MYP teacher training
Please indicate when your teachers, in every one of the eight subject groups, have received training. For partnerships*, at least one teacher from every site must be trained at an IBO-approved workshop in each subject group. We are also interested in which teachers, if any, have visited IB World Schools authorized to offer the MYP. Please indicate this on the chart.
Subject groups
|
Name of teacher
|
MYP course and grade levels
|
Training at IBO-approved workshops: place and date
|
School visits: place and date
|
Language A
|
|
|
|
|
|
Margaret De Roo
|
Language A, Level 4
|
Niagara Falls, March 2006
|
|
Language B
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(add rows as necessary)
|
Humanities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(add rows as necessary)
|
|
Jill Dondero
|
Humanities, Levels 4-5
|
Niagara Falls, March 2006
|
|
Sciences
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(add rows as necessary)
|
Mathematics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(add rows as necessary)
|
Share with your friends: |