A bank must examine a presentation to determine, on the basis of the documents alone, whether or not the documents appear on their face to constitute a complying presentation
Article 2 of UCP 600
complying presentation means a presentation that is in accordance with the terms and conditions of the credit, the applicable provisions of these rules and international standard banking practice
ASSUMPTION OF RISK
UCP allocates the risk of unexpected events, in almost all cases, away from the bank
If a force majeure event keeps a bank closed past the expiry date for a L/C, the beneficiary or holder bears that risk, not the bank
Art 37 Disclaimer for Acts of an Instructed Party
The UCP shields banks from liability for the conduct of their correspondent banks in L/C transactions, ,even if the first bank selected the defaulting bank for the task
STANDBY LETTERS OF CREDIT
UCC Art 5 applies to all documentary L/Cs, whether commercial or standby
Many standby L/Cs follow commercial L/Cs and incorporate the UCP to govern the rights and obligations under the credit
However, in 1998, the ICC issued a new set of rules called the International Standby Practices (ISP98), designed specifically to cover standby L/Cs (and demand guarantees)
Companies using standby L/Cs have to make a choice regarding whether they want their standbys made subject to the ISP98 or the UCP600
look to the applicable letter of credit law to determine if an allegation that the beneficiary is engaging in fraud suffices to stop a L/C bank from honoring a conforming presentation under the L/C
i.e. whether fraud is an exception to the independence principle
Two possible situations are especially important
Fraudulent or forged documents being presented under the L/C
This is starting point for any analysis of a fraud allegation with respect to L/Cs
p 380
See also Fall 2006 exam answer to Q2
Because standby L/Cs are generally drawn upon in the midst of serious underlying difficulties among the parties, they are involved in much of the case law considering the extent to which an allegation of fraud will justify an injunction against payment