•
Marxist ARGUE THAT IN intl rel as well, there is another hidden development of world politics
having to do with production • emancipate individual and lead to more participatory behaviour
• release themselves from position their locked in production pattern
•
Marx did not write much about intl rel
•
Marx did not specifically write on intl rel, state or actors but we seethe reflection of marxist ideas in intl rel, in writings from Lenin,
luxembourg • we see his writings refelct in intl rel
-early periods of Lenin regarding working of latest stage of capitalism • acc
Lenin imperialism latest, final stage of capitalism
• forced the world into core, periphery
• lenin was talking bout rel about core and perihphery and the constant flow
of good from core to perp • constant flow of raw material from periphery to core, meaning constant flow of wealth, a constant process of rich getting rich , and poor of getting poor bc a system working. for benefit of the core
• this systems composed of two tiers, periphery and core, we can seen periphery there
is a group being dispossessed, under constant exploitation
• however ken inn underlines imp issues, by bring. core and periphery
• if we think of world capitalsit system, a division btw country s
• the burgoeusie in core can provide better work condition fro periphery workers
•
idea of lenin, important trait of questioning world proletariat
• he argues bc of burg in core, to export periphery further, they can use revenue to make their workers in core work better
• then periphery left on its own, a unity of concern with the workers in the core,
an imp dimension • looking at this issue, of lenin talking bout burg how they pacify their worker in the core, the reason he gives there is not revolution in core countries can be understood by two tier working capitalist system
• during s dependency school theories led by gunner frank, cardoso who were critiqued capitalist system for placing them in consnttn rs of dependency, of being locked
• the underdeveloped of periphery
is bc of dev of core 56
• dev of underdeveloped, the scholars argue, that periphery was placed in industrialisation processes as constant providers of resources locked them in exploration
• has kept them inconstant depend , the poor poor rich rich
• ralf perish critics terms of trade btw core and periphery
Share with your friends: 
