Ir231 1st Lec. 24/09/2019

-realist ir critisized by Robinsons bc of ahistorici, timless wisdom

Download 0.86 Mb.

View original pdf

Page	30/39
Date	07.12.2023
Size	0.86 Mb.
	#62861

1 ... 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 ... 39

IR231 1
Ayşe-Şevval-Raylaz Assignment 2, book assignment, ENG102 Final, adm1122, Adm1122 midterm

Teschke

-
realist ir critisized by Robinsons bc of ahistorici, timless wisdom
• Robinson actually challenges and its ahistorical meaning
• robinson argues how the claim of Polepponasain war (perfect IR ) , how it is completely wrong
• he talks bout myopia of IRs, he propose we should focus on role of social relations and not on autonomous of politics as it is given to us in realist understanding
• he argues that, intl rel is not an autonomous arena (realists want that, unitary, functionary similar
• he says social relalism must betaken into account
• rel of prod permeate whole society
• most look tar more of proaction in the states and btw the states
• he is against rosenberg , idea of glob theory with end of CW, instead go glob theory which looks only at prod patterns, how liberals think through liberalisation , diﬀ actors inconstant rs, instead of this he proposes more holistic approach which explains the process
• acc to Rosenberg glob theory dense conectrsuon of processs but look at consequences
• foreign policy areas immune from other structures acc to enlist understanding
• what Rosenberg has argues is that we must look at whole process, not exaggerate similarities btw diﬀ periods, contest ahistocracy
• Teschke contests essential of social property
• he argues that , and. contest periods of grand transformation ,
• Teschke did not witness 2 grand changes, feudalism early capitalism , modern capitalism
• early capitalism brought to us absolute monarchies, modern capitalism brought us capitalist state
• in this intl system mixture feudal and absolutist states, then in modern period we had nation states
• T. says intl systems were completely diﬀ,
• diﬀerent processes working in feudal times
61

• we are seeing in intl rel, arena is always changing , diﬀ periods and diﬀ actor,
• Teschke also thinks that importance of 1648 is overstated
• transformation of intl rel. , transformation of modern rel emerges with emergence of capitalist system , high not always coincide with 1648 we must question 1648 pairing individual with technology
03/12/2018 IR Lec 8

Download 0.86 Mb.

Share with your friends:

1 ... 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 ... 39