I’ve got it let’s invade Iraq!



Download 2.43 Mb.
Page13/95
Date29.01.2017
Size2.43 Mb.
#12727
1   ...   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   ...   95

The Stupid 365 Project, Day 12: Art, Money, Books

October 12th, 2010

The more expensive an art form, the more conservative it is.

Of all live art forms, the most expensive is opera, the beached whale of the performing arts. Taking a creative risk in opera means Wagner on roller skates or “La Boheme” set in the Tokyo underworld — in other words, hanging ornamental parsley on the same old cuts of meat. Does that mean that artists — composers and librettists — aren’t trying right now to turn opera upside down? Of course, they are. It’s just highly unlikely they’ll ever get produced.

Film, the most expensive of all art forms, is more conservative than opera. Once every 4-5 years, an accident occurs and a really different film (a) gets made, and (b) is a hit. And does the film industry say, “Aha, we need more really different films”? No, they say, “We need to imitate the film that made the money,” and they do until the imitations flop.

In art, the equation is simple. Money equals stodge. The more bucks at risk, the fewer chances taken.

One of the reasons the pop music industry has so often been creatively ahead of other popular art forms is that it’s comparatively cheap to make a recording. And now that the major labels (big-money institutions) are losing their stranglehold in favor of digital distribution, there’s a new universe for independent artists such as Arcade Fire or The Libertines (when Pete Doherty was with them) or James McMurtry or Bird and the Bee or Rilo Kiley or Mary Gautier or Tegan and Sara or, or, or.

Historically, the artists whose work provides the earliest signals of changing perspectives and attitudes are painters. Pigments and canvas are relatively cheap, and a painting also costs little in terms of time; a painter can turn out dozens of canvases in the period required to write a novel.

Which leads at last to the point I’m moving toward with such agonizing slowness. Up till now, it’s been expensive to produce and sell books. There are dozens of reasons for this: design, printing, and paper aren’t cheap; books are heavy and expensive to distribute; booksellers are allowed to return unsold books; and 95% of all books published lose money. Some of the money-losers turn out, years later, to have been more important than the big hits. So a high-priced best-seller subsidizes the publication of a lot of other books, some of which may be prove to be much better than the best-seller.

But still, publishing is an expensive and therefore a relatively conservative enterprise. Publishers want books with undeniable sales potential. They want certain genres. They don’t, by and large, want experimental or revolutionary books. The costs of publishing make risk-taking potentially disastrous.

Now, though, all that has been turned on its head. The skyrocketing expansion of the e-book market makes it possible for literally anyone to write and publish a book. Good, bad, awful, brilliant, hackneyed, inspired, pornographic, prudish, right-wing, radical, subliterate, or pushing the envelope of structure and language — anyone’s book can come into being and be offered to a global marketplace in exchange for an investment of time and a very few dollars. Is most of what’s put out there going to be great? No. Is most of it going to be junk? Sure, and I’ll probably write some of it.

To me, right now, it means I can write the book I want to write, PULPED, even though my agent, in exquisitely polite euphemisms, has said that no publisher will buy it. The success of the Simeon Grist books in e-book form got me thinking about Simeon again, and also about discontinued series. What happens to series characters when the last unsold copy of the last book in the series is pulped and the contract is not renewed? It’s the publishing equivalent of death — no more new adventures, no more love affairs, no more getting injected with vodka by a Chinese gangster in a custard-yellow suit. Nothing, nada. But is it really? I mean, fictional characters have their own energy (ask any writer who’s been possessed by one). What actually becomes of them after they’re pulped?

Is there some kind of fictional afterlife? Is there a literary heaven for good characters and a somewhat warmer destination for bad ones, or would that be unfair, since even the worst characters can claim that they’re not really bad — it’s just (to paraphrase Jessica Rabbit) that they were written that way. So do bad and good mingle there — wherever it is — the same way we do here? Are the afterlives segregated by genre? Is the thriller afterlife cheaper and seedier than the Literary Fiction afterlife? If there’s an afterworld for mystery and thriller characters, do tough, hard-drinking male private eyes hang out with the heroines of quilting cozies?

Is there any way, up there, they can interact with what we so amusingly insist on calling “real life”? Are they aware in any way when someone “down here” opens one of the increasingly rare copies of their books? What happens when someone who’s reading, say, a Simeon Grist book, gets murdered? Really murdered, not stabbed with a noun or verbed through a 9th-story window.

All this struck me as interesting and possibly even funny in places, but, I’m told, not enough people would want to read it for any major publisher to be interested. But I know of several thousand people who would want to read it, because they’re paying good money right now (although not much of it — such a deal) to buy the Simeons as e-books. HarperCollins or Minotaur might not be interested in “several thousand” readers, but I am.

So, from a purely selfish viewpoint, this global revolution in publishing — something I think could change the world — means to me that I can write the book I want. It means that anybody can write the book they want. Write it, put it out there, hope people like it. If they do, great. If they don’t — well, the whole project hardly cost a thing. One global creative explosion, coming up.




This entry was posted on Tuesday, October 12th, 2010 at 11:48 am and is filed under All Blogs. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

11 Responses to “The Stupid 365 Project, Day 12: Art, Money, Books”


  1. Peg Brantley Says:
    October 12th, 2010 at 12:37 pm

This is a bandwagon I’ve missed, unpubbed and unknown. But that doesn’t stop me from spotting little glimmers of light up ahead that will benefit my meager efforts as well.

About to begin acquiring your Simeon Grist serieson my Kindle, and already antcipating PULPED.

Not to put too much of a flattering twist to things, but I’ve learned to trust you through Poke Rafferty.

Pretty sure I’ll like Tim Hallinan, unplugged.



  1. fairyhedgehog Says:
    October 12th, 2010 at 12:47 pm

That puts a very positive spin on it; I just hope that the good stuff rises to the top.

I’ll be in the market for PULPED anyway!



  1. Timothy Hallinan Says:
    October 12th, 2010 at 1:27 pm

Well, Peg, there’s no question that people who have established their names to some degree have an initial advantage when they go to e-book, but it doesn’t always mean much. Debbi Mack who never (so far as I know) published in paper, was the number one Kindle mystery for quite a while, and even now she’s #4 in hard-boiled and in the top 600 titles for Kindle overall. Selling a hell of a lot better than I am.

We all know what floats, Fairyhedgehog. The big problem, I think, is going to be a massive glut of titles. But I’m sure the people who love junk will find plenty of books to satisfy them, and so will the people who like quality. We are going to lose the filtration system of the professional publishers — screening out the really hapless material — but we’ll also get books that simply didn’t fit within their marketing parameters.



  1. Laren Bright Says:
    October 12th, 2010 at 2:14 pm

Still resisting an iPad & don’t want to be chained to my monitor to read e-books (I do enough reading all day for clients). So on this issue (along with lots of others, I’m sure) I’ll be a luddite.

Nonetheless, one day I’ll break down (budget willing) & get an e-reader & discover what I’ve been missing.

Of course, when all the print books have disappeared and everything’s electronic, you’ll have to come up with a new word for “pulped.”


  1. Peg Brantley Says:
    October 12th, 2010 at 3:06 pm

Laren, LOL . . . assuming pulped somehow relates to publishing. But even then it could be tres interesting.

I adore my Kindle 3. Am gifting my Kindle 2 to my husband. I still covet an iPad, but no longer for reading. It doesn’t come close to the reading experience on a Kindle (which is about as far away as reading on a computer screen as well . . . a book). Amazon is quite good about returns, so when you’re ready to make a move, check out a Kindle.

Speaking of what floats and what’s junk . . . when you think about it, there’s plenty of junk in print. There will probably be more of it in electronic form, but it won’t take me more than a sentence or two for me to recognize stinky stuff when I see it.


  1. Cliff Stanford Says:
    October 12th, 2010 at 3:46 pm

Laren: I am reading the Simeon Grist series using Kindle for the iPhone (even though Tim seems to think I’ll go blind).

If you have an iPhone or an Android phone, it’s a great way to read eBooks.



  1. Gary Says:
    October 12th, 2010 at 3:54 pm

What happens to fictional characters after they’re pulped? Ray Bradbury’s given you the answer to that one. In “The Illustrated Man”, his 1951 collection of short stories, there’s a story called “The Exiles.” Fictional characters from Earth literature are living in exile on Mars, and as the last book about each character is destroyed back on Earth that character vanishes – forever.

Everybody laughed at you, Tim, but you were right. Those garbled English words in reCAPTCHA – they’re the last faint, distorted cries of help coming to us through cyberspace, as each former fictional character shudders on the edge of extinction.

As if any further proof were needed, my CAPTCHA for today is “trobits curtains.” I rest my case.

And now that you know the truth, what are you going to do about it?



  1. Timothy Hallinan Says:
    October 12th, 2010 at 5:34 pm

Laren, I’ve been resistant too — I just love books as physical objects. But you could put every book in your house on a Kindle and take it with you, and it still wouldn’t weigh a pound. The screen is great. It’ll even read to you, in kind of a robotic voice, while you’re driving. Just amazing technology.

Peg, “pulped” is literally what happens to returned remaindered books: they’re fed into the maw of a machine that pulps them, mixes them with other paper and some starches, and turns out expensive recycled paper on the one hand, and newsprint on the other. I guess it there’s ever an e-book term it’ll be “de-pixelated” or something. As far as e-books go, I think we’ll all continue to be able to recognize the right books for us, but there will soon be so many of them that some sort of sifting mechanism — big review sites, maybe — are going to have to come into play.

Cliff actually read one of the Simeons on his iPhone so long that the phone got too hot to hold. An entirely new kind of compliment for a writer. And thanks for the review, Cliff.

Gary, once again you’ve managed to suggest a graceful unified field theory to explain seemingly disparate phenomena: Bradbury, out-of-print characters, and reCAPTCHA. Actually, I will have to change something in PULPED as a result of your note because I had a similar phenomenon with characters disappearing forever. Well, if I’m going to be anticipated, it might as well be someone as good as Ray Bradbury.

By the way, the offer Cliff took advantage of is open to all: Buy a Simeon in e-book form and review it on Amazon, send me the URL when the review appears, and I’ll send you a free Simeon e-book.


  1. EverettK Says:
    October 12th, 2010 at 5:57 pm

There is no doubt in my mind that you’ve framed the issue perfectly, Tim. Cheap=Flood, no two ways about it, and NoPublisher=GreatFreedom (both to succeed in strange new ways, and to fail in very big flames).

New authors will have to give away for free their first effort or two, quite likely, just to get heard above the noise. If they’re good enough, following books will sell quite well. If they’re not, they’ll have to continue to give them away (if they want anyone to read them).

Reviewers will take on a whole new importance (“Siskel and Ebert – At The Novels” anyone?)

Fun times are a’comin’!!!



  1. Timothy Hallinan Says:
    October 13th, 2010 at 8:59 am

Thank you, Everett — it’s going to be very interesting to see what happens. This is being spoken of mainly as a business revolution, threatening the very existence of traditional publishing, but I think of it primarily as a creative revolution.

Capitalism at its most Darwinian,



  1. Jaden Says:
    October 18th, 2010 at 2:54 pm

Tim, you can count me as one of the readers for PULPED when it comes out. Considering the number of aspiring writers out there, the book might have a bigger audience than you imagine.

More proof for the reCaptcha theory: mine is fictifi moeurs.




Download 2.43 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   ...   95




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page