Output 18: Climate Smart Initiatives Streamlined & Technologies Delivered
This output is for the PCU to pursue, which is engaged in overall coordination of program, M & E, review of work-plans & budget, management of progress, resource mobilization, coordination of CCIS development, and capacity building program. It will also coordinate baselines and impact studies and specific CC focused research in collaboration with CoRRB secretariat scientists.
Expected Output
|
Activities
|
18. Climate Smart Initiatives Streamlined & Technologies Delivered
|
GCCA PCU established & action plans initiated
|
SAPA prepared & submitted for approval to RGoB & EU
|
CCIS established
|
CC initiatives monitoring & evaluation procedures put in place
|
HRD Coordinated & implemented
|
Visualizations
|
Study impacts of climate change on livestock, agriculture, land utilization, Forest and Wetland Ecosystem
|
-
All implementing Dzongkhags, in consultation with the central agencies (stakeholders) will develop Annual Work-Plan & Budget (AWPB), which is the activity plan, linked to expected outputs within the approved 11th FYP (as described in section 3) and upload them in PLAMS. A copy of the uploaded data sheet will be submitted to CoRRB secretariat. CoRRB will make arrangement to access this data in collaboration with PPD & GNHC. As prescribed in PLAMS the progress should be updated on a quarterly basis by the designated FPs in all the ten stakeholder institutions. The FPs should also submit a compiled sub-sectoral progress report for the CCAP Dzongkhags to PCU. CoRRB-S in consultation with the stakeholders will also organize monitoring visits to actually see the actions in the field and document the progress. In parallel, CoRRB-S will also request SAPA-Technical Committee (SAPA -TC) to make rapid appraisals of some of the action areas and propose the way forward as and when required.
CoRRB based on the quarterly reports will prepare the comprehensive report and submit to MoAF for further circulation to the government and the donor.
The above mentioned procedures for monitoring of CCAP will not by itself give sufficient scientific documentation on impacts of CC on the sector. Detailed documentation to draw conclusions for CC analysis and developing proper adaptation measures are needed for proper decision making. The activities implemented by CoRRB secretariat, particularly on climate change research, baselines and impact studies, observation and validation of CC adaptation measures through initiation of climate smart villages and further probing of results after implementation of activities by the Dzongkhags, are going to provide material for this.
Result Based Management – FYP’s Monitoring Tool
In the light of foregoing background, this MF is developed for effective monitoring of the CCAP.
As is the case with all the programs of the RGoB, CCAP activities will be monitored using National Monitoring and Evaluation System (NMES) designed and promulgated by GNHC, which is the central coordinating agency for development planning, monitoring and evaluation.
The M&E System in use deploys structured formats and tools with dynamic database, data elements with stratified password protocols; inputs with Logical Framework Approach (LFA) with clearly defined results & indicators following the 11th FYP’s Results-Based M&E Approach based on the principles of Results-Based Management (RBM). RBM is a management strategy focusing on the achievement of clearly defined results and ensuring that its processes, products and services contribute to the achievement of clearly stated results. The key focus of the Results-Based M&E system is thus the outcomes and impacts of the programs and projects, as well as the means of achieving them through outputs, activities, and inputs.
The planned activities should be presented in matrices & tables using standard formats of PLAMS clearly indicating outputs, outcomes and impacts. These tables should include monitoring and evaluation responsibilities and schedules.
Table : Concepts & Definitions of Results
Results
|
Changes in a state or condition which derive from a cause-and- effect relationship. There are three types of such changes which can be set in motion by a development intervention – its output, outcome and impact.
|
Goal
|
The higher-order objective to which a development intervention is intended to contribute
|
Impact
|
Positive and negative long-term effects on identifiable population groups produced by a development intervention. These effects can be economic, socio-cultural, institutional, environmental, technological or of other types
|
Outcome
|
The intended or achieved short-term and medium-term effects of an intervention’s outputs, usually requiring the collective effort of partners. Outcomes represent changes in development conditions which occur between the completion of outputs and the achievement of impact
|
Outputs
|
The products and services which result from the completion of activities within a development intervention
|
Activities
|
Actions taken or work performed through which inputs, such as funds, technical assistance and other types of resources are mobilized to produce specific outputs
|
Inputs
|
The financial, human, and material resources used for the development intervention
|
Share with your friends: |