TABLE 12
(Continued)
THREATENED & ENDANGERED PLANT SPECIES
SPECIES
|
Status
|
Geogr.
Affinity
|
P/O
|
O/P
|
PPLL
|
C
|
HDW
|
Water,
Bog
Or Marsh
|
Non-
Forest
|
Slender nut rush
Scleria minor
|
T
|
S
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
X
|
Reticulated nut rush
Scleria reticularis
|
T
|
N/S
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
Sclerolepis
Sclerolepis uniflora
|
T
|
N/S
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
Wand-like golden rod
Solidago stricta
|
E
|
S
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
X
|
Little ladies tresses
Spiranthes tuberosa
|
T
|
N/S
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
False asphodel
Tofieldia racemosa
|
E
|
S
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
Humped bladderwort
Utricularia gibba
|
T
|
N/S
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
White-flowered bladderwort
Utricularia olivacea
|
E
|
S
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
Purple bladderwort
Utricularia purpurea
|
T
|
N/S
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
Reclined bladderwort
Utricularia resupinata
|
E
|
N/S
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
Yellow-eyed grass
Xyris flexuosa
|
T
|
S
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
HABITAT:
P/O - Pine Oak Forest
O/P - Oak Pine Forest
PPLL - Pitch Pine Lowland
HDW - Hardwood Swamp
C - Cedar Swamp
STATUS CODES:
T - Threatened
E - Endangered
F - Being considered for the Federal (national) list of threatened or endangered species by the
Department of the Interior.
GEOGRAPHICAL AFFINITY:
N - Northern
S - Southern
SOURCE: N.J. Pinelands Comprehensive Management Plan.
|
Although not all the above species are known or likely to occur in the Town of Hammonton, they were all listed because detailed studies to identify populations of many species are sketchy or lacking for certain areas. One significant trend which is recognized in the table is the relative number of species associated with the different habitats. Of the fifty-four (54) species listed, it is the various lowland habitats which support disproportionately higher numbers of species as compared with the upland pine-oak or oak-pine forests. Cumulative totals of species by habitat association are listed in the following table.
TABLE 13
HABITAT ASSOCIATION OF THREATENED & ENDANGERED PLANTS
HABITAT
|
ENDANGERED
|
THREATENED
|
FEDERAL
EVALUATION
|
TOTAL
|
Pine-Oak
|
4
|
3
|
0
|
7
|
Oak-Pine
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
4
|
Pitch Pine Lowland
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
4
|
Cedar Swamp
|
2
|
4
|
2
|
7
|
Hardwood Swamp
|
6
|
15
|
2
|
21
|
Bog
|
11
|
18
|
6
|
29
|
Marsh
(Inland & Coastal)
|
6
|
11
|
5
|
17
|
Water
|
6
|
6
|
2
|
12
|
Non-Forested
|
6
|
7
|
0
|
13
|
SOURCE: N.J. Pinelands Comprehensive Management Plan.
It is important to note that by the very definition of threatened and endangered plants, they can only be protected by the maintenance of suitable habitat. Many human activities can impact the survival of these species. Normal flowering and seed production of some species is affected by excess nutrients which may enter the environment through septic systems, lawn fertilizers, or agricultural runoff. Those native plants which are in danger are accustomed to the naturally low fertility of the soils and any increase in nutrient levels may favor more competitive species which previously were unable to grow in the region. Alterations to water levels in wetlands or other changes to natural drainage patters can have adverse effects on some species. These types of influences should be considered when designing or reviewing projects for development. In this way, adverse impacts can be eliminated or minimized.
6.05 Fire Hazard
Wildfires have been a part of the Pinelands ecology throughout recorded history. Indications are that natural wildfires occurred long before European settlement, and some authorities believe that Indian inhabitants of the area may have utilized controlled burning during wetter seasons to reduce the intensity of naturally occurring wildfires during dry periods in the area of their settlements. Prescribed or controlled burning techniques have been employed locally in forested areas since about 1928 in order to keep hazardous fuel accumulation under control. Even so, according to the National Fire Danger Rating System of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the Pinelands contain some of the most hazardous wildland fuel types in the nation.
Table 14 presents fire hazard classifications for each vegetation type in the Town of Hammonton. Many other factors control the susceptibility of forests to fire, primarily the conditions of wetness, the immediate weather conditions, and the degree to which large forested areas in Hammonton are accessed by roads for fire-fighting equipment. The individual should nevertheless consider the wildfire hazard along with local conditions when assessing the hazards to property and the appropriate clearing to create around structures as a firebreak. The Conservation Element of the Master Plan discusses recommended appropriate fuel breaks for minimum protection of structures from the threat of wildfires depending upon the local vegetation type and its rated fire hazard.
TABLE 14
WILDLAND FIRE HAZARD CLASSIFICATION
HAZARD
|
VEGETATION TYPE
|
Low
|
Atlantic white cedars swamps
Hardwood swamps
|
Moderate
|
Pine-oak or oak-pine greater than 20 ft. tall
and less than 20 ft. spacing
Non-Pine Barrens Forest
Prescribed burned areas
|
High
|
Pine-oak or oak-pine less than 20 ft. tall
and greater than 20 ft. spacing
|
Extreme
|
Immature pine-oak or oak-pine
Pitch Pine lowlands (all size classes)
Old field grasses
|
Variable
|
Inland marshes
Cranberry bogs
|
SOURCE: N.J. Pinelands Comprehensive Management Plan.
SECTION 7.00 Wildlife
In much the same way as vegetation types are a reflection of the localized habitat conditions, so are animal species controlled by the type and quality of habitat available for their survival and propagation. Each species requires a certain combination of soil, vegetation, and water features. As time goes by, changes in the landscape will necessarily produce changes to the wildlife of the area. Certain species are rather secretive and may be rarely seen by humans, even though substantial populations may exist. Others adapt readily to human presence, and still others are actually attracted to disturbed sites or suburban environments.
Despite the relative ease with which wildlife populations can be studied in the Pine Barrens, very little has been done beyond compiling species lists and habitat associations, Once again, the Vegetation Map (No.3) is the best indicator of locations within the Town of Hammonton where certain species are likely to be found. The species lists which are included in the following tables were compiled primarily by professional consultants to the Pinelands Commission and represent the latest available data on the species composition of the region.
The combined reports of wildlife experts who study the Pinelands fauna have identified thirty-nine (39) species of mammals, two hundred ninety-nine (299) bird species, fifty-nine (59) reptile and amphibian species, and ninety-one (91) fish species in the Pinelands. Of the total four hundred seventy-eight (478) species, two (2) are listed as endangered by the U.S. Department of the Interior and thirty-two (32) are listed as threatened or endangered by the N.J. Department of Environmental Protection.
ENDANGERED – Species whose prospects for survival within the State are in danger due to one or many factors – a loss of or change in habitat, over-exploitation, predation, competition, disease.
THREATENED – May become endangered if conditions surrounding the species begin or continue to deteriorate.
7.01 Mammals
The largest animal species in the region are mammals, but some mammals range down to sizes smaller than many birds and fish. Mammals are distinguished from other animals by the presence of hair (as compared with feathers on birds, hairless skin on reptiles and amphibians, and scales on fish). In addition, only mammals possess mammary glands by which they provide their young with milk.
TABLE 15
HABITAT ASSOCIATIONS OF MAMMAL SPECIES
|
Status*
|
Pine-Oak
|
Oak-Pine
|
Pitch Pine Lowland
|
Cedar Swamp
|
Hardwood Swamp
|
Water
|
Bog
|
Marsh
|
Non-Pine Barrens
|
Agricultural
|
Urban
|
Non-Forested
|
Borrow Pit
|
Old Fields
|
Oppossum, Didelphis virginiana
|
C
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
X
|
Raccoon, Procyon lotor
|
C
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
X
|
Long-tailed weasel, Mustela frenata
|
C
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
Mink, Mustela vison
|
C
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
River otter, Lutra canadensis
|
C
|
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
Striped skunk, Mephitis mephitis
|
C
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
X
|
Red fox, Vulpes fulva
|
C
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
Gray fox, Urocyon cinereoargenteus
|
A
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
Black bear†, Ursus americanus
|
UD
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
Bobcat†, Lynx rufus
|
E
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eastern coyote, Canis latrans
|
P/UC
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
X
|
Gray squirrel, Sciurus carolinensis
|
C
|
|
X
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
|
Red Squirrel, Tamiasciurus hudsonicus
|
A
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodchuck, Marmota monax
|
UC
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
Beaver, Castor canadensis
|
C
|
|
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
Muskrat, Ondatra zibethica
|
C
|
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
Eastern cottontail, Sylvilagus floridanus
|
C
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
White-tailed deer, Odocoileus virginianus
|
C
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
X
|
Masked shrew, Sorex cinerus
|
UC
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
X
|
|
X
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
Short-tailed shrew, Blarina brevicauda
|
UC
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
Least shrew, Cryptotis parva
|
UD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
Eastern mole, Scalopus aquaticus
|
C
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
X
|
Starnosed mole, Condylura cristata
|
UC
|
|
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
Little brown bat, Myotis lucifugus
|
UD
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
Eastern pipistrelle, Pipistrellus subflavus
|
UD
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
Big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus
|
UD
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
Eastern chipmunk, Tamias striatus
|
C
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
X
|
Flying squirrel, Glaucomys volans
|
C
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
Rice rat, Oryzomys palustris
|
UD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
White-footed mouse, Peromyscus leucopus
|
C
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
Red-backed vole, Clethrinonomys gapperi
|
C
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Meadow vole, Microtus pennsylvanicus
|
C
|
|
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
Pine vole, Pitymys pinetorum
|
C
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southern bog lemming, Synaptomys cooperi
|
UD
|
|
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Norway rat, Rattus norvegicus
|
C
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
X
|
House mouse, Mus musculus
|
C
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
X
|
Meadow jumping mouse, Zapus hudsonius
|
UD
|
|
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
SOURCE: N.J. Pinelands Comprehensive Management Plan.
* Explanation of Status Codes:
Abundant (A) - The species reaches its highest population densities in the Pinelands when compared to other areas of New Jersey.
Common (C) - The species population is at a level consistent with the habitat available in the Pinelands, but the density here is exceeded in other areas of New Jersey.
Uncommon (UC) - The species population level is below the level which the Pinelands is capable of supporting, or the species is rarely encountered because of a scarcity of habitat.
Undetermined (UD) - A species about which there is not enough information available to determine status.
Extirpated (Ex) - A species that occurred in the Pinelands within the last three hundred (300) years, but no longer exists within the region.
Peripheral (P) - The species reaches the limits of its distribution in the Pinelands. It may be uncommon to abundant. This designation will be used along with another status.
† Potential habitats exist for these extirpated species.
Although three (3) mammal species which formerly existed in the region were completely eliminated by human activity, one (1) has been re-introduced with considerable success. The beaver, once trapped out of existence, was re-introduced and now is firmly re-established in streams, lakes and swamps of the area. The black bear and bobcat were also former residents of the region, and although suitable habitat exists, plans to re-introduce these mammal species were shelved in response to public criticism of the proposals.
Share with your friends: |