U. S. Intelligence and REA

Does the U. S. intelligence community know about REA and how it works? A resounding yes.
A journalist in a July 2008 Yahoo news article wrote about visiting Guantanamo and interviewing some of the detainees. One of them was Omar Khadr, an Islamic Canadian who was only fifteen years old when he was captured in Afghanistan in 2002 and brought there.
Omar told the interviewer tearfully that he had lost both arms and both legs; yet, the boy was in perfectly sound physical condition. Interrogators and brain control experts from the CIA,
DOD, and other U. S. intelligence agencies had taken control of his mind and had convinced him that he had no arms or legs. As I write, Gitmo prisoners are being allowed trials by
Federal judges. However, Khadr’s lawyer warned that he is almost a basket case. His prison torturers doubtlessly erased any memory in his mind of his neurological torture.
In my overseas work, I knew many CIA/MIA/DIA types, who posed as businessmen, employees of international voluntary agencies, teachers in American overseas schools, missionaries and other clergy, sometimes foreign nationals who worked under contract for the
CIA, and other non-governmental persons. In addition, each embassy and its official appendages provide cover for CIA agents among their employees. The people whom I knew were agents normally had far more human defects than virtues. Some of them were virtual sleazebags. Only a very few honorable and good men and women in that line of work stand out in my mind.
I praise President Obama for condemning torture by those elements. There is absolutely no need nowadays for torture, for as targeted individuals can attest, the government has long had the capability to obtain involuntary information from persons by remote mind control.
Thus, the torture of detainees, using the pretext of extracting crucial information, represents only a sadistic excuse by torturers with otherwise little authority and decision-making power to carry out the evil in their twisted minds. Waterboarding is an example of that Inquisition period torture. I suggest that when the perpetrators are finally caught—and they will be--they be waterboarded to death. Let them experience the fruit of their work.
The mind control attackers operate by remote. Thus, some type of instrument or receiver/transmitter must be used to make contact with the victim’s brain. That instrument may be a scanner, ham radio, or a clandestine radio station guided by GPS. Regardless of the type of device, it must operate along a particular frequency, a frequency that can pick up the electromagnetic pulses of the human brain. If a radio is used, that frequency must necessarily be blocked. If not, any listener could happen upon that frequency and hear the whisperings and other mind control operations of the attackers, blowing the entire operations.
If it is indeed a blocked frequency, the local law enforcement, the FBI, and the FCC have to know about and approve it, additional proof that law enforcement has to know about REA.
Since 9/11 the Federal Government has monitored all radio frequencies to prevent terrorists from communicating with each other. Intelligence agents routinely scan the air waves for suspicious activity. It is an inescapable fact then that the Federal government has to know about electronic stalking and mind control. If the Federal, state, and local law enforcement are not involved directly in REA, their unwillingness to investigate makes them knowing accomplices.
The FBI
I live in a rural area in Ouachita Parish (county) in north central Louisiana. In late 2006, not

trusting the local authorities, I made a trip to the nearby city of Shreveport to seek out the FBI to make a complaint about the electronic stalking and mind control activities. I outlined verbally to one of the agents what was happening. I also gave the agent a CD with parts of my journal and my thoughts about those effects.
In fairness to the agent, I must reveal that I also showed him several items from my house that my attackers had caused me to believe were bugged. I no longer fall for those attackers’ tricks. (The agent did not examine those items but pretended to make a note about them.)
Later, I realized that the “bugs” were simply part of the attackers’ mind control games; however, the agent did not actually know that the items were NOT bugged.
The agent asked me only two questions: was I homosexual and was I being blackmailed?
Those questions strongly suggest to me that that particular group is being targeted with REA for purposes of experimentation and perhaps eventual annihilation and that the FBI is well aware of that exploitation. He probably wanted to know whether the attackers were trying to cash in on their operations by extorting money from targets in addition to receiving their salaries. At the end of the short meeting, the agent did not tell me that he would contact me after reviewing the material. And he did not. He also did not make any recommendations to me about how to deal with the electronic attacks or make any comment about them.
When I visited the FBI, I was convinced that I had been implanted with a microchip, and naturally I wanted that object removed. I asked the FBI agent which local hospital or clinic he and other FBI agents used that could be trusted. He gave me the name of a nearby hospital.
Set-Up by the FBI
After leaving his office, I went to the out-patient room of the hospital that he recommended intending to feign a symptom that would result in a doctor’s order for an MRI that would perhaps show any foreign object in my body. I waited for hours in the hospital waiting room.
Other drop-in patients, some of whom had arrived long after I did, were able to see doctors, and they came and went; yet, my name was not called. Finally, I waited alone in the large empty waiting room.
After hours of waiting, I was at last attended by an Oriental male intern who had very obviously been informed of my mission. His demeanor was condescending and he appeared to smirk as he asked me questions. At the time, I believed that I had a microchip implanted in a tooth, thus I complained of severe headaches to obtain an order for an MRI. During the examination, he disappeared for long periods seemingly for no reason. As I waited for his return, other interns would appear in the doorway to peer at me as if I were some very strange object of curiosity. Their appearance was obviously intentional. The examiner had very obviously told them about the “crazy man” whom he was examining. I felt that their presence was contrived to make me feel uncomfortable. I did. The FBI agent with whom I had spoken had probably also briefed the young intern about how he should treat me.
Finally, when the intern seemed reluctant to order further testing, I revealed to him my purpose for wanting the MRI, i.e., the electronic stalking and mind control. He looked at me in a manner that clearly said that he had known all along my intentions and told me in a mocking tone that he didn’t get into anything like that. By then, I realized that the FBI agent with whom
I talked had tipped off the hospital to expect a crazy man to show up seeking an MRI. I left

there feeling dejected and helpless, apparently what the attackers as well as the FBI agent wanted. Naturally, I heard nothing else from the FBI after that meeting. I visited that office a second time early in 2007 and again got no help or advice.
Non-Responses from the FBI
The refusal of the FBI to listen seriously to complainants and to investigate their claims indicts that agency. An electronic stalking victim whom I later met in person had also recurred to the
FBI to complain. The victim told me that the agent to whom she made her complaint said with a grin: “Makes you feel like you’ve got nowhere to turn, huh?” She stated that “He was quite aware of what I was experiencing.” That victim, a grandmother and a very soft spoken, almost timid person, had worked for a single telecommunications company for thirty-five years before she retired. Like most victims, she lived alone. A policeman lived next door and a
Fundamentalist preacher lived across the street.
For the sake of argument, let us consider that the FBI and local law enforcement just may be using electronic stalking and mind control, although illegal and inhuman, to attempt to combat crime. If there is any element of truth in that conjecture, it is not supported by statistics. Crime continues to grow at an alarming rate. Moreover, our government is based on the principle of
“due process of law” and justice for all, including drug smugglers, murderers, rapists, and others. An indictment of crime and a trial by jury are the cornerstones of our democracy.
When law enforcement becomes the judge, jury, and executioner by using covert electronic torture on targets, they trample on and make a mockery of those democratic principles.
I searched the internet for statistics concerning the categories of FBI investigations. The FBI has about 60 field offices and over 12,000 agents. There are departments whose only job is to surf the web for information on high-tech crimes and information relating to terrorism. The internet is literally full of references to electronic stalking and mind control, much of it in relation to terrorism. Yet, I did not find a single reference to the FBI’s having investigated a single case of electronic stalking and mind control activities.
The FBI continually monitors and even infiltrates known organizations that engage in domestic terrorism. It is ridiculous to consider that the FBI does not know about high-tech electronic harassment, the instruments used, and how the instruments work. Moreover, the
FBI, Secret Service, NSA, the DOD, and other government entities share the responsibility for the overall protection of the President, Vice President, cabinet members, Supreme Court justices, and Congresspersons. It is absurd to think that those intelligence agencies do not know about electronic stalking and mind control, how to prevent it, and, if discovered, how to neutralize it.
The subject of electronic stalking and mind control remains taboo. The controlled media will not touch that topic, which hints that the media is a co-conspirator with the government. Only on the internet, where data is still largely uncontrolled by the power brokers, can one find information on REA. In performing my research, I found on the internet multiple accounts by and about victims of REA, and I corresponded with scores of those targeted individuals. Most of those correspondents appeared to be regular people whom one would expect to live next door. Many of them had braved the stigma of being labeled schizophrenic to complain to the
FBI and their local law enforcement. Not a single case had led to an investigation.

There appears to be a high level sub-culture within the law enforcement and intelligence communities that endures regardless of which political party is in power and who might be the president. While other high-ranking members and heads of law enforcement and intelligence come and go, those employees remain. It is possible that those people, or some of those people, have learned to employ electronic torture and mind control and have lent that method to various groups for their own purposes.
On the premise that certain rogue factions of the FBI, and not the entire FBI, were involved in the electronic torture and mind control on Americans, on April 14, 2009, I wrote to the FBI.
Here is the letter.
Public Relations & Information
Federal Bureau of Investigation
935 Pennsylvania Ave, NW
Washington, DC 20535
Subject: Electronic Stalking and Mind Control Activities Performed on Americans
Dear Sirs:
Attached is an article on the above subject that I wrote under a pseudonym for online readers. In that paper, I pointedly state that the FBI and other U. S. intelligence services must necessarily know about electronic assault and mind control, yet they do nothing to halt that practice. Further, I write that FBI failure to take action against those domestic terrorists logically leads one to believe that the Bureau condones and perhaps even collaborates with those criminals.
I would appreciate receiving the FBI’s responses to the following questions.
-- Does the FBI officially acknowledge that electronic stalking and mind control, particularly the latter, are carried out by remote on selected targets in the United States of America?
-- If so, does the FBI know how those electronic and mind control effects are carried out on those victims?
-- If so, what action is the FBI pursuing to locate and apprehend the perpetrators?
-- If so, why does the FBI not inform local and state law enforcement and the general public of electronic assault and mind control being conducted on citizens and residents of the United States?
Thank you.
I sent the above letter by USPS Priority Mail on April 14, 2009, attaching the paper that you are reading to it. I asked for a delivery confirmation receipt. The collection site for mail leaving
Monroe is Shreveport, Louisiana. The collection sites are conveniently located in the same cities as the FBI field offices. When I checked the delivery status online, it showed that the package arrived in Shreveport on January 2,
2002, or seven years earlier
. January 2 was my mother’s birthday. The year 2002 probably also has some significance. It was about that time that my son became covered with painful and unsightly psoriasis sores.
Apparently the FBI field office or somebody working with the post office in Shreveport intercepted the package and would not acknowledge the date, as they needed time to examine its contents. According to the tracking advisory, the letter was supposedly picked up in Washington, DC on April 20, almost a week later. Priority mail guarantees a three or four day delivery period. I doubt that the package ever actually arrived at FBI headquarters. At any rate, I never received a reply from my letter.
Through their capability of knowing my thoughts, the attackers already knew that I was sending the letter. If the letter was delivered at all, the Shreveport FBI field office intercepted

the letter to add to or alter material intended for the FBI in Washington, DC. The obvious intent was to discredit me and make me appear to be mentally unsound.
Another attempt to communicate with the FBI had the same result. In late winter of 2011, I sent recordings of my silent environment to a sound specialist, and that technician confirmed that he had picked up human voices in my ambience. He also identified the frequency range of the voices from 1429.32 Hertz to 1438.36 Hertz. In the early summer, I wrote to the FBI
Field Office in New Orleans, asking them to identify the sources of those frequencies, which were not found on the FCC approved frequency chart. Although I sent my letter “delivery confirmation,” I did not receive a confirmation or a reply from that office. Certainly no surprise.
Occasionally, in its struggle to survive, the controlled media divulges information about the powerbrokers that is not in the interest of its benefactors. Such was the case when in June,
2011, a story broke about the FBI’s use of members of the Westboro Baptist Church as instructors in its training classes. The FBI’s employment of radical extremists as instructors struck a cord with mainstream America.
For those readers who may not remember, members of the Westboro Baptist Church of
Topeka, Kansas, gained notoriety in picketing at the funerals of soldiers killed in Iraq and
Afghanistan. Its pastor, Fred Phelps, whose extended family essentially makes up the church membership, claimed that their deaths were God’s way of punishing the United States for homosexuality. That Phelps singled out homosexuality, which is not illegal, as opposed to coldblooded murder, drug running, white collar thievery, armed robbery, bigamy, and other serious crimes, demonstrates the narrow bigoted focus of his group.
The FBI’s employment of members of that particular extremist group causes one to wonder about its charter to protect the American public, all of the American public. When the story broke, I remembered what the FBI agent in Shreveport asked me when I complained of being targeted: Was I homosexual? The agent’s question and the FBI’s use of the Westboro Baptist
Church cause me to wonder whether the FBI sponsors a program against homosexuals as a group in the United States. After the FBI story came out, I wrote the following letter to an FBI spokesperson about that case. The text of my letter follows.
Subject: Westboro Baptist Church Participation in FBI Training Courses
Dear Mr. Bresson:
Like many thousands, probably millions, of other Americans, I am a target of remote-delivered physical and neurological attacks. Mine began subtly about forty years ago, and for the last six years, the attacks have been escalating in intensity and continuous 24/7. I have appealed to the FBI three times for help in locating my assailants without receiving any cooperation whatsoever from that agency. All of the many targets with whom I am in contact report the same treatment from the FBI. Thus, you can readily see why I am apoplectic about the FBI hiring hatemongers like the Phelpses to instruct your agents.
Despite the lame reason given, there is no rationalization for using taxpayer money to hire people like the
Phelpses as training participants, let alone as instructors. Using them gives that group recognition and respectability, neither of which it deserves. I would appreciate FBI answers to the following questions.
What particular expertise do the members of the Westboro Baptist Church possess that the FBI does not already possess or cannot obtain from other sources?
Do you also hire members of the KKK, Militia, JDL, Black Panthers, M-13, and others

of that gendre with public funding to teach your agents?
Have you used the Westboro Baptist Church members for “training” purposes on other occasions in the past?
How much did the participation of the Westboro Baptist Church representatives cost the
American taxpayers?
Whose idea was it to hire members of a so-called church whose membership consists essentially of the Phelps extended family?
What positive result accrued from their performance?
I can be reached at (phone number excluded). However, I would appreciate receiving a written answer to those questions. Thank you.
In the past, I had sent other letters from the main post office in Monroe, Louisiana via various delivery confirmation methods without ever knowing whether they arrived or not. This time I sent the letter on July 5, 2011 by regular mail from my rural mailbox using regular postage.
Most targets would probably agree that the CIA and the FBI are very loosely run agencies whose members do not always feel compelled to uphold the oath that they took and who are not held accountable for their actions and non-actions. The facts, as seen by targets, show that the FBI not only decides what victims it is going to try to help but also decides what criminals it is going to pursue. The FBI, which represents the highest law enforcement authority in the land, has proven that it has no intention of aiding victims of electronic stalking and that likewise it will not attempt to determine who is behind the targeting. Those failures on the part of the FBI alone make that agency a part of the conspiracy against targeted individuals.

Download 0.99 Mb.

Share with your friends: