silence regardless of the reason.
Nobody knows that conspiracy of silence better than targets of electronic stalking and mind control. In my case, I have written to the President,
members of Congress, including my two senators from Louisiana and the representative from my voting district, the FBI, several government agencies,
the state attorney general, and the local sheriff about REA without receiving a single answer. My letters were not the ramblings of a delusional person but were concise, cogent, and respectful letters. Since no recipient could possibly know my state of mind when I wrote them, their failure to answer me proves that conspiracy of silence.
Most of the hundreds of correspondents who write me have recounted their efforts to communicate with politicians and others. They received the same silent treatment. Those politicians apparently had rather lose a vote
than to buck the powerbrokers, especially, as in my case, if the powerbroker is Israel or Israel’s backers.
A target from Texas advised me in early 2010 that he had succeeded in convincing an aide to a Congressman to look into his claims of electronic stalking and mind control. Upon finding out about the aide’s
cooperation, however, the Congressman fired the aide. That
Congressman could have attempted to placate a constituent even if he considered him psychotic. Instead, he perpetuated the conspiracy of silence. It becomes increasingly clear that members of Congress know about REA, know who is doing it, and choose not to interfere. There is probably either money or favors behind Congress’s spurning victims of remote-delivered electronic torture.
That conspiracy of silence also pertains to crime statistics and police reports. I have already recounted my writing the Public Affairs Division of Louisiana State Police for statistics on electronic stalking and mind control and receiving a letter saying “We do not have
statistics on such incidents.”
Although I had complained twice about REA to the local sheriff’s office, it had not reported those attacks in its monthly crime statistics report to the state police. Likewise, the FBI does not keep reports of remote torture. The conspiracy of silence is institutionalized and national in scope. The intention is very clear: If there is no crime report, no crime was committed.
Share with your friends: