cell carcinoma. He wanted to set up an appointment with a plastic surgeon to remove the cancerous growth, and he was dismayed when I told him that I would not seek nor accept treatment. I candidly explained that the spot was induced and that the attackers could and probably would only cause cancer in additional places. I gave him a copy of this same paper to read. I do not know whether he read it or not.
Two years later, however, mindful that one of the aims of the attackers
is to disfigure their victims, I finally made an appointment with a surgeon. He removed the carcinoma on
September 12, 2011. The attackers occasionally continue to visit that spot. We shall see what happens.
Electronic torture and mind control have been employed for decades. Why have they not been curtailed? Here is why: (1) Targets have suffered in silence. Only with the advent of the internet have targets begun to perform research and reach out to other victims. Most of that communication has transpired during the last ten years or less. The internet is the last bastion of communication freedom. The powerbrokers have not yet contrived a way to limit and control its use. (2) Targets have wasted too much time in complaining to each other and have gotten bogged down in self-pity. That does not at all mean that we should stop supporting and communicating with each other; yet, that should not be an end in itself. Targets should become activists instead of habitual complainers.
(3) Targets have
depended on law enforcement, national government, and international bodies to “investigate” and stop the electronic torture and mind control. They are correct is doing so; however, only those agencies of the government that
are most likely to engage in REA or aid the perpetrators or allow them free rein in operating have the necessary expertise to “investigate.” (4) Targets have remained anonymous. Most targets are reluctant to use their real names for fear that it will alienate family members and friends and make the targets appear crazy. I first wrote this paper under a pseudonym. However, when I realized that that did not serve the interest of the targeted community, I changed the name of the author to my real name.
Targets can best defend themselves against the attackers by learning to use their minds. By developing their own type of psychology against the attackers’ psychology, targets can offset many of the effects of both the physical and the neurological attacks.
In developing that psychology, they must start with the premise that the attackers can harm targets only if targets let them. Every facet of that self-made psychology must be based on positivism as opposed to negativism.
Share with your friends: