Ir231 1st Lec. 24/09/2019
Download 0.86 Mb. View original pdf
|
Ayşe-Şevval-Raylaz Assignment 2, book assignment, ENG102 Final, adm1122, Adm1122 midterm
- Navigate this page:
- Responsibility to Protect (R2P
- 1648 order
| 9/11 • a violent non state actor attacked superpower • war on terror re underlined role of state • after 9/11 the actors show us that the source of threat are not states • globalised network of terror organised in cell like structures, • Al Qaida crushing the far enemy • isis crushing near enemy, and then with far enemy • Al Qaida source of threat not a state • after cw, domestic and intl politics no there anymore • what was new was a violent non state actor • another imp point end of multilateralism by 9/11 • transformed us into sole actor • US era where unilateralism replaced multilateralism, going alone in attacking IRAQ • IRAQ invasion done without UN resolution • turned into new phase pf US leadership • multilateraslim —> unilateralism • this shift came with new emphasis on role of the state (ask Prof, how?) • at the same time questioning wether other agency to cope with globalised terror • on one hand globalised network of cells constituting major threat to intl security 46 • on the other hand it was the state which could cope, in terms of information sharing , fight with it • we see in order to cope with most sophisticated non state networks, we seethe sate emerging as major actor to respond to this issue • reemergence of the state in post 9/11 period • war on terror —> reemergence of state in world • justice —> idea that if u bring justice through regime change u will find radicalism in idealist sense • we see a return in away to the more traditional classic understanding . coop among democracies, intervening into non liberal states • by bringing core security issues in agenda, rather than interdependence, justice, coop, again talking bout security, unilateralism • after 9/11, and war on terror world has being going though turmoil, in the sense that the world has managed to fight with globalised networks of terror • some successful missions • we see that glob network of terror, or fundamentalist terror has also found ways to readapt to the change • while there was success, it has created its own offshoots in diff cases, Boko Haram, ISIS, —> new wave of terrorism in the second decade of snow in 5th wave of terrorism • apocalyptic war—> btw western powers and • religion coming into agenda • on then hadn’t many non state groups, concerns, religion with the idea of UMMAH, • wars more ethnic based, religiously based ideologies • unilateralism with G.W.B has destroyed leadership of US • US problems in IRAQ, in MEA, failure of policy in IRAQ, the bankruptcy of Iraq • the power vacuum filled by new challengers entering intl system, emerging in the far east • —> China as major competition • there is now great concern—> unipolarity, multilateralism • power vacuum shifting towards china • question Is Russia able to join as third pillar 47 • RP The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) is a global political commitment which was endorsed by all member states of the United Nations at the 2005 World Summit in order to address its four key concerns to prevent genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity. —> responsibility to protect those states who are violated by their rulers—> normative approach • RP implemented in Libya but not in Syria, bc national interest has prevailed over RP • norm building is three—> yet dint become norm, bc national interest overrides it • RP shows us that norm is getting build , intl comm. having responsibility to protect ppl within their states—> requires multilateralism—> • in terms of wars : what is happening into actors of intl actors—> actors have proliferated immense • another issue what has happened to 1648 order, bop, where is cs and bop • how we fight wars has changed after cw civil wars, intrastate wars bring new local actors Download 0.86 Mb. Share with your friends:
|