Ir231 1st Lec. 24/09/2019


• interstate conflicts : sometimes RP implemented —> Ruanda, Libya



Download 0.86 Mb.
View original pdf
Page22/39
Date07.12.2023
Size0.86 Mb.
#62861
1   ...   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   ...   39
IR231 1
Ayşe-Şevval-Raylaz Assignment 2, book assignment, ENG102 Final, adm1122, Adm1122 midterm
• interstate conflicts : sometimes RP implemented —> Ruanda, Libya
• it was not implemented in Syria
• we see conflicts have changed
• numbers of democracies have increased
• zones of peace have increased
• new conflicts, old conflicts, and how to cope with them have changed
• new wave of coop. and optimism after cw
• while keeping order, attempts to bring justice in conflict with 1648 order
• changes in world politics post 9/11
• talk about role of state, unilateralism, multilateralism where it is, issue of war—>
non state actors, globalised terror, challenges of conflict, security conflict
(CHAPTER 5)
2nd Hour
• why realism as most important theory
• realism is out major theory
• the great paradigm of intl politics is great debate btw idealist and realists
48


• idealists emergence of interwar periods : KANT (liberal) perpetual peace, forerunner of democtraic peace. theory , HOBBES, ROUSSEAU—> FORERUNNERS
• PWWI period interwar period between
• idealism as ir approach having roots in PWWI period
• driving motivation prevent wars, achieving peace
• both idealism and realism starting with human nature
• for idealist human nature good, idvd. are good, cooperative, loveable ; the problem is the system and bc the system is bad its forcing individuals to behave in was that are contrary to their peace ongoing behaviour
• Realist evil, competitive, conflict ridden , jealous and such
• both idealist and realist make resemblance of H.N with behaviour of Nation Sates
• idealist and realist make analogy with HN
• for idealist : states also peace loving, cooperative, but bc the system is bad, bc system is anarchical they act in bad , rival way
• enter conflict not bc they want to but have to
for them mitigate anarchy
• realists think HN is bad, competitive evil by nature, there is nothing wrong with step fro states to replicate this behaviour
• the idealist realist debate : greta debate rested on human analogy, the possibility of change onside of idealists and the acceptance of truth of realists
• realist have looked at working of idealists how the world ought to bayou cannot make a scientific analysis
• positivist idea indivisibility off science
• realists observe, and analyse as it is—why does it rain —> observe subject matter of rain
• duty to make scientific observations and undertone regularity of wars / i.e. rain
• realists thought that observer and observed distanced, no social background as u can reach to understand when it rains
• if we see two states acc. to much power, we expect certain kind of behaviour—> realists want to show AHISTORICAL TRUTH (independent of time , region and place, a true picture of working world politics )
49



Download 0.86 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   ...   39




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page