Privatization cp ddi 2012 1 Privatization + Coercion 1


The impact is linear – the stronger the government becomes the more liberty is lost



Download 1.35 Mb.
Page45/56
Date10.08.2017
Size1.35 Mb.
#31002
1   ...   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   ...   56

The impact is linear – the stronger the government becomes the more liberty is lost


Bovard, 95 (James, journalist for the New York Times, Wall Street Journal and Newsweek, Lost Rights: The Destruction of American Liberty, p.333-334,

Liberty by itself will not create an ideal society. As Friedrich Hayek observed, "The results of freedom must depend on the values which free individuals pursue." Unfortunately, the more powerful government has become, the more likely the people's values are to be debased. Current tax and welfare policy maximizes the rewards for dependency and the penalties for self-reliance. There is a great deal that people can do to help themselves and to help their neighbors and those in need. But the more powerful government has become, the more people devote their attention to Washington rather than to their own efforts. John Stuart Mill wrote in 1859: the most cogent reason for restricting the interference of government is the great evil of adding unnecessarily to its power. Every function superadded to those already exercised by the government causes its influence over hopes and fears to be more widely diffused, and converts, more and more, the active and ambitious part of the public into hangers-on of the government, or of some party which aims at becoming the government .6 We have paid dearly for idealizing the state. There is no virtue in denying the law of gravity, and there should be no virtue in denying the limitations of government. Good intentions are no excuse for perpetual failure and growing oppression. The more we glorify government, the more liberties we will lose. Freedom is largely a choice between allowing people to follow their own interests or forcing them to follow the interests of bureaucrats, politicians, and campaign contributors. This is the soul of the debate between liberty and pseudopaternalism, between letting people build their own lives and forcing them to build their lives as politicians dictate.



Impact – Linear – 2
Each rejection of government coercion and endorsement of non-aggression can help change the system

Dr. Ruwart, 93 (Dr. Mary J. Ruwart, Senior Scientist at a major pharmaceutical firm and a former Assistant Professor of Surgery at St. Louis University Medical School, Healing Our World: The Other Piece of the Puzzle, p.281-282

CHOOSING YOUR PATH If you've read this far, you are undoubtedly interested in seeing at least some aspects of non-aggression implemented. Several ideas may seem more relevant to you than others. If you are wondering whether a lone individual like yourself can make a difference, please be assured that you can. Even the smallest contribution can be pivotal. My favorite story illustrating this point is about a blacksmith who failed to put the final nail in a horse's shoe. For lack of a nail, the horse lost his shoe and went lame. The rider, who was carrying critical news to his king, had to continue on foot. As a result, he reached his sovereign too late. Without this important information, the king lost the battle he was fighting and the kingdom fell to invaders. The humble black-smith was pivotal to the safety of the kingdom. Never doubt that your contribution is just as important. Remember that the family and friends who talk with you about the win-win world possible through non-aggression will in turn talk to others, who will share the good news. Like a chain reaction, your message of hope will spread throughout our country and the world, bearing fruit in the most unexpected ways. If you do nothing more than extol the virtues of non-aggression to those around you, you will have done much toward manifesting it! Of course, you needn't stop there. The many groups cited above would welcome your participation. Are there any that excite you? Would you like to join a political campaign or speak on college campuses? Do you perceive a need for other strategies that you could initiate on your own or with others? Can you implement non-aggressive solutions in the midst of aggression-through-government, much like Guy Polheus and Kimi Gray did (Chapter 11: Springing the Poverty Trap)? All these things-and more-are needed to help others recognize that non-aggression is in every-body's best self-interest. We each have a part to play, a gift to the world that will one day be reflected back to us as better world. Our world is a joint creation. We all have the power to affect those around us profoundly. Each of us through our own inner wisdom can identify the piece of the puzzle that we can lay in the mosaic. Every piece is needed to construct the whole; never doubt that what you can do, however small it may seem to you, is essential. I urge you to embrace whatever aspect of non-aggression seems most valuable to you and appropriate to your unique talents. Whether you work behind the scenes or in the limelight, rest assured that the world will take notice. Whatever way you feel moved to participate is a gift you give to yourself and others. Let me be the first to thank you for making the world a better place!

Impact – Innovation

Freedom is critical to tech innovation -- empirics.


Glassman, ‘3

[James K., Technology and Freedom: The Virtuous Circle, Backgrounder No. 158, 1-10, National Center for Policy Analysis, “Technological innovations require freedom,” http://www.freemarketfoundation.com/ShowArticle.asp?ArticleType=Issue&ArticleId=1349]



Technology and freedom are symbiotic, forming a virtuous circle, Techcentralstation.com host James K. Glassman told a recent meeting in London.. By empowering individuals, technology helps the spread of human freedom around the world. Without the freedom provided by market economies, technological innovation is stymied. But in market economies, one new technology can enhance others, synergistically improving human welfare. For example, the increasing power of the computer chip has made possible the spread of related technologies. [See Table I.]  Over 30 years, the cost of sending 1 trillion bits of information has dropped from $150,000 to 17 cents.  Ten years ago there were only 23 million wireless phones in use worldwide; today, there are 1.4 billion.  In just five years, the number of global Internet users has increased from 96 million to 650 million, with more than half in Asia; within a year, users are forecast to reach one billion. Further improvements in the conditions of human life can be made through new technologies. For example, for the first time in human history, bioengineering of foods holds the promise of an adequate food supply for everyone, but anti-market forces in the European Union and elsewhere threaten the adoption of new biotech crops. Thus, as in medieval China – which produced many technological innovations but lacked a market economy to propel their widespread adoption – the major roadblocks to new technology are political.
A2 Voting/Services/Social Contract



Download 1.35 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   ...   56




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page