Proposed pebble bed modular reactor


Impact of the proposed PBMR Plant on Terrestrial Fauna and Flora



Download 3.55 Mb.
Page23/44
Date02.02.2017
Size3.55 Mb.
#14922
1   ...   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   ...   44

Impact of the proposed PBMR Plant on Terrestrial Fauna and Flora

Introduction


The site for the proposed PBMR is located between the inner and outer security fence, and some 400 meters south east of the Koeberg NPS.

The proposed site was previously used as a construction yard area for the establishment of temporary contractor site offices and material/equipment lay down areas.


Discussion


The area is still largely devoid of prominent fynbos species and is kept short for security purposes. Eskom has introduced free roaming Bontebok and Springbok, which through grazing, assist with the process of maintaining the vegetation in a short state.

Though a Plant survey was not conducted (in view of the status of the pioneering and sub climax vegetation) it is unlikely that rare or endangered plant species exist on the area.


Dune Regimes


Planting of marram grass to stabilize the dune area was completed in 1983 after a total of 152.75 ha was stabilised.

A stable and diverse plant community has taken over the stabilised dune area

A total of 280.63 ha of dune area is still untouched and is being conserved with the minimum of disturbance. The stability of these dunes is regularly monitored.

Land Ecosystem


Eskom maintains the remaining land around the Nuclear Power Station as a nature reserve (2820 ha). In 1991 the area was proclaimed as the Koeberg Nature Reserve. The main vegetation types of the area include: Strandveld and Acid Sand Plain Fynbos. These form part of the Cape Floristic Kingdom which is the smallest floristic kingdom in the world, but which has the greatest diversity of plant species. An Environmental Management Plan has been compiled by a consultant (Reference 8), and the nature reserve is managed on these principles.

Conservation objectives that receives attention are:



    The reserve also offers an opportunity for the local community to gain income by cutting Rooikrans trees in a woodlot area to sell for fire wood. This activity serves a dual purpose. It aids in removing the invasive alien species and supports ±50 - 100 people in receiving an income. The area owned by Eskom on the eastern side of the R27 is 90% infested by Port Jackson. Biological control methods were introduced into this area in 1991 by the Plant Protection Unit, as a long term solution to the problem.

Two hiking trails exist on the reserve, namely the Dikkop and the Grysbok trails. On average about 3 000 hikers walk these trails per year and the total is increasing on a yearly basis.

All roads and fences on the reserve are maintained and the entire fence line has been cleared to a width of ± 10 m, (using a tractor-drawn bushcutter), to serve as a fire belt.

The Cape Metropolitan Council (CMC) and CSIR jointly manage an underground aquifer which is used to pump water to Atlantis for industrial and domestic use. Approximately 5 300 000 m3 water is drawn each year.

Conclusions


  • The proposed Plant will have no significant impact on the existing fauna and flora on the site and provided that detailed rehabilitation procedures/plans are implemented, only temporary ecosystem disruption on a very limited scale, will be caused.

  • The construction area needs to be fenced, to deny the antelope entry to the area.

  • The exclusion zone area and remaining Eskom land is managed according to scientific method, thus preserving a valuable natural asset.

REFERENCES

  1. Currie, B and Cook, PA; Report on Biological Investigation for the Proposed Eskom Nuclear Power Station at Duynefontein; University of Cape Town, 1975.

  2. Cook, PA; A Prediction of Some Possible Effects of Thermal Pollution on Marine Organisms on the West Coast of South Africa, with Particular Reference to the Rock Lobster, Jasus Lalandii, University of Cape Town 1978.

  3. Cook, PA; Baseline Ecological Report 1981 - 1984, Marine Environmental Monitoring Programme, Koeberg Nuclear Power Station, Zoology Department, University of Cape Town, 1984.

  4. Cook, PA; Final Report, Marine Environmental Monitoring Programme, Koeberg Nuclear Power Station, Zoology Department, University of Cape Town, December 1989.

  5. Rattey, D and Potgieter, F; Warm Water Plume Report, Koeberg Nuclear Power Station, August 1987.

  6. Rattey, D and Potgieter, F; Interpretation of Physical Oceanographic Data for Koeberg 1985 - 1988, July 1989.

  7. Cook, PA; Marine Environmental Reports, 1990 - 1996, Zoology Department, University of Cape Town.

  8. ESK 02 C; Koeberg Nature Reserve, Environmental Management Programme, 1996.

  9. ESKPBAAD6; Eskom Environmental Management Policy, January 1996.


Archaeological and Paleaontological Characteristics of the proposed Plant Site

Introduction


During the development of the Koeberg site all archaeological and palaeontological sites of scientific value were identified, registered and recorded by the SA Museum. These sites are however in the eastern region of the Koeberg Reserve and remote from the proposed Plant site with proper fencing and access control.

The largest excavated sites are Duynefontein and Duynefontein 2, which are Middle to Later Stone Age Layers of the Die Kelders Cave 1. Ad hoc excavation work is still being carried out on these sites by the S. A. Museum and Universities.

These sites will not be affected by the construction, or operation of the proposed PBMR Plant.

During the excavation for the PBMR Plant building foundations (which will be some +22 meters deep over an area of about 60m x 40m = 2 400m2) palaeontological finds may be discovered. The construction EMP will however direct contractors on the procedures to follow in such event(s).


Conclusions


  • The proposed Plant site and its development is free of any known archaeological material of scientific note. Construction and operation activities for the proposed Plant will also not affect the known sites.

  • EMP construction procedures must be developed to direct contractors when paleaontological finds may be discovered during foundation excavations. The operators of excavation equipment must receive basic awareness training to identify such objects/materials.




Download 3.55 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   ...   44




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page