Report 4: Interim Evaluation



Download 1.96 Mb.
Page25/39
Date20.10.2016
Size1.96 Mb.
#5466
1   ...   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   ...   39

G.5Convergence


This final sub-theme is in effect an amalgamation of all the activities covered by the other three sub-themes as it has at its heart the overarching objective that: "within 20 years, the communities which host the 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games will enjoy the same social and economic chances as their neighbours across London".224 It was an objective which Oxford Economics estimated could see the host boroughs producing an additional £6.5 billion GDP per year by 2030.225

The logic model below provides a summary of the activities, outputs, results, outcomes/impacts for this sub-theme. The focus of the logic model is on those indicators where most progress has been made to date.



Figure 6: Convergence summary logic model


(i)Legacy programmes and initiatives


The activity within this sub-theme is encapsulated by the SRF that was first published in 2009. The SRF was an "expression of the host boroughs determination to use the 2012 Games as a catalyst to reduce poverty and transform the environment for the benefit of [all] citizens".226 Its activity is currently guided by a framework and action plan for 2011-2015.227 This framework and action plan groups activities under the three themes of:

Creating wealth and reducing poverty;

Supporting healthier lifestyles;

Developing successful neighbourhoods.

For each of these themes the host boroughs have grouped a number of key activities which are shown in Figure 6 .

Figure 6: Key convergence activities 2011-2015 by theme



Creating wealth and reducing poverty

To ensure that the Work Programme228 is effectively delivered and supports Convergence

To maximise the Olympic employment legacy

To maximise the inward investment legacy

To develop partnership architecture with employers and training providers to support achievement of Convergence outcomes

To increase the levels and relevance of qualifications of host borough residents


Supporting healthier lifestyles

To give the children of the host boroughs the best start in life

To reduce the number of people dying prematurely from preventable causes

To reduce the number of people whose health affects their ability to secure or maintain work

To increase physical activity and social capital through changes in the built environment

To increase sports and physical activity participation especially in sports benefiting from a facility legacy from the 2012 Games

To use Olympic and Paralympic momentum to motivate, raise aspirations and promote cultural activity



Developing successful neighbourhoods

To develop partnership arrangements for the developing successful neighbourhoods theme

To reduce levels of violent crime and gang activity

To complete the Olympic public realm improvements programme and secure the legislative changes necessary for more effective environmental enforcement

To increase the number of affordable homes and reduce overcrowding

To deliver new city districts with a range of accessible and high quality facilities


Sitting behind each of these activities is a detailed action plan with clear ownership and timeframe for delivery.

(ii)Evidence available


For each theme there is also a clear set of measures, based on secondary data sources, that allow for a regular and comprehensive assessment of progress, both in terms of actual improvement against a 2009 baseline, but also – perhaps more significantly – in comparison to the rest of London. The most recent assessment of progress was made in May 2012, using the latest available data. Given its timeliness, this is an extremely valuable source of evidence for this sub-theme.

Based on the progress made by 2010/11, looking at both the performance against the baseline and the comparison with London as a whole, the Host Borough Unit has made a summary assessment for each of the 21 indicators reviewed. Drawing on this assessment of progress it is possible to group the indicators into four categories. This is shown in Figure 6 .

Figure 6: Progress by 2010/11 on convergence indicators

'Gap' reduced – Convergence on track

'Gap' reduced slightly – Convergence not on track

19 year olds achieving NVQ level 2 threshold

% of working age population with no qualifications

Proportion of children in working age families receiving key benefits

Pupils achieving at least Level 4 in English & Maths at Key Stage 2

Pupils achieving 5 GCSE grades A*-C in maintained schools

19 year olds achieving NVQ Level 3 threshold

Life expectancy – male

Life expectancy – female

% of children achieving a good level of development at age 5

Mortality rates from all circulatory diseases at ages under 75

Recommended Adult Activity (3 times 30 minutes per week)

Violent crime levels



Employment rate – aged 16-64

Unemployment rate 16+

Working age population qualified to at least NVQ Level 4

Obesity levels in school children in year 6

No sport or activity (0 times 30 minutes per week)



Gap increased – Convergence not on track

New indicator – progress tracked from 2012/13

Median earning for full time workers living in the area


Improved street and environmental cleanliness

% of households defined as overcrowded

Overall satisfaction


Based on this analysis it is apparent that for 12 of the indicators the gap with the rest of London is closing and that the host boroughs are on track to achieve convergence by 2020. For example:

The proportion of 19 year olds achieving NVQ Level 2 threshold has increased from 73.6% to 81% and closed the gap with the rest of London from 4.4% to 2.4%;

The proportion of children achieving a good level of development at age 5 has increased from 48.7% to 55.2% and closed the gap with the rest of London from 6.0% to 4.3%;

The rate of violent crime has fallen from 28.9 per 1,000 population to 24 per 1,000 population and closed the gap with the rest of London from 6.1 to 4.3.

For a further five indicators the gap with the rest of London has closed, but not significantly enough to date, for example the gap in the employment rate has reduced from 5.5% to 4.8% but the target for 2014/15 is to have narrowed the gap to 2-3%. There are three indicators for which the data is yet to be collected and only one that is 'not on track': the gap in terms of median earning for full time workers living in the area has increased from £38.70 in 2009 to £39.40 in 2011.

It is also worth noting that each of the themes uses one of the 21 indicators as its 'key measure', with two of the three currently on track so far. The ley measure for:

Supporting healthier lifestyles is 'life expectancy' for men and women, of which both are currently on track;

Developing successful neighbourhoods is 'violent crime levels' which is on track;

Creating wealth and reducing poverty is the 'employment rate' which is currently not on track.

Since this assessment was carried out data from the 2011 census has been released which provides more accurate population figures. It shows a substantially larger population than previous estimates with an additional 174,000 residents across the six host boroughs compared against the 2010 mid-year population estimate provided by ONS. This may have a substantial impact on the calculation of some convergence indicators and will need to be explored further in Report 5.


(iii)Conclusions: Outcomes and additionality


Based on this evidence it is possible to conclude that good progress is being made on Convergence with two thirds of the indicators currently on track. In addition, for a further five indicators the gap with London is closing albeit either not fast enough or for the right reasons. However, what is not currently clear is the extent to which this change is being driven by and attributable to the SRF and therefore the extent to which the Games has impacted on East London.229

(iv)Progress in answering the research questions


To what extent and how have the host boroughs responded to the 2012 Games and the Host Borough Convergence Agenda by delivering a more integrated approach to regeneration and the physical environment across East London, in terms of public realm, transport connectivity and new developments?

The creation of the Host Borough Unit and the willingness of the individual host boroughs to support it, coupled with the SRF and the role it plays in expressing the host boroughs determination to use the 2012 Games as a catalyst to create wealth, reduce poverty, support healthier lifestyles and develop successful neighbourhoods is a strong example of the steps being taken to ensure that the opportunity of hosting the 2012 Games is not lost. This conclusion is supported by the evidence available which suggests that there has been a more integrated approach to regeneration and the physical environment. However, the specific role played by, and the attribution of influence to, the host boroughs is something that needs further exploration.

How, and with what success, have the host boroughs built upon the catalyst of the 2012 Games to help deliver the Convergence of major socio-economic outcomes between East London and the rest of London (including education and skills outcomes, employment levels and benefit dependency, housing quality, health, crime and participation in culture, sport and volunteering)?

To date, good progress has been made on two-thirds of the socio-economic Convergence indicators where it is apparent that East London is 'closing the gap' with the rest of London. The latest available data shows that the gap is closing on indicators related to education and skills, crime and health. Slower progress is however being made with regard to employment and unemployment rates as while the gap is closing it is not closing fast enough to deliver Convergence. What is not currently clear is the extent to which the 2012 Games have catalysed this progress.

What has been the longer-term impact of the 2012 Games on catalysing private and public investment in East London (and wider Thames Gateway area), and how did the Games influence the form, scale and timing of key investment decisions?

It is currently too early to assess the longer-term impact of the 2012 Games on catalysing private and public investment in East London. The intention is to explore this issue more fully in Report 5. However, what is already apparent from the evidence available is that the Westfield development at Stratford city was "made possible by the infrastructure investment underpinning the Olympic Games"230 and as a result was brought forward by around 5-7 years.

To what extent have the 2012 Games and legacy investments enhanced the image of and satisfaction with East London as a place to live (and for whom), and how has this contributed to social and economic change in the area?

Based on the survey of host borough residents specifically commissioned for this evaluation it is apparent that over three-quarters (79%) of respondents were satisfied with their local area as a place to live, with around a quarter (26%) noting that hosting the 2012 Games had made them more satisfied. In addition, 48% of respondents felt that the preparations for the 2012 Games had already made an improvement to the image of the local area, with 54% of respondents agreeing that one of the longer-term impacts of the 2012 Games will be to improve the image of the local area. It remains to be seen, however, how this contributes to social and economic change in the area.


Download 1.96 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   ...   39




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page