Yes. Cladosporium species have established in areas with a wide range of climatic conditions (Farr and Rossman 2011) and may spread naturally in infected propagative material. Therefore, these fungi have the potential for establishment and spread in Australia.
No: Cladosporium species cause minor foliage diseases or fruit rot in storage (Pearson and Goheen 1988). The two Cladosporium species (C. cladosporioides and C. herbarum) associated with berry rot, causing yield losses and reducing wine quality (Briceño and Latorre 2008), are present in Australia. C. fasciculatum is not associated with berry rot (Briceño and Latorre 2008) and is therefore not economically important.
|
|
Cladosporium herbarum (Pers.) Link [Capnodiales: Davidiellaceae]
|
Yes (Cook and Dubé 1989)
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
|
Cladosporium longipes Sorokīn [Capnodiales: Davidiellaceae]
|
No records found
|
Yes: Cladosporium species are saprobic on dead plant material (Farr et al. 1989), are associated with foliage and cause leaf spot (Pearson and Goheen 1988; Farr and Rossman 2011) or are associated with canes (Pearson and Goheen 1988). Therefore, dormant cuttings may provide a pathway for this fungus.
|
Yes. Cladosporium species have established in areas with a wide range of climatic conditions (Farr and Rossman 2011) and may spread naturally in infected propagative material. Therefore, these fungi have the potential for establishment and spread in Australia.
|
No: Cladosporium species cause minor foliage diseases or fruit rot in storage (Pearson and Goheen 1988). The two Cladosporium species (C. cladosporioides and C. herbarum) associated with berry rot, causing yield losses and reducing wine quality (Briceño and Latorre 2008), are present in Australia. C. longipes is not associated with berry rot (Briceño and Latorre 2008) and is therefore not economically important.
|
|
Cladosporium macrocarpum Preuss [Capnodiales: Davidiellaceae]
|
Yes (Farr and Rossman 2011)
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
|
Cladosporium oxysporum Berk. & M.A. Curtis [Capnodiales: Davidiellaceae]
|
Yes (PHA 2001)
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
|
Cladosporium roesleri Catt. [Capnodiales: Davidiellaceae]
|
No records found
|
Yes: Cladosporium species are saprobic on dead plant material (Farr et al. 1989), are associated with foliage and cause leaf spot (Pearson and Goheen 1988; Farr and Rossman 2011) or are associated with canes (Pearson and Goheen 1988). Therefore, dormant cuttings may provide a pathway for this fungus.
|
Yes. Cladosporium species have established in areas with a wide range of climatic conditions (Farr and Rossman 2011) and may spread naturally in infected propagative material. Therefore, these fungi have the potential for establishment and spread in Australia.
|
No: Cladosporium species cause minor foliage diseases or fruit rot in storage (Pearson and Goheen 1988). The two Cladosporium species (C. cladosporioides and C. herbarum) associated with berry rot, causing yield losses and reducing wine quality (Briceño and Latorre 2008), are present in Australia. C. roesleri is not associated with berry rot (Briceño and Latorre 2008) and is therefore not economically important.
|
|
Cladosporium tenuissimum Cooke [Capnodiales: Davidiellaceae]
|
Yes (PHA 2001)
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
|
Cladosporium uvarum McAlpine [Capnodiales: Davidiellaceae]
|
Yes (Dugan et al. 2004)
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
|
Cladosporium viticola Ces. [Capnodiales: Davidiellaceae]
|
No records found
|
Yes: Cladosporium species are saprobic on dead plant material (Farr et al. 1989), are associated with foliage and cause leaf spot (Pearson and Goheen 1988; Farr and Rossman 2011) or are associated with canes (Pearson and Goheen 1988). Therefore, dormant cuttings may provide a pathway for this fungus.
|
Yes. Cladosporium species have established in areas with a wide range of climatic conditions (Farr and Rossman 2011) and may spread naturally in infected propagative material. Therefore, these fungi have the potential for establishment and spread in Australia.
|
No: Cladosporium species cause minor foliage diseases or fruit rot in storage (Pearson and Goheen 1988). The two Cladopsorium species (C. cladosporioides and C. herbarum) associated with berry rot, causing yield losses and reducing wine quality (Briceño and Latorre 2008), are present in Australia. C. viticola is not associated with berry rot (Briceño and Latorre 2008) and is therefore not economically important.
|
|
Clathrospora turkestanica Domashova [Pleosporales: Pleosporaceae]
|
Not known to occur
|
No: This fungus has been recorded on Vitis species (Farr and Rossman 2011) but affected plant parts are not mentioned. Since its report on Vitis species from Central Asia in 1973 (Farr and Rossman 2011), it has not been reported from any other country, indicating that grapevine propagative material does not provide a pathway for this fungus.
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
Cochliobolus bicolor AR Paul & Parbery [Pleosporales: Pleosporaceae]
|
Yes (PHA 2001)
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
|
Cochliobolus geniculatus RR Nelson [Pleosporales: Pleosporaceae]
|
Yes (PHA 2001)
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
|
Colletotrichum acutatum J.H. Simmonds [Incertae sedis: Glomerellaceae]
|
Yes (Whitelaw-Weckert et al. 2007a)
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
|
Colletotrichum ampelinum Cavara [Incertae sedis: Glomerellaceae]
|
Not known to occur
|
No: Colletotrichum species are foliar pathogens (Mohanan 2005). This fungus is associated with grapevines, causing anthracnose in China (Anon 2005). Therefore, foliage free dormant cuttings do not provide a pathway for this fungus.
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
Colletotrichum capsici (Syd. & P. Syd.) E.J. Butler & Bisby [Incertae sedis: Glomerellaceae]
|
Yes (Shivas 1989)
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
|
Colletotrichum crassipes (Speg.) Arx [Incertae sedis: Glomerellaceae]
|
Yes (PHA 2001)
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
|
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides (Penz.) Penz. & Sacc. [Incertae sedis: Glomerellaceae]
|
Yes (Shivas 1989)
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
|
Colletotrichum simmondsii RG Shivas & YP Tan [Incertae sedis: Glomerellaceae]
|
Yes (Shivas and Tan 2009)
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
|
Coniella castaneicola (Ellis & Everh.) B. Sutton [Diaporthales: Schizoparmaceae]
|
Yes (PHA 2001)
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
|
Coniella diplodiella (Speg.) Petr. & Syd. [Diaporthales: Schizoparmaceae]
|
Yes (PHA 2001)
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
|
Coniella fragariae (Oudem.) B. Sutton [Diaporthales: Schizoparmaceae]
|
Yes (PHA 2001)
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
|
Coniella granati (Sacc.) Petr. & Syd. [Diaporthales: Schizoparmaceae]
|
Yes (PHA 2001)
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
|
Coniella petrakii B. Sutton [Diaporthales: Schizoparmaceae]
|
Not known to occur
|
No: This soil-borne fungus has been recorded on Vitis species, causing white root rot (König et al. 2009). Therefore, root free dormant cuttings do not provide a pathway for this fungus.
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
Corticium cremeoalbidum (MJ Larsen & Nakasone) MJ Larsen [Corticiales: Corticiaceae] (synonym: Laeticorticium cremeoalbidum MJ Larsen & Nakasone)
|
Not known to occur
|
No: This fungus has been recorded on the wood of Vitis species (CABI 2012b). There is no evidence that this species occurs on the young stems of grapevines. Therefore, semi-hardwood dormant cuttings do not provide a pathway for this fungus.
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
Coryneopsis microsticta Grove [Xylariales: Amphisphaeriaceae]
|
Yes (Farr and Rossman 2011)
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
|
Corynespora calicioidea (Berk. & Broome) M.B. Ellis [Pleosporales: Corynesporascaceae]
|
Not known to occur
|
No: These fungi have been recorded on Vitis species (Farr and Rossman 2011), but affected plant parts are not mentioned. However, other Corynespora species are associated with wood, bark and dead wood (Farr and Rossman 2011). Therefore, dormant cuttings do not provide a pathway for these fungi.
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
Corynespora kamatii (VG Rao) MB Ellis. [Pleosporales: Corynesporascaceae]
|
Not known to occur
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
Coryneum discolor Fautrey [Diaporthales: Pseudovalsaceae]
|
Not known to occur
|
No: These fungi have been recorded on Vitis species (Farr and Rossman 2011), but affected plant parts are not mentioned. However, Coryneum species occur on twigs and foliage of other hosts (Schloemann 2003-2004; Farr and Rossman 2011). Therefore, foliage free dormant cuttings do not provide a pathway for these fungi.
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
Coryneum microstictum Berk. & Broome [Diaporthales: Pseudovalsaceae]
|
Not known to occur
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
Coryneum vitiphyllum Speschnew [Diaporthales: Pseudovalsaceae]
|
Not known to occur
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
Crepidotus amarus Murrill [Agaricales: Inocybaceae]
|
Not known to occur
|
No: This fungus has been recorded on Vitis species (Farr and Rossman 2011), but affected plant parts are not mentioned. However, Crepidotus species occur on bark and wood of hardwoods on other hosts (Farr and Rossman 2011). Therefore, semi-hardwood dormant cuttings do not provide a pathway for this fungus.
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
Cryptophaeella trematosphaeriicola Frolov [Pleosporales: Montagnulaceae]
|
Not known to occur
|
No: This fungus has been recorded on Vitis species (Farr and Rossman 2011), but affected plant parts are not mentioned. Since its report on Vitis species from Central Asia in 1973 (Farr and Rossman 2011), it has not been reported from any other country. This indicates that dormant cuttings do not provide a pathway for this fungus.
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
Cryptosphaeria pullmanensis Glawe [Xylariales: Diatrypaceae]
|
Not known to occur
|
No: This fungus has been recorded on Vitis species and has been isolated from cankered wood (Trouillas and Gubler 2010). Generally, Cryptosphaeria species occur on bark of host plants (Romero and Carmaran 2003). Therefore, semi-hardwood dormant cuttings do not provide a pathway for this fungus.
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
Cryptostictis hysterioides Fuckel [Xylariales: Amphisphaeriaceae]
|
Yes (Farr and Rossman 2011)
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
|
Cryptostictis inaequalis Tehon & Stout [Xylariales: Amphisphaeriaceae]
|
Not known to occur
|
No: This fungus has been recorded on Vitis species (Farr and Rossman 2011), but affected plant parts are not mentioned. However, on other hosts this fungus occurs on the leaves (Farr and Rossman 2011). Therefore, foliage free dormant cuttings do not provide a pathway for this fungus.
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
Cryptovalsa ampelina Fuckel [Incertae sedis: Incertae sedis]
|
Yes (Sosnowski et al. 2007)
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
|
Cryptovalsa protracta (Pers.) De Not. [Unassigned]
|
Yes (Yuan 1996)
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
|
Cryptovalsa rabenhorstii (Nitschke) Sacc. [Unassigned]
|
Yes (Trouillas et al. 2011)
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
|
Cylindrocarpon destructans var. destructans (Zinssm.) Scholten [Hypocreales: Nectriaceae]
|
Yes (Sweetingham 1983)
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
|
Cylindrocarpon lichenicola (C. Massal.) D. Hawksw. [Hypocreales: Nectriaceae]
|
Yes (Brayford 1987)
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
|
Cylindrocarpon liriodendri JD MacDonald & EE Butler [Hypocreales: Nectriaceae]
|
Yes (Whitelaw-Weckert et al. 2007b)
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
|
Cylindrocarpon macrodidymum Schroers et al. [Hypocreales: Nectriaceae]
|
Yes (Whitelaw-Weckert 2008)
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
|
Cylindrocarpon obtusisporum (Cooke & Harkn.) Wollenw [Hypocreales: Nectriaceae]
|
Yes (PHA 2001)
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
|
Cylindrocarpon pauciseptatum Schroers & Crous [Hypocreales: Nectriaceae]
|
Not known to occur
|
No: This species is associated with black foot disease in grapevines (Schroers et al. 2008; Martin et al. 2011a). This fungus has reported to occur in the roots (Alaniz et al. 2007), stem vascular tissue and brown wood of young grapevines (Martin et al. 2011a). Semi-hardwood, root free dormant cuttings therefore do not provide a pathway for this fungus.
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
Cylindrocladiella lageniformis Crous et al. [Hypocreales: Nectriaceae]
|
Not known to occur
|
No: These fungi have been recorded on Vitis species (Farr and Rossman 2011), but affected plant parts are not mentioned. However, on other hosts these fungi occur on the roots (Van-Coller et al. 2005). Therefore, root free dormant cuttings do not provide a pathway for these fungi.
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
Cylindrocladiella parva (P.J. Anderson) Boesew [Hypocreales: Nectriaceae]
|
Not known to occur
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
Cylindrocladiella peruviana (Bat. et al.) Boesew) [Hypocreales: Nectriaceae]
|
Not known to occur
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
Daldinia concentrica sensu auct. [Xylariales: Xylariaceae]
|
Yes (PHA 2001)
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
|
Daldinia vernicosa (Schwein.) Ces. & De Not. [Xylariales: Xylariaceae]
|
Not known to occur
|
No: This fungus has been recorded on Vitis species (Farr and Rossman 2011), but affected plant parts are not mentioned. However, on other hosts, this fungus occurs on burnt wood (Rhoads 1918; Whalley and Watling 1980; Farr and Rossman 2011). Therefore, semi-hardwood dormant cuttings do not provide a pathway for this fungus.
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
Dendrophoma pleurospora Sacc [Xylariales: Xylariaceae] (synonym: Dinemasporium pluerospora (Sacc.) Shkarupa)
|
Not known to occur
|
No: This fungus is associated with Vitis species and has been isolated from the necrotic and healthy stem tissue of older grapevines (Serra et al. 2000). Therefore, semi-hardwood dormant cuttings do not provide a pathway for this fungus.
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
Dendryphiella infuscans (Thüm.) M.B. Ellis [Pleosporales: Pleosporaceae]
|
Not known to occur
|
No: This fungus has been recorded on Vitis species (Farr and Rossman 2011), but affected plant parts are not mentioned. However, on other hosts this fungus occurs on dead stems (Farr and Rossman 2011). Therefore, dormant cuttings do not provide a pathway for this fungus.
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
Dendryphion acinorum Ellis & Everh. [Pleosporales: Pleosporaceae]
|
Not known to occur
|
No: These fungi have been recorded on Vitis species (Farr and Rossman 2011), but affected plant parts are not mentioned. Since their report on Vitis species in the United States in 1952 (Farr and Rossman 2011), they have not been reported from any other country indicating that dormant cuttings do not provide a pathway for these fungi.
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
Dendryphion harknessii var. leptaleum Ellis [Pleosporales: Pleosporaceae]
|
Not known to occur
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
Dermatella viticola Ellis & Everh. [Helotiales: Dermateaceae]
|
Not known to occur
|
No: This species is associated with dead shoots (Farr and Rossman 2011). Therefore, dormant cuttings do not provide a pathway for this fungus.
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
Diaporthe australafricana Crous & Niekerk [Diaporthales: Diaporthaceae]
|
Yes (Van Niekerk et al. 2005)
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
|
Diaporthe eres Nitschke [Diaporthales: Diaporthaceae] (synonym Diaporthe ambigua Nitschke)
|
Yes (PHA 2001)
|
Assessment not required
|
|
|
|
Diaporthe kyushuensis Kajitani & Kanem [Diaporthales: Diaporthaceae]
|
Not known to occur
|
|
