Strategies for construction hazard recognition


Figure 4: Mathematical model selection flowchart for analysis



Download 2.75 Mb.
View original pdf
Page38/102
Date28.06.2022
Size2.75 Mb.
#59091
1   ...   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   ...   102
STRATEGIES FOR CONSTRUCTION HAZARD RECOGNITION

Figure 4: Mathematical model selection flowchart for analysis
After the selection of the most suitable mathematical model, the coefficients of the regression equation provide the level change and slope change coefficients. By aggregating the change measures for all the three crews, the weighted overall level change can be computed using the reciprocal of error variance estimates as shown in Equation 3.
𝐿𝐢
π‘œπ‘£π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘™π‘™
=
βˆ‘
1
𝜎
𝑗
2
𝑏
𝐿𝐢
𝑗
𝐽
𝑗=1
βˆ‘
1
𝜎
𝑗
2
𝐽
𝑗=1
(3) Where J is the number of crews is the level change coefficent estimated for the jth crew is the estimated standard error for the jth level change coefficient Fit Models I and II using Ordinary least squares
Model Comparison
H
0
: Ξ²
1
= Ξ²
3
= Accept H
0
Test for autocorrelated errors
H
0
:ρ
1
= Select Model II
Reject H
0
Test for autocorrelated errors
H
0
:ρ
1
= Accept H
0
Reject H
0
Select Model IV
Accept H
0
Reject H
0
Select Model I
Select Model III


61
Validation using construction case images
In addition to the multiple baseline study tests we conducted a pretest and post-test using construction case images to obtain corroborative evidence. The pretest was conducted prior to providing the SAVES and mnemonics training and the post-test was conducted after the intervention following the sixteenth work period for each crew. The test involved selecting a random set of 8 photographs for the pretest and a different random set of 8 photographs for the post-test from a database of more than a hundred photographs. Prior to field testing the expert panel identified a comprehensive list of hazards for each photograph. The HR index for this validation effort was computed using Equation 4. Once the data were collected a two sample test for independent measures was used to compare performance.
𝐻𝑅 =
𝐻
π‘π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘€
𝐻
π‘π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘€
+𝐻
π‘π‘Žπ‘›π‘’π‘™
(2) Where H
crew is the number of hazards identified by the crew, and H
crew
+ H
panel
is the total number of hazards identified by the crew and the research expert panel.

Download 2.75 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   ...   102




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page