The Bougainville Plan for Health 2012 to 2030


Appendix 8: Traditional medicine in Bougainville



Download 365.74 Kb.
Page8/9
Date28.01.2017
Size365.74 Kb.
#10063
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9

Appendix 8: Traditional medicine in Bougainville


Since the inception of the Traditional Health Project (THP) in July 2010, traditional medicine in Bougainville is gaining recognition and becoming better organized. The THP is a European Union (EU), Austrian Development Agency (ADA) and Drei Königs Aktion (DKA) funded project. The project operates under the auspices of the Catholic Diocese in Bougainville and HorizonT3000, helping with the preservation and safe utilization of local traditional medicines and practices. The THP supports and helps to implement the Traditional Medicine Policy of PNG, the goal of which is ‘to improve and maintain health by providing easy access to safe and effective forms of traditional medicine and practices as part of the National Health Care System.’

Specifically, the THP aims to:

contribute to knowledge and appreciation of traditional health resources in Bougainville

contribute to improvement of health parameters, in particular maternal health, in Bougainville

contribute to self sufficiency of Bougainville communities, in particular in rural areas, with respect to basic health

Preserve and continuously upgrade traditional health care knowledge and skills by introducing them into the modern health care system in Bougainville

The Bougainville Traditional Health Association (BouTHA) has been formed since the start of the THP. To date BouTHA has 300 members and 11 smaller associations representing districts or groups of villages. BouTHA’s dream is to strengthen the health service using safe and effective traditional medicine and practices and work with health staff to promote a healthy lifestyle.

In the short time since their inception, the THP and BouTHA have some notable achievements. Specimens from approximately 100 medicinal plants have been collected, analyzed and catalogued in conjunction with University of PNG and the Forestry Research Institute. The information obtained will be used to produce a booklet on medicinal plants used in Bougainville for health centres, schools and the general public. Members of BouTHA have been trained as trainers in primary health care and over 500 traditional healers from all parts of Bougainville have received primary health care training. Bone-setters and massage therapists have received training on human anatomy and physiology. Traditional birth attendants upgraded their knowledge in safe motherhood and delivery. Twelve herbalists are attending a course on rural health management conducted by Divine Word University. Links between BouTHA and the Bougainville Healthy Communities Project (BHCP) have begun to be established. BHCP includes training on herbal medicines as part of the training for volunteers and peer educators. Medicinal herb gardens have been established in primary schools.

In the future, the THP and BouTHA would like to establish more medicinal herb gardens at health centres and primary schools and include traditional medicine in the upper primary school curriculum. They want to establish a research institute and/or laboratory that can determine recommended doses for various herbal remedies. Other ideas include developing a quality control process for herbal medicines as well as techniques for mass production and preservation of herbal medicines. THP and BouTHA want to develop accreditation for traditional medical practitioners and collaborate more with health workers.

Appendix 9: Cost and financing scenarios


DRAFT ONLY

Financing issues facing the ABG health sector



1. Overall ABG revenue estimates

Currently, the GoPNG has committed to providing 100 Million Kina per annum financial support to the ABG over a 5 year period. With low levels of internal revenue, this support is most important to the ABG, as the post-conflict recovery and development financial needs are considerable. The ABG has budgeted its plans for the period 2011-2015 to meet certain development priorities, as indicated below.


Table 1: Estimated revenue required to finance ABG’s priorities for development 2011-2015 in kina (millions)4




2012

2015

Grants (external)

84.8

92.2

Internal revenue

22.5

24.8

Total

107.3

117.1

Currently, it is estimated the ABG generates about 5 million kina per year through taxes. These taxes are collected by the GoPNG taxation system with some returned directly to the ABG, under current agreements. The 2012 and 2015 budgets given in Table 1 assume a significant increase in taxation revenue over the 2012-2015 period. This taxation base includes group tax on wages, a goods and services tax, motor vehicle registration fees, liquor licensing fees, and excise taxes on alcohol and tobacco. The excise taxes are new and the ABG is hopeful of large revenue gains from these taxes into the future.

The GoPNG also provides financial support to the ABG health sector by funding the Buka Hospital, salary support for rural health services, financial support for the Church health services and provision of medical supplies (see below).

There is uncertainty over what level of support would be provided by the GoPNG in the longer term, after a referendum is held to determine if the ABG would continue as an autonomous government within the PNG Government, or as an independent nation.


2. Health sector recurrent expenditure estimates

The estimated recurrent expenditure of the ABG health sector is financed from a number of sources, as given below.



Table 2: Estimated recurrent expenditure ABG health 2012 (Kina 000’s)5

Buka Hospital

8.936

Church health

3.747

Rural Health

3.728

GIF Maintenance (Aust, NZ)

0.9

HIV funding

0.2

MSF

2.149

Rollover

0.076

Med supplies est

5.610

Maintenance costs11

0.36

DHFF (est) (NZ –HSIP)

0.912

Leprosy Mission Health (NZ –HSIP)

0.9613

Total

27.53

Of this 27.53 million kina estimated recurrent expenditure, ABG directly contributes an estimated 1.355 million kina in recurrent expenditure. The rest is made up of donor contributions (4.90 million kina) and GoPNG funding (21.27 million kina). The GoPNG is by far the major contributor to health sector recurrent funding, and is likely to remain so until sometime between 2015 and 2020. Within this five year period, the referendum has to be held, after which GoPNG funding will be uncertain.




Table 3: Details of recurrent expenditure by contributing entity




Kina (millions)

ABG contribution







Operational costs for 13 health centres

0.29




Health Division recurrent exps (not salaries

0.426




HIV funding

0.2




Rollover of recurrent costs from 2011

0.076




Maintenance costs from restoration and development

0.363




Budget rolled over from 2011







Sub-total

1.355

GoPNG contribution







Buka Hospital expenses (inc. revenue)

8.93




Church health services

3.74




Rural Health staffing costs

3.0




Medical supplies (est)

5.6




Sub-total

21.27







Total government contributions to recurrent funding 2012

22.625

Donor contributions







Maintenance (GIF)

0.9




MSF

2.14




DHFF (NZ through HSIP)

0.9




Leprosy Mission Health (NZ through HSIP)

0.96




Sub-total

4.9

Total Estimated Recurrent Expenditure 2012

27.53


3. ABG health sector capital expenditure estimates

For 2012, ABG is providing 4.5 million kina in capital funding for health infrastructure, as part its 100 million kina per year (for 5 years) grant from the GoPNG.



Table 4: Estimated capital funding ABG from various sources 2012




Kina (millions)

Capital Funding – ABG Infrastructure




ABG (PIP) Restoration and Development Grant 2012

4.5014

Restoration and Development Grant 2011 rolled over15

1.593

Total Government sourced capital funding

6.093

Donor contributions (capital - RHSDP)16

2.93

Total estimated capital funding for 2012

9.023


4. Total estimated expenditure from government sources 2012

This consists of GoPNG recurrent funding, and ABG sourced recurrent and capital funding, as indicated earlier.


Table 5: Estimate of total government sourced funding ABG 2012




Kina (millions)

Total government contributions to recurrent funding

22.625

Total government sourced capital funding

6.093

Total

28.718

Total government sourced expenditure per capita (Using the ABG population estimate of 239668 17)

119.82 Kina

Total government sourced expenditure per capita18 in US$

58.59 US$








5. International comparisons - Per capita government health expenditure US$19

In the chart below is a comparison of US$ per capita government sourced health expenditures of PNG overall, other Melanesian Pacific countries and ABG. Whilst ABG appears to be higher than PNG overall, it falls well short of the per capita health expenditures of the Solomons, Fiji, Kiribati and Vanuatu.



Table 6: Other countries per capita government sourced expenditures

Philippines

27

Timor Leste

32

Indonesia

38







Thailand

134

Tonga

140

Samoa

179

Malaysia

204







New Zealand

2728

Australia

3246

It should be noted there are limitations to the accuracy of these indicators, as they are dependent on data sourced from each country. However, WHO has gone to some length over at least ten years to standardise data collection and methods of calculation, to allow more meaningful comparisons. There are other methods of comparison which take into account relative purchasing power in each country, but in the interests of not over complicating the comparisons (since they are a guide only) this has not been done in this document. Notwithstanding limitations of inter-country health expenditure comparisons, it is useful to compare government health spending per capita of ABG’s Melanesian neighbours.

The ABG is currently quite close to the US$60 per capita level, which the WHO has determined would provide enough financing for a health system in a developing country to deliver all of the specified mix of interventions to treat conditions to meet the health Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and interventions targeting non-communicable diseases.20 However, it will be important over time that the ABG tries to increase its government-sourced health expenditure to levels comparable to other Melanesian countries, in order to improve its health services overall, as well as using ongoing workforce and health system productivity gains.
6. Government-sourced health expenditure growth scenarios

Up to 2015, the ABG can rely on its own funds (using the 100 million kina per year GoPNG grant) and GoPNG funds to finance its needs for health and other government expenditures. Beyond 2015, it is uncertain where the sources of government expenditure will come from, and this is dependent on the outcomes of the referendum. At the moment, GoPNG collects tax on behalf of ABG and returns an agreed proportion back to ABG. If ABG remains autonomous, it is uncertain to what extent and how long it will take for overall taxation imposition and collection responsibilities to transfer to ABG. If ABG becomes an independent nation, this date will be reliant on the date of the referendum (between 2015-2020) and the time it takes to totally transfer powers, including all taxation responsibilities. So between 2015 and when there develops a significant revenue stream for the ABG, possibly from 2020 onwards, when the Panguna mine starts to generate revenue, the ABG will need to find a way to finance its government services, including health. If it becomes independent, it can do this partially by taking over taxation powers from GoPNG at the time when PNG stops providing government funding.

With this uncertain context in mind, three financial scenarios for ABG Health are given below. The expenditure figures include both recurrent and capital expenditures.
Scenario 1: Total government sourced expenditure rises only to match population increases – so that per capita expenditure stays constant

Up until 2015, GoPNG have committed 100 million kina to ABG, of which it is understood, the ABG Health division will receive 15%, that is 15 million kina.

In this scenario, expenditure would increase from 2012 to 2013, because of the 15 million kina introduced to the ABG budget in 2013, and this would stay the same until 2015. From that point on, expenditure, it is assumed wholly funded by ABG, would stay at the 2015 level of US$69.12 per capita, but increase with population increases. So whilst the budget would increase by 2.3% per year to 2020 and then by 2.0% to 2030, it would only be rising with population increases and there would be no real per capita increase in expenditure.21

Expenditure stays at US$69.12 per capita

This scenario would mean that by 2030, expenditure per capita would still be well below the per capita expenditure of ABG’s southern Melanesian neighbours. These countries range from US$100 to US$143, with a crude average of US$120. This expenditure scenario would in effect mean that ABG Health would remain severely underfunded and would most likely not reach its desired health status targets.


Scenario 2: Bring ABG health expenditure up to US$120 per capita by 2030 on a steady basis with a 5.92% increase per year


US$100 per capita by 2025

Likely funding gap period

US$120 per capita by 2030

If the ABG decided to reach an expenditure target level of US$120 per capita by 2030, it would require a percentage increase in annual expenditure from 2015 of 5.92%. It would not reach US$100 per capita until 2025. With this scenario, it assumes that GoPNG expenditure would cease by the end of 2015, and from that date onwards the funding would come from ABG sources. This includes both recurrent and capital funding.
Scenario 3: ABG achieves US$100 per capita government health expenditure 5 years earlier than scenario 2, by 2020, and a US$120 per capita health expenditure by 2030.

This means ABG would need to have higher percentage annual increases in the first 5 years to achieve the US$100 per capita target earlier. To achieve these expenditure targets, it would require an annual percentage increase in the health budget of 10.14% to 2020, and a 3.87% increase from 2020 to 2030 (as indicated by the more gradual curve in the graph after 2030. Whilst this scenario allows achievement of the US$100 target earlier, it also means a much higher percentage increase in funding in the 5 years from 2015, just in the time period of likely funding uncertainty.



Likely funding gap period

US$100 per capita by 2020

US$120 per capita by 2030


Summary

Scenario 1 would not allow ABG to be sufficiently funded to reach its health status objectives. Scenario 3 puts too much pressure on funding requirements in the period 2015 to 2020, which is the period of most funding uncertainty. Scenario 2 has a more modest but steady growth of 5.92% per annum, and allows for a funding target of US$100 per capita to be achieved by 2025 and US$120 per capita by 2030. Scenario 2 is the most optimum.





7. The recurrent and capital expenditure mix

Because the WHO international comparisons of government-only financial sources quoted above use both capital and recurrent expenditures combined, so too does this analysis. This allows projections of target dates for US$100 and US$120 to be developed. However, in practice, capital and recurrent funding needs to be separated. With the steadily increasing overall health budget that Scenario 2 outlines (5.92% per annum) from 2015 to 2030, there is scope to utilise some of the increase for recurrent and some for capital purposes. Because recurrent health expenditures are generally non-flexible downwards (they can only generally rise or stay the same, because of locked in recurrent costs like wages and other program commitments) it is useful to project recurrent costs based on Scenario 2 (5.92% growth) and the 2012 recurrent expenditure estimates. These projections can act as a tool for recurrent expenditure growth using 2012 as the baseline expenditure.

The graph of estimated recurrent health expenditure to 2030 is given below. Between 2012 and 2015, it rises from 28.72 million kina to 36.27 million kina, due to the commitment of GoPNG providing the 15 million kina per annum to ABG and the GoPNG providing most of the recurrent health funding. From 2016, there is a steady 5.92% increase. However, as indicated in the graph, ABG’s contribution will need to rise dramatically from 2015 to 2016, from 8.093 million kina to 38.42 million kina, to replace the loss of 21.27 million kina which up until then would be provided by GoPNG. This situation would arise if ABG was an independent nation from 2015 onwards. This may or may not be the case, but this assumption has been made in this document to indicate the possibility of the most critical funding situation occurring. ABG needs to prepare for such a possibility, given that a referendum could occur as early as 2015.

Note – See Table below for inflation adjusted data.


As a guide to funding needs to ensure a steady 5.92% growth to 2030, the data has been provided in Annex 1, also with Kina funding needs taking into account inflation changes.

Capital funding spending can be projected in a similar way using the 2012 government sourced capital funding estimate as a base. However, this baseline figure for 2012 of 6.093 million kina may or may not be appropriate, and given the need to upgrade health facilities over the next few years, it is probably inadequate. However, the capital funding projections could act as the minimum required per year to ensure the total government sourced expenditure (recurrent and capital) reaches the US$120 per capita target by 2030.


In the next few years (probably beyond 2020) ABG could source significant extra capital funding from its own resources, especially when the government tax and mining royalty revenue base starts to climb. However, in the intervening period, from now to 2020 at least, external sources of additional capital funding will be needed to finance planned restoration and capital development projects in the health sector (e.g. hospitals and health centres and their equipment requirements).

Note – See Table below for inflation adjusted data.


9. Recurrent and capital expenditure projections taking into account losses in purchasing power due to inflation

Inflation rates within an economy are an indication of rising prices but not extra resources, whether they be staffing, operational costs, medical supplies, transport and other recurrent expenses. Because of inflation, the same resources cost more, and that is why expenditure data needs to be adjusted by the inflation rate, which is a crude average of the rise in prices of the same number of goods and services.

In the graph and table below, the recurrent and capital expenditure increases projected to 2030 at 5.92% per year, in order to reach a total expenditure target of US120 per capita, have been adjusted for inflationary price increases. These are the increases which can be used to guide recurrent and capital budget increases into the future to achieve the US$120 target by 2030. However, the figures are a guide only and should be treated within the context of the objectives of the Health Plan, taking into account over time emerging funding requirements and the limits of funding availability.

For the purposes of the projections a long term 6% inflation rate is used.22




Table 7: Inflation adjusted ABG health recurrent and capital expenditures needed to ensure a 5.92% steady growth rate in real terms – to achieve a US$120 per capita (in real terms) expenditure target by 203023


Year

Total recurrent expenditure (2012 kina millions)

Total capital expenditure (2012 kina millions)

Total expenditure (2012 kina millions)

Total recurrent expenditure needed to offset 6 % inflation

Total capital expenditure needed to offset inflation

Total expenditure needed to offset inflation

2012

22.63

6.09

28.72

22.63

6.09

28.72

2013

30.18

6.09

36.27

31.99

6.46

38.45

2014

30.18

6.09

36.27

33.91

6.85

40.75

2015

30.18

6.09

36.27

35.94

7.26

43.20

2016

31.96

6.45

38.42

40.35

8.15

48.50

2017

33.85

6.84

40.69

45.30

9.15

54.45

2018

35.86

7.24

43.10

50.87

10.27

61.14

2019

37.98

7.67

45.65

57.11

11.53

68.64

2020

40.23

8.12

48.35

64.12

12.95

77.06

2021

42.61

8.60

51.21

71.99

14.53

86.52

2022

45.13

9.11

54.24

80.82

16.32

97.14

2023

47.80

9.65

57.45

90.74

18.32

109.06

2024

50.63

10.22

60.85

101.88

20.57

122.45

2025

53.63

10.83

64.45

114.38

23.09

137.47

2026

56.80

11.47

68.27

128.42

25.93

154.35

2027

60.16

12.15

72.31

144.18

29.11

173.29

2028

63.72

12.87

76.59

161.87

32.68

194.56

2029

67.49

13.63

81.12

181.74

36.70

218.44

2030

71.49

14.43

85.92

204.05

41.20

245.24


10. Staffing needs to develop an accounting and finance capacity for ABG Health

It will be important to further develop the accounting and finance capacity of AGB Health by employing and/or training a suitable person to oversee and manage the ABG health sector finance system. Ideally, this person would be a qualified accountant, eligible to be a member of one of the professional accounting bodies recognized in PNG. This would normally require at least a diploma in accounting or business studies with major studies in accounting. It would also be useful for this person to have some training in economics. This person could service the health sector by either working in the overall administration of ABG, but dedicated to the health services, or working specifically within a proposed health department, whichever structure may emerge.



11. Health Commitment Table 2012-2030 ABG Health

This table is provided as an accompanying excel spreadsheet. (Health Commitment Table to 2030.xlsx ) It can be used as a finance planning tool for ABG Health. The table indicates on an annual basis the funds available for planned increases in recurrent and capital expenditures, and what available funding can be carried forward for later years. It is a flexible Excel table and can have different financial inputs to the ones utilised currently.

It assumes that funds available in 2012 are fixed and committed. From 2013 to 2015, the recurrent funding increases as a result of the 15 million kina made available and committed to ABG Health from the ABG.

This forms the basis of committed funding at 2015.

From 2016 onwards it is assumed there will be no more funding from GoPNG and that all funds are from the ABG. It is also assumed that from 2016 onwards this funding will increase by 5.92% per annum to 2030. This funding can be used for recurrent or capital spending.

Increased expenditures as per the Health Plan priorities are then matched against these steady annual increases in funding. These expenditures are included as sufficient funding becomes available.

It is assumed that when recurrent expenditures are included, they then form the basis of an increased recurrent expenditure base (i.e they stay in the recurrent budget in following years).

When capital expenditures are included, they may be included partially over a number of years, depending on funding available each year, or if small enough they are completed in one year.

When capital expenditures do span more than a year, related recurrent funding is added partially over those years to reflect the amount of the project completed and operating.

When a capital expenditure is completed by the end of a year, it is assumed that the full recurrent spending relating to it will occur in the following year and will then continue annually.





Download 365.74 Kb.

Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page