Theology beacon dictionary of theology


For Further Reading: Bonhoeffer



Download 6.66 Mb.
Page39/111
Date18.10.2016
Size6.66 Mb.
#2418
1   ...   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   ...   111

For Further Reading: Bonhoeffer, Ethics; Titus and
Keeton,
Ethics for Today; Lehmann, Ethics in a Christian
Context;
Freedman, "a Meta-Ethic for Professional Mo-
rality," Effcics 1978, 8ff; Dyck,
On Human Care; DeWolf,
Responsible Freedom. oscar F. reed

EUCHARIST. The Greek term eucharistia means "thanksgiving as an act of worship." Eucharist is a traditional name for the sacrament more com­monly known as Communion, Lord's Supper, Agape, and Mass (R.C.). The Early Church seems to have observed the "breaking of bread" at ev­ery service (Acts 2:42). Historically the Roman Catholic church has taught that the bread and wine become the body and blood of Christ. Mar­tin Luther taught that Christ's body and blood coexist with the bread and wine. Zwingli be­lieved that the Eucharist was only a symbolic commemoration of Christ's death. Christians to­day hold to one of these three or some variations of them. The Eucharist is one of the two Protes­tant sacraments along with water baptism.

The Eucharist is a celebration of Christ's aton­ing sacrifice, and its repetition serves to keep us aware of the enduring nature of the work of Christ, so that we can say, "He is born, He is cru­cified, He is resurrected." Whatever one's theol­ogy of this sacrament, Christ's presence is a mystery of faith—and who would dare to say that He is not present at His own table? The bread and wine are symbolic, not only of His "body broken and blood poured out," but also of the Bread of Life that nourishes and the Blood that cleanses. The implications of the various pe­riods of the Christian calendar, such as Advent, Christmas, Lent, Good Friday, Easter, and Pen­tecost, find expression in the celebration of the Eucharist. Its observance is our dedicated, thank­ful, expectant response to the salvation wrought by Christ's atoning sacrifice. It is also our accep­tance by faith of God's grace for pardon and pu­rity, fellowship and service.

See SACRAMENTS, COMMUNION (HOLY).

For Further Reading: Battenson, ed., The Early Church
Fathers;
Richardson, ed., A Theological Word Book of the
Bible.
Harvey J. S. Blaney

EUTHANASIA. The term is derived from the Greek eu, "well," and thanatos, "death," and so means easy or painless death. In contemporary usage it refers to the practice of "mercy killing," the painless putting to death of persons suffering from incurable and extremely painful disease. It



196 EUTYCHIANISM—EVANGELICAL

is also used for the painless putting to death of the socially unfit, such as the feebleminded and deformed.

Euthanasia is sometimes considered as being either passive or active. Passive euthanasia would be simply deliberate failure to use the means available to prolong life. (Most authorities deny this meaning to the concept.) Active eutha­nasia is the positive and intended use of means to end life painlessly.

Euthanasia is also classified as either voluntary or compulsory. Voluntary euthanasia pre­supposes the rational request for and consent of the person to be killed, whereas compulsory eu­thanasia presupposes neither request nor con­sent of the person to be killed.

Those who advocate the practice of euthanasia tend to do so on the utilitarian ground of the good of society. Nineteenth-century utilitarians held euthanasia to be a sensible means of dispos­ing of persons who are a burden or embarrass­ment to society. The Nazis even included those who are economically, politically, or racially an embarrassment.

Those who oppose euthanasia base their argu­ment on the dignity of the individual and the sa-credness of human life. The Christian church, both Catholic and Protestant, has consistently condemned euthanasia. Its position is that life is the gift of God and only God has the right to terminate it. The right of life is natural and in­alienable and is a part of man's stewardship re­sponsibility. "Mercy killing" assumes the right of others to make decisions for which they have in­sufficient knowledge. Human motives are too complex, and euthanasia offers the possibility for concealment of selfish and criminal motives. It also fails to understand the Christian concept of suffering as having positive and redemptive value, both for the sufferer and those around him.

Theologians such as Karl Barth, Dietrich Bon­hoeffer, and Emil Brunner have condemned euthanasia as being a usurpation of God's sov­ereign right over life and death (John Dedek, Hu­man Life: Some Moral Issues, 122-23).

See LIFE. MURDER, ABORTION, SUFFER (SUFFERING).

For Further Reading: Dedek, Human Life: Some Moral Issues; Heifetz, The Right to Die, 99-117; Koop, The Right to Live, The Right to Die, 85-117.

M. Estes Haney



EUTYCHIANISM. In the fifth century the church was formulating a doctrinal statement concern­ing the relationship of the human and the divine in Christ. Monophysites (Gr. one nature) affirmed a belief that Christ had only one nature. Eu-tyches, a monk from Constantinople (d. 454), gave his name to the doctrine which affirmed that after the Incarnation, Christ's nature was only divine, not human. Eutychianism now in­cludes modifications of the original doctrine.

The Council of Chalcedon (451) adopted the statement of the oneness of Person without de­nying either the complete divine nature or the complete human nature of the incarnate Christ.

See APOLLINARIANISM, CHRISTOLOGY, HYPOSTATIC UNION, CHRIST.

For Further Reading: Latourette, A History of Chris­tianity, 164-72; Wiley, CT, 2:160-84.

Richard S. Taylor

EVANGELICAL. This adjective derives from the Greek noun euangelion, translated "gospel" or "good news" (often transliterated "evangel"). That which is evangelical therefore relates to the gospel, the message of salvation of the Christian faith. Paul wrote: "For I am not ashamed of the gospel: it is the power of God for salvation to every one who has faith, to the Jew first and also to the Greek" (Rom. 1:16, rsv). The evangel is synonymous with kerygma, "preaching." Evan­gelical also connotes the spirit of zeal and ear­nestness with which the message of salvation is witnessed to or proclaimed.

Evangelical and evangelicalism were not widely used in the history of the church until the time of the Reformation, during which period they took on a somewhat pejorative meaning. Luther's in­sistence that the light of the gospel of justifi­cation by faith had been "hidden under a bushel of ecclesiastical authority, tradition, and liturgy" led Erasmus, Thomas More, and Johannes Eck to employ the term evangelicals derisively to refer to the Lutherans. Luther reacted negatively to being so named because he believed evangelical could be used for all Christians who accepted the gos­pel of free grace. Eventually, following the Peace of Westphalia in 1648, with its recognition of the Reformed churches as evangelical; with the pub­lication of the Corpus Evangelicorum in 1653; and with the union of Lutheran and Reformed churches in Germany in 1817, evangelical came to be used of all Protestants. The Methodist re­vival under Wesley in England was characterized as an evangelical revival.

The term was given more specific content when the Evangelical Alliance was formed in London in 1846. The Alliance adopted a set of nine doctrines as representative of the meaning of evangelical: (1) the inspiration of the Bible; (2) the Trinity; (3) the depravity of man; (4) the me-





EVANGELISM

197



diation of the divine Christ; (5) justification by faith; (6) conversion and sanctification by the Holy Spirit; (7) the return of Christ and judg­ment; (8) the ministry of the Word; (9) the sacra­ments of baptism and the Lord's Supper.

Since that time the word evangelical, both in Europe and America, has taken on broader and narrower definitions. The term is often used to refer to neoorthodoxy on one end of the spec­trum and to fundamentalism on the other end. Broadness and narrowness are determined mainly by the theological stance of the definer. The hallmarks of evangelicalism, as delineated by Donald Bloesch, are 10 in number: (1) the sovereignty of God; (2) the divine authority of Scripture; (3) total depravity; (4) the substi­tutionary Atonement; (5) salvation by grace; (6) by faith alone; (7) primacy of proclamation; (8) scriptural holiness; (9) the Church's spiritual mis­sion; (10) the personal return of Christ.

See orthodoxy. fundamentalism, christianity, evangelism, neoevangelicalism.

For Further Reading: Bloesch, The Evangelical Renais-
sance;
Quebedeaux, The Young Evangelicals; Ramm, The
Evangelical Heritage;
Wells and Woodbridge, eds., The
Evangelicals.
WILLARD H. TAYLOR

EVANGELISM. Evangelism is that activity of Christians by which they seek to make known the gospel and persuade people to believe in Christ the Lord. This activity may be private and personal or public, involving an evangelistic type of preaching and methods of inducing immedi­ate response. Generally evangelism is seen as a primary responsibility of the Church, to be en­gaged in continuously and by some degree of system and organization. A popular method in the 19th and 20th centuries has been the planned revival campaign. However, of more re­cent years greater stress has been placed on training laymen to evangelize by means of every­day vocation and personal witnessing.

Everything the church does which aims at con­versions is a form of evangelism. Even the Sun­day School, while primarily an educating and nurturing agency, has been widely effective as a tool of outreach and evangelism. All other auxil­iaries and activities should also be geared to evangelism, and evaluated in terms of their evangelism potential.

While missions and evangelism are generally disconnected in the local church, they are es­sentially the same. In the broader sense, mis­sions constitute a subdivision of evangelism, i.e., evangelism carried out by missionaries serving elsewhere, whereas evangelism as popularly conceived is soul-winning activity locally.

Evangelism has the word angel at the heart of it, and an angel is always thought of as a messen­ger of the Lord. All Christians are to be involved in evangelism, since all are to be witnesses or messengers of the Lord. Anyone who is truly Christian will be involved in sharing with some­one else what the Lord has done for him. No one is to be a spectator, but all are to be participators in circulating the good news of Christ's redeem­ing love.

The pulpit type of evangelism places the em­phasis on congregational participation in spiri­tual activities which generates an atmosphere in which the unsaved have a confrontation with the Holy Spirit. In such a setting the worshippers are blended into a spirit of collective obedience that makes it normal for individuals to be obedient to the Lord. This is often referred to as "mass evan­gelism," though the term is of doubtful accuracy, since the ultimate decisions are personal and in­dividual. Evangelism is not crowd psychology or mob hysteria.

Personal evangelism involves one-to-one, person-to-person contacts for the Lord. Every Christian will have a means to make a living, but he will also have a meaning for living, and the latter is related to his concern about winning an­other to the Lord. Total mobilization of the laity for winning men to Christ is the greatest chal­lenge confronting the Church world today. Only as Christians turn the casual contacts that come on the job, in the office, and in the neighborhood into occasions for witnessing will the Church have an impact on contemporary society.

Theologically, evangelism is the Church's pri­mary task, as it is a fulfillment of the Great Com­mission (Matt. 28:19-20). It presupposes the lostness of men, their universal salvability in Christ, and the faithfulness of the Holy Spirit in working through witnessing and preaching to bring about awakening and conversion. Evan­gelism is in one sense a human work, involving intentional activity, and requiring training, skill, planning, strategy, and generally some degree of organization. Yet the Church's efforts, while they may win adherents, will fail in bringing about NT conversion unless guided by the Spirit and endued with His power.

See soul winning, evangelist, mission (missions,

missiology).

For Further Reading: Turnbull, ed., Baker's Dictionary
of Practical Theology,
148-92; Taylor, Exploring Evan-
gelism.
Mendell L. Taylor



EVANGELIST. The evangelist (euangelistes) is a messenger or proclaimer of good news. The "good news" (gospel, euangelion) is clearly delin­eated in the NT (1 Cor. 15:1-5; 1 Tim. 1:15; 2 Tim. 1:8-11). All Christians are evangelists, since regeneration creates a spontaneous impulse to share the Good News (Acts 8:1-4). However, it is evident from Eph. 4:11 that some are called "evangelists" in a specialized and official sense. This function and office is one of God's gifts to the Church for its equipping; therefore the Church suffers when and if this particular form of ministry is depreciated. The implication of Ephesians is that not only are evangelists called to spend their time in taking the gospel to those who have not yet heard, but they must have a function in teaching evangelizing to the Church.

Only Philip is called "the evangelist" (Acts 21:8); yet he was elected to "serve tables" and was ordained as a deacon (Acts 6:1-6). But that he was first of all an evangelist at heart was dem­onstrated in the first persecution, when his elect­ive position was dissolved and he went to Samaria. Apparently thereafter the Church rec­ognized that God through providence and inner urge had promoted him. Since there is no hint of a subsequent special ordination, we may con­clude that the evangelist represents a function and at times an office but not necessarily an order of ministry. Not only the apostles but ordained deacons and ordained elders could serve as evangelists.

While some are called to specialize as evan­gelists, and the office is distinct from the "pas­tors and teachers" (Eph. 4:11), we are not to conclude that nonspecialists may remain aloof from evangelizing activities and interests. Tim­othy was primarily a pastor-administrator, yet he is commanded to "do the work of an evangelist" (2 Tim. 4:5). Only thus could he "fulfill" his min­istry (NASB). The "work" of an evangelist would be repeated proclamation of the essential mes­sage and a systematic seeking out of those who had not yet heard or at least were not yet won.

See EVANGELISM, SOUL WINNING, MISSION (MIS­SIONS, MISSIOLOGY), CLERGY.



For Further Reading: Baker's Dictionary of Practical
Theology,
148-89; Purkiser, The New Testament Image of
the Ministry,
79-84. RICHARD S. TAYLOR

EVE. The name, mentioned only twice in the OT (Gen. 3:20; 4:1), is given by Adam to his female companion and wife in the Garden of Eden. He first calls her "Woman" (ishah, 2:23). The signifi­cance of the name ishah is highlighted in the Sa­maritan Pentateuch and LXX rendering "out of her man," which contrasts the woman with the beasts which are taken "out of the ground" (v. 19). The name Eve is first applied at the mention of childbearing in the curse of 3:14-19.

The significance of the name is explained in the text as denoting that the woman is "the mother of all living" (v. 20). Yet in the biblical account it is not clear whether she is yet a mother at all. And even when she becomes a mother, she is not literally "mother of all living" (for example, of animals).

The problem is that though the name appears to be related to the Hebrew verb meaning "to be," its form is not Hebrew. Thus alternate explana­tions have been offered as to the origin of the name. For example, the suggestion has been made that the name is actually built upon a Se­mitic root translated "clan." Thus Eve is under­stood to mean "mother of every human clan."

Another approach has been to relate the name Eve to the Aramaic word for serpent and suggest that Eve is so named because she had done the serpent's work in tempting Adam. Neither expla­nation adduces any better evidence for itself than the simple biblical explanation that the name Eve appears to be related to the Hebrew verb "to be," and thus Eve is "the mother of all living."

The creation of Eve is justified in Genesis 2 as God's provision for a man in his lonely solitude (v. 18). The solitude was not alleviated by the presence of the beasts. But the woman is imme­diately recognized as "bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh" (v. 23). This unity of flesh is symbolized and sealed in the singular commit­ments of marriage (v. 24) which include the sepa­ration from family and bearing of children. Thus the origin of human sexuality is assigned to the commonality shared by man and woman rather than to the reflection of some erotic nature in the creating Deity. This point heightens the contrast between the worship of the Israelites and the worship of their Canaanite neighbors who un­derstood the nature and function of their deities in chiefly sexual terms.

New Testament references to Eve occur in 2 Cor. 11:3 and 1 Tim. 2:13. In both passages the susceptibility of Eve to the solicitations of the tempter is the important element. In the Timo­thy passage it is used to support an understand­ing of the subordination of women to men in the Church assumed from the account in Genesis 3 in which Eve sinned first, then Adam. In Corin­thians it serves as a warning by example of how easily one may be led astray.

Eve was the mother of Cain, Abel, and Seth.
EVENT—EVIL

199



She was also the mother of numerous unnamed children.

See woman, sex (sexuality), family, parents and children.

For Further Reading: Von Rad, Old Testament Theol­ogy, 1:149; Thielicke, How the World Began.

Daniel N. Berg

EVENT. Event is important for Christian theology in discussions regarding revelation. Before crit­ical study of the Bible no questions were raised about the character of the biblical events, and lit­tle particular value was placed on event as part of revelation. Emphasis was on the concepts of Scripture as the source for doctrine and theology. Liberalism bypassed the historical character of the record in favor of universal truths of religious and ethical value. Yet the outlook of the 19th and 20th centuries has made history and, hence, event important. Both orthodox and modernist thinkers have taken the historical character of the Bible seriously but disagree on its impli­cations.

The question of events points to the larger is­sue of the relation of history, eternity, and time. Where does revelation occur on the line that con­nects the eternal acts of God and the temporal events of history? Some emphasize the supra-historical character of revelation (and its event-ness) in order to preserve the otherness of God and the uniqueness of the gospel. The event of revelation is located variously in "great acts of God" in the past or existential encounters, escha­tological events, or language events in the present. Others accent the historical character of revelation (and events) in order to guarantee its verifiability and relevance. The inability to hold these concerns together is present where the su­pernatural and natural are seen as incompatible. Evangelical theology has sought to avoid this di­lemma by accepting the biblical view of miracle and of creation as the point of contact between God the Creator and His world.

Event is significant for revelation in several ways. First, event points to the external, objective dimension of the divine work in the world. Thus the Resurrection is not just an idea but an event that affects the real world (1 Cor. 15:3-19). Sec­ond, and as a consequence, event secures the ex-clusiveness of Christianity inasmuch as God has acted for the world's salvation in special, once-for-all events, e.g., the Exodus and the death and resurrection of Jesus.

For biblical faith, event and word must be seen as complementary aspects of revelation—God speaks and acts. The divine word causes events;

the divine word through a prophet interprets or foretells events.

See heilsgeschichte, historical jesus (the), his-toricism, revelation (special).

For Further Reading: Brown, History, Criticism, and
Faith;
Henry, God, Revelation, and Authority, 2:247-334;
1DB, supp. vol., 746 ff; Ramm, Special Revelation and the
Word of God.
george R. Brunk III

EVIL. As the opposite of good, evil is any quality, condition, or event which is inherently negative and destructive. The pain and unhappiness which result from evil are generally viewed as evils in themselves, but their evil quality is reflec­tive and sometimes more apparent than real.

The Bible commonly uses "evil" as a synonym for sin, as "the fear of the Lord is to hate evil" (Prov. 8:13). There follows a listing of some evils: "pride, and arrogancy, and the evil way, and the froward mouth." From these personal evils of spirit and conduct grow all the social evils which plague men.

Far less serious are the nonmoral forms of evil such as disease, accident, natural calamities, and death. These evils are nonmoral in the sense that they do not imply immediate culpability in the one who experiences them. It is not a sin to be ill or to die, when such is not self-induced.

Nonmoral evil is relative and temporary. In­deed it is often difficult to distinguish between real evil and that which merely seems to be. If God "causes all things to work together for good" in the life of a trusting believer (Rom 8:28, nasb), do the "evil" things remain evil, or are they trans­muted by God's grace into good? Chastening also seems like evil ("grievous," Heb. 12:11) when be­ing experienced, but with sons of God the evil is only apparent; it is really a blessing in disguise. We must conclude that unpleasant events and experiences will fall into their final category only when viewed from the vantage point not only of God but of eternity.

The presence of evil in the world has long been a knotty problem to philosophy and theol­ogy. Particularly crucial is what some have called "surd" evil—that for which there is no compen­sating benefit or rationale, such as useless pain in children or the tooth and claw of nature. In some minds this problem has been so acute that they have despaired of reconciling absolute omnipo­tence in God with infinite goodness. To resolve the difficulty, they have postulated a "finite God," i.e., that surd evil reflects the limitations in God himself, against which He is struggling (Edgar S. Brightman). This of course is the self-made dilemma of rationalism which (1) rejects



200

EVOLUTION—EX CATHEDRA


the biblical answer; (2) overevaluates pain in terms of this life; and (3) presumes that man is capable of determining what is and is not surd evil, or even proving that there is such a thing.

The Bible traces the presence of evil in the uni­verse to the fall of Satan, and the presence of evil on earth to the fall of man. In both cases non-moral evil is the consequence of moral evil. Christians are divided as to the extent this state­ment should include violence in nature such as windstorms and earthquakes. Are these irregu­larities which would not have been known in the world if man had not sinned?

It seems certain at least that pain and hardship are decreed by God to be not only a consequence of sin but in some cases a direct judgment on sin. In this sense God does "create" evil as well as good (Isa. 45:7). The hold of sin is such that without evil in the natural order sufficient to pre­vent complacency, the possibility of winning man back to God would be small if not nil. Evil becomes an instrument of the Spirit in fostering that sense of dependence so basic to religion.

Furthermore the Bible casts the light of re­demption and eternity upon the apparent evils of life. In this light believers know no surd evils; they are surd solely for the unbeliever. The Christian perceives that the only absolute evil is unforgiven sin, since such evil alone is eternal and irremediable in its consequences.

That branch of theology which seeks to justify God in permitting evil in the world is called the­odicy.

See SUFFER (SUFFERING), GOD, ATTRIBUTES (DIVINE), MORAL ATTRIBUTES OF GOD, PROVIDENCE.

For Further Reading: Henry, Answers for the Now Gen-
eration,
39 ff; Harvey, A Handbook of Theological Terms,
236 ff; Purkiser, ed., Exploring Our Christian Faith,
153-63. Richard S. Taylor


Directory: sites -> default -> files -> publications
publications -> Table of Content forward introduction
publications -> Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center for Wireless Technologies Georgia Institute of Technology
publications -> Housing Counseling Research in Chicago
publications -> Communicating with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Audiences
publications -> New Brunswick Info Sheet on First Nations Child Welfare
publications -> Paap’s Electronic Newsletter 14 November 2008 Volume 11 Number 22 towards ‘smart’ subsidies in agriculture: lessons from recent experience in malawi
publications -> Information support of pedagogical process for the children experiencing difficulties with acquisition of preschool educational programs
publications -> Asus’ ZenFone ar has Google’s augmentted and virtual reality baked in — but not combined
publications -> School Readiness and Early Grade Success Consultation Memo Atlanta, ga

Download 6.66 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   ...   111




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page