Fears that RFID signals destroy the drugs themselves drive industry opposition – perception outweighs reality
Liang, 06 - Executive Director and Professor of Law, Institute of Health Law Studies, California Western School of Law (Bryan, 16 Alb. L.J. Sci. & Tech. 483, “STRUCTURALLY SOPHISTICATED OR LAMENTABLY LIMITED? MECHANISMS TO ENSURE SAFETY OF THE MEDICINE SUPPLY”, lexis)
n129. Industry representatives…30% unusable
Industry studies confirm massive fears of reliability and unforeseen costs
Liang, 06 - Executive Director and Professor of Law, Institute of Health Law Studies, California Western School of Law (Bryan, 16 Alb. L.J. Sci. & Tech. 483, “STRUCTURALLY SOPHISTICATED OR LAMENTABLY LIMITED? MECHANISMS TO ENSURE SAFETY OF THE MEDICINE SUPPLY”, lexis)
RFID suffers from…fake or tainted drugs
the plan would enrage early adopters of RFID that invested tons of money in the technology for competitive advantage. The plan pays for RFID adoption for Pfizer’s competitors – which makes Pfizer’s prior investments useless
RFID Update, 06 (“What the FDA Announcement Means for RFID”, 6/12, http://www.rfidupdate.com/articles/index.php?id=1136)
One important thing…ROI-driven adoption
The vast majority of companies haven’t invested in RFID – only the big players like Pfizer have – and Pfizer has invested millions. The plan subsidizes Pfizers competitors
Whiting, 06 (Rick, “FDA Scolds Drug Industry For Anemic RFID Adoption”, Information Week, 6/19,
http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=189500084)
RFID in the industry…to be done yet
Technological lockin is a link - there’s still a big debate over appropriate technology – bar codes vs. RFID – and the plan would force manufacturers that have invested a lot in bar codes to lose those investments since they have to use RFID instead
DeMarrais, 10/24/07 (Kevin, The Record, “A Cure for Fake Drugs?”, lexis)
Bar codes, which…to carry RFIDs
Hegemony Bad
Hegemonic temptation –
A. MAKES MILITARY AGGRESSION INEVITABLE
LAYNE 6 (THE PEACE OF ILLUSIONS: American Grand Strategy from 1940 to the Present , pp. 152-3)
There is another road to US oversxtension…more than they can chew
B. Policymakers will exaggerate threats to justify hegemony
Layne 6 (Same as above, p 185-6)
Proponents of offshore balancing…too many times in the past
C. This creates self-fulfilling prophecies and perpetual wars, causing extinction
Valunzuela 6 ("Perpetual War, Perpetual Terror", informationclearinghouse.info)
Today the Us is responsible for 40%...we fear most, a terrorist state.
Multipolarity is inevitable
Lyne 6 (Same as above, page 149)
Although balance-of-power theorists…multipolar between now and 2020
Hegemony fuels terrorism
Layne 6 (page 189-90)
the events of 9/11 are another example….a lightning rod for muslim anger
Extinction – Alexander 3
Us hegemony on balance generates greate instability than retreat
Kolko 6 (The Age of War: The United States confronts the world, page 173-8, Gabriel)
the obsession with power and the conviction that armies…only produced endless misery and upheavals of every kind
Hegemony is unsustainable – multiple economic costs
Layne 6 ("Impotent Power? Re-examining the nature of America's hegemonic Power", the national interest, ebsco)
The real issue is not if American primacy will end…no longer could afford to maintain its primacy
Delaying the transition makes the economic costs worse – collapses the economy
Layne 6 (Ebsco Article, form above)
During the past 15 years or so since the Soviet Union…economic base upon which it rests
Mead 92
Airpower DA
1nc: A. AFRICOM will be rejected now – the plan ensures AFRICOM sustainability by focusing it on threats to African insecurities instead of the US’s
Africa News. 8/1/07. “Africa: Questioning Africom” No Author Lexis.
In October 2008…http://www.africafocus.org
B. AFRICOM overstretches the Air Force – it’s on the brink now and current calculations for hiring and cutting personnel don’t assume AFRICOM’s huge needs
Inside the Air Force, 12/21/07 – “Air Force may need more personnel to fill troop support roles” lexis
C. The Air Force is in the midst of an equipment crisis – every plane and every dollar counts. And, budget caps force tradeoffs
US Fed News, 7 – lexis – “TOP AIR FORCE GENERALS ADDRESS AIRMEN'S CONCERNS”
Recapitalization, creation…Lichte said
And, current recapitalization is key to continued air dominance
Wynne and Mosely, 10/24/07 – Michael Wynne, secretary of USAF and Gen. Michael Mosely, Air Force Chief of Staff Dept. CQ congressional Testimony: “AIR FORCE STRATEGIC INITIATIVES” – lexis
Our final priority is…our current dominance
D. Airpower readiness is the only internal link to deterrence, solving counterinsurgencies, and preventing a US-China conflict; escalation means extinction
Dunlap, 6 (Maj. Gen Charles Dunlap Jr, Armed Forces Journal, deputy judge advocate of the Air Force, has 30 years of service and graduate of the National War College, “America’s Assymetric Advantage”)
So where does that leave us… U.S. is at risk
2nc: And, airpower readiness prevents multiple scenarios for nuclear conflict in Asia
Khalilzad and Lesser, 98 (Zalmay Khalilzad and Ian Lesser, eds. Ashley J. Tellis, Chung Min Lee, James Mulvenon, Courtney Purrington, and Michael D. Swain, “Sources of Conflict in Asia” RAND Corp)
This subsection attempts…already broken out
this is the most probable scenario for a nuclear war:
Dibb, 1 (Paul, Naval College War Review, Winter 01, “Strategic Trends – military and political in Asia”)
The areas of maximum danger… when confronted with major crises.
Share with your friends: |