Unclassified
Download 3.47 Mb. View original pdf
|
600-85, KSARNG, Substance Abuse Prevention & Control, 2007 Jun 1(2)
| Table 12 – 1 High risk factors — Continued No. Factor Definition Data proponent as writing bad checks, excessive debt, and an inability to meet current financial obligations or (2) had a FICO score of 619 or below coupled with a debt- to-income ratio of 40 percent or more. 15 Urinalysis samples tested The number of urinalysis specimens tested at the Forensic Toxicology Drug Testing Laboratory (FTDTL). NOTE The number of specimens collected might be higher than those tested at the laboratory because specimens must meet forensic specifications to be tested. DTC, DAMIS, G 16 Positive urinalysis tests The number of Soldiers in the reporting unit who have tested positive for illicit drug use (after Medical Review Officer evaluation. NOTE This includes abuse of pharmaceuticals and legal synthetics. BTC, DAMIS, G 17 Administrative disciplinary actions The number of Soldiers in the reporting unit who have received administrative disciplinary actions (non-judicial).These include, but are not limited to, nonjudicial punishment under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice and Memorandums of Reprimand. Staff Judge Advocate (SJA) 18 Administrative separations initiated The number of Soldiers in the reporting unit who had administrative separations initiated in accordance with AR 635 – 200 or AR 600 – 8 – 24. SJA, AG 19 Administrative eliminations The number of Soldiers in the reporting unit who were approved for separation from the Army in accordance with AR 635 – 200) or AR 600 – 8 – 24. SJA, AG 20 Courts martial The number of Soldiers in the reporting unit who were tried and found guilty by court-mar- tial. SJA f. Any Soldier has a potential exposure to risk and therefore to ensure accurately capturing a unit’s total potential for risk, RRPCs will report the total peak population of a given unit within the month. Download 3.47 Mb. Share with your friends:
|