Web archive org


==== The Two Tibetan Monks ====



Download 1.78 Mb.
Page14/26
Date22.12.2020
Size1.78 Mb.
#55494
1   ...   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   ...   26
Whistle Blowers expose Earth's Elite Alien alliance - Is James Mahu a Liar$
==== The Two Tibetan Monks ====
The other "site" I told you about above was actually visited by 2 Tibetan Monks in the 1960s. These two well dressed Tibetan Monks said they had read about the exact location in ancient Tibetan texts. This is a double verified fact. I personally visited a man who was an archaeologist with another witness to this story and we questioned him but did NOT mention that we knew about the Tibetans (which had been told us by our personal friend a thousand miles away.) We wanted to see if he would bring them up on his own. We weren't even sure if we were speaking to the same Archaeologist our friend had told us about since it had been many years since the Tibetans had visited...
This took place long before the Wingmakers site was ever written about or even supposedly discovered and long before the internet was commonly available. We talked to this archaeologist and quite to our surprise he began telling us the story in his own words about the Two Tibetan monks who had come through the area in the 1960s and told him they were visiting all 7 sites which had been revealed to them in the ancient texts. So this story was first told me and the other witness by a man back in the Eastern USA and it was a story that took place over a period from the 1950s through the 60s. Then 20 years or so later this story was verified by myself and one other – even though it had taken place 20 and 30 some years previously! We had taken a long trip to the area out west and our visit to the archaeologist was because this person was ALSO known to have witnessed the opening of the rock as well as the visit by the Monks. We looked at one another and jaws dropped because he hit the jackpot. IT was all verified right before our eyes a thousand miles away by a complete stranger. (The archaeologist would later become a friend to me. Even more strange – it turns out that during some geneology research this person also happened to be related directly to my own family tree. Almost as if DNA finds DNA?)
The monks told the Archaeologist that the area (there) was ONE of the sites but that they were also visiting 6 additional ones which were all around the world and all of them were along specific GPS latitudes and longitudes... I can tell you that those coordinates are not found within the state of New Mexico where James Mahu claimed.
One last thought here: James (on the wingmakers new sites) talks a lot about something he refers to as the "Sovereign Integral". I would encourage you to consider the RANGE of what those two words placed together might actually imply. Once again, I do not believe it is benign.


This brings us to ANOTHER deception: 15 and the enigmatic picture above.

This picture is supposedly a photo of the man known ONLY as '15'.
The picture above is the ONLY PURPORTED/ подразумеваемый PHOTO of the ENIGMATIC and CLOSEST ASSOCIATE of James Mahu (Mahu Nahi) '15' who is the ONLY KNOWN Human working alongside the Corteum.
Everywhere one sees this photo the caption reads that it supposedly was taken in Hawaii during a retreat around 1978 (15 would have been 44 years of age).
NSA was built (just like the CIA) on and by and for professional liars, so Why would 15 be any different?
One thing is for sure, there are people saying that 15 leads the Bilderberger groups and he is Not dead and instead he Faked his death so that he could buy even more anonymity. For a man who spies on everyone in the entire world – and who by his actions claims that the rest of those don't deserve any privacy – don't you find it striking just how obsessed all these guys are with their own privacy?
So why do I think the picture above is a deception?

First, I have a problem with the claim of 'where' this picture is claimed to have been taken.
The palm fronds pictured are not the fronds of a coconut – which is by far the dominant palm of Hawaiian beaches.
Most people would not know the difference – but the leaves pictured in fact are Phoenix canariensis not Cocos nucifera. While normally it's not scientifically proper to be able to identify a Palm species to 'Taxa' based solely on leaf morphology, in this particular case it is quite easy to narrow it to the Phoenix genus and to eliminate Cocos nucifera as the Genus. Phoenix is the only Pinnate leaf form that may be identified directly to taxa based on leaf Morphology alone. This is because the genus is the only pinnate palm with an induplicate leaf not a reduplicate leaf as all other pinnate palms. It is ironic then that this is the palm chosen to represent Hawaii since this particular plant is not a Tropical plant – and in fact suited best to temperate desert climates not coastal tropical humid climates.
This particular palm is a plant not even widely planted in Hawaii. The photo reveals no background whatsoever such as hotels or other identifying info. Based on these things I suspect that this photo is contrived and even most likely a fraud given the source claims the date and location...
I have scoured hundreds of photographs of Hawaiian beaches and while I'm certain that there must be numerous Phoenix canariensis somewhere – I have been unable to find any. So it seems quite the coincidence that in this photo purportedly to have been taken in Hawaii that the one palm pictured would be the one Palm least likely to actually appear in any photo of Hawaii!
The reason I find this all so interesting... is because this is the only known photo of '15' and yet it appears to be yet more deliberate misinformation!
What are the odds that the lone photo we have of 15 would be a deception as well? Just like the only photo we have of James Mahu? James, who happens to be 15's only known associate and both of them have exactly one photo each to their names! Both photos being deceptions? What are the odds? All the other photos on the original WingMakers sites happen to be deceptions as well.
I'm going to go out on a limb here because my intuition is running pretty good and say that 15 claimed the only known photo we have of him just so happened to be taken in the ONE PLACE on the entire planet that he likely had in fact, never ever visited. After all, that's what great disinformation minds would do, right?

Download 1.78 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   ...   26




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page